解析《鲁滨逊漂流记》中的殖民主义

IIINotesColonialism:Colonialismistheaggressivepolicyofpowerfulcountriestoturnbackwardcountriesintocolonies,semi-coloniesorvassalsbyvariousmeansofaggression.Culturalinfiltration:Culturalpenetrationmeansthatdevelopedcountriesorregionspromotetheirownculturetoothercountriesbyusingmediaandtransnationalcorporationsascarriers,soastoachieveeconomicbenefitsandassimilateothercountries.Colonialrule:Colonialrule,whichoriginatedinEuropeinthe16thcentury,istheactofastrongcountryoccupyingaweakcountry.Colonialrulewasanactofaggressionwhichhadaseriousnegativeimpactonthecolonies.Bibliography[1]Barish,A.ThepostcolonialGothic:HauntingandHistoricityintheLiteratureafterEmpire[D].StateUniversityofNewYork,2005：28-34.[2]Burton,William.J.InaPerfectWorld:UtopiasinModernJapaneseLiterature[D].UniversityofWashington,2002:15-16.[3]朱桦.《后殖民批评视域下的鲁滨逊》[J]．嘉兴学院学报,2006(05):221-228.[4]Shawn,T.FortressofAmericanSolitude:theCrusoeToposinNineteenth-centuryAmerica[D].UniversityofKansas,2006:287-366.[5]Darlene,E.AccountingandAuthorshipinEighteenth-centuryIslandNarratives[D].CarnegieMellonUniversity,2009:9-13.[6]Williams,R.J.Nakedcreatures:RobinsonCrusoe,thebeast,andthesovereign[J].ComparativeStudies,2005(3):337-348.[7]Jonathan,E.“IMadeHimKnowHisNameShouldBeFriday’’.NamingandSexualityinRobinsonCrusoeandFoe[D].StateUniversityofNewYork,2009:23-24.[8]刘思文.试析《鲁滨逊漂流记》中鲁滨逊的三重身份.现代交际[J].2021(4):6-12.[9]王艳.论《鲁宾逊漂流记》中主人公的形象塑造[D].美与时代,2006(08):97-101.[10]钟鸣.《鲁滨逊漂流记》的双重解读[J]．外国文学研究，2000（3）：79-84.[11]Marshall,D.AutobiographicalactsinRobinsonCrusoe[J].ELH,2004(4):899-920.[12]Robert,P.Linguisticimperialism[M].Oxford;OxfordUniversityPress,1992:272-273.[13]Rousseau,J.J.Atreatiseonnaturaleducation[A].InM.Shinagel(ed.),1994:34-46.[14]许建忠.《鲁滨逊漂流记》中殖