已阅读5页,还剩1页未读, 继续免费阅读
版权说明:本文档由用户提供并上传,收益归属内容提供方,若内容存在侵权,请进行举报或认领
文档简介
SCCM/ASPEN成年危重病患者营养支持治疗实施与评估指南(1/6)2016年02月15日指南导读,进展交流暂无评论Guidelines for the Provision and Assessment of Nutrition Support Therapy in the Adult Critically Ill Patient: Society of Critical Care Medicine (SCCM) and American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition (A.S.P.E.N.)成年危重病患者营养支持治疗的实施与评估指南:美国危重病医学会(SCCM)与美国肠外肠内营养学会(ASPEN)Taylor BE, McClave SA, Martindale RG, et al. Crit Care Med 2016; 44: 390-438翻译:清华大学长庚医院周华 许媛A. NUTRITION ASSESSMENT 营养评估Question: Does the use of a nutrition risk indicator identify patients who will most likely benefit from nutrition therapy?问题:营养风险筛查工具能否鉴别哪些患者最可能从营养治疗中获益?A1. Based on expert consensus, we suggest a determination of nutrition risk (for example, nutritional risk score NRS-2002, NUTRIC score) be performed on all patients admitted to the ICU for whom volitional intake is anticipated to be insufficient. High nutrition risk identifies those patients most likely to benefit from early EN therapy.根据专家共识,我们建议对收入ICU且预计摄食不足的患者进行营养风险评估(如营养风险评分NRS-2002,NUTRIC 评分)。高营养风险患者的识别,最可能使其从早期肠内营养治疗中获益。A2. Based on expert consensus, we suggest that nutritional assessment include an evaluation of comorbid conditions, function of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract, and risk of aspiration. We suggest not using traditional nutrition indicators or surrogate markers, as they are not validated in critical care.根据专家共识,我们建议营养评估应当包括对于合并症、胃肠道功能以及误吸风险的评估。我们建议不要使用传统的营养指标或其替代指标,因为这些指标在ICU的应用并非得到验证。Question: What is the best method for determining energy needs in the critically ill adult patient?问题:确定成年危重病患者能量需求的最佳方法是什么?A3a. We suggest that indirect calorimetry (IC) be used to determine energy requirements, when available and in the absence of variables that affect the accuracy of measurement.Quality of Evidence: Very Low。如果有条件且不影响测量准确性的因素时,建议应用间接能量测定(间接测热法,indirect calorimetry,IC) 确定能量需求。证据质量:非常低A3b. Based on expert consensus, in the absence of IC, we suggest that a published predictive equation or a simplistic weight-based equation (2530 kcal/kg/ day) be used to determine energy requirements. (see section Q for obesity recommendations.)根据专家共识,当没有IC时,我们建议使用已发表的预测公式或基于体重的简化公式(2530 kcal/kg/ day)确定能量需求。(见Q部分有关肥胖患者的推荐意见。)Question: Should protein provision be monitored independently from energy provision in critically ill adult patients?问题:对于成年危重病患者,除能量提供外,是否需要单独监测提供的蛋白质量?A4. Based on expert consensus, we suggest an ongoing evaluation of adequacy of protein provision be performed.根据专家共识,我们建议连续评估蛋白质供给的充分性。B. INITIATE EN 开始肠内营养(EN)Question: What is the benefit of early EN in critically ill adult patients compared to withholding or delaying this therapy?问题:对于成年危重病患者而言,与不给予或延迟给予EN相比,早期EN有何益处?B1. We recommend that nutrition support therapy in the form of early EN be initiated within 2448 hours in the critically ill patient who is unable to maintain volitional intake.Quality of Evidence: Very Low对于不能维持自主进食的危重病患者,我们推荐在24 48小时内通过早期EN开始营养支持治疗。证据质量:非常低Question: Is there a difference in outcome between the use of EN or PN for adult critically ill patients?问题:成年危重病患者使用EN或PN对预后的影响有何不同?B2. We suggest the use of EN over PN in critically ill patients who require nutrition support therapy.Quality of Evidence: Low to Very Low对于需要营养支持治疗的危重病患者,我们建议首选EN而非PN的营养供给方式。证据质量:低至非常低Question: Is the clinical evidence of contractility (bowel sounds, flatus) required prior to initiating EN in critically ill adult patients?问题:在成年危重病患者开始EN前是否需要有肠道蠕动的证据(肠鸣音,排气)?B3. Based on expert consensus, we suggest that, in the majority of MICU and SICU patient populations, while GI contractility factors should be evaluated when initiating EN, overt signs of contractility should not be required prior to initiation of EN.基于专家共识,我们建议,对于多数MICU和SICU患者,尽管启用EN时需要对胃肠道蠕动情况进行评估,但此前并不需要有肠道蠕动的体征。Question: What is the preferred level of infusion of EN within the GI tract for critically ill patients? How does the level of infusion of EN affect patient outcomes?