版权说明:本文档由用户提供并上传,收益归属内容提供方,若内容存在侵权,请进行举报或认领
文档简介
SchneiderSupplierManagementSAMSQMSPMaSchneiderSupplierManagementSSupplierApprovalModule(SAM)SSQMProcessforEvaluatingSuppliersSupplierApprovalModule(SAMSAM:ProcessFlowRequestinSSRM!!!RecordinSSRM(VENUS)!RecordinSSRM(VENUS)!RecordinSSRM(VENUS)!Technological&designauditsSAM:ProcessFlowRequestinSS
SSRM,SchneiderSupplierRelationshipManagementSSRM,SchneiderSupplierRel
SAM:SupplierAssessmentSupplierAssessmentQuestionnaireIdentifygeneralstrengths&weaknessesCommoditybasedEachlocationrequiresanewevaluationIdentifiedexperimentedpurchasingassessorsdesignedbythecommoditymanagertodoandcompleteAfterphysicalvisitatsupplierScoringbasedon‘
ObjectiveEvidence
’SpecificIF->THENscoringRecommendedornot!SAM:SupplierAssGlobalCompact
Sustainable
DevelopmentGlobalCompact
SustainablGlobalCompactGlobalCompactGlobalCompact:
Global
CompactChartGlobalCompact:
GlobalGlobalCompactisachartsignedbythecompaniesengagingthemtorespect10principlesGlobalCompactGlobalCompactisachartsign
SAM:FunctionalAuditsDetailedanalysisofsupplierMandatoryforquality&supplychainMadebycertifiedauditors(experience+training)ObjectiveDetermineifsupplierhastheabilitytomeetourneedsIdentifyfunctionalstrengths&weaknessesIdentifyimprovementareasIdentifyGeneralCapabilityLevelAdditionalauditsifneededTechnological,design…QualityLogisticSAM:Functional
SAM:TeamDecision“DoesSupplierhaveabilitytomeetourneeds?”AllfunctionsmustagreeEachhas«
Veto
»authorityNot«
Consensus
»votingIf“Approved”-TeamapprovesIf“Rejected”-TeamrejectsIf“ConditionalApproved”-ImprovementplanisrequiredIf“ConditionalRejected”-Improvementplanand2ndauditarerequiredSAM:TeamDecision“DoGreen绿色Yellow黄色Orange橙色Red红色DecisionforSAMcolor(Quality)
SAM审核颜色确定(质量)Green:0reject,0condition,TotalScore>=18Original:≤2rejects,≤4conditions
TotalScore>=10Red:≥3rejects,≥5conditionsTotalScore<10Yellow:0reject,≤2conditions
TotalScore>=15SAMGreen绿色DecisionforSAMcolorSAMDecisionofSAMaudit
Redsupplier:NotstartorstopbusinessOrangesupplier:notstartornonewbusinessgiven,improvementwithin6months.Yellowsupplier:Withinoneyear,mustmovetoGreen.IfnotmovetoorangeGreensupplier:Keysupplierarereviewedonceper1-2years(normally)SAMDecisionofSAMaudit
RedsCommodityManagertodecideIf“NO”-theprocessisstoppedIf“YES”:=S=tolistallweak/improvementpoints(Requestforactionplan)SuppliertofillintheactionstoRAP=S=toReview&ApprovetheRAPSuppliertoimplementtheRAPSAM:DecisiontoImproveCommodityManagertodecideSAM
SAM:ImprovementPlanMustbeshortterm(upto1year)SchneidermustverifyimprovementsAtSupplierlocationSuppliermustimproveOrlose“Conditional”ratingImprovementplanisdocumentedinSSRM(tobeimplemented)AfullauditisnecessarytoremoveCONDITIONALREJECTEDstatusSAM:ImprovementPlanMustb
SAM:SupplierApprovalResultsstoredelectronicallyinSSRMDatabaseSupplierAssessmentQuality&SupplyChainAuditsOtherAudits(ifany)ImprovementPlans(tobeimplemented)Resultsavailableacrossall=S=Approval->
Supplierhasbeenevaluated,andshouldhavecapabilitytomeetourneeds(Foraspecificlocation/commodity)SAM:SupplierApprovalResSAMSAMSupplierQualificationModule(SQM)SSQMProcessforEvaluatingGoods&ServicesfromSuppliersSupplierQualificationModuleTheSQMQualificationTeammustinclude(ataminimum):Engineering(ProductResponsible)QualityPurchasingManufacturing(LogisticsorIndustrial)AdditionalactorsfortheQualificationTeammayinclude:AdvancedManufacturingSupplyChainAdvancedQualityMarketingSafety,Health&EnvironmentalCorporateQuality
