已阅读5页,还剩66页未读, 继续免费阅读
版权说明:本文档由用户提供并上传,收益归属内容提供方,若内容存在侵权,请进行举报或认领
文档简介
15 Monopoly Whileacompetitivefirmisapricetaker amonopolyfirmisapricemaker Afirmisconsideredamonopolyif itisthesolesellerofitsproduct itsproductdoesnothaveclosesubstitutes WHYMONOPOLIESARISE Thefundamentalcauseofmonopolyisbarrierstoentry WHYMONOPOLIESARISE Barrierstoentryhavethreesources Ownershipofakeyresource Thegovernmentgivesasinglefirmtheexclusiverighttoproducesomegood Costsofproductionmakeasingleproducermoreefficientthanalargenumberofproducers MonopolyResources Althoughexclusiveownershipofakeyresourceisapotentialsourceofmonopoly inpracticemonopoliesrarelyariseforthisreason Government CreatedMonopolies Governmentsmayrestrictentrybygivingasinglefirmtheexclusiverighttosellaparticulargoodincertainmarkets Government CreatedMonopolies Patentandcopyrightlawsaretwoimportantexamplesofhowgovernmentcreatesamonopolytoservethepublicinterest NaturalMonopolies Anindustryisanaturalmonopolywhenasinglefirmcansupplyagoodorservicetoanentiremarketatasmallercostthancouldtwoormorefirms NaturalMonopolies Anaturalmonopolyariseswhenthereareeconomiesofscaleovertherelevantrangeofoutput Figure1EconomiesofScaleasaCauseofMonopoly Copyright 2004South Western QuantityofOutput 0 Cost HOWMONOPOLIESMAKEPRODUCTIONANDPRICINGDECISIONS MonopolyversusCompetitionMonopolyIsthesoleproducerFacesadownward slopingdemandcurveIsapricemakerReducespricetoincreasesalesCompetitiveFirmIsoneofmanyproducersFacesahorizontaldemandcurveIsapricetakerSellsasmuchoraslittleatsameprice Figure2DemandCurvesforCompetitiveandMonopolyFirms Copyright 2004South Western QuantityofOutput a ACompetitiveFirm sDemandCurve b AMonopolist sDemandCurve 0 Price QuantityofOutput 0 Price AMonopoly sRevenue TotalRevenueP Q TRAverageRevenueTR Q AR PMarginalRevenueDTR DQ MR Table1AMonopoly sTotal Average andMarginalRevenue Copyright 2004South Western AMonopoly sRevenue AMonopoly sMarginalRevenueAmonopolist smarginalrevenueisalwayslessthanthepriceofitsgood Thedemandcurveisdownwardsloping Whenamonopolydropsthepricetosellonemoreunit therevenuereceivedfrompreviouslysoldunitsalsodecreases AMonopoly sRevenue AMonopoly sMarginalRevenueWhenamonopolyincreasestheamountitsells ithastwoeffectsontotalrevenue P Q Theoutputeffect moreoutputissold soQishigher Thepriceeffect pricefalls soPislower Figure3DemandandMarginal RevenueCurvesforaMonopoly Copyright 2004South Western QuantityofWater Price 11 10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 1 2 3 4 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 ProfitMaximization Amonopolymaximizesprofitbyproducingthequantityatwhichmarginalrevenueequalsmarginalcost Itthenusesthedemandcurvetofindthepricethatwillinduceconsumerstobuythatquantity Figure4ProfitMaximizationforaMonopoly Copyright 2004South Western Quantity Q 0 Costsand Revenue ProfitMaximization ComparingMonopolyandCompetitionForacompetitivefirm priceequalsmarginalcost P MR MCForamonopolyfirm priceexceedsmarginalcost P MR MC AMonopoly sProfit Profitequalstotalrevenueminustotalcosts Profit TR TCProfit TR Q TC Q QProfit