




版权说明:本文档由用户提供并上传,收益归属内容提供方,若内容存在侵权,请进行举报或认领
文档简介
1、给GRE班学生的Argument模版第一部分:Diction Variety,写Argument的时候遣词的多样性。Author:author, writer, arguer, speaker, Concludes that:reaches/arrives at/comes to the conclusion that, advocates that, claims that, Recommends:suggests that, recommends that, Expects:predict, anticipate, expect, Support:support, strengthen,
2、bolster, enhance, uphold, fortify, corroborate, Show Assumption:argues that, claims that, assumes that, reasons that, Show Evidence:provide, cite, point out, present, produce, Statistical Evidence:survey, poll, statistics, study, research, Flawed:groundless, unwarranted, unreliable, untenable, quest
3、ionable, problematic, unfounded, open to doubt, indefensible, ambiguous, flawed, fraught, 第二部分:Sentence Variety,造句的多样性(6-9因为句式单一,反面教材)。1. In this argument, the arguer recommends that To justify the claim, the arguer provides the evidence that In addition, he cites the result of a recent study that 2
4、. In this argument, the arguer advocates that This recommendation is based on the observation that Meanwhile, the arguer assumes that 3. The conclusion in this argument is that In support of this prediction, the arguer claims that Moreover, the arguer assumes that 4. In an attempt to, the article cl
5、aims that. The evidence cited is that Additionally, the author points out that . 5. In this argument the author reaches the conclusion that. The basis for this recommendation is that. An additional reason given in support of this recommendation is that.The author also cites.as an example in support
6、of this recommendation. 6. The conclusion of this argument is that .The author employs several lines of reasoning to reach this conclusion. In the first, the author reasons that In the second, the author points out that 7. The speaker proposes that, and N reasons are offered in support of this argum
7、ent. First, . Second, 8. In this argument, the author concludes that The authors line of reasoning is that 9. In this argument, the author concludes that The author bases this conclusion on the following claims about XXXXX: 第三部分:你的结论(7-10因为承认了原文的部分正确性,反面教材)1. A careful examination of this argument w
8、ould reveal how groundless it is. 2. This line of reasoning is unconvincing for a couple of reasons. 3. This argument is problematic (questionable) for a couple of reasons. 4. The argument is fraught with vague, oversimplified and unwarranted assumptions. 5. The argument is unfounded because the spe
9、aker oversimplifies the problem and its solutions. 6. This argument is unconvincing because several questionable assumptions must be made for the stated evidence to support the authors conclusion. 7. At first glance, the argument appears to be somehow plausible, but further reflection reveals that i
10、t suffers from at least XX logic flaws. 8. At first glance, the authors argument appears to be somewhat convincing, but further reflection reveals that it omits some important concerns that should be addressed to substantiate the argument. 9. At first glance, the authors argument appears to be someh
11、ow appealing, while a close examination will reveal how groundless it is. We do not have to look very far to see the invalidity of this argument. This argument is problematic for the following reasons. 10. While the authors argument has some merit, it suffers from two critical problems.附:Structure V
12、ariety(可以在结构上做出变化)1. Citing facts from / Based on the fact that, the arguer concludes that 2. The authors conclusion that is flawed because it relies on the dubious assumption that Further, the author assumes that And we also do not know whether 3. The idea that is based on N questionable assumption
13、s: In the first place, it can be shown that ; In the second place, it can be shown that It is, therefore, most likely that下面是四个开头的例子,仅供参考: Citing facts drawn from the color-film processing industry that indicate a downward trend in the costs of film processing over a 24-year period, the author argue
14、s that Olympic Foods will likewise be able to minimize costs and thus maximize profits in the future. In support of this conclusion the author cites the general principle that as organizations learn how to do things better, they become more efficient. This principle, coupled with the fact that Olymp
15、ic Foods has had 25 years of experience in the food-processing industry, leads to the authors rosy prediction. This argument is unconvincing because it suffers from two critical flaws. In this argument the author concludes that the city should allocate some of its arts funding to public television.
