




已阅读5页,还剩27页未读, 继续免费阅读
版权说明:本文档由用户提供并上传,收益归属内容提供方,若内容存在侵权,请进行举报或认领
文档简介
3/20/2019,-,1,PointEstimation:OddsRatios,HazardRatios,RiskDifferences,Precision,ElizabethS.GOncologyBiostatisticsMarch20,2019,ClinicalTrialsin20Hours,3/20/2019,-,2,PointEstimation,Definition:A“pointestimate”isaone-numbersummaryofdata.Ifyouhadjustonenumbertosummarizetheinferencefromyourstudy.Examples:Dosefindingtrials:MTD(maximumtolerabledose)SafetyandEfficacyTrials:responserate,mediansurvivalComparativeTrials:Oddsratio,hazardratio,3/20/2019,-,3,TypesofVariables,Thepointestimateyouchoosedependsonthe“nature”oftheoutcomeofinterestContinuousVariablesExamples:changeintumorvolumeortumordiameterCommonlyusedpointestimates:mean,medianBinaryVariablesExamples:response,progression,50%reductionintumorsizeCommonlyusedpointestimate:proportion,relativerisk,oddsratioTime-to-Event(Survival)VariablesExamples:timetoprogression,timetodeath,timetorelapseCommonlyusedpointestimates:mediansurvival,k-yearsurvival,hazardratioOthertypesofvariables:nominalcategorical,ordinalcategorical,3/20/2019,-,4,Today,PointEstimatescommonlyseen(andmisunderstood)inclinicaloncologyoddsratioriskdifferencehazardratio/riskratio,3/20/2019,-,5,PointEstimates:OddsRatios,“Age,Sex,andRacialDifferencesintheUseofStandardAdjuvantTherapyforColorectalCancer”,Potosky,Harlan,Kaplan,Johnson,Lynch.JCO,vol.20(5),March2019,p.1192.Example:Isgenderassociatedwithuseofstandardadjuvanttherapy(SAT)forpatientswithnewlydiagnosedstageIIIcolonorstageII/IIIrectalcancer?53%ofmenreceivedSAT*62%ofwomenreceivedSAT*Howdowequantifythedifference?,*adjustedforothervariables,3/20/2019,-,6,OddsandOddsRatios,Odds=p/(1-p)TheoddsofamanreceivingSATis0.53/(1-0.53)=1.13.TheoddsofawomanreceivingSATis0.62/(1-0.62)=1.63.OddsRatio=1.63/1.13=1.44Interpretation:“Awomanis1.44timesmorelikelytoreceiveSATthanaman.”,3/20/2019,-,7,OddsRatio,OddsRatioforcomparingtwoproportionsOR1:increasedriskofgroup1comparedto2OR=1:nodifferenceinriskofgroup1comparedto2OR0:increasedrisklogOR=0:nodifferenceinrisklogOR0:decreasedrisk,3/20/2019,-,12,RelatedMeasuresofRisk,RelativeRisk:RR=p1/p2RR=0.62/0.53=1.17.Differentwayofdescribingasimilarideaofrisk.Generally,interpretation“inwords”isthesimilar:“Womenareat1.17timesaslikelyasmentoreceiveSAT”RRisappropriateintrialsoften.But,RRisnotappropriateinmanysettings(e.g.case-controlstudies)NeedtobeclearaboutRRversusOR:p1=0.50,p2=0.25.RR=0.5/0.25=2OR=(0.5/0.5)/(0.25/0.75)=3Sameresults,butORandRRgivequitedifferentmagnitude,3/20/2019,-,13,RelatedMeasuresofRisk,RiskDifference:p1-p2Insteadofcomparingriskviaaratio,wecomparerisksviaadifference.InmanyCTs,thegoalistoincreaseresponseratebyafixedpercentage.Example:thecurrentsuccess/responseratetoaparticulartreatmentis0.20.Thegoalfornewtherapyisaresponserateof0.40.Ifthisgoalisreached,thenthe“riskdifference”willbe0.20.,3/20/2019,-,14,WhydowesooftenseeORandnotothers?,(1)Logisticregression:Allowsustolookatassociationbetweentwovariables,adjustedforothervariables.“Output”isalogoddsratio.Example:InthegenderSATexample,theoddsratioswereevaluatedusinglogisticregression.Inreality,thegenderSAToddsratioisadjustedforage,race,yearofdx,region,maritalstatus,.