作业检查清单

1、作业检查清单1. 作业要符合作业要求（不要出现文不对题） 2. 作业内容中没有抄袭现象 3. 要用Flinders大学提供的统一封面 4. 封面上是否有课程名称及代码 5. 封面上是否有姓名 6. 封面上是否有学号 7. 封面上是否有作业截止日期 8. 封面上是否有作业字数 9. 作业是否标注页码 10. 论文题目（标题）字体为小三号，加黑 11. 论文正文字体为小四 12. 作业正文要两端对齐 13. 引用参考文献规范 14. 通篇英文作业没有中文 （包括参考文献，参考的中文文献必须翻译成英文） 15. 作业文档命名正确 文件命名规范为 “课程代码名字”，举例：天津班的王小小交毕业论文，毕业

2、论文课程代码为HSMT9008，则毕业论文命名为HSMT9008-Wang Xiaoxiao；定量定性分析医院管理者视角该门课程的代码为HSMT9018，由于该课程分为几部分讲授，相应的有几个小作业，则该作业命名为HSMT9018(1)-Wang Xiaoxiao。 注意： 以上要求如有任何一条不符，则要求修改后重新提交； 作业超过一个星期（包括一个星期）扣所得分数的5% （不足一星期按照一星期计算），超过两个星期扣所得分数10%，依此类推。Assessment作业A. HSMT9016 Major Assignment 2,000 words written in EnglishHSMT90

3、16大作业2000字英文 Describe the key features of the health system of one Western Country. 描述一个西方国家的医疗卫生体系的关键特点 Which, if any, aspects of this system would you like to see introduced into China? 如果有的话，这个体系的哪些部分你愿意看到被引入中国？ Give reasons for your answers 给出你的理由Assessment Guidelines 评分指南 Is the description of

4、the health system you have selected clear and comprehensive? 你对所选择的医疗卫生体系的描述是否清晰和完整？40% Have you given clear and logical reasons for your answer? 你的答案组织是否清晰和有逻辑？20% Have you used evidence (Data, reports, literature references) to support your answers? 你是否应用了论据（数据，报告，参考文献）来支持你的答案？20% Is the paper wel

5、l organized? 整篇文章是否结构清晰？o Title page封面o Student name and number名字和学号o Summary小结o Introduction绪论o Main text 正文o Conclusion (s) 结论o References 参考文献20%DUE DATE: June 30, 2010截止日期：2010年6月30日Assessment (continued)B. HSMT9018 Part 1: 300 600 words written in EnglishHSMT9018-第一部分：300-600字英文As hospital mana

6、gers or health bureau staff you will often be presented with “evidence” that a new piece of equipment, a new service or a new population health initiative (like a cancer screening test) needs to be introduced and deserves financing. As managers we often do not have the knowledge and skills to assess

7、 proposals like this and we depend on other experts to help us make sense of the so-called evidence presented to us and to make the right decision. But in the end, we have to make a decision or recommendation that we are responsible for. 作为医院管理者或者卫生局工作人员，你经常会面对“证据”，说明购买某台新设备或某项新服务或开展某项人群健康项目（比如说某项癌症

8、筛查项目）的必要性和需要的配套资金。作为管理者，很多情况下，我们并不具备评估该提案的知识和技术，我们需要依靠其他专家来帮助我们理解这些摆在我们面前的所谓的证据，从而做出正确的决策。但是到最后，我们自己却不得不为这些做出的决策或建议负责。The purpose of the topic “Quantitative and Qualitative Analysis of Data for Hospital Managers” is to make you aware, that it is necessary to think quite carefully about information p

9、resented to you as “fact” or “evidence” and to help you think about the sort of questions you should ask and the type of expert opinion you should seek. “定量定性分析-医院管理者视角”这门课程的目的在于使得大家认识到在面对以“事实”或“证据”形式出现在大家面前的信息时要进行谨慎思考的必要性，并且帮助大家思考你应该问什么样的问题或者去寻求什么类型的专家意见。Another purpose of this topic ,of course, is