16、The conclusion is based on two facts: (1) attendance at the citys art museum has increased proportionally with increases in visual-arts program viewing on public television, and (2) public television is being threatened by severe cuts in corporate funding. While this argument is somewhat convincing,
17、 a few concerns need to be addressed. A newspaper publisher is recommending that the price of its paper, The Mercury, be reduced below the price of a competing newspaper The Bugle. This recommendation is in response to a severe decline in circulation of The Mercury during the 5 -year period followin
18、g the introduction of The Bugle. The publishers line of reasoning is that lowering the price of The Mercury will increase its readership, thereby increasing profits because a wider readership attracts more advertisers. This line of reasoning is problematic in two critical respects.The editorial reco
19、mmends that the school board of Nova High spend a greater portion of available funds on the purchase of additional computers and adopt interactive computer instruction throughout the curriculum. Two reasons are offered in support of this recommendation. First, the introduction of interactive compute
20、r instruction in three academic subjects was immediately followed by a decline in the school dropout rate. Second, impressive achievements in college were experienced by last years graduates. This argument is unconvincing for two reasons.第四部分:结尾的模版1. In conclusion, the arguer fails to validate the c
21、onclusion that A. To solidify the argument, the arguer should provide more concrete evidence to demonstrate/prove that B. In addition, the arguer would have to rule out the abovementioned possibilities that would undermine the arguers claim. 2. To sum up, the conclusion lacks credibility because the
22、 evidence cited in the analysis does not lend strong support to what the arguer claims. To make the argument more convincing/solidify the argument, the arguer would have to provide more/specific information/evidence concerning A. 3. As it stands, the argument is not well reasoned. To make it logical
23、ly acceptable, the arguer should demonstrate that A. Additionally, the arguer should provide more evidence to validate/substantiate the conclusion. 4. To conclude, the argument is not persuasive as it stands. Before we accept the claim, the arguer should present more substantial facts to prove that
24、A. Besides, to better access the argument, we still need more information concerning B. 5. In summary, the conclusion reached in this argument is invalid and misleading. To make the argument more convincing/persuasive, the arguer would have to prove that A. Moreover, I would suspend my judgment abou
25、t the credibility of the recommendation until the arguer can provide concrete evidence that B. 6. In sum, the author fails to validate the conclusion that D. To make it logically acceptable, the author should demonstrate that A and that B. In addition, the arguer would have to provide more concrete
26、evidence, especially the information concerning C, to rule out the abovementioned possibility that would undermine the authors claim.附:结尾的例子(观点总结)1. In conclusion, each of the studies cited by the author bases its findings on evidence that does not represent dieters in general; for this reason, neit
27、her premise of this argument is a reliable generalization. Consequently, I am not convinced that dieters are better off consuming sugar instead of aspartame.下面是六个Possible Improvement:1. In conclusion, this is a weak argument. To strengthen the conclusion that Apogee should close field offices and ce
28、ntralize, this author must provide a thorough cost-benefit analysis of available alternatives and rule out factors other than decentralization that might be affecting current profits negatively. 2. In conclusion, this is a weak argument. To strengthen the recommendation that the manager of the purch
29、asing department be replaced, the author would have to demonstrate that the falling revenues were a result of the delays in manufacturing. Additionally, the author would have to show that knowledge of the properties of metals is a prerequisite for planning in purchasing metals. 3. In conclusion, thi
30、s argument is unacceptable. To strengthen the argument the author would have to provide evidence that the population of younger consumers will remain relatively constant over the next decade. 4. In conclusion, the recommendation that Nova High spend a greater portion of available funds on the purcha
31、se of additional computers and adopt interactive computer instruction throughout the curriculum is ill-founded. To strengthen this recommendation the author would have to demonstrate that the decline in the dropout rate and the impressive performance of recent graduates came about as a result of the
32、 use of computer-interactive instruction. All that has been shown so far is a correlation between these events.第五部分:逻辑错误攻击模版1、可疑数据之Respondent The statistical evidence cited in the argument is problematic because the repondents views are not necessarily representative of the views of A in general. Fo
33、r example, because the survey has to do with B , it makes sense that only those who BB would respond to it, thereby distorting the overall picture of B among A Without knowing how the survey was conducted, it is impossible to assess whether or not this is the case.2、可疑数据之模糊信息 The information provide
34、d in this program / The poll cited by the author is too vague to be informative / described in the vaguest possible terms. The claim does not indicate who conducted this survey, who responded, or when, where and how the survey was conducted. Lacking information about the number of people surveyed an
35、d the number of the respondent, it is impossible to assess / evaluate the validity of the results. For example, if 200 persons are surveyed but only 2 responded, the conclusion that would be highly suspect. Because the argument offers no evidence that would rule out this kind of interpretation / exp
36、lanation, until / Until these questions are answered, the results of the survey are worthless as evidence for the conclusion.3、Hasty Generalization The author commits a fallacy of hasty generalization in assuming that A will automatically result in / lead to B. The author does not provide sufficient
37、 evidence to support the claim. The example cited, while suggestive in trends, is insufficient to warrant its truth because there is no reason to believe that B will occur automatically. For instance, Thus, there is no guarantee of 4、Post hoc, ergo propter hoc(时间先后和因果混淆) The author commits a fallacy
38、 of “Post hoc, ergo propter hoc” in assuming that A is the cause of B. The only evidence offered to support the claim is that A occurred before B. However, the evidence is insufficient to establish the claim in question because a mere chronological relationship is only one of the indicators of a cau
39、sal relationship and, therefore, does not necessarily prove a causal relationship. To establish a general causal relationship between A and B, other factors that could result in B should be considered and eliminated. For example, The authors failure to investigate or even consider other possible exp
40、lanations for B renders the conclusion based upon it highly suspect. 5、Cum hoc, ergo propter hoc(同时发生和因果关系混淆) The author commits the fallacy of “Cum hoc, ergo propter hoc” in assuming that A is the sole reason behind B. However, the evidence offered is insufficient to support the claim: A mere positive correlation between A and B does not necessarily prove a causal relationship. To est
温馨提示
- 1. 本站所有资源如无特殊说明,都需要本地电脑安装OFFICE2007和PDF阅读器。图纸软件为CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.压缩文件请下载最新的WinRAR软件解压。
- 2. 本站的文档不包含任何第三方提供的附件图纸等,如果需要附件,请联系上传者。文件的所有权益归上传用户所有。
- 3. 本站RAR压缩包中若带图纸,网页内容里面会有图纸预览,若没有图纸预览就没有图纸。
- 4. 未经权益所有人同意不得将文件中的内容挪作商业或盈利用途。
- 5. 人人文库网仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对用户上传分享的文档内容本身不做任何修改或编辑,并不能对任何下载内容负责。
- 6. 下载文件中如有侵权或不适当内容,请与我们联系,我们立即纠正。
- 7. 本站不保证下载资源的准确性、安全性和完整性, 同时也不承担用户因使用这些下载资源对自己和他人造成任何形式的伤害或损失。
最新文档
- 绿色环保低碳建材产业园建设项目技术方案
- 腰痛考试题多选题及答案
- 堤防地质勘察与风险评估
- 水库扩建工程施工方案
- 企业离职补偿及员工培训协议范本
- 双方财产清算及分期偿还债务协议书
- 商业设施租赁合同范本:购物中心租赁合同
- 离婚协议子女抚养权及财产分割详细范本指南
- 研究型大学全职教师聘任与科研成果转化合同
- 采购文员考试试题及答案
- 浅谈国内外深基坑支护技术的现状及进展
- 网络舆情应对及处置
- 工业数据采集技术及应用 -配置能源采集仪表参数
- 《应急救援知识》课件
- 【一例重症肺炎的个案护理案例报告6000字(论文)】
- 电梯使用维护说明书
- 专业方向证明
- 范里安-微观经济学:现代观点
- 传热学全套PPT完整教学课件
- 部编版六年级道德与法治上册第5课《国家机构有哪些》优秀课件
- 民族区域自治制度课件 【核心知识精讲精思】 高中政治统编版必修三政治与法治
评论
0/150
提交评论