不动产买受人的实体法地位辨析兼谈《异议复议规定》第28条

不动产买受人的实体法地位辨析兼谈《异议复议规定》第28条一、本文概述Overviewofthisarticle随着经济的发展和法治的深化，不动产交易在我国社会经济活动中占据越来越重要的地位。不动产买受人作为不动产交易的核心主体，其法律地位的确定和保护直接关系到交易的公正性、稳定性和安全性。然而，在现行法律体系中，关于不动产买受人实体法地位的规定尚存在诸多争议和模糊之处，这无疑增加了不动产交易的风险和不确定性。因此，本文旨在通过深入分析不动产买受人的实体法地位，结合《异议复议规定》第28条的具体内容，探讨如何更好地保障不动产买受人的合法权益，促进不动产市场的健康发展。Withthedevelopmentoftheeconomyandthedeepeningoftheruleoflaw,realestatetransactionsoccupyanincreasinglyimportantpositioninChina'ssocialandeconomicactivities.Asthecoresubjectofrealestatetransactions,thedeterminationandprotectionofthelegalstatusofrealestatebuyersaredirectlyrelatedtothefairness,stability,andsafetyoftransactions.However,inthecurrentlegalsystem,therearestillmanycontroversiesandambiguitiesregardingthesubstantivelegalstatusofrealestatebuyers,whichundoubtedlyincreasestherisksanduncertaintiesofrealestatetransactions.Therefore,thisarticleaimstoexplorehowtobetterprotectthelegitimaterightsandinterestsofrealestatebuyersandpromotethehealthydevelopmentoftherealestatemarketbydeeplyanalyzingthesubstantivelegalstatusofrealestatebuyers,combinedwiththespecificcontentofArticle28oftheRegulationsonObjectionsandReconsiderations.本文首先将对不动产买受人的实体法地位进行界定，明确其在不动产交易中的权利和义务。在此基础上，通过对相关案例的梳理和分析，揭示当前司法实践中关于不动产买受人实体法地位认定的难点和争议焦点。随后，本文将对《异议复议规定》第28条进行深入解读，分析其对不动产买受人实体法地位的影响和作用。结合理论和实践，提出完善不动产买受人实体法地位保护的建议和对策，以期为立法和司法实践提供参考和借鉴。Thisarticlefirstdefinesthesubstantivelegalstatusofrealestatebuyers,clarifyingtheirrightsandobligationsinrealestatetransactions.Onthisbasis,bysortingandanalyzingrelevantcases,thedifficultiesandcontroversialpointsinthecurrentjudicialpracticeregardingtherecognitionofthesubstantivelegalstatusofrealestatebuyersarerevealed.Subsequently,thisarticlewillprovideanin-depthinterpretationofArticle28oftheRegulationsonObjectionReconsideration,analyzingitsimpactandroleonthesubstantivelegalstatusofrealestatebuyers.Basedontheoryandpractice,proposesuggestionsandcountermeasurestoimprovetheprotectionofthesubstantivelegalstatusofrealestatebuyers,inordertoprovidereferenceandguidanceforlegislationandjudicialpractice.二、不动产买受人实体法地位的理论探讨Theoreticalexplorationofthesubstantivelegalstatusofrealestatebuyers在不动产交易中，买受人的实体法地位是一个复杂且关键的问题。这不仅涉及到买受人的权益保护，还关乎整个交易秩序的稳定和公平正义的实现。因此，对不动产买受人实体法地位的深入探讨，对于完善相关法律制度、指导司法实践具有重要的理论和实践意义。Inrealestatetransactions,thesubstantivelegalstatusofthebuyerisacomplexandcrucialissue.Thisnotonlyinvolvestheprotectionofthebuyer'srights,butalsorelatestothestabilityoftheentiretransactionorderandtherealizationoffairnessandjustice.Therefore,in-depthexplorationofthesubstantivelegalstatusofrealestatebuyershasimportanttheoreticalandpracticalsignificanceforimprovingrelevantlegalsystemsandguidingjudicialpractice.