P ATC Q Figure5TheMonopolist sProfit Copyright 2004South Western Quantity 0 Costsand Revenue AMonopolist sProfit Themonopolistwillreceiveeconomicprofitsaslongaspriceisgreaterthanaveragetotalcost Figure6TheMarketforDrugs Copyright 2004South Western Quantity 0 Costsand Revenue ComparingMonopolytoPerfectCompetition Amonopolymarketcanbeexpectedtohaveahigherpriceandloweroutputthananotherwisesimilarperfectlycompetitivemarket ComparingMonopolyandPerfectCompetition 100 000 E 10 D S 1 000 ATC MC d 10 Fig 5cComparingMonopolyandPerfectCompetition 100 000 QuantityofOutput PriceperUnit E 10 D c Monopoly S MC 60 000 MR 15 F Figure4ComparingMonopolyandPerfectCompetition ComparingMonopolytoPerfectCompetition ChangeoverfromperfectcompetitiontomonopolybenefitsownersofmonopolyandharmsconsumersoftheproductImportantprovisoconcerningthisresultIncomparingmonopolyandperfectcompetition priceishigherandoutputislowerundermonopolyifallelseisequal ComparingMonopolytoPerfectCompetition GeneralconclusionMonopolizationofacompetitiveindustryleadstotwoopposingeffectsForanygiventechnologyofproduction monopolizationleadstohigherpricesandloweroutputChangesintechnologyofproductionmadepossibleundermonopolymayleadtolowerpricesandhigheroutputUltimateeffectonpriceandquantitydependsonrelativestrengthsoftwoeffects MonopoliesOftenEarnZeroEconomicProfit 1 Governmentregulation2 Rent seekingactivity MonopoliesOftenEarnZeroEconomicProfit Rent SeekingActivityAnycostlyactionafirmundertakestoestablishormaintainitsmonopolystatus WhyMonopoliesOftenEarnZeroEconomicProfit Incountrieswithcorruptbureaucracies rent seekingactivityincludesbribestogovernmentofficialsInlesscorruptgovernments itincludestimeandmoneyspentlobbyinglegislatorsandpublicforfavorablepolicesRent seekingactivitythathelpsestablishormaintainafirm smonopolypositionispartoffirm scostsAsaresult rent seekingactivitycanreduceeconomicprofitofamonopolyMayevenreduceittozero THEWELFARECOSTOFMONOPOLY Incontrasttoacompetitivefirm themonopolychargesapriceabovethemarginalcost Fromthestandpointofconsumers thishighpricemakesmonopolyundesirable However fromthestandpointoftheownersofthefirm thehighpricemakesmonopolyverydesirable Figure7TheEfficientLevelofOutput Copyright 2004South Western Quantity 0 Price TheDeadweightLoss Becauseamonopolysetsitspriceabovemarginalcost itplacesawedgebetweentheconsumer swillingnesstopayandtheproducer scost Thiswedgecausesthequantitysoldtofallshortofthesocialoptimum Figure8TheInefficiencyofMonopoly Copyright 2004South Western Quantity 0 Price TheDeadweightLoss TheInefficiencyofMonopolyThemonopolistproduceslessthanthesociallyefficientquantityofoutput TheDeadweightLoss Thedeadweightlosscausedbyamonopolyissimilartothedeadweightlosscausedbyatax Thedifferencebetweenthetwocasesisthatthegovernmentgetstherevenuefromatax whereasaprivatefirmgetsthemonopolyprofit PUBLICPOLICYTOWARDMONOPOLIES Governmentrespondstotheproblemofmonopolyinoneoffourways Makingmonopolizedindustriesmorecompetitive Regulatingthebehaviorofmonopolies Turningsomeprivatemonopoliesintopublicenterprises Doingnothingatall