sci审稿意见写.doc

sci审稿意见写 英文论文审稿意见汇总 xx-04-2419:24 以下12点无轻重主次之分。每一点内容由总结性标题和代表性审稿人意见构成。 1、目标和结果不清晰。 ItisnotedthatyourmanuscriptneedscarefuleditingbysomeonewithexpertiseintechnicalEnglisheditingpayingparticularattentiontoEnglishgrammar,spelling,andsentencestructuresothatthegoalsandresultsofthestudyarecleartothereader. 2、未解释研究方法或解释不充分。 Ingeneral,thereisalackofexplanationofreplicatesandstatisticalmethodsusedinthestudy. Furthermore,anexplanationofwhytheauthorsdidthesevariousexperimentsshouldbeprovided. 3、对于研究设计的rationale: Also,therearefewexplanationsoftherationaleforthestudydesign. 4、夸张地陈述结论/夸大成果/不严谨： Theconclusionsareoverstated.Forexample,thestudydidnotshow ifthesideeffectsfrominitialcopperburstcanbeavoidwiththepolymerformulation. 5、对hypothesis的清晰界定： Ahypothesisneedstobepresented。 6、对某个概念或工具使用的rationale/定义概念： Whatwastherationaleforthefilm/SBFvolumeratio? 7、对研究问题的定义： Trytosettheproblemdiscussedinthispaperinmoreclear, writeonesectiontodefinetheproblem 8、如何凸现原创性以及如何充分地写literaturereview: Thetopicisnovelbuttheapplicationproposedisnotsonovel. 9、对claim,如AB的证明，verification: Thereisnoexperimentalparisonofthealgorithmwithpreviouslyknownwork,soitisimpossibletojudgewhetherthealgorithmisanimprovementonpreviouswork. 10、严谨度问题： MNQiseasierthantheprimitivePNQS,howtoprovethat. 11、格式（重视程度）： Inaddition,thelistofreferencesisnotinourstyle.Itisclosebutnotpletelycorrect.IhaveattachedapdffilewithInstructionsforAuthorswhichshowsexamples. Beforesubmittingarevisionbesurethatyourmaterialisproperlypreparedand formatted.Ifyouareunsure,pleaseconsulttheformattingnstructionstoauthorsthataregivenundertheInstructionsandFormsbuttoninheupperright-handcornerofthescreen. 12、语言问题（出现最多的问题）： 有关语言的审稿人意见： ItisnotedthatyourmanuscriptneedscarefuleditingbysomeonewithexpertiseintechnicalEnglisheditingpayingparticularattentiontoEnglishgrammar,spelling,andsentencestructuresothatthegoalsandresultsofthestudyarecleartothereader.Theauthorsmusthavetheirworkreviewedbyapropertranslation/reviewingservicebeforesubmission;onlythencanaproperreviewbeperformed.Mostsentencescontaingrammaticaland/orspellingmistakesorarenotpletesentences. Aspresented,thewritingisnotaeptableforthejournal.Therearepro blemswithsentencestructure,verbtense,andclauseconstruction. TheEnglishofyourmanuscriptmustbeimprovedbeforeresubmission.Westronglysuggestthatyouobtainassistancefromacolleaguewhoiswell-versedi nEnglishorwhosenativelanguageisEnglish. PleasehavesomeonepetentintheEnglishlanguageandthesubjectmatterofyourpapergooverthepaperandcorrectit.? thequalityofEnglishneedsimproving. 的鼓励： Encouragementfromreviewers: Iwouldbeverygladtore-reviewthepaperingreaterdepthonceithasbe eneditedbecausethesubjectisinteresting. Thereiscontinuedinterestinyourmanuscripttitledwhichyousubm ittedtotheJournalofBiomedicalMaterialsResearch:PartB-AppliedBiomat erials. TheSubmissionhasbeengreatlyimprovedandisworthyofpublication. CSDN博客，转载请标明出处： 老外写的英文综述文章的审稿意见 Ms.Ref.No.:* Title:* MaterialsScienceandEngineering DearDr.