英语考试作文-GRE写作模板5步练习法作文高分不再是梦

1、文档编码 : CF6L10M2I4A9 HQ6B1S10K9U9 ZN7O1E7U7A5英语考试作文GRE写作模板 5 步练习法 梦作文高分不再是使用模板进行 GRE写作的备考是考生比较常用的复习手段； 不过也常有考生虽然预备了大量模板,却仍是写不好 GRE作文；下面就和大家共享GRE写作模板的五步练习法, 帮忙大家正确合理地使用 GRE写作模板；开头In the argument, the 主题对象 recommends that 对结论做论述,基本上可以抄原文,用另外一种方式表达即可 . To support this recommendation the argument point o

2、ut that 说明文章用了什么论据去证明观点了,同上抄袭即可 however This argument is logically flawed in several critical respects 说明这篇文章规律上是有缺陷的 ；攻击论据1. 调查结果没有证据申明To begin with, the argument depends on the assumption that 阐述说出了一个没有依据的申明,并说出文中的缘由 rather than for some other reasons. Yet it is entirely possible that 说明这种估计可能的缘由

3、or some other factor. Without ruling out all other reasons why 方向的结论 ； 重述这个申明 说出反2. 提到了样本,但是数据不具有代表性 数据不够 Firstly, the author provides no evidence that the survey is statistically reliable. Perhaps the survey s sample is not sufficient in size or representative of the quality of 说明对象的数量和质量不够 For tha

4、t matter, this survey is not strong enough to establish causation between 在这里列出缘由和结果,做比较 However, the other reasons of the survey which 表达其他缘由下的情形 . As a result, without the evidence that the survey is statistically reliable the author cannot justifiably draw any conclusion by relying on this survey

5、. 攻击论证过程1. 时间上的错误类比To begin with, 陈述某个数据 may not a reliable date of that rate would be now 和现在相比较是不行信的 . Perhaps the 反例 , For that matter, perhaps 说出反例的情形下会导致何种结果. In short, without ruling out other possible reasons for 假设说出针对反例应当怎么做 the memos author cannot convince me on the basis of 结论 2. 错误的因果关系

6、3. 两个事实错误的类比 Even if 让步,即使某个条 说出应当有的件成立 the argument unfairly assumes that 说明错误的类比的情形 . It is entirely possible that the 比 较对 象 own different situations. Perhaps 具 体 说 出 反 例 Without accounting for such differences between the two places is unreliable. 结论的攻击说明结论不完善,可以有其他的方法Finally, the argument fails

7、 to consider 有更好的方法实现目标 . Perhaps by 方法一 , or by 方法二 , 对目 标 进 行 展 望 In short, without weighing the suggestion against alternatives, it is unconvincing that 案不好 ；结尾段说明供应的方In sum, the argument seems logical, but is based on nothing more than pure speculation and perhaps wishful thinking, yet lack of some warranted investigation. To strength it, the author needs to evaluate all possible alternatives and provide detail and comprehensive evidence before jumping to t