




已阅读5页,还剩13页未读, 继续免费阅读
版权说明:本文档由用户提供并上传,收益归属内容提供方,若内容存在侵权,请进行举报或认领
文档简介
On Cultural Differences Between American and Chinese Face PerspectivesAbstract: Politeness is a symbol of human civilization and the feature of all the civilized society. It is not only universal but also culturally specific. Two countries like America and China have different cultures which lead to different realization on politeness. As one theory of politeness principle, the face perspective is also different. The paper introduces the different face perspectives between America and China and analyzes cultural differences behind them and their corresponding reasons. At first, this paper tries to introduce different concepts of face between America and China by quoting and analyzing some scholars opinions on face, such as Goffman, Brown & Levinson and Hu Hsienchins. Next step, this paper tries to discuss the cultural conflicts behind different concepts of face, for instance, American individualism and Chinese collectivism, American negative face and Chinese positive face and American equality and Chinese hierarchy, and analyzes the reasons from different aspects including history, culture, thinking patterns, national characters and traditional ideology, etc. Finally, in order to reduce barriers caused by different concepts of face in cross-cultural communication, this paper further suggests that it is necessary to understand mutual different concepts of face by trying to be direct when among the Americans and trying to be euphemistic when among the Chinese. And the paper also believes that based on better understanding of mutual face perspectives and more effective communication between America and China, the friendship between the two countries will be promoted. Key words: Cross-cultural communication; cultural difference; face perspective; 从面子观看中美文化差异摘要:礼貌是人类文明的标志,也是所有文明的特征。礼貌既是一种普遍现象,又是一种个性化的交际原则。像中美这两个拥有不同文化背景的国家,其文化的不同必然导致人们对礼貌有着不同的认识。面子观,作为礼貌原则之一,在这两个国家自然有着不同的理解。本文介绍了中美不同的面子观并分析了不同面子观背后反映出来的不同的文化和相应的原因。作者通过引用像高夫曼,布朗和列文森,以及胡先晋等学者的观点介绍了中美不同的面子观。接下来,文章探讨了不同面子观背后反映出的不同文化,比如:美国的个人主义和中国的集体主义的差异,美国的消极面子和中国的积极面子的差异,美国的平等性和中国的等级性的差异,并分析了造成这些差异成因,例如历史,文化,思维模式,民族性格以及传统意识等方面的原因。最后,本文建议,为了减少国际交流中的一些障碍,应当了解彼此的面子观,与美国人打交道时尽量直接点,与中国人打交道尽量委婉点。相信读者在此基础上能够更好地理解中美的面子观,能够进行更有效的国际交流,以促进中美关系的发展。关键词:跨文化交际;文化差异;面子观 ContentsIntroduction.11. An approach to different face perspectives.11.1 The American face perspective21.1.1 Erving Goffmans opinion on face perspective .21.1.2 Brown & Levinsons opinion on face perspective31.2 The Chinese face perspective.42. Cultural conflicts & reasons behind different concepts of face.52.1. Individualism vs. Collectivism.52.1.1 The American value- individualism & reasons.52.1.2 The Chinese value- collectivism & reasons.62.2. Negative Face vs. Positive Face82.2.1 The American Negative Face & reasons.8 2.2.2 The Chinese Positive Face & reasons.92.3 Equality vs. Hierarchy.102.3.1 The American equality & reasons.102.3.2 The Chinese hierarchy & reasons.113. Suggestions .123.1. Knowing different concepts of face.123.2. Trying to be direct when among the Americans.123.3. Trying to be euphemistic when among the Chinese13Conclusion.13References.15Acknowledgements1615On Cultural Differences Between American and Chinese Face PerspectivesIntroductionPoliteness is a symbol of human civilization and the feature of all the civilized society. Politeness which is thought to be one of the moral aspects is referred to the practical application of good manners or etiquette. It is a culturally-defined phenomenon, and therefore what is considered polite in one culture can sometimes be quite rude or simply eccentric in another cultural context. Similarly, face perspective, as one of the basic factors of politeness, is unexceptionally different under the different cultural contexts in China and America. If people know nothing about these differences, they wont be able to have effective communication in intercultural context.In this thesis, cultural differences between American and Chinese face perspectives are discussed in three aspects: the introduction of different concepts of face under different cultural backgrounds between America and China, the analysis of cultural differences reflected by different concepts of face and their causes, and some suggestions to reduce barriers caused by different concepts of face in cross-cultural communication so as to promote mutual understanding between the two nations.1. An approach to different face perspectives“Face” is a ubiquitous concept that exists in all cultures. However, in different cultural context, the concept