*, Reviewershavenowmentedonyourp aper.Youwillseethattheyareadvisingthatyoureviseyourmanuscript.Ifyouare preparedtoundertaketheworkrequired,Iwouldbepleasedtoreconsidermydecision.Foryourguidance,reviewersmentsareappendedbelow. Reviewer#1:Thisworkproposesanextensivereviewonmicromulsion-basedmethodsforthesynthesisofAgnanoparticles.Assuch,thematterisofinterest,howeverthepapersuffersfortwoseriouslimits: 1)theoverallqualityoftheEnglishlanguageisratherpoor; 2)someFiguresmustbeselectedfrompreviousliteraturetodiscussalsothesynthesisofanisotropicallyshapedAgnanoparticles(thereareseveralexamplespublished),whichhasbeenlargelyoverlookedthroughoutthepaper.; Oncetheaboveconcernsarefullyaddressed,themanuscriptcouldbeaeptedforpublicationinthisjournal :/blog/rensl.htm 这是一篇全过程我均比较了解的投稿，稿件的内容我认为是相当不错的，中文版投稿于业内有较高影响的某核心期刊，并很快得到发表。其时我作为审稿人之一，除了提出一些修改建议外，还特建议了5篇应增加的参考文献，该文正式发表时共计有参考文献25篇。 作者或许看到审稿意见还不错，因此决意尝试向美国某学会主办的一份英文刊投稿。几经修改和补充后，请一位英文“功底较好的中国人翻译，投稿后约3周，便返回了三份审稿意见。 从英文刊的反馈意见看，这篇稿件中最严重的问题是文献综述和引用不够，其次是语言表达方面的欠缺，此外是论证过程和结果展示形式方面的不足。 感想：一篇好的论文，从内容到形式都需要精雕细琢。 附1：中译审稿意见 审稿意见1 (1)英文表达太差，尽管意思大致能表达清楚，但文法错误太多。 (2)文献综述较差，观点或论断应有文献支持。 (3)论文读起来像是XXX的广告，不知道作者与XXX是否没有关联。 (4)该模式的创新性并非如作者所述，目前有许多XX采取此模式（如美国地球物理学会），作者应详加调查并分析XXX运作模式的创新点。 (5)该模式也不是作者所说的那样成功(审稿人结合论文中的数据具体分析)审稿意见2 (1)缺少直接相关的文献引用(如)。 (2)写作质量达不到美国学术期刊的标准。 审稿意见3 (1)作者应着重指出指出本人的贡献。 (2)缺少支持作者发现的方法学分析。 (3)需要采用表格和图件形式展示(数据)材料。 附2：英文审稿意见(略有删节) Reviewer:1 Therearemanythingswrongwiththispaper. TheEnglishisverybad.Althoughthemeaningisbyandlargeclear,nottoo manysentencesarecorrect. Theliteraturereviewispoor.Thepaperisriddledwithassertionsandclaimsthatshouldbesupportedbyreferences. ThepaperreadsasanadvertisementforXXX.ItisnotclearthattheauthorisindependentofXXX. TheAAmodelofXXXisnotasinnovativeastheauthorclaims.TherearenowmanyXXthatfollowthismodel(AmericanGeophysicalUnion,forexample),andtheauthorshouldsurveythesemodeltoseewhichonefirstintroducedtheelementsoftheXXXmodel. Themodelisalsonotassuessfulastheauthorclaims. Overall,thepresentationandthecontentsofthepapercanonlymeanthatIrejectthatthepaperberejected. Reviewer:2 Thearetwomajorproblemswiththispaper: (1)Itismissingthecontextof(andcitationsto)whatisnowknowasthetwo-sidedmarketliteratureincludingthatdirectlyrelatedto(e.g. Braunstein,JASIS1977;Economides&Katsanakas,Mgt.Sci.,xx;McCabe&Snyder,B.E.JEconAnalysis,xx). (2)ThewritingqualityisnotuptothestandardofaUSscholarlyjournal.Reviewer:3 1.Theauthorshouldaentuatehiscontributionsinthismanuscript. 2.Itlacksanalyticalmethodologiestosupportauthorsdiscoveries. 3.Descriptionstylemateriallikethismanuscriptrequiresstructuredtables&figuresforbetterpresentations. 论文题目：PharmacokiicandpharmacodynamicstudiesontheantiviruseffectsofA(一种中草药)againstvirusB（一种病毒） 所投杂志：LifeSciences 投稿结果：这次大修后又经过一次小修，被接受发表 信内容（注：有删节）： DearMr.XXX, Yourmanuscripthasbeenexaminedbytheeditorsandqualifiedreferee.WethinkthemanuscripthasmeritbutrequiresrevisionbeforewecanaeptitforpublicationintheJournal.Carefulconsiderationmustbegiventothepointsraisedinthereviewerments,whichareenclosedbelow. Ifyouchoosetosubmitarevisionofyourmanuscript,pleaseincorporateresponsestothereviewermentsintotherevisedpaper.Apleterebuttalwithnomanuscriptalterationsisusuallyconsideredinadequateandmayresultinlengthyre-reviewprocedures. Aletterdetailingyourrevisionspoint-by-pointmustaompanytheresubmission. YouwillberequestedtouploadthisResponsetoReviewersasaseparatefileintheAttachFilesarea. Weaskthatyouresubmityourmanuscriptwithin45days.Afterthistime,yourfilewillbeplacedoninactivestatusandafurthersubmissionwillbeconsideredanewmanuscript. Tosubmitarevision,gotoees.elsevier./lfs/andloginasanAuthor.YouwillseeamenuitemcalledSubmissionNeedingRevision.Youwillfindyoursubmissionrecordthere. Yourssincerely, JosephJ.Bahl,PhD Editor LifeSciences