不动产买受人作为交易的一方当事人，其法律地位应受到法律的明确保护。在实体法上，买受人通常被视为一种特殊的债权人，其权益受到合同法和物权法的双重保障。然而，由于不动产交易的特殊性质，买受人在交易中的地位往往更加复杂。一方面，买受人通过签订买卖合同，获得了请求对方履行交付不动产的义务的权利；另一方面，买受人还享有对不动产的期待权，即期待在合同履行完毕后取得不动产的所有权。Asapartytoatransaction,thelegalstatusofarealestatebuyershouldbeclearlyprotectedbylaw.Insubstantivelaw,thebuyerisusuallyregardedasaspecialtypeofcreditor,whoserightsareprotectedbybothcontractlawandpropertylaw.However,duetothespecialnatureofrealestatetransactions,thebuyer'spositioninthetransactionisoftenmorecomplex.Ontheonehand,thebuyerobtainstherighttorequesttheotherpartytofulfilltheobligationofdeliveringrealestatebysigningasalescontract;Ontheotherhand,thebuyeralsohastherightofexpectationovertheimmovableproperty,thatis,theyexpecttoacquireownershipoftheimmovablepropertyafterthecompletionofthecontractperformance.在不动产交易中，买受人的实体法地位还受到相关法律制度的影响。例如，《异议复议规定》第28条对不动产买受人的权利保护作出了明确规定。根据该条款，买受人在符合一定条件的情况下，可以对抗第三人的强制执行请求。这一规定体现了对买受人实体法地位的重视和保护，有助于维护交易安全和稳定。Inrealestatetransactions,thesubstantivelegalstatusofthebuyerisalsoinfluencedbyrelevantlegalsystems.Forexample,Article28oftheRegulationsonObjectionReconsiderationprovidesclearprovisionsontheprotectionoftherightsofrealestatebuyers.Accordingtothisclause,thebuyercanresisttheenforcementrequestofathirdpartyifcertainconditionsaremet.Thisregulationreflectstheimportanceandprotectionofthebuyer'ssubstantivelegalstatus,whichhelpstomaintaintransactionsecurityandstability.然而，在实践中，不动产买受人的实体法地位仍然面临一些挑战和争议。例如，在不动产交易过程中，买受人可能会遇到出卖人一物多卖、欺诈交易等违法行为，导致其权益受到损害。由于不动产交易的复杂性和专业性，买受人在交易过程中往往处于弱势地位，容易受到不公平待遇。However,inpractice,thesubstantivelegalstatusofrealestatebuyersstillfacessomechallengesandcontroversies.Forexample,intheprocessofrealestatetransactions,buyersmayencounterillegalbehaviorssuchasthesellersellingmultipleitemsorengaginginfraudulenttransactions,resultingindamagetotheirrightsandinterests.Duetothecomplexityandprofessionalismofrealestatetransactions,buyersareofteninadisadvantagedpositionandaresusceptibletounfairtreatmentduringthetransactionprocess.因此，我们需要进一步完善相关法律制度，明确不动产买受人的实体法地位，加强对其权益的保护。还需要加强司法实践中的指导和监督，确保相关法律制度得到有效执行。只有这样，才能真正实现不动产交易中的公平正义和秩序稳定。Therefore,weneedtofurtherimprovetherelevantlegalsystem,clarifythesubstantivelegalstatusofrealestatebuyers,andstrengthentheprotectionoftheirrightsandinterests.Itisalsonecessarytostrengthenguidanceandsupervisioninjudicialpracticetoensuretheeffectiveimplementationofrelevantlegalsystems.Onlyinthiswaycanwetrulyachievefairness,justice,andorderstabilityinrealestatetransactions.三、国内外相关法律规定与实践Relevantdomesticandforeignlegalprovisionsandpractices不动产买受人的实体法地位在不同国家和地区的法律规定及实践中呈现出多样性。