翻译老外细数‘西方女权’的卑劣极其产生背景(二)极其.doc

Maybe the ancestor of CEDAW - the 1946 UN Commission on the Status of Women - had good intentions. But those good intentions have been high jacked by CEDAW. Instead of improving the welfare and securing basic rights for women in the poorer nations, CEDAWs main game is transforming society in the West. The Optional Protocol will be used by individuals and NGOs in the West to achieve radical social change that national parliaments would never dare consider, because their members have to face voters. Its through UN treaties such as CEDAW and the UN Charter of Human Rights that homosexual relationships will achieve the legal status of marriage.（也许消除妇女歧视公约委员会的前身成立于1946年的联合国妇女地位委员会的初衷是好的。但是她们的初衷和目的已经被后来的消除妇女歧视公约委员会的渣滓们所劫持和篡改。她们已经不局限于提高妇女的基本权力用于保障妇女基本人生安全和社会福利，而是妄想按照她们的游戏规则来改造西方社会，任择公约被西方的一些非政府组织机构和不怀好意的个人所利用，以便完成她们所希望的社会剧变，而国会根本没有胆量对此现象提出质疑和过问，因为要当上国会成员，必须来源于这些选举人的投票。此外，有关同性恋婚姻合法化的具体政策措施也是通过诸如消除妇女歧视公约以及联合国人权宣言的各项条文来进行。）The most cursory glance over the countries that have signed and ratified CEDAW makes the whole thing a sick joke. The first three are Albania, Algeria and Angola, hardly well-known for their equal treatment of women. Burundi - where people regularly hack each other to death with machetes - has signed. So has Cambodia, of the killing-fields fame. China has signed too, even though it performs third trimester abortions - read infanticide - on unwilling women.（所有签约和认可该项公约组织条文的大多数国家都是仓促草率的，不自觉地给自己的国家开了个恶心的玩笑。最先签约的三个国家是阿尔巴尼亚阿尔及利亚和安哥拉，这三个国家在女性平等权益事务上几乎碌碌无闻，布隆迪一个民众普遍充满暴力倾向，互相用双刃刀砍自残的疯狂国家也签了该项公约。签约的国家还有被誉为杀戮地带的柬埔寨，中国也签定了公约，即使在其对国内孕妇强制引产堕胎的政策推行依然进行的情况下。）Needless to say, Canada and Australia, both of whose governments are heavily feminist influenced, have signed. To its eternal credit, the US has not.（更不要说像加拿大和澳大利亚这种政府被女权理念渗透及其严重的国家也签署了该公约，为了表示国际信用，美国自己反而不签。）So, thats the overall picture. Now lets look at whats behind feminism.（所以这就是大致情形，现在让我们来看看女权主义的背后是什么）。Modern radical feminism is founded on contradictory lies. The fact that theyre lies doesnt matter, because truth is always secondary for ideologues. The fact that theyre contradictory is no source of shame, because feminists believe that logic is just a tool of the patriarchy to oppress women and that women have other, and superior, ways of knowing 4.（现代激进的女权主义分子的所有理论是建立在自相矛盾的谎言上。现实是，她们对自己的谎言根本无所谓，因为就算是事实，在她们所持有的理想主义面前，也永远是二等公民的地位。她们自相矛盾，不知羞耻。因为这些女权分子坚信逻辑是父权社会用来压迫女性的工具，她们始终认为女人应该有比逻辑思维更好更优秀的认知方式。）The first lie is that men and women are interchangeable, and that there arent any differences between the sexes apart from anatomical ones. In fact, feminists claim that there arent two sexes at all but at least five genders, which are socially constructed. They regard heterosexual men and women as being hopelessly repressed in gender stereotypes forced upon them by society. Their lifes mission is to liberate us from these imposed stereotypes.（女权分子的第一个谎言，就是男人和女人可以交换角色，是可以人为塑造的，并且在她们眼里，除了解剖学上的差别，男人和女人没有任何差异，女权分子申称人类没有两性，而是至少应该存在着5个性别，而这些所谓的性别都是通过社会塑造而来的。她们把异性恋的正常男女看作是社会主流性别意识形态大环境压迫下毫无希望的产物。而她们的终极任务就是将我们从传统性别意识形态的束缚下解放出来。）To achieve the interchangeability, feminists at first tirelessly promoted the traditional male life pattern of un-interrupted full-time work as the norm for women. Creches and childcare were demanded to free women from domesticity, whether they wanted to be freed or not. In Australia, groups such as the Womens Electoral Lobby fought to change Australias tax system from a family-friendly one to a profoundly unjust one where a married man with a family pays virtually the same tax as a single man. They won, and their victory clearly shows the contempt for ordinary women that is the hallmark of feminism.