FormatSuggestion:PleaseaesstheGuidetoAuthorsatourwebsitetochecktheformatofyourarticle.PayparticularattentiontoourReferencesstyle. Reviewersments: Reviewer#1: XXXXX（略） Reviewer#2: XXXXX（略） Editorsnoteandsuggestions:（注：的建议） Title:Re-writethetitletoreadmoresmoothlyincontemporaryEnglish PharmacokiicandpharmacodynamicstudiesoftheantiviraleffectsofAagainstvirusB. Abstract:Re-writetheabstracttoreadmoresmoothly. A,analkaloidisolatedfromC(注：一种中草药),wastestedforantiviralactivityagainstvirusB.BothinvitroandinvivoassaysalongwithserumpharmacologicalexperimentsshowedAtohavepotentantiviralactivity.ThepharmacokiicprofileofAinSprague/DawleyratplasmaafteroraladministrationwasmeasuredbyHPLC.Bloodsamplestakenatselectedtimepointswereanalyzedtostudypotentialchangesinantiviralpharmacodynamicsasmeasuredbyinfectivityofviruses.FromthesimilarityoftheserumconcentrationprofilesandantiviralactivityprofilesitisconcludedthatAitself,ratherthanametabolite,exertedtheeffectagainsttheviruspriortobioinactivation.TheneedforeffectiveclinicalagentsagainstvirusBandtheseresultssuggestthepossibilityofbenefitfromfurtherexperimentswithA. Theauthorsshouldchecktobesurethatthetermsbloodsamples,plasmaandserumarealwaysusedappropriatelythroughouttheabstractandtext. Introduction:somesentencescanbemadelesspassive.example1stparagraphAappearstobethemostimportantalkaloidisolatedfromtheplant,itsstructuralformulaisshowninFig1.Whileitproducedageneralinhibitionofantibodyproductionlymphocyteproliferationwasstimulated(XiaandWang,1997).ThesepharmacologicalpropertiessuggestapotentialuseinthetreatmentofviralmyocarditisagainstvirusBthatcouldbestudiedinexperimentsincellcultureandanimals. Theauthorsshouldchecktheentiremanuscriptforspellingerrors(examplegiven:inyourtextalkaloidisincorrectlyspelledalkaloid) Theauthorsshouldreadtheguidelinestotheauthorsandnotincludethefirstnameoftheauthorsbeingcitedinthetext.Inthereferencesectionthefirstnameshouldbeabbreviatedasshownintheguidelinetoauthors(thustheearliertextreferenceshouldbe(Liuetal.,xx)andtheremainingoneshouldbe(Chenetal.,xx) Theauthorsinsteadofdirectlyansweringthefirstplexquestionofreviewer#1mayincludethethreequestionsasfutureresearchaiminthediscussionsection. Ratherthanredrawingfiguretheauthorsmaychoosetoamendthe wordingofthestatisticalanalysissectiontostatethattheresultoftablesaremeans+-SEMandforfiguresare+-SD. reviewer#1mentnumber8andreviewer#2ment3mightbesatisfiedbyinclusionofarepresentativephotoofcellsandheartshowingCPE.Remembermostreadersofthejournalhaveneverseenwhatyouaretryingtodescribe. BecauseIthinkthatyoucandealwithallofthepointsraisedIamhopingtoseearevisedmanuscriptthatyouhavecarefullycheckedforerrors.Ifyouhavequestionsordonotknowhowtorespondtoanyofthepointsraisedpleasecontactmeatbahlu.arizonaJosephBahl,PhDEditor2LifeSciences 作者回复信原稿： DearDr.Bahl, Im（注：正式信函不要简写）veryappreciate（注：不适合作为给回信的开始，同时有语法错误）foryourmentsandsuggestions. I（注：实际上是学生做的）haveconductedinvivoantivirusexperimentsagain（注：要表明是应审稿人或建议而作）.Miceweresacrificedon15daysand30daysafterinfection.Deathrate,heartweighttobodyweightratio(HW/BW),virustitersandpathologicslices（注：用词错误）werecalculated（注：用词不当）.ProductionofmRNAofIL-10,IFN-andTNF-were（注：语法错误）measuredbyRT-PCR. Ihaverevisedthismanuscriptandespeciallypaidmuchattentiontoyourmentsandsuggestions.Iwouldliketore-submitittoLIFESCIENCE.Titleofmanuscripthasbeenchangedto“TheantiviruseffectsofAagainstvirusBanditspharmacokiicbehaviourinSDratsserum”tomakeitmoreclearandsmooth. AnswerstoReviewersquestionswereasfollows:（注：可附在给的回复信后） Reviewer#1: XXXXX Reviewer#2: XXXXX Editorsnoteandsuggestions: Title:Re-writethetitletoreadmoresmoothlyincontemporaryEnglish Answer:Ihaverewritethetitleto“TheantiviruseffectsofAagainstvirusBanditspharmacokiicbehaviourinSDratsserum”tomakeitmoreclearandsmooth（注：多处语法错误）. Abstract:Re-writetheabstracttoreadmoresmoothly. Answer:Ihaverevisetheabstractcarefullytomakeitmoresmoothandinformative（注：语法错误）. Theauthorsshouldchecktobesurethatthetermsbloodsamples,plasmaandserumarealwaysusedappropriatelythroughouttheabstractandtext. Answer:Ihavepaidattentiontothisquestionanditisclearer（注：不具体）.Introduction: somesentencescanbemadelesspassive. Answer:IhaverevisethewholepapertomakesentenceslesspassiveandobtainedhelpofmycolleagueproficientinEnglish（注：语法错误，句子不通顺）. Theauthorsshouldchecktheentiremanuscriptforspellingerrors Answer:Imverysorrytogiveyousomuchtroubleforthosespellingerrors（注：不必道歉，按建议修改即可）.Ihavecarefullycorrectedthem. Theauthorsshouldreadtheguidelinestotheauthorsandnotincludethefirstnameoftheauthorsbeingcitedinthetext.Inthereferencesectionthefirstnameshouldbeabbreviatedasshownintheguidelinetoauthors(thustheearliertextreferenceshouldbe(Liuetal.,xx)andtheremainingoneshouldbe(Chenetal.,xx) Answer:Ichangedthestyleofreferences. Ratherthanredrawingfiguretheauthorsmaychoosetoamendthewordingofthestatisticalanalysissectiontostatethattheresultoftablesaremeans+-SEMandforfiguresare+-SD. Answer:（注：作者请公司帮回答） reviewer#1mentnumber8andreviewer#2ment3mightbesatisfiedbyinclusionofarepresentativephotoofcellsandheartshowingCPE.Remember:mostreadersofthejournalhaveneverseenwhatyouaretryingtodescribe. Answer:Thankyouforyoursuggestions.Ihavesupplementedpicturesofcardiacpathologicslicesinthepaper(Fig2). Ihavetoapologizeforgivingyousomuchtroublebecauseofthosemisspellingandconfusingstatements（注：一般不是延误或人为失误，不必轻易道歉，按建议修改即可）.Yourmentsandsuggestionsreallyhelpedmealot.Ihaveputgreateffortstothisreview.Iwishitcanbesatisfactory. Iftheres（注：正式信函不要简写）anyinformationIcanprovide,pleasedonthesitatetocontactme. Thankyouagainforyourtimeandpatience.Lookforwardtohear（注：语法错 误）fromyou. YoursSincerely XxxxXxxx(通讯作者名) 建议修改稿： DearDr.Bahl, Thanksyouverymuchforyourmentsandsuggestions. Assuggested,wehaveconductedinvivoantivirusexperiments.Miceweresacrificedon15daysand30daysafterinfectionwithvirusB.Mortality,heartweighttobodyweightratio(HW/BW),virustitersandpathologicscoresweredetermined.Inaddition,mRNAexpressionofIL-10,IFN-andTNF-weremeasuredbyRT-PCR. Wehaverevisedthemanuscript,aordingtothementsandsuggestionsofreviewersandeditor,andresponded,pointbypointto,thementsaslistedbelow.Sincethepaperhasbeenrevisedsignificantlythroughoutthetext,wefeelitisbetternottohighlighttheamendmentsintherevisedmanuscript（正常情况最好表明修改处）. TherevisedmanuscripthasbeeneditedandproofreadbyamedicaleditingpanyinHongKong. Iwouldliketore-submitthisrevisedmanuscripttoLifeSciences,andhopeitisaeptableforpublicationinthejournal. Lookingforwardtohearingfromyousoon. Withkindestregards, YoursSincerely XxxxXxxx(通讯作者名) RepliestoReviewersandEditor Firstofall,wethankbothreviewersandeditorfortheirpositiveandconstructivementsandsuggestions. RepliestoReviewer#1: Xxxxx（略） RepliestoReviewer#2: Xxxxx（略） RepliestotheEditorsnoteandsuggestions: Title:Re-writethetitletoreadmoresmoothlyincontmeporaryEnglish Answer:Ihaverewrit