在中国，随着市场经济的深入发展和法治建设的不断完善，对不动产买受人权益的保护也日益加强。Thesubstantivelegalstatusofrealestatebuyersexhibitsdiversityinthelegalprovisionsandpracticesofdifferentcountriesandregions.InChina,withthedeepeningdevelopmentofthemarketeconomyandthecontinuousimprovementoftheruleoflaw,theprotectionoftherightsandinterestsofrealestatebuyersisalsoincreasinglystrengthened.中国的《物权法》确立了不动产物权变动的基本原则，包括买卖不破租赁、善意取得等制度，为不动产买受人提供了基本的法律保障。同时，《合同法》对买卖合同进行了详细规定，明确了买卖双方的权利义务，为不动产买受人提供了合同法的保护。ThePropertyRightsLawofChinaestablishesthebasicprinciplesofrealestatepropertyrightschanges,includingsystemssuchasbuyingandsellingwithoutbreakingleases,andobtainingingoodfaith,providingbasiclegalprotectionforrealestatebuyers.Atthesametime,theContractLawprovidesdetailedprovisionsforsalescontracts,clarifyingtherightsandobligationsofbothpartiesandprovidingprotectionforrealestatebuyersundertheContractLaw.为了更加具体地保护不动产买受人的权益，最高人民法院颁布了《关于审理涉及执行异议之诉案件适用法律若干问题的解释》（以下简称《异议复议规定》）。该解释第28条明确规定了不动产买受人在特定情形下的排除执行权利，即在人民法院查封之前已签订合法有效的书面买卖合同、已合法占有该不动产、已支付全部价款或已按照合同约定支付部分价款且将剩余价款按照人民法院的要求交付执行、非因买受人自身原因未办理过户登记等情形下，不动产买受人可以排除执行。这一规定体现了对不动产买受人实体法地位的重视和保护。Inordertomorespecificallyprotecttherightsandinterestsofrealestatebuyers,theSupremePeople'sCourthasissuedthe"InterpretationonSeveralIssuesConcerningtheApplicationofLawintheTrialofCasesInvolvingExecutionObjections"(hereinafterreferredtoasthe"ProvisionsonObjectionReconsideration").Article28ofthisinterpretationclearlystipulatestheexclusionaryrightofthebuyerofimmovablepropertyinspecificcircumstances,thatis,inthecasewherealegallyvalidwrittensalescontracthasbeensignedbeforethepeople'scourtsealsup,theimmovablepropertyhasbeenlawfullyoccupied,theentirepricehasbeenpaidoraportionofthepricehasbeenpaidaccordingtothecontractandtheremainingpricehasbeendeliveredforexecutionaccordingtotherequirementsofthepeople'scourt,andthebuyerhasnotcompletedthetransferregistrationduetoreasonsotherthanthebuyer'sown,thebuyerofimmovablepropertycanexcludeexecution.Thisregulationreflectstheimportanceandprotectionofthesubstantivelegalstatusofrealestatebuyers.在国际层面，不同国家和地区的法律规定和实践也各具特色。例如，德国民法典对不动产物权变动进行了详细规定，包括物权行为的独立性、无因性等原则，为不动产买受人提供了较为完善的法律保障。而在美国，通过判例法形成了善意购买者规则等制度，旨在保护善意购买不动产的买受人的权益。Attheinternationallevel,differentcountriesandregionshavetheirownuniquelegalprovisionsandpractices.Forexample,theGermanCivilCodeprovidesdetailedprovisionsonchangesinrealestatepropertyrights,includingprinciplessuchastheindependenceandnoncausationofpropertyrights,providingrelativelycompletelegalprotectionforrealestatebuyers.IntheUnitedStates,asystemsuchastheruleofgoodfaithbuyershasbeenestablishedthroughcaselaw,aimedatprotectingtherightsofbuyerswhopurchaserealestateingoodfaith.