问题:危重病患者胃肠道输注EN的最佳速度是多少?EN输注速度如何影响患者预后?B4a. We recommend that the level of infusion be diverted lower in the GI tract in those critically ill patients at high risk for aspiration (see section D4) or those who have shown intolerance to gastric EN.Quality of Evidence: Moderate to High对于具有误吸高危因素(见D4部分)或不能耐受经胃喂养的重症患者,我们推荐减慢EN输注的速度。证据质量:中至高B4b. Based on expert consensus we suggest that, in most critically ill patients, it is acceptable to initiate EN in the stomach.基于专家的共识,我们建议经胃开始喂养是多数危重病患者可接受的EN方式。Question: Is EN safe during periods of hemodynamic instability in adult critically ill patients?问题:对于成年危重病患者,血流动力学不稳定时EN是否安全?B5. Based on expert consensus, we suggest that in the setting of hemodynamic compromise or instability, EN should be withheld until the patient is fully resuscitated and/or stable. Initiation/reinitiation of EN may be considered with caution in patients undergoing withdrawal of vasopressor support.根据专家共识,我们建议在血流动力学不稳定时,应当暂停EN直至患者接受了充分的复苏治疗和(或)病情稳定。对于正在撤除升压药物的患者,可以考虑谨慎开始或重新开始EN。C. DOSING OF EN EN的剂量Question: What population of patients in the ICU setting does not require nutrition support therapy over the first week of hospitalization?问题:哪些患者住ICU的第一周内无需营养支持治疗?C1. Based on expert consensus, we suggest that patients who are at low nutrition risk with normal baseline nutrition status and low disease severity (for example, NRS-2002 3 or NUTRIC score 5) who cannot maintain volitional intake do NOT require specialized nutrition therapy over the first week of hospitalization in the ICU.根据专家共识,我们建议那些营养风险较低及基础营养状况正常、疾病较轻(例如NRS-2002 3 或 NUTRIC评分 5)的患者,即使不能自主进食,住ICU的第一周内不需要特别给予营养治疗。Question: For which population of patients in the ICU setting is it appropriate to provide trophic EN over the first week of hospitalization?问题:哪些ICU患者在住院第一周内适合滋养型喂养 (trophic EN)?We recommend that either trophic or full nutrition by EN is appropriate for patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS)/acute lung injury (ALI) and those expected to have a duration of mechanical ventilation 72 hours, as these two strategies of feeding have similar patient outcomes over the first week of hospitalization.Quality of Evidence: High对于急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)/急性肺损伤(ALI)患者以及预期机械通气时间 72小时的患者,我们推荐给予滋养型或充分的肠内营养,这两种营养补充策略对患者住院第一周预后的影响并无差异。证据质量:高Question: What population of patients in the ICU requires full EN (as close as possible to target nutrition goals) beginning in the first week of hospitalization? How soon should target nutrition goals be reached in these patients?问题:哪些ICU患者住院第一周需要足量EN(尽可能接近目标喂养量)?这些患者应多长时间达到目标量?C3. Based on expert consensus, we suggest that patients who are at high nutrition risk (for example, NRS-2002 5 or NUTRIC score 5, without interleukin-6) or severely malnourished should be advanced toward goal as quickly as tolerated over 2448 hours while monitoring for refeeding syndrome. Efforts to provide 80% of estimated or calculated goal energy and protein within 4872 hours
温馨提示
- 1. 本站所有资源如无特殊说明,都需要本地电脑安装OFFICE2007和PDF阅读器。图纸软件为CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.压缩文件请下载最新的WinRAR软件解压。
- 2. 本站的文档不包含任何第三方提供的附件图纸等,如果需要附件,请联系上传者。文件的所有权益归上传用户所有。
- 3. 本站RAR压缩包中若带图纸,网页内容里面会有图纸预览,若没有图纸预览就没有图纸。
- 4. 未经权益所有人同意不得将文件中的内容挪作商业或盈利用途。
- 5. 人人文库网仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对用户上传分享的文档内容本身不做任何修改或编辑,并不能对任何下载内容负责。
- 6. 下载文件中如有侵权或不适当内容,请与我们联系,我们立即纠正。
- 7. 本站不保证下载资源的准确性、安全性和完整性, 同时也不承担用户因使用这些下载资源对自己和他人造成任何形式的伤害或损失。
最新文档
- 妇产科护理团队协作
- 山东省护理核心制度考核流程详解
- 医养结合模式下的老年护理成本效益分析
- 创新疗法早期临床研究的IRB风险预判机制
- 创伤骨科手术模拟的精准化训练
- 康复护理中的团队协作
- 创伤中心模式下黄金一小时救治流程标准化
- 分级诊疗中患者满意度保障策略
- 分子标志物在消化道早癌预后中的价值
- 出院指导标准化在围手术期管理中的价值
- 地球的公转与四季成因-七年级地理上册教学设计
- 2026年医疗机构医德医风测试题及解析
- 2025高二英语冲刺卷
- 留学行业分析和市场分析报告
- 社区工作者岗前培训
- 安全主任面试题目及答案
- 2025年国企招聘考试(纪检)历届真题及答案(河南)
- 水平定向钻机 安全操作规程
- DBJ61-T 112-2021 高延性混凝土应用技术规程
- 2026版.北京版.高考总复习.语文1-专题五 非连续性文本阅读
- PCSK9抑制剂临床应用
评论
0/150
提交评论