of “face” has been defined in many different ways. Goffman (1955) conceptualized it as “something that is diffusedly located in the flow of events.” People experience face concerns in different social situations.Brown and Levinson (1978) in their classic work of “Universals in language usage: Politeness phenomenon”, present face as “the public self-image that every member of a society wants to claim for himself/herself.” Face is a social image that individuals would like to preserve for themselves. At other times, individuals have to fight to preserve their face.And the Chinese scholar, Lin Yutang (1968) defines it as “a psychologically image that can be granted and lost and fought for and presented as a gift.” This definition includes the concern for dignity, honor, and status. Hence, face can be given by people and lost.1.1 The American face perspectiveIn terms of American face perspective, the Canadian sociologist, Erving Goffman and English scholars, Brown and Levinson, are typical, and their relative ideas on face concerns are popular among Americans.1.1.1 Erving Goffmans opinion on face perspectiveIn 1950s, Erving Goffman, a Canadian sociologist, came up with his face perspective from angle of sociology in his article: On Face-work: An Analysis of Ritual Elements in Social Interaction. According to Goffman, face is defined as a kind of positive social value one person pursues in social interaction, which is also known as the positive image of self that individuals have when interacting with others. According to Goffman (1955), face is a sociological construct of interaction and once individuals give out a positive self image of themselves, they would have to keep that set image. When individuals can not keep the image they claim to be, they risk being embarrassed and also they will be considered to be odd and perverse.Goffman came up with the theory of Face work on the issue. The way individuals want to keep their self-image is to do face work. Face work is a mutual thing. It needs both the listener and the speakers mutual work. When the listener calls into questions the self image the speaker presents, the speaker will risk losing their face. In return, the listener will lose their face for putting the speaker into that situation. So the best way to solve this problem for the listener and the speaker is to protect face for each other. That is also why people try to use courteous expressions in social interaction.1.1.2 Brown & Levinsons opinion on face perspectiveIn 1978, two English scholars, Brown and Levinson, published their famous Universals in Language Usage: Politeness Phenomena based on Goffmans definition of face perspective. It talks about Face Management View. According to their research, they find among English, the native Mexican language, and the native Indian language, three totally different kinds of language backgrounds, using courteous expressions is universal. After some modifications, they published Politeness: Some Universals of Language Usage in 1987. The book talks about acts threatening face, discusses the differences between positive face and negative face, introduces politeness phenomena and face perspective to a point. They explain their politeness theory and present three concepts: Face, Face-Saving Theory and Face-Threatening Acts.According to Brown and Levinson, face is defined as public image individuals strive for when interacting with others. Through social interaction, individuals fight for their own public image which is demonstrated by the party to win over real social value. As to the Face-Saving Theory, Brown and Levinson assumes everyone who interacts with others is the Model Person.(Brown & Levinson , 1978: 63) Simply put, everyone is an individual who has no trouble in socializing. They believe every model person is a reasonable person who has the need of face. And the face every social member wants is actually the public self-image he or she strives for in the public. It is divided into two categories: negative face and positive face. Negative face refers that individuals dont like being forced, nor being interfered by others or sacrificing their own benefits to fawn on others. They want the freedom to be themselves. Positive face means the desire of being approved and praised by others.At the same time, Brown and Levinson believe that most of the speech acts are threatening face essentially. Sometimes, they may cause embarrassment. Thats why people use courteous language in social communications to reduce the rate of threatening face. So when talking to others, individuals have to