英语教师授课能力评价表.doc

. Evaluating Teacher CompetenciesTeacherClassLevelDate of classStudents NO.Lesson OpeningInterpersonal CommunicationInstructions Gained student attention Clarity of objectives: the class understood what was wanted at all times AppropriacyExplanations Assisting understanding Were comprehension checks and concept checks carried out?Questioning Quality of questions Variety of questionsHow frequently was eliciting used? Amount of teacher talk Appropriacy of language with respect to learners proficiency level Were there any cultural misunderstandings? Rapport with learners Learning atmosphere: Were students enthusiastic?Classroom Activities Was there a variety of tasks? Were materials & learning appropriate to the specified aims? Were all students interested in the lesson? Use of teaching aids Pace of classTeaching Strategies A number of these strategies should be demonstrated:- Warmer- Whole class teaching- Group work- Pair work- Individual student work (seat work)- One-to-one help while students work- Opportunity for controlled practice- Balance of teaching strategies employedLesson Closure Feedback to students Restatement of lesson objectives Concept checkingClassroom Management Predicts student difficulties Use of blackboard/whiteboard Were student groupings & sub-groupings appropriate? Was teacher skill evident in organizing group work?Did the lesson match the lesson plan? Comments . . . . . 1 2 3 4 5Comments . . . . . 1 2 3 4 5 . . . . . 1 2 3 4 5 . . . . . 1 2 3 4 5 . . . . . 1 2 3 4 5 . . . . . 1 2 3 4 5Comments . . . . . 1 2 3 4 5Comments . . . . . 1 2 3 4 5Comments . . . . . 1 2 3 4 5Comments . . . . . 1 2 3 4 5Comments . . . . . 1 2 3 4 5The following statements relate to METENs code of conduct. (5 points) a. Behaves in a professional manner that serves as a positive role model for students and staff. . . 1 2b. Refrains from saying negative comments or airing complaints in class. . . 1 2c. Follows the company dress code. . 1 How appropriate were the teaching strategies used to initiate student responses? Was every student involved at some point?How appropriate were the teachers responses to student contributions? Was correction of learner language & feedback was appropriate? Did genuine communication occur?Comments:Areas of Strength:Areas for Development:Scale: