中国中西医结合杂志_第1页
中国中西医结合杂志_第2页
中国中西医结合杂志_第3页
中国中西医结合杂志_第4页
中国中西医结合杂志_第5页
已阅读5页,还剩36页未读 继续免费阅读

下载本文档

版权说明:本文档由用户提供并上传,收益归属内容提供方,若内容存在侵权,请进行举报或认领

文档简介

Bioterrorism:InvestigationFlorida,Washington,DCarea,NewYorkCity/ConnecticutInvestigationlaunchedimmediatelywith1stvictim(FLmedia),closedAugust2008withpurportedidentificationofsuspect(Ivins,USAMRIID)7-yearinvestigation;estimated$1Bdirect/indirectmeasurablecosts;terror/fear/uncertainty;massiveinvestmentsinnewbiosecurityRrealizationofmanyvulnerabilitiesandshortfalls(manyremain),Confirmationthat“alittlecangoalongway(makeabigmess)”,ElementsoftheCrimes,WasaCrimeCommitted?Microbeusedasaweaponwithdeliverysystem,couldnothaveoriginatedfromnaturalcontaminationoraccidentResultedindeathandillnessDamagetoandmisuseofGovernment-ownedpropertyandinfrastructure.ViolationsofFederallaw(Indictment,Prosecution)TerrorismMisuseofbiologicalagents(BiologicalWeaponsAntiterrorismstatute)Homicideandattemptedhomicide“Property”and“misuse”elementsInterstateelements.(hereswheretheprosecutorswouldhave“piledon”),CourseoftheInvestigation,NumerousAvenuesPursuedTraditionalInvestigation,Positive/NegativeIntelligenceandForeign,Positive/NegativeScientific/ForensicNumerousTwists,Turns,DeadEnds;ExternalSpeculation,DistractionsandStimuliScience(Ostensibly)ProvidesVitalLinkandAidsinNarrowingPossibleSuspectsandSourcesof“MicrobeofInterest”:Qsamples(atleasttwobatches)letters,victims,mailbox,sitestoDugwayandUSAMRIIDInvestigationFocusesonLimitedNumberofPossibleSuspects(ProcessofElimination/Inclusion)Ivins,StandardsofProofinUSSystem,NoCauseorSuspicionReasonableSuspicion(Events/Circumstances,Contacts,Interviews/Interrogation,Non-IntrusiveMethodsNoExpectationofPrivacy)ProbableCause(ArrestandSearchWarrants,Orders)BeyondAReasonableDoubt(Trial,Conviction:WhatDoesaReasonableJurorBelieve?),InvestigationisaProcessWhichSeeks,Gathers,Develops,Analyzes,Weightsand“Packages”PositiveandNegativeInformationandEvidenceToExoneratetheInnocentandProsecuteandConvicttheGuiltyEvidenceisAdditiveandSubtractive,ReinforcingandConflicting;AnalyticalandInterpretativeProcessisPrimarilyNotQuantitative,RatherQualitativeandReliesonHumanJudgment,WhatWeThinkWeKnow(1)FromaffidavitinsupportofasearchwarrantforIvinshouse,threevehiclesandasafedepositbox,Attimeofattacks,Ivinswascustodianofhighlypurifiedanthraxthatisgenetically“identical”totheanthraxanalyzedfromtheattacks(solecustodianofstockculturesince1997whenoriginated;freeaccesstosuiteatUSAMRIIDwherestockculturekept)NosatisfactoryexplanationprovidedforIvinslatenightlaboratoryaccesscontemporaneouswiththeattacksIvinsclaimedthathewassufferingfromseriousmentalhealthissuesinthemonthsprecedingtheattacks(toco-worker:“incredibleparanoid,delusionalthoughtsattimes”)IvinsbelievedtosubmitfalsesamplesofanthraxforforensicanalysistomisleadinvestigatorsAttimeofattacks,IvinswasunderpressuretoassistcompanywhichproducedanthraxvaccineandhadlostFDAapproval;believedvaccineessentialforforceprotectionIvinssentemailcontemporaneouswithattackswithlanguagesimilartomailedletterscontaininganthraxIvinsandwifereportedlyhadissueswithSens.LeahyandDaschle;Ivinshadobsessionwithsorority,sororityofficeinPrincetonnearmailboxusedformailings,WhatWeThinkWeKnow(2)ScientificEvidencePubliclyBriefedsilicon“signature”notpreviouslydescribedforB.anthracisWild-typeB.anthracisAmes,withsignificantnumbersofphenotypicvariants(substrains);“Unique”phenotypicvariantscouldbedetectedby4indelpolymorphismsOf1070inknownAmescultures(16U.S.labs,Canada,Sweden,U.K.),8containedallfourpolymorphisms,nonehadthreeoutoffour,fewcontainedoneortwo;of8thatcontainedallfour,allofthe8withallfourpolymorphismsweredirectlyrelatedtoasingleAmesculture(RMR-1029)PresenceofB.subtilisascontaminantinonesetoflettersbutnottheother,suggestingtwoseparateculturingevents;geneticanalysisofB.subtilisdemonstrateddissimilaritieswithotherknowncultures;RMR-1029indicatedassourceforB.anthracisinallQsamples(inferredbutnotstateddirectly)SourceofenvelopesusedinmailingsnarrowedtocertaindistributionsourcesandVirginiaandMaryland;proximitybetweensourceofenvelopesandsourceofanthraxOther“SporeswereproducedinnortheastU.S.”Traceevidence,tapeandinkavailableforcomparison(letters,mailbox),WhatWeDontKnoworHave:Examples,“Smokinggun”(notlikelyeverwill,noeyewitnessesnorIvinscaughtintheact)SpecificwhereaboutsofIvinsduringkeyeventsrelatedtoattacksInterviewsofallco-workers,associates,supervisors,laboratorymanagementInterviewsandinvestigationofallothersatUSAMRIIDwhohadaccesstoRMR-1029stockcultureandproximatelaboratoryfacilitiesInvestigationandinterviewsofthoseknowledgeableaboutandinpossessionoflaboratoryaccessschedules,securityprocedures,documentationDetailsofinvestigationconductedincommunity(neighborhood,church,etc)(somereportedinmedia)SurveillancelogsCooperatingwitnessinterviews,DocumentsLikelyForthcoming,CurrentlyUnderReviewbyFBIandDOJ,TheMediaandPolitics,Sevenyearparadeofspeculators,“experts”,conspiracytheorists,“forensicinvestigators”,investigativereporters(credentialed,non-credentialed),mostofwhomwerewrongallorinpart;culminatinginmediaflurrywiththeidentificationofIvinsasprimesuspectandsuicide.Criticallyassess:Whatarethedrivers,motivationsandagendasforthosewhorendered“expertise”andopinion?Varioushearings,particularlyrecentlywithidentificationofIvinsandlikelyclosingofcase:summary“FBIevidencenotconclusiveorconvincing,manyquestionsremainunanswered”Criticallyassess:Whatarethedrivers,motivationsandagendas?,MySkepticismof“Skeptics”and“TalkingHeads”,RelevantKnowledgeRelevantCredentialsRelevantExpertiseandExperiencePersonalAgendasPersonalandProfessionalMotivesPoliticalAgendasPersonalandProfessionalLiability,“ForensicScience101”,ForensicScience,ApplicationofscienceintheinvestigationoflegalmattersScientificknowledgeandtechnologyareusedtoserveaswitnessesinbothcriminalandcivil(intelligence)mattersSciencemaynotofferdefinitivesolutionsforallscenarios;itdoesprovideaspecialinvestigativeroleGoalis“attribution”i.e.,whocommittedthecrime,FourMissionAreas,PREVENTTerrorismbytacklingunderlyingcauses,PURSUETerroristsandthoseThatsponsorthem,PROTECTThepublicandNationinterests,PREPAREFortheconsequences,ToreducetheTHREAT,ToreduceVULNERABILITY,ToreducetheRISK,ForensicScienceisone“toolinthekit”,PhasesofForensicInvestigations,Intelligencevalidationguidelinesinpressnow;scientificpapersreAnthrax2001inpreparation,“reviewandacceptance”bycommunitypendingNoindependent,external,peerreviewofscience,results,conclusionsandvalidationtodate(NASreviewexpected)Fewcourtcasestodate,fewcaselawprecedentsNolegalchallengesorrulingstodatereadmissibilityofnovelscientificevidenceormethods,evidence,resultsorconclusionsattrial,GapsIdentified:ScientificWorkingGroupforMicrobialGeneticsandForensics,Effectivemethods/toolstoquicklyidentifywhen,where,how&bywhatmeans,anoutbreakhasoccurredAbilitytoquicklydiscernwhetheranoutbreakisnaturalorintentionalSimultaneoussampling&investigativecharacterization:forensicsepidemiologyAbilitytoquicklylocateandexploit“thecrimescene”Fullyunderstandtheapproachesandmethodsusedby“theperp”Labcapabilitiesthatmatchinvestigativequestions,MoreGapsIdentified:ScientificWorkingGroupforMicrobialGeneticsandForensics,Independentlyvalidatedmethodsandprotocols:samplecollectionthroughallanalyticpathways,andinterpretationExploitmicrobialandcontaminatedphysicalevidenceRobustqualityassurance&datacontrolsystemsUnderstandingofmicrobialdiversity&backgroundDefinitive&consistentmicrobialsystematics(phylogeny+taxonomy)Comparativegenomicsstudies,including“nearneighbors”“Post-genomics”,including“smallmolecules”NationalMicrobialStrainRepository,ForensicScience,BacteriologyMycology&Virology,Epidemiology,GenomicsMetagenomics,Ecology,AnalyticalChemistry&Biochemistry,Informatics,Biostatistics&PopulationGenetics,PlantPathology,BiomedicalSciences&PublicHealth,VeterinaryMedicine,MicrobialForensics,MaterialsScience,ProcessEngineering,FoodScience,Microscopy,Physics,DeepeningCross-DisciplinaryKnowledgeandEpisystemicCapabilities,MicrobialForensics:EmergingandFutureTechnologies,ThreatstoAddress?,Creative,EvenSubtleGeneticEngineeringBioprospecting,ExploitingNaturalDiversityGeneShuffling&DirectedEvolutionSmallFootprintDesign&ProductionSystemsCreativeDenialandDeceptionSyntheticBiology,Can“Passive”and“Active”MeasuresbeAnticipated?Developed?,Attribution:Effective,ReliableCapabilitiesforJusticeandPolicy,Multilevel,multidisciplinary“toolkit”ofdefined,supported,validatedanalyticalapproachesforfullexploitationof“evidentiary”samplesIntegratedapproachesthatenabledefinitiveanalysesthatarefullysupportiveofattribution,anddosoaccurately,responsively,adaptivelyanddefensiblyCapabilitiesbuiltuponwellvettedandproperlyappliedscienceandtechnology,withattributesandlimitsfullyunderstoodandcommunicableAgileleveragingandintegrationwithmatchedinvestigativeandintelligencecapabilitiesMethods,applicationsandexpertsthatcanwithstandrigorousscientific,legal,policyandpoliticalscrutiny,BW(WMD)Attribution:ASystemWhichDoesntYetCoherently&FullyExist,Science&Technology,Law&Policy,Operations,Investigation&Intelligence,Strategy,Plans&Doctrine,MicrobialForensicsandPolicy,Whatquantityandqualityofevidenceisneededtosupportnationalorglobalpolicydecisionsregardingillicitintentions,researchandpreparation,testing,anddeliveryofbiologicalweapons?Howmuchandwhatkindof“evidence”shouldberequiredtosupportwhatdecision?Whatshouldpolicymakersexpectofitsnationalorglobalmicrobialforensicscapabilities?Whatcontributioncanorshouldforensicsmaketonationalorglobalpolicydecisionsinvolvingbiologicalweapons/bioterrorism?Howshouldmicrobialforensicsresultsbebestintegratedwithotherformsofrelevantinformation(evidence)andintelligence?Howmuchreliancecanorshouldbeplacedonforensicevidenceandanalysisfordecisionsrelatedtoattributionand“prosecution”andwhat“standards”ordecisionframeworkshouldbeused?Cancompetentmicrobialforensicscontributetothedeterrenceofthepossession,development,

温馨提示

  • 1. 本站所有资源如无特殊说明,都需要本地电脑安装OFFICE2007和PDF阅读器。图纸软件为CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.压缩文件请下载最新的WinRAR软件解压。
  • 2. 本站的文档不包含任何第三方提供的附件图纸等,如果需要附件,请联系上传者。文件的所有权益归上传用户所有。
  • 3. 本站RAR压缩包中若带图纸,网页内容里面会有图纸预览,若没有图纸预览就没有图纸。
  • 4. 未经权益所有人同意不得将文件中的内容挪作商业或盈利用途。
  • 5. 人人文库网仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对用户上传分享的文档内容本身不做任何修改或编辑,并不能对任何下载内容负责。
  • 6. 下载文件中如有侵权或不适当内容,请与我们联系,我们立即纠正。
  • 7. 本站不保证下载资源的准确性、安全性和完整性, 同时也不承担用户因使用这些下载资源对自己和他人造成任何形式的伤害或损失。

评论

0/150

提交评论