REPORT(英文报刊读物).doc_第1页
REPORT(英文报刊读物).doc_第2页
REPORT(英文报刊读物).doc_第3页
REPORT(英文报刊读物).doc_第4页
REPORT(英文报刊读物).doc_第5页
已阅读5页,还剩1页未读 继续免费阅读

下载本文档

版权说明:本文档由用户提供并上传,收益归属内容提供方,若内容存在侵权,请进行举报或认领

文档简介

Why Are Conservatives Happier Than Liberals?SUMMARYHow do feelings about ideology and economic inequality affect a persons happiness? As part of his reporting of Making Sen$e of financial news, economics correspondent Paul Solman explores the connection and asks some liberals at Occupy DC and conservatives at the American Enterprise Institute to grade their own happiness.TranscriptJEFFREY BROWN: And finally tonight, how do your feelings about economic inequality impact your sense of happiness?NewsHour economics correspondent Paul Solman finds out.Its part of his regular reporting on Making Sense of financial news.PAUL SOLMAN: How happy are you, scale of one to four, one not at all happy, four very happy?LORI SANDERS, American Enterprise Institute: Im a four.PAUL SOLMAN: A four?LORI SANDERS: Im very happy.PAUL SOLMAN: Lori Sanders works at the conservative Washington think tank the American Enterprise Institute. A few blocks away, Occupy D.C.er Eric is on the more liberal end of the spectrum.What number would you give yourself?MAN: A one.PAUL SOLMAN: Are you unhappy, do you think, because of the inequality, economic inequality in this country?MAN: Well, yes.PAUL SOLMAN: Study after study, it turns out, finds conservatives happier than liberals.Yale social psychologist Jaime Napier has a theory as to why.JAIME NAPIER, Yale University: Economic inequality really does affect peoples subjective well-being.PAUL SOLMAN: Napiers work has convinced her conservatives are happier than liberals because they think theres equality of opportunity in America.JAIME NAPIER: One of the biggest correlates with happiness in our surveys was the belief of a meritocracy, which is the belief that anybody who works hard can make it. That was the biggest predictor of happiness. That was also one of the biggest predictors of political ideology. So, the conservatives were much higher on these meritocratic beliefs than liberals were.PAUL SOLMAN: Liberals like the folks we found at Occupy D.C., who dont think the opportunities out there are equal these days. Their message is clear: The system is not fair.WOMAN: Everybody here at this Occupy movement is here because they have had enough. So, theyre angry. And chances are, you know, people here are very unhappy with the way that our society works.WOMAN: I believe that things should be equal, or people should have more of an opportunity to become closer to the 1 percent, because, right now, its like the 1 percent is the 1 percent, the 99 is the 99, and we kind of dont stand a chance.PAUL SOLMAN: The conservative AEI staffers, on the other hand, think we do.How many of you, on average, think Americans get what they deserve they deserve economically?Reza Jan, who grew up in Pakistan, believe in Horatio Algerism for all, sort of.REZA JAN, American Enterprise Institute: I would say not everybody is able to pull off those kinds of success stories. But, in this country, more than any other, for the work you do, you are able to better yourself.PAUL SOLMAN: Thats true no matter who you are, said Jesse Blumenthal.JESSE BLUMENTHAL, American Enterprise Institute: The pull yourself up by your bootstraps notion works here more than really anywhere else in the world.PAUL SOLMAN: Now, optimism alone doesnt determine contentment. Religion boosts happiness. So does marriage. But Napiers research accounted for that.JAIME NAPIER: We adjusted for education, for income, for marital status, religion, people who lived urban vs. rural, all kinds of things. So, you know, on average, just your ideology alone is an independent predictor of your subjective well-being.ARTHUR BROOKS, American Enterprise Institute: It is true that conservatives tend to be less concerned about income inequality.Arthur Brooks, president of the AEI, and the author of Gross National Happiness, agrees with Napier about the conservative happiness edge.ARTHUR BROOKS: Conservatives think that fairness is one in which outcomes are based on merit and people start with more or less equal opportunities, or at least were working for equal opportunities. If you believe those things, and you see that some person makes more than others or the top 1 percent is breaking away than the bottom 99 percent, thats not going to affect your happiness very much at all.PAUL SOLMAN: But with the average wage flatlined and more than 28 million Americans still jobless or underemployed, do merit and hard work really drive success these days?The late comedian George Carlins viral video answer has become a liberal credo.GEORGE CARLIN, comedian: The owners of this country know the truth. Its called the American dream, because you have to be asleep to believe it.