不应禁止面向儿童的广告.docx

不应该禁止面向儿童的广告一辩陈述：We believe that advertising for children should not be banned. The existence of advertisement is meaningful, and the prohibition of advertisement is equivalent to denying the meaning of advertising. Children need the advertisements for them so that they can understand and choose what they like or want. They can also learn about society through advertising and improve their judgment and self-control. For businesses, there are many products for children that need to be advertised to raise their awareness. Adults often dont have a good understanding of things that children really want, so advertising needs to gear towards children. Besides commercial advertisements, there are also some public service advertisements. Interesting public service advertisements are a good guide for children. We cant deny the advantages of advertising to children because of a small number of bad ads. Especially now in most countries, although there is a film classification, there is no restriction on advertising, which indicates that there is no need to restrict the crowd for advertising. Therefore, we do not believe that advertisements aimed at children should be banned.我们认为不应禁止为儿童做广告。广告的存在是有意义的，禁止广告等同于否定广告的含义。儿童需要的广告，这样他们就能理解并选择他们喜欢或想要的东西。他们还可以通过广告来了解社会，提高他们的判断力和自制力。对于企业来说，有许多儿童产品需要做广告来提高他们的知名度。成年人往往没有很好的理解孩子真的想要什么，所以广告需要面向儿童。除了商业广告外，还有一些公益广告。 有趣的公益广告是孩子们的好向导。 我们不能因为有少量的不良广告而否认广告对儿童的好处。 特别是现在大多数国家，虽然有电影分类，但对广告没有限制，这表明没有必要限制广告面向的人群。因此，我们认为针对儿童的广告不应禁止。二辩陈述：Advertisements aiming at children should not be banned. Toy manufacturers must be able to market their products to children, otherwise they would go out of business- plus it would be impossible to enact this ban. Childrens television ads should not be banned because its how children find new toys to play with. Also, toy manufacturers would go out of business if they could not advertise to children. Its also impossible to imagine that such a ban could be effectively put in place. And its difficult to argue the intended audience of many advertisements- hence creating a slippery slope between catering to children, adults or teenagers. Another reason for our opinion is that children are also a very important target audience. Advertisers need to reach out to children. Of course, advertisements targeting children aim to promote the products and services. Advertisements targeting children aim to promote the products and services, which cater for childrens needs and have no damaging intention at all.面向儿童的广告不应该被禁止。玩具制造商必须能够把他们的产品推销给孩子们，否则他们就会失去生意，而且也不可能颁布这一禁令。儿童电视广告不应该被禁止，因为这是孩子们找到新玩具来玩的方法。还有，玩具制造商如果不能向儿童做广告，他们将会失去工作。而且，这样的禁令可能是有效放到位也是无法想象的。而且很难与许多广告的预期观众争论, 因此在迎合儿童、成年人和青少年之间造成了一个滑倒的斜坡。 我们认为的另一个原因是,孩子也是一个非常重要的目标受众。广告客户需要和孩子们接触。当然，广告针对儿童的目标是推广产品和服务。针对儿童的广告旨在促进产品和服务, 以满足儿童的需要, 这并没有任何糟糕的意图。三辩陈述：Television shouldnt be banned, its also educational and very informative. We can do nothing if we cope without news, cannot catch up with what goes around in society as well. I understand that it might be harmful for our bodies just like watching too much TV，however, to be honest, everything has a risk. We just must control what they do and work around the problems including advertising. Television ads directed at children should not be banned. What is needed is more media literacy education. Children need to know that they are being bombarded by messages (both good and bad) every day. They need to be taught how to discern these messages from a very early age and to decide how to react to the messages based on content AND controller. I understand that certain ads, for example for food, are a temptation, but it is up to the parent to teach the child correctly.电视不应该被禁止, 它也有教育意义和信息性。如果我们没有获取新闻，我们什么都做不了，也跟不上周围的社会。我明白它可能会对我们的身体造成损伤，就像看太多电视一样。然而,说实话, 一切都有风险，我们只是必须控制他们并解决问题，包括广告。针对儿童的电视 广告不应被禁止。需要的是更多的媒体素养教育。孩子们需要知道他们每天都被信息 (好坏) 所轰炸。他们需要学会如何从很早的年龄辨别这些信息, 并决定如何根据内容和控制器对消息做出反应。 我知道某些广告, 例如食物, 是一种诱惑, 但家长要正确地教导孩子。四辩陈述：There should not be a ban on ads for children because it is the parents job to teach their children. More and more issues with children are being blamed on external things. No one really looks at the heart of the matter in that it is the parents job to raise and educate their children. there is nothing wrong with such advertisements There should not be a ban on television advertisements aimed at children because a ban would imply that the advertisers are somehow to blame for Generation Ys need to have brand name products. Most who complain about there being too many ads geared toward children argue that the ads make kids think that they need to have the latest and greatest in toys and other products. However, theres nothing wrong with seeing a few ads. It should be the parents responsibility to monitor how much TV their child is watching so that they are not overexposed to said ads.五辩总结：Advertisement as a way of information dissemination, because of its huge quantity and numerous audience, is valued by people. It is an important way for TV station to make money by advertising ads to children in the animation program, as well for merchants to increase the sales of products. The economic impact of banning advertising for children is not simply a decline in product sales, it may even lead to some unanticipated problems in the social economy. People gradually realize that information that advertisements contain can sometimes make somebody lose their judgment, especially children, whose mind are not yet ripe. But this is just an excuse for parents to avoid responsibility. As long as there is a commodity for children, it