版权说明:本文档由用户提供并上传,收益归属内容提供方,若内容存在侵权,请进行举报或认领
文档简介
1、Case Reading,1,Case Reading Skills,PreviewDoReview” is your basic learning strategy. After creating a positive learning environment, you are ready to read cases. Preview each case. Instead of plunging into a case, preview it. Get a feel for the case without bogging down in specifics. Try these three
2、 strategies for getting a preview and use the one that works best for you. (1)First and last paragraphs: Read the beginning and end of the case, just enough to get a taste for the parties, the dispute, and the holding. (2)First sentence of each paragraph: Read the first paragraph, first sentence of
3、each succeeding paragraph, and the last paragraph. In addition to getting the basic plot, you will be introduced to the courts reasoning. (3)Story line reading: Skim the case quickly for the basic story line. Connect the story to the subject you are studying,2,Ask questions. Based on your preview, a
4、sk yourself questions. What is this case about? Why did the winning party prevail? What were the key facts? How does the case relate to the casebook topic? Read each case. After your preview, read through the case carefully and actively, try to answer the questions that you posed to yourself. Take n
5、otes in the margins if this helps you,3,Review. You will have two stages of review. 1) Briefing the case. What are the facts the court found most important in reaching their decision? What rule of law should you understand from the case? What types of legal reasoning did the court rely on in coming
6、to a decision? 2) Reviewing after briefing. After you brief all your cases, spend two minutes thinking about how each case you read relates to the subject matter of the class. Does one case illustrate a majority and the other a minority rule? Traditional rule and modern rule? Rule and exception? Thi
7、s review will help you remember the cases and also acts as a preview for the class,4,案例的组成部分,1、Case Name (案例名称)eg: Smith v. John, v. is short for versus.(诉) 2、Court rendering the opinion (判决法院)eg: New Jersey Supreme Court(新泽西最高法院) 3、Citation(卷宗号、案号)eg:93 N. J.324, 461 A. 2d 138(1983),这说明该案出自新西汇编第93卷
8、,第324页,以及大西洋汇编第二辑第138页,该案件判决于1983年。像这种指明两个或两个以上出处的卷宗号叫做parallel citation(an additional reference to a case that has been reported in more than more reporter平行卷宗号,5,Citation,Citation is a reference to a legal authority 布莱克法律词典中的定义:A reference to a legal precedent or authority, such as a case, statute
9、, or treaties, that either substantiates or contradicts a given position,6,案例之中的卷宗号通常包括以下几个部分,A) the names of the parties involved in the lawsuit B) the volume number of the reporter containing the full text of the case C) the abbreviated name of that case reporter D) the page number on which the ca
10、se begins E) the year the case was decided F) the name of the court deciding the case,7,案例之中的卷宗号通常包括以下几个部分,A) the names of the parties involved in the lawsuit(案件双方当事人姓名) B) the volume number of the reporter containing the full text of the case(案件全文的汇编卷号) C) the abbreviated name of that case reporter
11、(案例汇编的缩写名称) D) the page number on which the case begins(案例开始的页码数) E) the year the case was decided (案例判决年份) F) the name of the court deciding the case(案例判决法院,8,卷宗号之中的缩略码,A.Atlantic Reporter 大西洋汇编 A.2d. Atlantic Reporter, 2nd Series大西洋汇编第二辑 Cal.Rep.California Reporter加利福尼亚州汇编 F.Federal Reporter联邦汇编 F
12、.2d. Federal Reporter , 2nd Series联邦汇编第二辑 F.3d. Federal Reporter , 3rd Series联邦汇编第三辑 F. Supp. Federal Supplement联邦补充案例 L.Ed.U.S. U.S. Supreme Court Decisions, Lawyers Edition 美国最高法院案例汇编,律师版 L.Ed. 2d.U.S. U.S. Supreme Court Decisions, Lawyers Edition, 2nd Series美国最高法院案例汇编,律师版第二辑 N.E. Northeastern Rep
13、orter东北汇编 N.E.2d. Northeastern Repoter,2nd Series东北汇编第二辑,9,卷宗号之中的缩略码,N.W.Northwestern Reporter西北汇编 N.W.2dNorthwestern Reporter ,2nd Series西北汇编第二辑 N.Y.S.New York Supplement纽约补充案例 N.Y.S. 2dNew York Supplement , 2nd Series纽约补充案例第二辑 S.Ct. Supreme Court Reporter最高法院案例汇编 S.E. Southeastern Reporter东南汇编 S.E
14、. 2d Southeastern Reporter ,2nd Series东南汇编第二辑 So. Southern Reporter南方汇编 So. 2d. Southern Reporter ,2nd Series南方汇编第二辑 S.W. Southwestern Reporter西南汇编 S.W. 2d. Southwestern Reporter ,2nd Series西南汇编第二辑 U.S.United States Reports美国案例汇编,10,案例的组成部分,4、Justice wrote the opinion(主审法官姓名) 5、Opinion(stating the i
15、ssue raised, describing the parties and facts, discussing the relevant law, and rendering judgment判决书) 判决书是整个案例的主体部分,其中包括法律争议(Issue)、双方当事人情况、事实经过、判决采用的相关法律以及判决结果。 注意:在阅读判决书的过程中,要注意的几点有(1)时态方面:主审法官的意见用现在时态,前审法院的意见用过去时态。(2)主审法官的意见是法院意见。(3)除了法院外还有两种意见,它们被称为dissenting opinion or dissent(反对意见是指opinion of
16、fered by a judge disagreeing with the majority panel of judges conclusion )和concurring opinion(配合意见是指opinion written by a judge agreeing with the majoritys conclusion but not its reasoning,11,The Structure of a Judicial Opinion,1)Headnote (2)Caption (3)Citation (4)Author of Opinion (5)Facts (6)Issue
