单边主义法律选择方法论文：单边主义法律选择方法研究.doc

单边主义法律选择方法论文：单边主义法律选择方法研究【中文摘要】国际私法所处理的主要问题就是解决国际范围内的多元法律体系之间的法律冲突,解决私法冲突的主要途径是在多元法律体系中做出选择,所以法律选择方法在国际私法中具有举足轻重的作用。追寻国际私法的理论发展轨迹,几乎所有的理论都是在探讨国际私法中的法律选择方法,而追寻国际私法法律选择方法的历史发展路径,我们不难发现单边主义法律选择方法是最初的也是存在时间最长的一种法律选择方法。作者写作本文主要是因为虽然在十九世纪单边主义法律选择方法被以萨维尼的“法律关系本座说”为代表的多边主义法律选择方法打得落花流水,但进入二十世纪以后,随着世界政治、经济的发展,以美国冲突法革命和欧洲的冲突法改革为契机,单边主义法律选择方法再次复兴。复兴的单边主义法律选择方法在各个国家的国际私法中又开始起到重要作用。单边主义法律选择方法是一种很好的实现法律主权的方式,对于国家根本利益,它是唯一有绝对保障的实现方式。随着福利国家的出现和国家干预的常态化,在涉及国家利益、政府利益和社会公共利益的法律问题中,单边主义法律选择方法正逐渐成为一种优势的选择。由于我国对于单边主义法律选方法研究还不够成熟,在2010年10月28日颁布的中华人民共和国涉外民事法律关系适用法中并没有相关的立法。无论是出于推动我国政治、经济发展的,还是出于对我国重大利益保护的,亦或是出于与世界国际私法立法接轨的,我国都有必要对其进行彻底深入的研究,进而在立法中予以体现。本文通过采用文献研究法、比较法等研究方法,对单边主义法律选方法的概念、历史发展情况、单边主义法律选方法的存在合理性以及发展现状进行了研究,最后作者提出了在我国确立单边主义法律选择方法的立法构想。具体说来：第一部分单边主义法律选择方法的概念,主要是对单边主义法律选择方法与多边主义方法等对应以及类似概念进行比较的方式进行研究。第二部分是有关单边主义法律选择方法的历史发展概况的相关内容。从意大利巴托鲁斯的法则区别说写起,到柯里的政府利益分析说和欧洲的“直接适用的法”。第三部分是阐述单边主义法律选择方法的存在合理性。主要是从法理及国家主权学说对单边主义法律选择方法的理论支撑和现实需要方面论述。第四部分总结并评价了单边主义法律选择方法在当今世界上的发展现状。第五部分是本文的写作重点,主要论述了我国应该以引进欧洲“直接适用的法”的模式,在国际私法典中确立我国的单边主义法律选择方法。虽然本文着重探讨的是单边主义法律选择方法,但作者并不是对其他方法持否定态度的极端者。由于能力有限,论文难免纰漏,但作者仍希望通过自己的研究,能够为我国法律选择方法立法研究起到抛砖引玉之作用。【英文摘要】The main problem of private international law dealing with is resolving the multiple international legal system legal conflicts, the main method to resolve the conflicts of private law is to make a smart and reasonable choice among the plural legal systems. So the method of law choice in private international law sector has a pivotal role. Pursue the development path of private international law theory, almost all of the theory of private international law are focus on the choice of law in private international law approach, and seek methods of private international law choice. Review the historical development paths, we find that unilateral method of law choice also have a long historical standing and is the original legal choice subject.Unilateral method of law choice is a good way to achieve legal sovereignty,and to the fundamental interests of the country, it is the only way to achieve. With the emergence of the welfare state and the normalization of state intervention, in relation to national interests, government interests and legal issues in the public interest, unilateral choice of law method to be an excellent choice. Although in the nineteenth century,the unilateral method of law choice is replased to Savignys theory,but during the twentieth century, with the world politics, economic development, the United States and the European states conflict laws revolutionary reform as an opportunity to select the method of unilateral law revived. Revival of choice of law approach of unilateralism in international private law in each country, it also began to play an important role. Because of the method of law choice for the unilateral method is not mature enough, in the October 28,2010 promulgated the “Republic of China for Foreign Relations of Civil Law Act,” there is no relevant legislation. Whether out to push the political and economic development purposes, or for the protection of vital interests of our country the purpose of, or for integration with the world the purpose of private international law legislation, our country is necessary for a thorough in-depth study of its, then be reflected in legislation. By using literature, comparative and other research methods, selection methods of unilateralism, the concept of law, historical development, legal unilateralism, there is a reasonable selection methods and the development status of research, made the final of the China unilateral choice of law approach to establish the legislative ideas. Specifically: The first part of the unilateral approach the concept of choice of law, mainly on the choice of law approach of unilateralism and multilateralism, and the corresponding methods to compare the way similar concepts studied. The second part of the this paragraph is mainly with the historical development. From the difference between the laws of Italy Bartolus, to Curries governmental interest analysis and Europe “directly applicable law.” The third part, is mainly focus on the reasonable existence of the unilateral choice method of conflict law. Its mainly discussed from the legal doctrine of state sovereignty and unilateral choice of law approach of the theoretical support and practical needs.Part IV summarizes and evaluates the development of the status of the choice of law approach for unilateralism in the world nowadays.The fifth part is the focus of writing this article, in this partmainly discusses the introduction of the European country “directly applicable law” model, established the unilateral method of law choice in the Code of Private International of PRC.Although the paper focuses on the unilateral choice of law approach, but to other methods,my attitude is not negative or an extreme opponent. Because of limited capacity of myself, the paper inevitably flawed, but I hope through my own research, I could able to make some useful contribution【关键词】单边主义法律选择方法 多边主义法律选择方法 国家主权【英文关键词】unilateral method of law choice multilateralism of law choice national sovereignty【目录】单边主义法律选择方法研究摘要4-6Abstract6-7引言10-11一、单边主义概念界定11-16(一) 单边主义概述11-12(二) 单边主义法律选择方法与相关概念的比较分析12-151. 多边主义方法132. 意思自治方法13-143. 优法方法14-15(三) 单边主义法律选择方法的作用15-16二、单边主义法律选择方法的历史演进16-24(一) 单边法律选择方法的产生及发展17-19(二) 单边主义法律选择方法的进一步发展及衰微19-21(三) 单边主义法律选择方法的复兴21-24(四) 复兴的单边主义法律选择方法与历史的法律选择方法的不同24三、单边主义法律选择方法的存在合理性24-30(一) 单边主义法律选择方法的现实基础25-271. 产生时的现实基础25-262. 发展过程中的现实基础26-27(二) 单边主义法律选择方法的理论基础27-301. 单边主义法律选择方法符合正义的要求27-282.