IncreasingCompetitionwithAntitrustLaws Antitrustlawsareacollectionofstatutesaimedatcurbingmonopolypower Antitrustlawsgivegovernmentvariouswaystopromotecompetition Theyallowgovernmenttopreventmergers Theyallowgovernmenttobreakupcompanies Theypreventcompaniesfromperformingactivitiesthatmakemarketslesscompetitive IncreasingCompetitionwithAntitrustLaws TwoImportantAntitrustLawsShermanAntitrustAct 1890 Reducedthemarketpowerofthelargeandpowerful trusts ofthattimeperiod ClaytonAct 1914 Strengthenedthegovernment spowersandauthorizedprivatelawsuits Regulation Governmentmayregulatethepricesthatthemonopolycharges Theallocationofresourceswillbeefficientifpriceissettoequalmarginalcost Figure9Marginal CostPricingforaNaturalMonopoly Copyright 2004South Western Quantity 0 Price Regulation Inpractice regulatorswillallowmonopoliststokeepsomeofthebenefitsfromlowercostsintheformofhigherprofit apracticethatrequiressomedeparturefrommarginal costpricing PublicOwnership Ratherthanregulatinganaturalmonopolythatisrunbyaprivatefirm thegovernmentcanrunthemonopolyitself e g intheUnitedStates thegovernmentrunsthePostalService DoingNothing Governmentcandonothingatallifthemarketfailureisdeemedsmallcomparedtotheimperfectionsofpublicpolicies PRICEDISCRIMINATION Pricediscriminationisthebusinesspracticeofsellingthesamegoodatdifferentpricestodifferentcustomers eventhoughthecostsforproducingforthetwocustomersarethesame PRICEDISCRIMINATION Pricediscriminationisnotpossiblewhenagoodissoldinacompetitivemarketsincetherearemanyfirmsallsellingatthemarketprice Inordertopricediscriminate thefirmmusthavesomemarketpower PerfectPriceDiscriminationPerfectpricediscriminationreferstothesituationwhenthemonopolistknowsexactlythewillingnesstopayofeachcustomerandcanchargeeachcustomeradifferentprice PRICEDISCRIMINATION Twoimportanteffectsofpricediscrimination Itcanincreasethemonopolist sprofits Itcanreducedeadweightloss Figure10WelfarewithandwithoutPriceDiscrimination Copyright 2004South Western a MonopolistwithSinglePrice Price 0 Quantity Figure10WelfarewithandwithoutPriceDiscrimination Copyright 2004South Western b MonopolistwithPerfectPriceDiscrimination Price 0 Quantity PRICEDISCRIMINATION ExamplesofPriceDiscriminationMovieticketsAirlinepricesDiscountcouponsFinancialaidQuantitydiscounts First DegreePriceDiscriminationinPractice Quantity Q Sixpricesexistresultinginhigherprofits WithasinglepriceP 4 therearefewerconsumers DiscriminatinguptoP6 competitiveprice willincreaseprofits Second DegreePriceDiscrimination Insomemarkets consumerspurchasemanyunitsofagoodovertimeDemandforthatgooddeclineswithincreasedconsumptionElectricity water heatingfuelFirmscanengageinsecond degreepricediscriminationPracticeofchargingdifferentpricesperunitfordifferentquantitiesofthesamegoodorservice Second DegreePriceDiscrimination Quantitydiscountsareanexampleofsecond degreepricediscriminationEx BuyinginbulkatSam sClubBlockpricing thepracticeofchargingdifferentpricesfordifferentquantitiesof blocks ofagoodEx electricpowercompanieschargedifferentpricesforaconsumerpurchasingasetblockofelectricity