protect both other peoples negative face and positive face. Face-Threatening Acts are classified by Brown and Levinson, including acts threatening listeners negative face and positive face and acts threatening speakers negative face and positive face. In the meantime, they came up with negative politeness strategy and positive politeness strategy correspondingly.1.2 The Chinese face perspectiveAccording to Hu Hsienchin, a Chinese anthropologist, face represents important social reputation which people gain through their continuous hard working and wisdom in their life experience. It is an important and typical social psychological phenomenon. Chinese have always been valuing face. From their point of view, face is so important, sometimes even as important as life. (1944)Chinese face is divided into two characters, one standing for honour and reputation and the other self-esteem and dignity. The two are something that Chinese people will pay at any price and at any time to protect.Face can be thought as invisible face. Just like what Mr. Lin Yutang said “Chinese peoples face can be washed, shaved, lost, given, fought and saved.”(1941: 139) No matter how rich or poor one person is, no matter in what social hierarchy one person is, they all need to protect their face.When interacting with people, Chinese always try to protect both their own face and other peoples face. They always disparage themselves and elevate others. Even if when they have to criticize people, they will compliment them first and then point out their shortcomings. The Chinese face value has been well observed for thousands of years just because of “li”, an ideology advocated by Confucianism and deeply influencing Chinese people. In accordance with this doctrine, people should be self-restrained and considerate and loving one another. Li refers to right conduct in maintaining ones place in the hierarchical order. Li is now used by the average Chinese to mean decorum. One important way to be decorous is to accept and respect each other to preserve face. In this way, they can maintain harmonious relationships with other people.2. Cultural conflicts & reasons behind different concepts of faceUnder different cultural backgrounds, face perspectives are different. Likewise, different concepts of face reflect cultural differences. And these cultural differences are caused by different reasons. In general, there are mainly three differences about cultural conflicts behind different concepts of face between America and China, such as Individualism vs. Collectivism, Negative Face vs. Positive Face, and Equality vs. Hierarchy, which are really important and should be taken into consideration during cross-cultural communications.2.1 Individualism vs. CollectivismThe first cultural difference is about the two countries different value. Americans value individualism and Chinese value collectivism. The difference is caused by different reasons, such as history, ideology, and life-style and so on.2.1.1 The American value - individualism & reasonsFrom the concepts of American face perspective as introduced before, it is known that American face perspective emphasizes individualism. American face perspective highlights the realization of self-value, pursuance of self-spirit, the satisfaction of self-desire and self-freedom. Individual desire exceeds that of the group and an individual wouldnt like to give up his or her own benefits for the group.Why does individualism play such an important role in America? Following reasons should be taken into consideration. Firstly, American individualism can be traced back to as early as the American colonial period. As early as in 1607, first British colony was founded at Jamestown, Virginia. After that, many other colonies were founded one after another. The colonists were building a new way of life in the New World. There were a number of features which would play a role in forming the American characters, including rule of law, respect of individual rights, religious tolerance and a strong spirit of individual enterprise. In 1620, a part of British puritans sailed to the New World in a ship called “Mayflower”. They brought Christianity to the New World. It encouraged people to show themselves and value themselves. Whats more, the Declaration of Independence and the basic belief Americans held when they got off British colonialism fully embodied individual pursuance of freedom, life and happiness.Secondly, life in North American has been mobile virtually from the earliest days of European colonization. Colonial people did not hesitate to