




已阅读5页,还剩18页未读, 继续免费阅读
版权说明:本文档由用户提供并上传,收益归属内容提供方,若内容存在侵权,请进行举报或认领
文档简介
0附录外文翻译英文原文HUMANRESOURCEMANAGEMENTANDTHEINDIVIDUALISATIONOFAUSTRALIANINDUSTRIALRELATIONSABSTRACTBytradition,Australianindustrialrelationshasbeenregulatedbyindustrialawardsandcollectiveagreementsmadeby,orundertheauspicesof,industrialtribunals.Thecentralpartiestotheseagreementsandawardswereemployersandtradeunions.Theindividualemploymentcontractbetweenemployerandemployeewassubjecttothesecollectivearrangementswhich,generallyspeaking,settheminimumfloorofemploymentconditionsfromwhichthepartiescouldnotderogate.Incommonwithothercountries,therewasastrongpushforderegulationofthelabourmarketthroughoutthe1980sandthe1990sinAustralia.In1996theLiberal/NationalPartyCoalitionConservativegovernmentintroducednewfederallabourlawswhichpermittedemployersandemployeestoenterindividualisedemploymentrelationshipsbyexcludingtheoperationofmuchcollectiveregulationfromtheiraffairs.Thispaperexploresthesupposedrationalesforthislegaldevelopment,andoutlinesthelegalconditionswhichareimposeduponthisstatutoryindividualisationprocess.Italsoexaminestheevidenceinordertoaddresscertainquestions.HoweffectivehastheindividualisationprocessbeeninAustralia?Explicitlyorimplicitly,whatsortofemploymentsystemoutcomeswereenvisaged.Whatformsofflexibilityhasitbeenabletointroduceintotheemploymentrelationship?AndtowhatextenthasitbeenabletopromoteahighperformanceHRMagendainAustralianworkplaces?1INTRODUCTIONOverthepasttwodecadestheindividualemploymentrelationshiphasrisentoprominenceasacentralconcerninlabourrelations.Onesourceofthisinteresthas1emergedinthefieldofnewinstitutionaleconomicswhichhaspickedupanddevelopedearlierideasabouttheefficiencyofparticulartypesofemploymentrelationshipsandtheconsequentpreferenceforparticularlegalformsofthatrelationshipoverothers.UnderlyingonestrandofthisHRMoutlookisthedesiretoimprovebusinesscompetitivenessinaglobaleconomythroughastrategicintegrationofenterpriseobjectiveswithemployeeperformanceandcommitment.ThusHRMfocusesupontheelementswhichcanenhancethevalueoftheemployeescontributiontothebusiness-flexibilityinworkperformance(flexibleworkinghoursanddutiesforexample),empowermentoftheemployeethroughparticipationinworkplacedecision-making(includingteamwork,consultativecommitteesandsoon),performancerelatedrewardsystems(suchasprofitsharingandemployeeshareownershipschemes),commitmenttoqualityofserviceorproduct(totalqualitymanagement)andloyaltytothebusinessconcern.Thisis,essentially,amodelofanotionalhightrustorhighperformanceworksystementerprise.Whilstlabourlawyershaveengagedwiththeimplicationsofthenewinstitutionaleconomics,inadditiontograpplingwiththenumerousdifficultiesarisingintheirowndisciplinefromthechallengetothehegemonyofthestandardindividualemploymentcontract,theyhavebeenratherlessenthusiasticinexploringtheimplicationsandprospectsinherentintheHRMhightrustagendaforenterprisestrategyandgovernance.Forexampleasidefromoneortwopartialexercises,untilrecentlytherehadbeennoattemptinthefieldtoprovideathematicelaborationofthestrengthsandweaknessesofthecontractofemploymentasaninstrumentforthedevelopmentoftheHRMproject.OnereasonforthismightbethegeneralrhetoricalnatureofmuchHRMliterature:hightrust,flexibility,commitmentandparticipationarehighlyinexactterms.Asecondreasonundoubtedlyisconnectedwiththepurpose(s)oflabourlaw.Traditionallylabourlawyershaveviewedthepurposeoftheirfieldasdesignedtopromotethepowerof,andprotecttheinterestsof,employeesvis-a-vistheemployerratherthanthereverse.Asaresulttheyhavetendedtobemoreinterestedinthedeunionisationeffectsofindividualisation,thecorrespondingdeclineofcollectiveemployeepower,andtheconsequentenhancementofmanagerialprerogative,thanintheutilisationoftheindividual2relationshiptopromotecompetitiveness.Onesuspects,however,thatthisoutlookhasbeenfundamentallyalteredasaresultofveryrecentdevelopmentsinlabourlaw.ThecardinalcaseinpointistheBritishEmploymentRelationsAct1999,whichappearsatlasttohavebroughtintocloseexplicitrelationshipthecontentoflabourlawandtheagendaofmodernHRM.ThebasisofthisconnectionisthepartnershipatworkmodelwhichembodiesmanyofthecoreideasofhightrustHRM,andwhichalsosubtlyinformstheActsagendaforencouragingandnurturingvoluntaryarrangementsforconsultationandsharingofinformationbetweenmanagementandworkers.2STATUTORYINDIVIDUALISEDEMPLOYMENTAGREEMENTSANDTHEHRMAGENDAOneviewoftheindividualisationprocess,anditisapopularview,isthatitservesmerelytorestoreareasofjobcontroltomanagementpreviouslysharedwith,orexercisedexclusivelyby,unions,andthusallowsemployerstoreducecoststhroughgreaterexploitationoflabour.Thisperspectivealsofitswithmuchoftheavailableevidence,althoughtheevidenceiscontested.Itisclearthatthede-regulatorylabourmarketpoliciesofvariousAustraliangovernmentssincethelate1980s,includingthoseembodiedinthetermsoftheWRA,havetosomedegreebeeninfluencedbyargumentsbasedontheeconomictheorythatfreeandopencompetitivemarketsproducethemostefficientoutcomes.AsimilarsetofideasemergedinasuccessionofIndustrialRelationsPoliciesreleasedbytheConservativeCoalitionPartiesfrom1986onwards.Thosepoliciesalsocommonlystressedco-operation,commonintention,flexibility,andemployeeparticipation.Theassociatedproposaltosupportindividualisationofemploymentrelationswasinitiallyratheroblique.The1986Policyandits1988updatereferred,ratherdisingenuously,toVoluntaryAgreementswhichmightbenegotiatedindividuallybyemployeesorgroupsofemployees.IntheCoalitions1990policystatementVoluntaryAgreementswereatlastdefinedasseparateagreementsbetweentheemployerontheonehandandeachemployeeconcernedontheother.WiththereleaseoftheJobsbackPolicyin1992cautionwasfinallythrowntothewind.Directcontractualarrangementsbetweenemployerandemployee3weredeclaredtobethesinglemostimportantindustrialrelationsreforminAustralia.First,whetherbydesignoraccident,thelegislationassociatedwiththemakingandprocessingofAWAsdoesnotsupport,orevenseriouslysuggest,arequirementforindividualbargainingassuch.ItistruethatthelanguageoftheWRAiscouchedintermsofbargainingoverAWAs.Itallowsforbargainingagentsanditstipulatesthatsuchagentsmustberecognised.However,allthataside,legallytheWRAprovideslittleinthewayofsupportfortheindividualisationprocesstobeabargainedone.Inrealitytheobligationtorecogniseabargainingagentisvacuous.Thereisnoobligationupontheemployertobargain,nortoactingoodfaith.Intheabsenceofsuchrequirements,therecouldbenostatutoryresponsibilitytobargainovermattersarisingfromtheHRMagenda.Theempiricalevidenceresultingfromsurveyworkislessclearcut.Inhisreportbasedonthe1998NationalInstituteofLabourStudiesWorkplaceManagementSurvey,WoodenconcludedthatemployerspursuingindividualisticemploymentarrangementsweremorelikelyalsotobehighcommitmentworkplacescharacterisedbyHRMfeaturessuchasconsensusdecision-making,teamworkandinformationsharing.7ThisfindingisdirectlycontrarytothestudyofindividualisedworkplacesundertakenbyDeeryandWalshbasedupontheAustralianWorkplaceIndustrialRelationsSurvey1995.Thatstudyindicatedthatwhennegotiationsweretotakeplacetheoverwhelmingpreferenceofindividualisingfirmswasfordirectnegotiationswithindividualemployees,ratherthanwithunionofficialsorcollectivegroupsofemployees.Howeverthestudyalsofoundthatnegotiationsofanysortoverworkplaceissueswereuncommonamongstindividualisingemployers,thattheoverwhelmingmajorityofsuchfirmshadnotenteredintosuchnegotiationsduringtheprevious12months,andthatlessthanonethirdofthemhadnegotiatedoverstaffinglevels,wageincreases,occupationalhealthandsafety,technology,andchangesinworkpractices.Tocompoundthissituation,onlyaminorityofindividualisingworkplaceshadinplacequalitycircles,semi-autonomousgroupsandcontinuousimprovementmethods.Inshort,inemploymentpracticethereseemstobelittleevidenceofacausalconnectionbetweenindividualisationasaprocessandtheadoptionofahightrustagenda.4Oneveryobviouseffectoftheindividualisationprocesshasbeenthecorrespondingderecognitionorexclusionofunionsfromworkplacegovernance.ThisisalsoafindingcommontoAustraliaandBritain.InAustralia,twothirdsofindividualisedworkplaceshadnounionpresenceaccordingtoarecentstudy,andinmanyindustriesandenterpriseswherethereisunionpresencetheirresistancepowerhasbeenweakenedbylegalandlabourmarketfactors.Oneoutcomeofthis,ofcourse,hasbeenaconsequentrestorationofunilateralpowertomanagement,asunionrestraintsandcontrolsattheworkplacehavebeenrolledback.TheprovisionsoftheActofferassistancetoemployersincreatingtheconditionsinwhichunionsmaymoreeasilybeexcluded,andhencethroughwhichindividualisedemploymentrelationsmightbeintroduced,thoughitisclearthattherearelimitstothisprocess.However,asindicatedearlier,theevidencedoesnotsuggestthatemployersareseekingtoutilisetheirrecoveredand/orextendedmanagerialpowersforhightrustHRMpurposes.InAustralianworkplaceswheresubstantialdeunionisationwastakingplaceDeeryandWalshfoundnoevidencethathightrustHRMpolicieswerebeingusedasunionsubstitutiondevices.Ironicallytheirstudysuggestedthatteambuilding;taskforces/adhoccommittees;regularmeetingsbetweenemployeesandmanagement;jointconsultativecommittees;suggestionschemes;and,grievanceproceduresweresignificantlymorelikelytobeassociatedwithworkplacesthathadstableorincreasinglevelsofunionisation.InsomerespectsthisevidenceonceagainmatchestheBritishfindings.Greatermanagerialdiscretiontosettermsandconditionsofemployment,accordingtoamajorBritishstudy,didnotnecessarilyimplyanenhancedroleforindividualcontractsasincentivedevicesforelicitingemployeeco-operation.RathertheBritishevidenceindicatedthatthekeyeffectofindividualisationhasbeentheenhancedcapacityofmanagementtobringaboutdesiredflexibilities,includingfunctionalflexibilities,throughtheopportunitytosetemploymentconditionsatwill.IntheabsenceofprogressthroughthesetwoavailableroutestotheHRMorhighperformanceemploymentsystemtypeenterprise,itisnecessarytoreturntoa5considerationofwhatrolethestatemightplaythroughitslegislationandinstitutions,inpursuingthisagenda.Itisnecessarytobearinmindherethatitisonethingtolegislatefortheprotectionofminimumstandardsthroughtheestablishmentoflegalrights,andquiteanothertolegislatetoattempttobringaboutattitudinalchangeonthepartofthepartiestoarelationship.AsCollinshaspointedoutinthecaseofrecentBritishemploymentlegislation,regulatingfortrust,co-operationandflexibilitypresentsthelegislatorwithaverydifficulttask.Asaresulttheremaybeaconsiderablegapbetweenpolicyaspirationandregulatoryspecifics.UnliketheBritishEmploymentRelationsAct1999,theWRAcontainsnospecificprovisionforthespendingofmoneyonthepromotionofco-operativeworkpractices.HoweverthereisacleareducativeandpromotionalchartersetdownfortheEmploymentAdvocateinthetermsoftheWRA,muchofitfocussedupontheAWAregime.AmongitsfunctionstheEmploymentAdvocateischargedwithprovidingadvicetoemployersandemployees,inconnectionwithAWAs.Inperformingthisfunction,theEmploymentAdvocatemusthaveparticularregardtoassistingworkerstobalanceworkandfamilyresponsibilitiesandtopromotingbetterworkandmanagementpracticesthroughAustralianworkplaceagreements.Inshort,thereisclearscopeintheseprovisionsfortheEmploymentAdvocatetopromotetheHRMagendaandotherworkplacechangethroughadvice,suggestionandeducationofthepartiestotheemploymentrelationship.Aswasthecasewiththeindividualagreementsconcept,plansforthedevelopmentofahighproportionofemployeeshare-ownershipinenterpriseshasbeenontheagendasinceatleastthelate1980s,andinrelationtothisissueitisclearthatbothpolicyandregulatoryinitiativesfairlyunambiguouslyfittheco-operativeorpartnershipstrategy.SinceitcametoofficetheCoalitiongovernmenthaslegislatedtorestructurethetaxsysteminvariouswaysinordertofacilitateandencouragegreatershareownershipamongemployees,orinwayswhichareatleastbeneficialtosuchschemes.Inadditionthegovernmenthasintervenedinthecorporationslawarea,removingprospectusrequirementsforsomeclassesofemployeeshareschemes.Insummarythen,weseeinthesevariousregulatorymeasuresalegalandinstitutional6frameworknotnecessarilydirectedtowards,orsuitedto,thepropagationofacooperativehightrustmodelofHRMinAustralianenterprises.Thegovernmentiswillingtointerveneandleadthewayinrelationtosomeassociatedpolicies(suchasemployeeshareownership)butnotwithrespecttoothers(suchasemployeeparticipationindecision-making).Andapartfromverylimitedexceptions,individualisationsitsastheonemajorinitiativeintheWRAwhichcanclearlybeidentifiedasdirectlyassociatedwiththeHRMstrategy.3THELEGALFRAMEWORKForexampletheTaxationLawAmendmentAct(No.2)1995(Cth.)(providedamoregeneroustaxationbaseforemployeeshareholdingbyincreasingthetaxexemptionlimit);ANewTax(IncomeTaxLawAmendment)Act1999(Cth.)