SQM-KeyPoints:TheSQMQualificationTeammusProjectIntroduction:Descriptionofproject/activityInformationsharingRoughScheduleStartofPPEPFormThisisthefirststepintheSQMprocess->Whentherequestisinitiatedtoqualifyagoodfromasupplier.Atthisstep,theQualificationTeammeetstogethertodiscusstherequestMeetingorconferencecallReviewgeneralcharacteristicsofthegoodComplexdesign?Newtool?Samematerial?Sameprocess?OutputofthisstepisanestimateforthequalificationrequirementsandscheduleSSQM:SQMProcessFlowProjectIntroduction:ThisistDetermineRequirements:AllFunctionalRequirementsMustConsider:ParttoSpecificationSupplierProcessCapabilityEnd-ProductFunctionalityInternalManufacturingProcessRecordRequirementsinPPEPFormThisisthesecondstepintheSQMprocess->ThedefinitionofthequalificationrequirementsAtthisstep,theQualificationTeamworksseperatelytodefineeachfunctionalrequirementsQualitydeterminescontrolplan,processFMEA,traceability,GaugeR&REngineeringdeterminescomponent&finishedproductfunctionaltestingManufacturingdeterminespre-productionbuildacceptancecriteriaetcTheQualificationTeamthenhasasecondmeetingtocombineallfunctionalrequirements,andlisttheserequirementsinthePPEPformSSQM:SQMProcessFlowDetermineRequirements:ThisisSupplierReview:CommunicateRequirementstosupplierBeforesuppliermakessamplepartsAndbetter,beforequotationThisisthethirdstepintheSQMprocess->ReviewingthequalificationrequirementswiththesupplierItiscriticalthatthesupplierunderstandallofourfunctionalrequirementsBeforethesupplierfabricatessamples,orstartstodeveloptooling.Suppliermustknowourexpectationsbeforeanyinvestmentismade->tobecertainthatthegoodwillmeetourneedsThedeliverablesthatthesuppliermustcompletearedefinedatthismeetingFirstArticleInspectionReport,ControlPlan,etcThesuppliermustcommittoprovidingtheirdeliverablesSSQM:SQMProcessFlowSupplierReview:ThisisthethCompleteActions:DOTHEWORK!ThisisthefourthstepintheSQMprocess->CompletingthequalificationrequirementsThisiswheretheSupplierandtheQualificationTeaminsurethatalloftherequirementsarecompleted,andsatisfytheacceptancecriteria.SSQM:SQMProcessFlowCompleteActions:ThisisthefQualificationOK?:Question:AreallfunctionsOKwithsupply?All4‘
considerations
’utilized?Readyforproduction?ProductioncannotbeinitiateduntilaftertheentireQualificationTeamagreesthateachrequirementhasbeensatisfiedThisdoesnotimpactpre-production->pre-productionbuildsarenecessarytovalidateseveraloftherequirementsThisdoesrequirethatbeforeapartcanbeconsidered«
QUALIFIED
»thatalltherequirementshavebeen«
ACCEPTED
»bytheQualificationTeamSSQM:SQMProcessFlowQualificationOK?:ProductioncPRODUCTION:DocumentresultsinPPEPformPlaceproductionordersRetaininformationincomponentqualityrecordsatplantsPPEPFormTestResults….ProductionsignalstheendoftheSQMprocessTheQualificationTeamisdisbanded,andthequalificationprojectisclosedTheQualityManagementSystemforafacilitydeterminesthequalityoversightforthegoodSSQM:SQMProcessFlowPRODUCTION:ProductionsignalsNew
Part/ProductEvaluationPlan(PPEP)
SummarySheet
New
Part/ProductEvaluationPWhatisaPPEPform?Apurchasingprojecttooltoselectallthenecessarypartfunctionalrequirements,alltheactorsinordertoqualifyasupplyandaprocess.WhatisaPPEPform?ApurchasWhentoestablishaPPEP?Atthestartofanypurchasingproject,normallybeforethesupplierchoiceandbetterbeforethequotationstep.Don’t’forgettoreadtheSAMauditsbeforechoiceasupplier.WhentoestablishaPPEP?AttWhatisapurchaseproject?AuseofaNewSupplierARawMaterialChangeASupplierProcessChange(eg:Cr6Cr3)ASupplierLocationChangeADesignChangeAnOutsourcing<->InsourcingADifferentSchneiderManufacturingLocationAPartNon-Conformancesimprovement(likecorrectiveaction)Whatisapurchaseproject?AWhoestablishaPPEPform?Thequalificationteamincludingatleastthefollowingfunctionswithavetoright:Engineering(ProductResponsible)QualityPurchasingManufacturing(LogisticsorIndustrial)WhoestablishaPPEPform?TheWhoisresponsibletostartthePPEPprocess?TheprojectleaderWhoisresponsibleofthePPEPapplication?TheQualityDepartment.WhosignthethePPEP?Thesupplierbeforetostarttheprojectandthequalityresponsibleattheend.WhovalidatethePPEP?ThequalificationteamWhoisresponsibletostartth施耐德供应商管理流程。课件施耐德供应商管理流程。课件施耐德供应商管理流程。课件