随着全球化的发展和国际交往的增多，各国在不动产买受人权益保护方面的法律规定和实践也呈现出相互借鉴和融合的趋势。例如，一些国家和地区在制定或修改相关法律时，会参考其他国家或地区的先进经验和做法，以更好地保护不动产买受人的权益。Withthedevelopmentofglobalizationandtheincreaseofinternationalexchanges,thelegalprovisionsandpracticesofcountriesinprotectingtherightsandinterestsofrealestatebuyershavealsoshownatrendofmutualreferenceandintegration.Forexample,somecountriesandregionsmayrefertotheadvancedexperiencesandpracticesofothercountriesorregionswhenformulatingoramendingrelevantlaws,inordertobetterprotecttherightsandinterestsofrealestatebuyers.不动产买受人的实体法地位在不同国家和地区的法律规定及实践中呈现出多样性。在中国，《物权法》《合同法》以及《异议复议规定》等法律法规为不动产买受人提供了基本的法律保障和排除执行权利。国际层面上的法律规定和实践也为不动产买受人权益的保护提供了有益的参考和借鉴。未来，随着法治建设的深入推进和国际交流的增多，相信不动产买受人的实体法地位将得到更加全面和完善的保护。Thesubstantivelegalstatusofrealestatebuyersexhibitsdiversityinthelegalprovisionsandpracticesofdifferentcountriesandregions.InChina,lawsandregulationssuchasthePropertyRightsLaw,theContractLaw,andtheProvisionsonObjectionReviewprovidebasiclegalprotectionandexcludetherighttoenforcementforrealestatebuyers.Thelegalprovisionsandpracticesattheinternationallevelalsoprovideusefulreferencesandguidancefortheprotectionoftherightsandinterestsofrealestatebuyers.Inthefuture,withthedeepeningoftheruleoflawconstructionandtheincreasinginternationalexchanges,itisbelievedthatthesubstantivelegalstatusofrealestatebuyerswillbemorecomprehensivelyandcomprehensivelyprotected.四、《异议复议规定》第28条的具体内容解读InterpretationofArticle28oftheRegulationsonObjectionReconsideration《异议复议规定》第28条，主要对非因买受人原因未办理过户登记情形下，买受人的权利保护进行了规定。根据这一条款，买受人在满足一定条件下，可以排除法院对出卖房屋的强制执行。这一规定为买受人提供了一种实体法上的救济途径，体现了对买受人权益的保护。Article28oftheRegulationsonObjectionReconsiderationmainlystipulatestheprotectionofthebuyer'srightsinthecaseoffailuretocompletethetransferregistrationduetoreasonsotherthanthebuyer.Accordingtothisclause,thebuyercanexcludethecourt'scompulsoryenforcementofthesoldpropertyifcertainconditionsaremet.Thisprovisionprovidesasubstantivelegalremedyforbuyers,reflectingtheprotectionoftheirrightsandinterests.具体来说，第28条规定的内容涵盖了以下几个方面：买受人必须已经与出卖人订立了有效的买卖合同。这是买受人享有排除强制执行权利的前提，只有有效的买卖合同才能确立买受人的合法权益。买受人必须已经支付了全部价款，或者已经按照合同约定支付了部分价款且将剩余价款按照人民法院的要求交付执行。这是买受人履行了合同义务的表现，也是其获得房屋所有权的必要条件。买受人必须已经实际占有该不动产，即已经对房屋进行了实际的控制和管理。这是买受人行使所有权的具体体现，也是其获得排除强制执行权利的基础。