文献综述和外文翻译.doc

毕 业 设 计（论 文）文 献 综 述、外 文 翻 译题目 姓名 学号 系 别 专业 指导教师 201 年 月 日县级政府绩效评估存在的问题及完善参考文献综述4030102012 王宁绩效评估是政府对其自身的管理及政府行为的成效的测量、考核和总结，目的是提高政府管理的绩效。政府绩效评估体现政府管理追求公众满意、服务公众、公共责任与公众效益的一种管理理念。政府绩效评估成为政府管理发展的必然方向。县级政府管理的模式需要创新，县级政府的绩效评估也在积极探索中进行。我国对政府绩效评估工作，起始于干部人事制度。随着党中央提出科学发展观和正确政绩观，各地政府和部门积极探索绩效评估，形成了各具特色的模式。目前，许多学者在这方面进行了研究。关于县级政府绩效评估方面：刘虎其、杨畅在县级政府管理引入绩效评估模式的难点和对策分析中分析了将绩效评估模式引入到县级政府管理中的必要性，县级政府管理模式创新的紧迫性已为理论界和实践界所认同，绩效评估模式是从西方工业管理学中引入到政府管理中来的,面对县级政府管理中所存在的问题,针对其难点试图来提出对策。张劲松的县级政府能力绩效评估的内涵、依据及其模型，对县级政府能力开展绩效评估有着三方面的理论依据,而在实践中需要建构一种基于绩效评估过程的有利于县级政府能力提升的组织运行模式,这种模式的运行能推动县级政府以绩效评估为核心的行政绩效的变革。彭国甫在推进县级政府管理模式创新提出了当前县级政府在管理中存在的一些问题，对县级政府进行绩效评估，并以次为切入点来促进政府机构的改革，对县级政府的绩效评估具有重要的意义。蒋意桥的地方政府绩效考核价值取向及评价标准的完善对地方政府在绩效评估取得的成就和存在的问题进行了分析，对地方政府的价值取向和评估指标方面的改善进行了探索和总结。通过对县级地方政府绩效评估中存在的问题进行研究，找出我国县级政府绩效评估存在的问题，并且针对县级政府的特点进行分析，对存在的问题进行改善，使县级政府的绩效评估更加规范化。探索建立适合我国国情的地方政府绩效考核，使考核方式规范化，合理化，推动地方政府积极实施绩效评估，更好地发挥地方政府的社会服务职能，实现政府行政的高效率。参考文献：1 邱霈恩.落实科学发展观须调整绩效导向N.人民日报,2004-02-16(9).2 胡税根,汪菁,(韩)朴钟权.韩国政府绩效评估及其评价J.甘肃行政学院学报,2006,(4)3 政府部门绩效评估研究报告EB/OL./Lunwen/Shxlw/Shxzh/55134.html.2007-05-07. 4 陈振明.公共管理学M.北京:中国人民大学出版社,2003.5 张勤.政绩观的扭曲与绩效评估的推进J.公共行政J,2007,(4). 6 胡税根.韩国政府绩效评估制度给我们的启示.江西行政学院学报J,2004,(1). 7 蒋意桥.地方政府绩效考核价值取向及评价标准的完善J.哈尔滨商业大学学报(社会科学版),2006,(3).8 彭国甫.推进县级政府管理模式创新J.公共行政J,2007,(4). 9 刘虎其,杨畅.县级政府管理引入绩效评估模式的难点和对策分析J.湖南行政学院学报,2004,(1).10 倪星,余凯.论中国政府绩效评估制度的创新.政治学研究J,2004,(3).11 王爱冬.政府绩效评估主体多元化及其在中国的构建J.河北学刊,2006,(6)12 卓越.公共部门绩效评估的主体构建J.中国行政管理,2004,(5)13 王伟.论我国公民作为政府绩效评估的主体.沧桑J,2006,(2)14 2004年中国政府网站绩效评估报告15 黄寅德,吴妤.我国政府绩效评估与绩效文化的构建.行政与法J,2007,(3)16 张劲松.县级政府能力绩效评估的内涵、依据及其模型.理论导刊J,2006,(6).17 Lu Gang. The Problem of local authority Performance Appraisal and Improvement Measure. 2004.18 Richard, D. M.J.Smith. Governance and public policy in the United kingdom, New York: Oxford University press.2002,26（此部分不少于1000字）县级政府绩效评估存在的问题及完善外文参考文献403010201223 王宁 The Problem of local authority Performance Appraisal and Improvement MeasureLu GangPerformance measurement of government is an important theories problem, and is a very important realistic problem too. It has many functions that cant be replaced, in appreciating the governments ability, improving governments performance, supervising governments behavior, improving relation of government and society public etc. Since the 70s of 20 centuries, along with the enhance of all countries governmentscost-consciousness and the citizens inspecting- consciousness, the performance measurement of government were given of big value and suffered with the favor. It was booming up used as an important political activity in the developed countries, and became an important measure that adopt quickly and widely in the reformation of the western government. In the last few years, along with the continuous administration reforms of our country and the improving in the level of the government management, the some local governments already started with the trial of the government performance measurement. It had obtained the certain results, and made some positive effects. These practices proved that the performance measurement of government has got the extensive need in our local governments and other public sections. However, because our country is in the period of the new system instead of the old system, the some original irregularities of the old system still have very big inertial. This kind of inertial affected the fulfillment of performance measurement of local government, made some of them exposed a serious problems in theirs process of practice. Because performance measurement of the local government is still stated in the stage in start, and because we dont have enough experiences that make the problem of the local government performance evaluation unavoidable. This paper point out problems of our local government performance measurement. On this foundation, the article analysis the substance and course of these problems from viewpoints of the pubic administration, the politics science, economics and sociology, and put forward the strategies that concentrate on finding a developing path for performance measurement of local government, which keep it with state of the our country and the concrete local circumstance closely. The thesis starts from the theories analysis of performance measurement of government, giving a definition of it, proceed to explain its realistic meaning from the widespread meaning; The next in order, take British and American as examples, introduce practices of the local government performance measurement in western countries and their experience, and give a brief evaluation to it; Again, the theories combines together with fulfillment, analyze condition and existent problems of performance measurement of local government in present; Finally, aim at the existent problems, regard the important thought of the three representatives as the guide, according to the principle that draw lessons from the experience of the western country and combine it with the state of our country together, inquiry into the concrete measures that push forward the development of performance measurement system of local government, to make it to head for the road that scientific, systemize, standardize, develop its functions well in the modernization of government management. 我国地方政府绩效评估存在的问题及改进对策政府绩效评估，既是一个重要的理论问题，又是一个很重要的现实问题，它在评价政府能力、监督政府行为、提高政府部门绩效、改进政府公共部门与社会公众之间的关系等方面具有不可替代的作用。自 20 世纪 70 年代以来，随着各国政府成本意识的强化和公民监督意识的增强，政府绩效评估受到了极大的重视和青睐，政府绩效评估作为一项重大的政治活动在西方国家蓬勃展开，并迅速成为西方政府改革普遍采取的