Second DegreePriceDiscrimination Q Withoutdiscrimination P P0andQ Q0 Withsecond degreediscriminationtherearethreeblockswithpricesP1 P2 P3 Quantity Differentpricesarechargedfordifferentquantitiesor blocks ofsamegood Third DegreePriceDiscrimination PracticeofdividingconsumersintotwoormoregroupswithseparatedemandcurvesandchargingdifferentpricestoeachgroupDividesthemarketintotwogroupsEachgrouphasitsowndemandfunction PriceDiscrimination ThirdDegreePriceDiscriminationMostcommontypeofpricediscriminationExamples airlines premiumvs non premiumliquor discountstostudentsandseniorcitizens frozenvs cannedvegetables Third DegreePriceDiscrimination SamecharacteristicisusedtodividetheconsumergroupsTypically elasticitiesofdemanddifferforthegroupsCollegestudentsandseniorcitizensarenotusuallywillingtopayasmuchasothersbecauseoflowerincomesThesegroupsareeasilydistinguishablewithID s CONCLUSION THEPREVALENCEOFMONOPOLY Howprevalentaretheproblemsofmonopolies Monopoliesarecommon Mostfirmshavesomecontrolovertheirpricesbecauseofdifferentiatedproducts Firmswithsubstantialmonopolypowerarerare Fewgoodsaretrulyunique Summary Amonopolyisafirmthatisthesolesellerinitsmarket Itfacesadownward slopingdemandcurveforitsproduct Amonopoly smarginalrevenueisalwaysbelowthepriceofitsgood Summary Likeacompetitivefirm amonopolymaximizesprofitbyproducingthequantityatwhichmarginalcostandmarginalrevenueareequal Unlikeacompetitivefirm itspriceexceedsitsmarginalrevenue soitspriceexceedsmarginalcost Summary Amonopolist sprofit maximizinglevelofoutputisbelowthelevelthatmaximizesthesumofconsumerandproducersurplus Amonopolycausesdeadweightlossessimilartothedeadweightlossescausedbytaxes Summary Policymakerscanrespondtotheinefficienciesofmonopolybehaviorwithantitrustlaws regulationofprices orbyturningthemonopolyintoagovernment runenterprise Ifthemarketfailureisdeemedsmall policymakersmaydecidetodonothingatall Summary Monopolistscanraisetheirprofitsbychargingdifferentpricestodifferentbuyersbasedontheirwillingnesstopay Pricediscrimination
温馨提示
- 1. 本站所有资源如无特殊说明,都需要本地电脑安装OFFICE2007和PDF阅读器。图纸软件为CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.压缩文件请下载最新的WinRAR软件解压。
- 2. 本站的文档不包含任何第三方提供的附件图纸等,如果需要附件,请联系上传者。文件的所有权益归上传用户所有。
- 3. 本站RAR压缩包中若带图纸,网页内容里面会有图纸预览,若没有图纸预览就没有图纸。
- 4. 未经权益所有人同意不得将文件中的内容挪作商业或盈利用途。
- 5. 人人文库网仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对用户上传分享的文档内容本身不做任何修改或编辑,并不能对任何下载内容负责。
- 6. 下载文件中如有侵权或不适当内容,请与我们联系,我们立即纠正。
- 7. 本站不保证下载资源的准确性、安全性和完整性, 同时也不承担用户因使用这些下载资源对自己和他人造成任何形式的伤害或损失。
最新文档
- 供销原煤合同范本
- 购置pad合同范本
- 萍乡市安源区2025年面向社会公开招聘社区工作者备考题库【11人】含答案详解(培优b卷)
- 2025辽宁沈阳市浑南区总工会招聘工会社会工作者10人备考题库附答案详解ab卷
- 小学五上科学试卷及答案
- 2025浙江宁波市郭巨街道招聘编外人员1人备考题库及答案详解(基础+提升)
- 2025陕西宝鸡市金台区招聘社区专职人员58人备考题库完整答案详解
- 2026年中国农业发展银行校园招聘备考题库附答案详解(综合题)
- 天车工考试试题及答案
- 2025浙江丽水市景宁畲族自治县招聘专职社区工作者15人备考题库及答案详解(基础+提升)
- 市政道路工程施工组织设计
- 2025年北京公共交通控股集团有限公司校园招聘笔试试题及答案
- 2025-2026学年人教版一年级美术上册全册教案
- 6.3 梯形的面积 课件 2025-2026学年五年级上册数学人教版
- 中央厨房市场分析
- 2025年摄像导演岗位招聘面试参考试题及参考答案
- 2026-2031中国野山参市场运营态势报告
- 护理礼仪(高职)全套教学教案
- 关于鲁迅简介
- 电力增容工程投标方案(技术标)
- 劳动合同书通用电子版下载2022
评论
0/150
提交评论