Specifically,Article28coversthefollowingaspects:thebuyermusthavealreadyenteredintoavalidsalescontractwiththeseller.Thisisaprerequisiteforthebuyertoenjoytherighttoexcludecompulsoryexecution,andonlyavalidsalescontractcanestablishthebuyer'slegitimaterightsandinterests.Thebuyermusthavealreadypaidthefullprice,orhavepaidaportionofthepriceasagreedinthecontractanddeliveredtheremainingpriceforexecutionasrequiredbythepeople'scourt.Thisisamanifestationofthebuyer'sfulfillmentofcontractualobligationsandanecessaryconditionforthemtoobtainownershipoftheproperty.Thebuyermusthaveactuallytakenpossessionoftherealestate,thatis,theyhavealreadyexercisedactualcontrolandmanagementovertheproperty.Thisisaconcretemanifestationofthebuyer'sexerciseofownershipandthebasisforobtainingtherighttoexcludecompulsoryenforcement.在解读这一条款时，需要注意几个关键点。非因买受人原因未办理过户登记是适用该条款的前提条件。如果买受人自身存在过错，如未及时办理过户手续等，则不能适用该条款。买受人排除法院强制执行的权利并非绝对，而是在满足一定条件下才能获得。这些条件包括已经订立有效买卖合同、已经支付全部或部分价款、已经实际占有不动产等。该条款的适用需要结合具体案件情况进行判断，不能简单地将其作为一个普遍适用的规则。Wheninterpretingthisclause,severalkeypointsneedtobenoted.Itisaprerequisitefortheapplicationofthisclausethatthetransferregistrationhasnotbeencompletedduetoreasonsnotattributabletothebuyer.Ifthebuyerisatfault,suchasfailingtocompletethetransferproceduresinatimelymanner,thisclausecannotbeapplied.Thebuyer'srighttoexcludecourtenforcementisnotabsolute,butcanonlybeobtainedundercertainconditions.Theseconditionsincludehavingenteredintoavalidsalescontract,havingpaidallorpartoftheprice,andhavingactualpossessionofrealestate.Theapplicationofthisclauseneedstobejudgedbasedonspecificcasesituationsandcannotbesimplyregardedasauniversallyapplicablerule.《异议复议规定》第28条为不动产买受人提供了一种实体法上的救济途径，有助于保护买受人的合法权益。在实际操作中，需要结合具体案件情况进行判断，以确保该条款的适用符合法律规定和公平原则。也需要关注该条款与其他法律制度的协调与衔接，避免出现法律适用上的冲突和矛盾。Article28oftheRegulationsonObjectionReconsiderationprovidesasubstantivelegalremedyforrealestatebuyers,whichhelpstoprotecttheirlegitimaterightsandinterests.Inpracticaloperation,itisnecessarytomakejudgmentsbasedonspecificcasesituationstoensurethattheapplicationofthisclausecomplieswithlegalprovisionsandtheprincipleoffairness.Itisalsonecessarytopayattentiontothecoordinationandconnectionbetweenthisclauseandotherlegalsystemstoavoidconflictsandcontradictionsinlegalapplication.五、不动产买受人实体法地位的司法实践分析JudicialPracticeAnalysisoftheEntityLawStatusofRealEstateBuyers在司法实践中，不动产买受人的实体法地位是一个复杂且重要的问题。这不仅涉及到买受人的权益保护，还关乎交易的稳定性与公正性。通过对相关案例的梳理和分析，我们可以发现，对于不动产买受人的实体法地位，司法机关在审判中主要遵循以下几个原则：Injudicialpractice,thesubstantivelegalstatusofrealestatebuyersisacomplexandimportantissue.Thisnotonlyinvolvestheprotectionofthebuyer'srights,butalsorelatestothestabilityandfairnessofthetransaction.Throughthesortingandanalysisofrelevantcases,wecanfindthatthejudicialauthoritiesmainlyfollowthefollowingprinciplesinthetrialofthesubstantivelegalstatusofrealestatebuyers:保护交易安全原则。在多数情况下，司法机关倾向于保护已经成立并生效的不动产交易，维护买受人的合法权益。例如，在涉及一房二卖的情况下，如果买受人已经完成了房屋过户登记手续并支付了房款，那么该买受人通常会被认定为合法的房屋所有权人，其权益将得到优先保护。