(LAUGHTER)PAUL SOLMAN: Napier says American economic malaise of the past few decades disheartened everyone, but liberals most of all.JAIME NAPIER: So, everybody was decreasing in happiness as there was more inequality, but liberals to a significantly greater extent than conservatives.And, in 1974, the difference between liberals and conservatives on happiness wasnt statistically significant. It was, basically, ideology didnt predict happiness in 1974.PAUL SOLMAN: And, today, it does?JAIME NAPIER: And, today, it definitely does.PAUL SOLMAN: How much happier are conservatives than liberals, on average?JAIME NAPIER: Its about a half-a-point on a 1-4 scale.PAUL SOLMAN: Now, its not as if liberals are clinically depressed. Indeed, besides unhappy Eric, the liberals at Occupy D.C., a protest movement, after all, were a reasonably cheery lot.How happy are you on a scale of one to four, one not at all happy, four very happy?CRAIG HUDSON, Occupy D.C.: I would probably have to say three.ALAN BALL, Occupy D.C.: I would say definitely three-plus.PAUL SOLMAN: And there were even a few fours.Ellie (ph), who declined to give her last name, rated herself a two-and-a-half on the happiness scale.Is the economic inequality and growing economic inequality in this country something that has personally, emotionally disturbed you?WOMAN: Absolutely, no questions.PAUL SOLMAN: Alan Balls three-plus came despite his concerns about inequality.ALAN BALL: The reconciliation of inequality is very difficult to do, especially with the system that we have right now. But I have tried to get beyond that, because I dont want external things to affect my well-being. Theres a temple of love right over there that were going to put an altar in, and were going to set up a sacred space where people can go in to have peace, to meditate.PAUL SOLMAN: A temple a tad less inviting than the American Enterprise Institute, where, if not ecstatic, neither was any one of them below a three.STUART JAMES, American Enterprise Institute: Im about three-and-a-half, I would say.REZA JAN: I would probably call it somewhere around a three-and-a-half.JESSE BLUMENTHAL: Its probably somewhere between a three-and-a-half and a four.PAUL SOLMAN: Alex Della Rocchetta, a three-and-a-half, Lori Sanders, you may remember, a full four.OK, a ludicrously small sample, but, on average, our conservatives scored about half-a-point happier on the 1-4 scale than the liberals at Occupy D.C. And thats the very same half-point advantage found in the studies Jaime Napier cites.No surprise to Occupier Craig Hudson.CRAIG HUDSON: Its pretty obvious that conservatives represent the interests of the rich, I mean, for the most part. So, people with money generally are happier and generally like to say, well, I got to where I am because I worked hard or parents, whatever, and anybody else, well, they must not have worked hard enough.STUART JAMES: If everyone was a conservative, wed all be a lot happier, I guess, right?PAUL SOLMAN: Probably, but not, says Arthur Brooks, because they are wealthier.ARTHUR BROOKS: Its not true that conservatives are richer than Liberals. Liberals are actually richer than conservatives.The reason that conservatives tend to be less concerned with income inequality is not because that theyre ignorant. Its not because theyre calloused. Its not because they have less of a sense of a morality. It has to do with the fact that they see the world differently.PAUL SOLMAN: See it as a world of just desserts.AEI staffer Stuart James:STUART JAMES: I hate the idea of sitting around waiting for someone else to come and, you know, sweep you off your feet and save you from student loan debt or an underwater mortgage or whatever i

温馨提示

  • 1. 本站所有资源如无特殊说明,都需要本地电脑安装OFFICE2007和PDF阅读器。图纸软件为CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.压缩文件请下载最新的WinRAR软件解压。
  • 2. 本站的文档不包含任何第三方提供的附件图纸等,如果需要附件,请联系上传者。文件的所有权益归上传用户所有。
  • 3. 本站RAR压缩包中若带图纸,网页内容里面会有图纸预览,若没有图纸预览就没有图纸。
  • 4. 未经权益所有人同意不得将文件中的内容挪作商业或盈利用途。
  • 5. 人人文库网仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对用户上传分享的文档内容本身不做任何修改或编辑,并不能对任何下载内容负责。
  • 6. 下载文件中如有侵权或不适当内容,请与我们联系,我们立即纠正。
  • 7. 本站不保证下载资源的准确性、安全性和完整性, 同时也不承担用户因使用这些下载资源对自己和他人造成任何形式的伤害或损失。

评论

0/150

提交评论