(2)Canbemoregloballyapplied.Designofstudydoesnotrestrictusage.,3/20/2019,-,15,AnotherExample,“RandomizedControlledTrialofSingle-AgentPaclitaxelVersusCyclophosphamide,Doxorubicin,andCisplatininPatientswithRecurrentOvarianCancerWhoRespondedtoFirst-linePlatinum-BasedRegimens”,Cantu,Parma,Rossi,Floriani,Bonazzi,DellAnna,Torri,Colombo.JCO,vol.20(5),March2019,p.1232.Groups:paclitaxel(n=47)versusCAP(n=47)“14patientsintheCAPgroupand8patientsinthepaclitaxelgrouphadcompleteresponsesp1=14/47=0.30;p2=8/47=0.17OR=(0.30/0.70)/(0.17/0.83)=2.1,3/20/2019,-,16,OddsRatiovia2x2table,“14patientsintheCAPgroupand8patientsinthepaclitaxelgrouphadcompleteresponses“PatientsintheCAPgrouparetwiceaslikelytohaveaCRasthoseinthepaclitaxelgroup.”2x2Tableapproach:OR=ad/bc=(14*39)/(8*33)=2.1,3/20/2019,-,17,“RandomizedControlledTrialofSingle-AgentPaclitaxelVersusCyclophosphamide,Doxorubicin,andCisplatininPatientswithRecurrentOvarianCancerWhoRespondedtoFirst-linePlatinum-BasedRegimens”,Cantu,Parma,Rossi,Floriani,Bonazzi,DellAnna,Torri,Colombo.JCO,vol.20(5),March2019,p.1232.,PointEstimates:HazardRatios,“WhatistheeffectofCAPonoverallsurvivalascomparedtopaclitaxel?”MediansurvivalinCAPgroupwas34.7months.Mediansurvivalinpaclitaxelgroupwas25.8months.But,mediansurvivaldoesnttellthewholestory.,3/20/2019,-,18,HazardRatio,ComparesriskofeventintwopopulationsorsamplesRatioofriskingroup1toriskingroup2Firstthingsfirst.Kaplan-MeierCurves(product-limitestimate)Makesa“picture”ofsurvival,3/20/2019,-,19,HazardRatios,Assumption:“Proportionalhazards”Theriskdoesnotdependontime.Thatis,“riskisconstantovertime”Butthatisstillvague.HypotheticalExample:Assumehazardratiois2.Patientsinstandardtherapygroupareattwicetheriskofdeathasthoseinnewdrug,atanygivenpointintime.Hazardfunction=P(dieattimet|survivedtotimet),3/20/2019,-,20,HazardRatios,HazardRatio=hazardfunctionforStdhazardfunctionforNewMakestheassumptionthatthisratioisconstantovertime.,3/20/2019,-,21,HazardRatios,HazardRatio=hazardfunctionforPachazardfunctionforCAPMakestheassumptionthatthisratioisconstantovertime.,HR=2,3/20/2019,-,22,HazardRatios,HazardRatio=hazardfunctionforPachazardfunctionforCAPMakestheassumptionthatthisratioisconstantovertime.,HR=2,HR=2,3/20/2019,-,23,InterpretationAgain,Foranyfixedpointintime,individualsinthestandardtherapygroupareattwicetheriskofdeathasthenewdruggroup.,HR=2,HR=2,3/20/2019,-,24,Hazardratioisnotalwaysvalid.,HazardRatio=.71,3/20/2019,-,25,CAPvs.Paclitaxel,HazardRatioforProgressionFreeSurvival:0.60forCAPvs.Paclitaxel,3/20/2019,-,26,CAPvs.Paclitaxel,HazardRatioforOverallSurvival:0.58forCAPvs.Paclitaxel,3/20/2019,-,27,IntroductiontoPrecisionIssues,PrecisionVariabilityTwokindsofvariabilitywetendtodealwithvariationinthepopulation:howmuchdoindividualstendtodifferfromoneanother?varianceofstatistics:howcertainareweofourestimateoftheoddsratio?Theremightbegreatvariabilityinthepopulation,butwithalargesamplesize,wecanhaveverygoodprecisionforasamplestatistic.,3/20/2019,-,28,StandardDeviation,StandarddeviationmeasureshowmuchvariabilitythereisinavariableacrossindividualsinthepopulationCD20ExpressioninHodgkinandReed-SternbergCellsofClassicalHodgkinsDisease:AssociationswithPresentingFeaturesandClinicalOutcome,Rassidakis,Mederios,Viviani
温馨提示
- 1. 本站所有资源如无特殊说明,都需要本地电脑安装OFFICE2007和PDF阅读器。图纸软件为CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.压缩文件请下载最新的WinRAR软件解压。
- 2. 本站的文档不包含任何第三方提供的附件图纸等,如果需要附件,请联系上传者。文件的所有权益归上传用户所有。
- 3. 本站RAR压缩包中若带图纸,网页内容里面会有图纸预览,若没有图纸预览就没有图纸。
- 4. 未经权益所有人同意不得将文件中的内容挪作商业或盈利用途。
- 5. 人人文库网仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对用户上传分享的文档内容本身不做任何修改或编辑,并不能对任何下载内容负责。
- 6. 下载文件中如有侵权或不适当内容,请与我们联系,我们立即纠正。
- 7. 本站不保证下载资源的准确性、安全性和完整性, 同时也不承担用户因使用这些下载资源对自己和他人造成任何形式的伤害或损失。
最新文档
- 涂料调配工综合考核试卷及答案
- 电机定子防氧化工艺考核试卷及答案
- 森林树种改良与土壤改良工艺考核试卷及答案
- 租赁业务员基础考核试卷及答案
- 2024-2025学年广东省深圳市育才三中七年级(下)开学英语试卷
- 新医科视域下口腔医学继续教育课程思政建设:现实困境与路径策略
- 药物制剂技术期末试题及答案
- 特种设备安全法及场厂内专用机动车辆使用规定知识试卷
- 绿化专业考试试题及答案
- 机械专业钳工试题及答案
- 施工项目管理手册范本
- 苏州大学医学部操作技能直接观察评估(DOPS)评分表
- FIDIC银皮书(中英文对照)
- 新安天玉混炼胶产品
- 云南大学博士、硕士研究生学位论文写作规范
- JIS G3507-1-2021 冷镦用碳素钢.第1部分:线材
- 第11章-网络故障诊断及排除ppt课件(全)
- 初二家长会ppt通用PPT课件
- 战略管理2015-2-11
- 村民自治中存在问题的分析报告
- 三年级作文指导暑假趣事(课堂PPT)
评论
0/150
提交评论