(reducedcapitalgainsratesandloweredincometaxratesonincomederivedfromemployeeheldshares);andtheCorporateLawEconomicReformAct1999(Cth).Aswenotedearlier,theActpayslipservicetotheideathatanAWAisaresultofnegotiation:itprovidesforthepartiestoappointbargainingagentsandtotakeprotectedindustrialactioninthecourseofnegotiations.However,theActanticipatesthatmorecommonlytheemployerwilldrafttheAWAandpresentittotheemployeeonatake-it-or-leave-itbasis.TheemployerisrequiredtogivetheemployeeacopyoftheAWAtogetherwithaninformationstatementpreparedbytheEAandmustexplaintheeffectoftheAWAtotheotherparty.Thereisaminimumcooling-offperiod(fivedaysforexistingemployees;14daysfornewemployees)beforesigning.Theonlyrecognitionoftheimbalanceofbargainingpowerisfoundinthelegislativeprohibitionsagainstduress,misleadinginformation,threatsandintimidation.ThecontentofanAWAislargelyleftforthepartiestodetermine,althoughaswenotedearlierthereisbroadgeneralscopefortheEAtoprovideassistanceandguidanceonthesematters.Section170VGoftheActimposesonlythreeexplicitrequirementsoncontent.First,eachAWAmustcontainaprovisionprohibitingvarioustypesofdiscriminationasproscribedbytheregulations;iftheAWAomitsthisclause,theAWAistakentoincludetheregulatorytext.Second,theAWAmustcontainadisputeresolutionprocedureofsomesort;ifoneisnotincluded,themodelprocedurefoundintheregulations(providingforbilateral7discussionsbeforeconciliationorarbitration)applies.Finally,theAWAmustnotprohibitorrestrictdisclosureofitsdetailsbyeitherparty.InordertotakeeffectasanAWA,theagreementmustbelodgedfortheapprovaloftheEAwithin21daysofitssigning.TheemployermustattachadeclarationthattheAWAcomplieswiththestatutoryrequirementsanddisclosewhetherornotithasofferedanAWAinthesametermstoallcomparableemployees.TheEAmustissueafilingreceiptwherethesefilingrequirementshavebeenmet(or,iftheyhavenotbeenmet,wherethereisnodisadvantagetoeitherparty).TheEAmustapprovetheAWAifitissatisfiedthatallofthestatutoryrequirementsaremetandifitissurethatitpassestheno-disadvantagetest.38TheAWApassesthistestifitdoesnotdisadvantagetheemployeeinrelationtotheirtermsandconditionsofemploymentieifitdoesnotresult,onbalance,inareductionintheoveralltermsandconditionsofemploymentenjoyedunderthelegislationandtheawardwhichwouldotherwiseapplytotheemployee39(or,ifnoawardapplies,theawardwhichisdeemedbytheEAtobeappropriateforthepurposeofcomparison40).IftheEAisnotsurethattheAWApassesthetest,itcanresolveitsconcernsbyacceptingundertakingsfromtheemployer41orbycondoningotheraction.Ifitsconcernsarenotresolvedinthisway,theEAmustrefertheAWAtotheAustralianIndustrialRelationsCommission(theCommission).IftheCommissionissatisfiedthattheAWApassestheno-disadvantagetest(anditmayresolveitsownconcernsbyacceptingundertakings)itmustapprovetheAWA.EveniftheAWAfailstheno-disadvantagetestbutitisnotcontrarytothepublicinteresttoapprovetheAWA,theCommissionmustalsoapprovetheAWA;alegislativenotesuggeststhatthismightoccurwheremakingtheAWAispartofareasonablestrategytodealwithashort-termcrisisbusinesscrisis.Thefilingandapprovalprocessisprivateandconfidential.Thirdpartiesarenotpermittedtointerveneatanystagetheprocess.Allproceedingsoccurheldinprivateandtheofficialsinvolvedarenotpermittedtodisclosetheidentityofthepartiesonpainofimprisonment(subjecttosomeexceptions).Duringitsperiodofoperation,breachesoftheAWAareprohibited,asisthetakingof8industrialactionbeforethenominalexpirydate.Apartymayenforcetheseprohibitionsincourtbyseekingapenalty(maximum$10,000forabodycorporateor$2,000inothercases),injunctionsand/ordamages.Threecrucialaspectsofthislegalframeworkshouldbenoted.First,amajorincentivetoemployersforusingAWAsliesinthefactthatitispossibleforthemtofashiontheiremploymentsystemsaroundtheuseofindividualisedarrangementstotheexclusionofmostexternalcollectiveformsofregulation.AwardsarecompletelyexcludedbyAWAs.Certifiedagreementsmadewithunionsmaybeexcludediftheemployerstructuresitsemploymentarrangementsaccordingly.Evenifcertifiedagreementsareoperativeintheworkplace,AWAsmaystillbeusedasanadditionalsourceofrightsandobligationsprovidedtheydonotconflictwiththetermsofthecertifiedagreement.Furthermore,manyotherstate-basedlabourlawsmaybeexcludedbyoperationofanAWA.Secondly,atthesametimethereseemslittledoubtthatthesheervolumeoftechnicalandadministrativerequirementsinmaking,negotiatingandfilingconstitutesamajordisincentivetoemployersinutilisingtheprocess.Thirdly,theevidenceseemstosuggestthatnodisadvantagetesthasnotprovedaveryeffectivelegaldeviceinpreventingunder-awarddealsbeingstruckthroughenterprise-basedbargaining.Wereturntothisissueintheconcludingsectionofthispaper.4THEPROGRESSOFINDIVIDUALISATIONANDTHEPROMOTIONOFPOLICYMeasuredintermsofAWAapprovalsonly,theprogressofindividualisationinAustralianworkplacesappearstobeslightatbest.TheAWAprovisionsoftheWRAbecameeffectiveinMarch1997.BytheendofOctoberthatyear,amere3,350AWAsinvolving164employershadbeenapprovedbytheEA,althoughafurther198hadbeenreferredonforconsiderationbytheAIRC.Subsequentincreasesweresteady,butslow.BytheendofOctober1998,thenumberofapprovalshadrisento7,500,withafurther6,500underconsideration.TheOfficeoftheEAannouncedthearrivalofamilestone,50,000AWAapprovalson23rdofFebruary1999.BytheendofOctober2000,thisfigurehadincreasedtoalmost135,000.Atthatstageatotalof2,577Australianemployershadsuccessfully9processedAWAscoveringsome,orall,oftheiremployees.Despitetheincreasingtrendintherateofapprovals,whichappearsinanycasetohavelevelledofftosomedegree,AWAsstatisticallyconstituteonlyaveryminoraspectofAustralianindustrialregulation,coveringatinyproportionofthew
温馨提示
- 1. 本站所有资源如无特殊说明,都需要本地电脑安装OFFICE2007和PDF阅读器。图纸软件为CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.压缩文件请下载最新的WinRAR软件解压。
- 2. 本站的文档不包含任何第三方提供的附件图纸等,如果需要附件,请联系上传者。文件的所有权益归上传用户所有。
- 3. 本站RAR压缩包中若带图纸,网页内容里面会有图纸预览,若没有图纸预览就没有图纸。
- 4. 未经权益所有人同意不得将文件中的内容挪作商业或盈利用途。
- 5. 人人文库网仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对用户上传分享的文档内容本身不做任何修改或编辑,并不能对任何下载内容负责。
- 6. 下载文件中如有侵权或不适当内容,请与我们联系,我们立即纠正。
- 7. 本站不保证下载资源的准确性、安全性和完整性, 同时也不承担用户因使用这些下载资源对自己和他人造成任何形式的伤害或损失。
最新文档
- 滕州市初三数学考试卷及答案
- 市场营销策划考试题库及答案
- 2025年西藏自治区事业单位招聘考试综合类专业能力测试试卷(建筑类)试题及答案
- 2025年南京市事业单位招聘考试科技常识真题模拟试卷
- 衡阳初一考试题库及答案
- 河南中专的考试题及答案
- 绩效考核体系创新-洞察与解读
- 总经理个人年度工作总结范文汇报
- 2025国考南京市经济分析岗位申论模拟题及答案
- 2025国考鞍山市科研技术岗位申论高频考点及答案
- 达芬奇手术器械处理流程及质控要点
- (完整版)新概念英语第一册单词表(打印版)
- 员工履历表(标准样本)
- 人教版历史七年级上册第一单元《史前时期:原始社会与中华文明的起源》检测试题
- 北京市《配电室安全管理规范》(DB11T 527-2021)地方标准
- 《鱼》初中生物教学设计教案
- 2024年贵阳智慧城市运营发展集团有限公司招聘笔试冲刺题(带答案解析)
- 农村宅基地转让协议书
- 输尿管结石课件
- 排球竞赛规则2021-2021电子版
- 护理书写中的潜在法律问题
评论
0/150
提交评论