17、s (7)Procedural History (8)Legal Reasoning (9)Holding/Decision (10)Concurrence/Dissent,12,Headnote,Headnote is a summary of the key legal points determined by a court, which appears just above each decision in the published reports of cases,13,Caption,Caption is the title of the case, which tells yo
18、u who was involved in the case and reflects the last names of the two sides to the dispute. These two sides are often refered to as the parties or as the litigants. Eg: Smith v. Jones (Mr. Smith sues Mr. Jones,14,Citation,略,15,Author of opinion,The author of opinion is the name of the judge who wrot
19、e the opinion. The name tells you which judge wrote that particular opinion. In most cases, the opinion often simply states a last name followed by the initial “J”. “J” stands for “Judge” or “Justice”, depending on the court (eg: Holmes, J. is Judge Holmes or Justice Holmes). Some courts call their
20、judge “Chancellors”, so the initial will be a “C” instead of a “J”, some variations include “C.J.” for Chief Judge, “V.C.” for Vice Chancellor,16,Facts,The facts of the case are probably the most important aspects of a legal case, because law is often fact sensitive. Facts can tell you the judges un
21、derstanding of the case and what the judge though was an important aspect of the case that help the judge reach the decision,17,Issues,Issue is the matter of dispute in a legal controversy or lawsuit. The issue of a case is usually fairly easy to spot. Sometimes the judge writing the opinion will re
22、fer to the “issue presented”, “question presented” or “the factual issues” by the case. There is always at least one issue in a case. The issue of a case should always be phrased in the form of a question. An example of an issue would be: May a police officer enter a home to search when he hears som
23、eone yelling for help,18,Procedural history,Most state systems and federal system have three different courts. The lowest court is the trial court. The intermediate courts are called the Court of Appeal. The procedural history usually consists of various hearings, trials, and proceedings that went o
24、n in the case before the court. State Trial Court Court of AppealState Supreme Court U.S. Supreme Court,19,Legal Reasoning,To understand the reasoning of an opinion, you should first identify the source of the law the judge applied. Some opinions interpret the Constitution, the founding charter of t
25、he government. Other cases interpret “statutes,” which is a fancy name for written laws passed by legislative bodies such as Congress. After you have identified the source of law, you should next identify the method of reasoning that the court used to justify its decision. When a case is governed by
26、 a statute, the court usually will simply follow what the statute says. The courts role is narrow in such settings because the legislature has settled the law. Similarly, when past courts have already answered similar questions before, a court may conclude that it is required to reach a particular r
27、esult because it is bound by the past precedents. This is an application of the judicial practice of stare decisis,20,Holding/Decision,The holding is the core legal principle that the case represents. It is the conclusion that the case stands for, the courts resolution of the key legal dispute that it faced. It usually appears at the end of the main opinion, and tells you what action the court is taking with the case,21,Concurrence/Dissent,When a group of judges get together to decide a case, they vote on which side should win and also try to agree on a legal rationale to explain why
温馨提示
- 1. 本站所有资源如无特殊说明,都需要本地电脑安装OFFICE2007和PDF阅读器。图纸软件为CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.压缩文件请下载最新的WinRAR软件解压。
- 2. 本站的文档不包含任何第三方提供的附件图纸等,如果需要附件,请联系上传者。文件的所有权益归上传用户所有。
- 3. 本站RAR压缩包中若带图纸,网页内容里面会有图纸预览,若没有图纸预览就没有图纸。
- 4. 未经权益所有人同意不得将文件中的内容挪作商业或盈利用途。
- 5. 人人文库网仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对用户上传分享的文档内容本身不做任何修改或编辑,并不能对任何下载内容负责。
- 6. 下载文件中如有侵权或不适当内容,请与我们联系,我们立即纠正。
- 7. 本站不保证下载资源的准确性、安全性和完整性, 同时也不承担用户因使用这些下载资源对自己和他人造成任何形式的伤害或损失。
最新文档
- 2025中国能建新疆院校园招聘(56人)笔试历年参考题库附带答案详解
- 2025上控(青岛)水务发展有限公司招聘相关人员4人(山东)笔试历年参考题库附带答案详解
- 2026年江苏省高三考前地理模拟试卷及答案
- 4.1 我国的个人收入分配 课件统编版高中政治必修二 经济与生活
- 2026 二年级上册《学系红领巾》课件
- 2026五年级上《冀中的地道战》教学课件
- 汽车机械基础课件 齿轮传动的失效形式、设计准则及材料选用
- 快递车辆消杀制度
- 建立算法备案和审计制度
- 2026年汽车代售合同(1篇)
- 某1.8万方反硝化深床滤池设计计算书
- 2024届浙江省名校协作体高三下学期开学联考物理试题及答案
- 2024年广东佛山市南海区大沥镇镇属企业招聘笔试参考题库含答案解析
- 100部经典好看韩国电影大全
- 新版医院住院病案首页
- C919客机机组培训-指示记录
- 2023年华侨、港澳、台联考高考物理试卷(含解析)
- 2023年广东中山市文化广电旅游局所属事业单位(孙中山故居纪念馆)招考聘用笔试题库含答案解析
- 2023化工总控工(高级)技能理论考试核心题库500题(含各题型)
- 轮毂加工工艺规程及专用车夹具设计
- 售楼部装修施工方案设计
评论
0/150
提交评论