Theprincipleofprotectingtransactionsecurity.Inmostcases,judicialauthoritiestendtoprotectestablishedandeffectiverealestatetransactionsandsafeguardthelegitimaterightsandinterestsofbuyers.Forexample,incasesinvolvingonehousefortwosales,ifthebuyerhascompletedthetransferregistrationproceduresandpaidthehouseprice,thebuyerisusuallyrecognizedasthelegalownerofthehouse,andtheirrightswillbegivenpriorityprotection.公平原则。在处理不动产买受人实体法地位问题时，司法机关也会考虑到公平因素。例如，在买受人与出卖人之间存在信息不对称或出卖人存在欺诈行为的情况下，司法机关可能会倾向于保护买受人的利益，避免其因不知情而遭受损失。Theprincipleoffairness.Whendealingwiththeissueofthesubstantivelegalstatusofrealestatebuyers,judicialauthoritiesalsoconsiderfairnessfactors.Forexample,insituationswherethereisinformationasymmetrybetweenthebuyerandtheseller,orwherethesellerengagesinfraudulentbehavior,judicialauthoritiesmaytendtoprotectthebuyer'sinterestsandpreventthemfromsufferinglossesduetoignorance.诚实信用原则。诚实信用原则是民法的基本原则之一，在不动产交易中也同样适用。司法机关在审判中通常会要求买受人在交易过程中保持诚实信用，不得采取欺诈、胁迫等不正当手段损害出卖人的利益。如果买受人违反了诚实信用原则，那么其实体法地位可能会受到影响。Theprincipleofhonestyandcredibility.Theprincipleofgoodfaithisoneofthefundamentalprinciplesofcivillaw,whichisalsoapplicableinrealestatetransactions.Judicialauthoritiesusuallyrequirethebuyertomaintainhonestyandcredibilityduringthetransactionprocessandnottouseimpropermeanssuchasfraudandcoerciontoharmtheseller'sinterestsduringthetrial.Ifthebuyerviolatestheprincipleofgoodfaith,theirlegalstatusmaybeaffected.在司法实践中，对于不动产买受人的实体法地位问题，司法机关通常会综合考虑多个因素，包括交易安全、公平原则和诚实信用原则等。《异议复议规定》第28条也为司法机关在处理这类问题时提供了一定的指导和依据。然而，由于不动产交易的复杂性和多样性，对于买受人的实体法地位问题仍然需要进一步研究和探讨，以更好地保护各方当事人的合法权益。Injudicialpractice,whenitcomestothesubstantivelegalstatusofrealestatebuyers,judicialauthoritiesusuallyconsidermultiplefactors,includingtransactionsecurity,fairnessprinciples,andgoodfaithprinciples.Article28oftheRegulationsonObjectionReconsiderationalsoprovidescertainguidanceandbasisforjudicialorganstohandlesuchissues.However,duetothecomplexityanddiversityofrealestatetransactions,furtherresearchandexplorationareneededonthesubstantivelegalstatusofbuyerstobetterprotectthelegitimaterightsandinterestsofallpartiesinvolved.六、完善不动产买受人实体法地位的建议Suggestionsforimprovingthesubstantivelegalstatusofrealestatebuyers随着社会和经济的发展，不动产交易日益频繁，不动产买受人的权益保护问题也日益凸显。针对我国现行法律规定在不动产买受人实体法地位方面的不足，本文提出以下建议，以期完善相关法律规定，更好地保障不动产买受人的合法权益。Withthedevelopmentofsocietyandeconomy,realestatetransactionsarebecomingincreasinglyfrequent,andtheissueofprotectingtherightsandinterestsofrealestatebuyersisalsobecomingincreasinglyprominent.InresponsetotheshortcomingsofthecurrentlegalprovisionsinChinaregardingthesubstantivelegalstatusofrealestatebuyers,thisarticleproposesthefollowingsuggestionsinordertoimproverelevantlegalprovisionsandbetterprotectthelegitimaterightsandinterestsofrealestatebuyers.