move on if life in a certain locality didnt suit them. Afterwards, with the founding of American economic institutions of capitalism and the establishing of American society based on private ownership, the population was quite transient and its harder and harder to form a stable society. Thus, the composition of ones community and friendship groups changed often during ones lifetime and even relatives would be left behind when one decided to search elsewhere for a better life. Given the constant shifting of group memberships, attention increasingly focused on individuals instead of on groups integrity, and harmony rarely attained the significance for Americans. So long as one didnt obstruct others, he could do whatever he wanted. And then, individual particular lifestyle was valued and individual feeling, desire and privacy were respected. Respecting individual freedom, rights and independence was actually polite. Otherwise, its not.2.1.2 The Chinese value - collectivism & reasonsSimilarly, from Chinese face perspective as introduced before, it can be inferred that Chinese face emphasizes group. Chinese face highlights personal awareness and personal social status in the group and harmonious relationships among all the members. Ting-Toomey argues that in a collectivist culture like China, the face of the group is more important than the face of any individual in that group. In China, individual has to be subject to the group and the desire of individual cant exceed that of the group. Here is a research helping understand the difference between American individualism and Chinese collectivism to some extent. When 3 pictures of chicken, cattle and hay are shown to a group of Americans and Chinese to pick out two of them, it turns out that most Americans pick out the pictures of chicken and cattle, because both of them are animals; but most Chinese pick out cattle and hay, because cattle eat hay. Thus, a conclusion can be drawn that Americans tend to see things as category while Chinese tend to see the relationship between things. There are two reasons can be used to explain why the good of the group is so important in China. First and foremost, Chinese people are deeply influenced by Confucianism. Confucianism advocated great harmony, which emphasized the harmony and integrity among individual, group and the whole society. One should try his best to obey his community and society to the maximum extent. So Chinese face is based on collectivism and emphasizes that individual interest subordinates to the general interest.Second, China has a feudal history of more than two thousand years. And the traditional idea of Chinese feudal society and policy has always held that farming overweighs commerce. Hu Wenzhong said, “In such an agricultural country, farmers were tied down to the land they lived by from generation to generation. There was hardly any change among farmers, neither their social class nor locality, except for wars or famine”. (胡文仲,1988: 1) And then, interdependent relationships were formed between people and land, people and people. Thus, group relationships were getting closer and closer and society more and more stable. In this way, the Chinese had little opportunity to move away from the locality of their birth and have tended to spend their entire lives in the company of the same friends, neighbors, and relatives. When one was attached for life to a given group of people, maintaining harmonious relationships among all its members became of paramount importance. Under this history background, collectivism is gradually formed. People take the
温馨提示
- 1. 本站所有资源如无特殊说明,都需要本地电脑安装OFFICE2007和PDF阅读器。图纸软件为CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.压缩文件请下载最新的WinRAR软件解压。
- 2. 本站的文档不包含任何第三方提供的附件图纸等,如果需要附件,请联系上传者。文件的所有权益归上传用户所有。
- 3. 本站RAR压缩包中若带图纸,网页内容里面会有图纸预览,若没有图纸预览就没有图纸。
- 4. 未经权益所有人同意不得将文件中的内容挪作商业或盈利用途。
- 5. 人人文库网仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对用户上传分享的文档内容本身不做任何修改或编辑,并不能对任何下载内容负责。
- 6. 下载文件中如有侵权或不适当内容,请与我们联系,我们立即纠正。
- 7. 本站不保证下载资源的准确性、安全性和完整性, 同时也不承担用户因使用这些下载资源对自己和他人造成任何形式的伤害或损失。
最新文档
- 色散的题库及答案
- 航空乘务员培训考试题及答案
- 来料检验面试题目及答案
- 瑞昌职高高考试卷及答案
- 防范与减少患者外出走失流程试题(附答案)
- 吉林大学《语文教育经典文献研读》2024-2025学年第一学期期末试卷
- 辽宁科技大学《数字逻辑设计实验》2024-2025学年第一学期期末试卷
- 2024年河池市宜州区事业单位考试真题(附答案)
- 辽宁公务员面试题及答案
- 浙江音乐学院《CoreDRAW》2024-2025学年第一学期期末试卷
- 2025年食品安全培训考试试题及答案
- 2025年长江证券港股通开通测试题及答案
- 2025西安亮丽电力集团有限责任公司招聘10人笔试备考题库及1套完整答案详解
- 2025河北唐山某国有企业单位招聘劳务派遣工作人员44人笔试参考题库附带答案详解(10套)
- 成都银行总行招聘考试真题2024
- 基孔肯雅热培训测试题含答案
- 小额贷款公司贷款五级分类办法
- 2025公卫执业医师考试试题(附答案)
- 医院药品质量管理课件
- 2025年上海市中考招生考试数学真题试卷(真题+答案)
- 2025年广东省中考英语试题卷(含答案解析)
评论
0/150
提交评论