10、 to prepare you for undertaking your Masters thesis, in which you are expected to demonstrate an ability to write an academic paper and evaluate evidence critically. 本门课程的另外一个目的在于使得大家做好完成硕士毕业论文的准备，因为在毕业理论中，你需要证明你能够完成一篇学术论文的能力和能够批判性的评估证据的能力。In this assignment you are asked some questions about the fo

11、llowing paper: Sumitra SA et al (2009) “Initial impact of Australias National Bowel Cancer Screening Program” , Med Jnl of Aust vol197 7, pp 378 -381. (Paper and translation provided) 在这个作业中，你需要根据一篇指定文章澳大利亚全国肠癌筛查项目的初步影响（Sumitra SA et al(2009, Med Jnl of Aust vol197 7, pp 378 -381) 回答一些问题。Screening f

12、or Bowel Cancer ( the second most common cancer in Australia) for the 55 -65 years age group was introduced in Australia after many years of debate and several preliminary studies. The paper looks at a sample of patients diagnosed with colorectal cancer (CRC) and compares the patients who were diagn

13、osed by screening test (Faecal Occult Blood Test FOBT) with the patients diagnosed because they had symptoms (“symptomatic” patients). 在多年的争论和完成了一些初步研究后，澳大利亚在全国范围内对55-65岁年龄组人群进行肠癌（澳大利亚排位第二的癌症）筛查。该研究针对一组被诊断出患有结直肠癌的患者样本进行研究，比较了通过筛查（粪便隐血试验FOBT）诊断出的患者与由于出现症状被诊断出的患者（“症状性”患者）的区别。Table 1 shows the total nu

14、mber of patients with CRC ; how many were diagnosed by screening test (FOBT) and how many were diagnosed by other means (“symptomatic”).表1显示了患者结直肠癌的患者总人数；通过筛查诊断出的人数；以及通过其它途径（“症状性”）诊断出的人数。Table 2 shows cancers diagnosed in the 55 -65 yr aged group. This is the age group targeted by the national scree

15、ning program. 表2 显示了55-65岁年龄组诊断出癌症的人数。这个年龄组是国家筛查项目的目标年龄组。Table 3 compares the tumors found through the National Bowel Cancer Screening Program (NBCSP) with tumors diagnosed because the patient complained of symptoms. The table compares tumor stage (early stage is Stage 1; advanced stage is Stage 4)

16、tumor location (which part of the bowel) and patient Socio-Economic Status (SES). 表3比较了通过国家结肠癌筛查项目发现的肿瘤与由于患者出现症状诊断出的肿瘤。该表格比较了肿瘤分期（早期是1期；晚期是4期），肿瘤部位（肠的哪部分）以及患者的社会经济地位（SES）。Please discuss this paper with members of your group (or with colleagues) and then answer the following questions:1. What is the

17、fundamental question the paper is trying to answer? 该文章试图回答的最主要的问题是什么？2. How was the sample of 1268 cancers collected (over what time period; where from; how many cases were excluded; why?)1268个癌症样本是如何收集的（时间段多长；来源于哪；多少病例被排除；为什么？）3. What possible sources of bias might have been introduced into the st

18、udy by using this method of sampling.由于使用该样本收集方法，该项研究有可能存在的偏见来源有哪些？4. What were the main differences between cancers diagnosed by the screening program and the “symptomatic” cancers. What does this suggest to you?通过筛查项目诊断出的癌症与“症状性”癌症的主要区别有哪些？这告诉了我们什么？5. What does the paper tell you about the number of false negative and false positive screening test?这篇文章告诉你关于筛查结果的假阴和假阳数据是什么？6. Any comments you would like to make about the usefulness of this paper? 关于这篇文章的有用性，你有什么评论？Note: you will see that this study was part of a large “data linkage” project (BioGrid Australia). Data