应明确不动产买受人的法律地位。在相关法律法规中，应明确规定不动产买受人在交易过程中的权利和义务，确保其在交易中的合法权益得到充分保障。同时，应明确不动产买受人在不动产权属争议中的诉讼地位，使其能够依法维护自己的合法权益。Thelegalstatusoftherealestatebuyershouldbeclearlydefined.Inrelevantlawsandregulations,therightsandobligationsofrealestatebuyersinthetransactionprocessshouldbeclearlydefinedtoensurethattheirlegitimaterightsandinterestsinthetransactionarefullyprotected.Atthesametime,itisnecessarytoclarifythelitigationstatusofrealestatebuyersindisputesoverrealestateownership,sothattheycanprotecttheirlegitimaterightsandinterestsinaccordancewiththelaw.应完善不动产买受人权益保护机制。在现行法律规定中，应增加对不动产买受人权益保护的具体措施，如建立不动产买受人权益保障基金，为买受人提供风险保障；加强不动产交易的监管力度，防止欺诈、虚假宣传等不法行为的发生；完善不动产登记制度，确保买受人的不动产权益得到有效保障。Weshouldimprovethemechanismforprotectingtherightsandinterestsofrealestatebuyers.Incurrentlegalprovisions,specificmeasuresshouldbeaddedtoprotecttherightsandinterestsofrealestatebuyers,suchasestablishingarealestatebuyerrightsprotectionfundtoprovideriskprotectionforbuyers;Strengthenthesupervisionofrealestatetransactionstopreventtheoccurrenceofillegalactivitiessuchasfraudandfalseadvertising;Improvetherealestateregistrationsystemtoensurethattherealestaterightsandinterestsofbuyersareeffectivelyprotected.再次，应加强对不动产买受人权益的司法保护。在司法实践中，应加强对不动产买受人权益的保护力度，依法审理涉及不动产买受人的案件，确保买受人的合法权益得到公正、公平的裁判。同时，应加强对相关法律的适用和解释，确保法律规定的正确实施。Onceagain,judicialprotectionoftherightsandinterestsofrealestatebuyersshouldbestrengthened.Injudicialpractice,effortsshouldbemadetostrengthentheprotectionoftherightsandinterestsofrealestatebuyers,andcasesinvolvingrealestatebuyersshouldbeheardinaccordancewiththelawtoensurethatthelegitimaterightsandinterestsofbuyersarefairlyandjustlyjudged.Atthesametime,itisnecessarytostrengthentheapplicationandinterpretationofrelevantlawstoensurethecorrectimplementationoflegalprovisions.应提高不动产买受人的法律意识。通过加强法律宣传和教育，提高不动产买受人的法律意识和风险防范能力，使其在交易过程中能够更好地维护自己的合法权益。应鼓励买受人积极参与不动产交易的监管和维权活动，推动不动产市场的健康发展。Weshouldraisethelegalawarenessofrealestatebuyers.Bystrengtheninglegalpublicityandeducation,improvingthelegalawarenessandriskpreventionabilityofrealestatebuyers,theycanbetterprotecttheirlegitimaterightsandinterestsinthetransactionprocess.Buyersshouldbeencouragedtoactivelyparticipateinthesupervisionandrightsprotectionactivitiesofrealestatetransactions,andpromotethehealthydevelopmentoftherealestatemarket.完善不动产买受人实体法地位的建议包括明确买受人的法律地位、完善权益保护机制、加强司法保护以及提高买受人的法律意识等方面。这些建议的实施将有助于更好地保障不动产买受人的合法权益，促进不动产市场的健康发展。Suggestionsforimprovingthesubstantivelegalstatusofrealestatebuyersincludecla