LinksbetweenSSQMandPMP
Selectionofsuppliersin“technologysuppliermapping”Verificationplaninclude:listofallcomponentsthatshouldbesubmittedtoverification,+PPEPselectedoperationstobeperformedforeachcomponent,+qualityspecificationsFinalcheckofqualificationaspectsduring“suppliercontractreview”SupplyQualification
ModuleQualificationreportreportofPPEPselecteditems(couldincludecomponentapproval)SupplierApprovalModulenewprojectfocussedonpartscomponentverificationSupplierPerformanceModuleSuppliercontractreviewmethods&toolsSupplierperformanceevaluationresultsSSQMSchneiderSupplierQualityManagementS.SRMapprovedsuppliersSuppliersforNewProjectDevelopmentande.designlabelCriteriaE.designcriteriaincludedifneededRequestCriticalitylevelLinksbetweenSSQManSupplierPerformanceModule(SPM)SSQMProcessforMonitoringPerformanceofSuppliersSupplierPerformanceModule(
SupplierPerformanceModuleTheSSQM-SPMSupplierevaluationprocessisacombinationofdailyandregularlyscheduledevents;Daily:Communication&resolutionofSupplierDelivery,QualityandCriticalIssuesbySupplierQualityEngineerandUpstreamFlowSupervisorMonthly:CompilemetricdataforKeySuppliersbySupplierLeaderandSupplierQualityManagementEngineerandSupplierSupplyChainManagementEngineerQuarterlyCommunicatemetricperformancevs.targettoKeySuppliersbySupplierLeadersYearlyAnnualreviewswithKeySuppliersoncurrentyearperformanceandfutureyearrequirementsbySupplierLeaderandMarketManagerSupplierPerformTodaygloballyallthesuppliersaremonitoredwiththeSPM.ButeachCountryaremorefocusonsomecategoriesofsuppliers,suchas;TheKey&ChallengersuppliersThemainactivesuppliersThemostimpactingsuppliers...Additionally,CorporatePurchasingandOperatingDivisionPurchasingalsohastheresponsibilitytomonitor“Global”SuppliersacrossSchneider.TheCountryorganizationsmustprovideperformancedatatoCorporatePurchasingforthese“Global”SuppliersDefinitionofSupplierstobeMonitoredTodaygloballyallthesupplie
SupplierPerformanceModuleThereare5minimumSupplierperformancemetricsrequiredbytheSupplierQualityPolicyandSSQM;Delivery DeliveryofProductvs.Lead-TimeQuality QualityofProductDeliveredProductivity AchievementofProductivityTargetsAdministrative ResponsetoSchneiderRequestsDevelopment CompletionofImprovementPlansButonly3areusedtodaySupplierPerformTheExternalSupplierServiceRate(ESSR)
(Thequantityoforderlinesontime/thequantityoforderlinesexpectedinthesamemonth)*100(%)AftercommonacknowledgementbetweenthesupplierandSchneideronthedeliverydayoraccordingthestandardleadtime
(Nomorethan7days
beforeand
)noonedayafterOnlyformassproductionandexcludingprototypes,samples,pilotrun,…TheExternalSupplierServiceTheDefectPartsperMillion(DPMe)FormulaandDefinitionDP1=(numberofdefectivesamples/totalnumberofsamplesinspected)*Totalnumberofpartsinthebatchorifasort,thetotalNCparts/totalquantityofthebatchx1000000DP2=numberofdefectiveparts
温馨提示
- 1. 本站所有资源如无特殊说明,都需要本地电脑安装OFFICE2007和PDF阅读器。图纸软件为CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.压缩文件请下载最新的WinRAR软件解压。
- 2. 本站的文档不包含任何第三方提供的附件图纸等,如果需要附件,请联系上传者。文件的所有权益归上传用户所有。
- 3. 本站RAR压缩包中若带图纸,网页内容里面会有图纸预览,若没有图纸预览就没有图纸。
- 4. 未经权益所有人同意不得将文件中的内容挪作商业或盈利用途。
- 5. 人人文库网仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对用户上传分享的文档内容本身不做任何修改或编辑,并不能对任何下载内容负责。
- 6. 下载文件中如有侵权或不适当内容,请与我们联系,我们立即纠正。
- 7. 本站不保证下载资源的准确性、安全性和完整性, 同时也不承担用户因使用这些下载资源对自己和他人造成任何形式的伤害或损失。
最新文档
- 家禽禽流感防控应急处置预案
- 土地流转合同管理指引
- 生态破坏事件防范处置方案
- 整脊复位手法操作规范
- 茄果类蔬菜枯萎病综合防治指引
- 淋巴引流排毒操作指引
- 反违章操作管理专项处置办法
- 营业数据统计管理操作服务流程
- 辣椒水肥一体化实施方案
- 托福听力讲座类题库及答案
- T-ZBDIA 0004-2024 预辊涂铝锌镁高强合金板应用技术标准
- 07第七章-药品上市后再评价与监测管理
- 工业设计方法学
- 八年级国家义务教育质量监测德育考核试题
- 医用氧气使用检查记录表
- 英美文学选读教案
- 新松agc小车控制台tc操作手册
- 二类费用工程建设其他费用取费标准集合上海市
- 西安水务公司招聘考试真题
- GB/T 5169.16-2017电工电子产品着火危险试验第16部分:试验火焰50W水平与垂直火焰试验方法
- 协方差分析(三版)
评论
0/150
提交评论