（为了完成她们男女两性颠倒的任务，女权分子首先就孜孜不倦的将传统男性的全职工作养家的生活方式强制转变为女性的常规生活方式。因此大办托儿所能够满足让广大女性从家庭中解放出来的需要，完全不用考虑这些女性是否愿意享受这种所谓的自由。在澳大利亚，一个叫妇女选举游说小组的组织致力于和澳洲的税务系统进行抗争，结果彻底把一个原先有利于家庭维持的税收方案硬生生的改造为一个不公平的税收方案，即：婚后承担家庭开支的男性和未婚单身男性必须收同样的税。结果她们胜利了，她们的这种胜利赤裸裸的反应出女权主义霸权对普通大众妇女的蔑视。）But seeing as ignoring babies doesnt go down too well with most mothers, feminists have changed tack. If they cant force women to be like men, then theyll force men to be like women. The sexes MUST be interchangeable for their gender theory to work. This is behind the increasingly hectoring calls for men to avail themselves of the opportunity of part-time work and to do more domestic work out of fairness. Australian academic Ken Dempsey deplores the fact that most of the women in his surveys on domestic work perversely fail to see theyre oppressed 5.（但是，由于大多数女人的天性决定其无法忽略对孩子的照顾和依恋，这迫使女权分子的工作无法很好的进展下去，于是她们就开始换了新的计量，如果她们无法迫使女人和男人一样，那就迫使让男人变成女人。因为按照她们的工作理论，性别必须可以被转换，背后她们所用的方法，就是不断的恐吓男性，并要求他们寻找干临时工的机会，以及完全用不公平的手段强迫让男人多干家务。澳洲大学的Ken Dempsey根据他所做过的有一项有关家务活的调查中反映：大多数的女人都不认为家务活是家庭对自己的拖累和压榨，但是他还是在感情上强烈抵触这一自己调查出的事实。）These academics cant even see how absurd, let alone insulting they are to the men and women of Australia. What business of theirs is it how couples organize their domestic life? In any case, their concern is hypocritical: feminist high-flyers dont share the domestic chores as they exhort the lower orders to. No, they employ household help. They dont have part-time work either. No, they have well-paying full-time careers 6.（这些所谓的专家学者连自己的荒谬都看不出，更别提他们是否会意识到自己的所作所为对于澳洲男女构成了一种多大的侮辱。关于夫妻如何安排家庭生活的事，他们到底能帮些什么忙？无论如何，可以看出他们对妇女所谓的关心是出于多么虚伪的一面：女权分子的野心家们自己从不干家务琐事，她们却对庶民的家庭琐事却格外关心起来，并用命令的方式将自己的理念强加于别人。哦对了，她们自己的家里还请了佣人，她们也不干临时工。哦对了，而且她们自己还有一份报酬丰厚的全职工作。）The first lie was that there are no differences between the sexes. The second and contradictory lie is that women are in fact superior to men. Increasingly, feminists claim that maleness is some sort of pathology, in need of a cure. And so there is a widespread demonization of men in our culture, with disastrous effects on young males who are made to feel ashamed of their sex and to scorn the manly virtues. And then politicians, academics and social commentators have the hide to express concern about male suicide rates.（女权分子的第一个谎言是两性之间没有差异。而第二个自相矛盾的谎言是女人实际上比男人更优秀。女权分子不断的申称男性特征是一种异常的病理现象，是一种需要治疗的疾病。如此一来，在我们的文化体系中就形成了铺天盖地针对男性的各种妖魔化信息，这给年轻的男性们造成毁灭性打击，因为他们会对自己的性别产生耻辱感，对于自身男性特有的积极品质也会给与谴责和否定直至丧失。而政治家们，学者们，以及社会评论家们，却故意掩盖的男性自杀率，故意忽略对此现象的关注。Increasingly men are being regarded and treated as second class citizens, being freely discriminated against in employment via affirmative action programmes. Feminists contemptuously dismiss the achievements of Western civilization as the product of dead white males. And theyre doing their best to overthrow it and replace it with their own socialist hell where every facet of life will be regimented, even down to doing the housework. Its already happened in one German state 7.（男性不断的被当作二等公民对待，在所谓平权行动方案的干涉下，男人们在职场上被迫遭受逆向歧视。女权分子对已故的白人男性们所创造的西方文明果实嗤之以鼻，并且千方百计地想要颠覆它，妄想把它替换为她们心中所梦淫的社会主义乌托邦地狱，在这个地狱中，人们所有生活的方方面面，下至家务劳动都要被监管。德国的某个州就已经发生了这种情况。）Yet Australian feminists continue to feed the media with this arrant nonsense that one in four Australian women has been raped. And the lies continue, though Im beginning to think they originate in stupidity more than malice. For instance, one feminist academic wrote the following nonsense to me after I politely chided her for slandering all men as violent. She wrote, The Womens Safety Survey, a national survey conducted by the Australian Bureau of Statistics (most recently 1996) of 6,880,500 women aged 18 years and over, found t