版权说明:本文档由用户提供并上传,收益归属内容提供方,若内容存在侵权,请进行举报或认领
文档简介
WORKINGPAPER
26-11TheEffectofLow-Skill
ImmigrationRestrictionsonUS
FirmsandWorkers:EvidencefromaRandomizedLottery
MichaelA.Clemens
andEthanG.Lewis
July2026
©AmericanEconomicAssociation.ThispaperhasbeenpublishedinAmericanEconomicJournal:AppliedEconomics.Reprintedwithpermission.
ABSTRACT
USfirmshiringforeignworkersinlow-skillnonfarmjobsface
MichaelA.Clemens
abindingquotaontheH-2Bvisa,allocatedinpartthrougharandomizedlottery.Weevaluatethequota’smarginalimpact
isaneconomist
andprofessorattheJohnsHopkins
usingthelottery,anovelfirmsurvey,andapreanalysisplan.Firms
UniversitySchool
exogenouslyemployingmoreH-2Bworkersinlow-skilljobsincreaseproduction(elasticity0.20–0.22),investment(1.5–2.1),andprofits
ofGovernment
andPolicyand
nonresidentsenior
(0.15).TheelasticityofsubstitutionbetweenH-2BandUSworkers
fellowatthe
isverylow(0.8–2.0).ThustheeffectonUSemploymentiszeroorpositiveoverall,andpositiveinruralareas.Forensicanalysis
PetersonInstituteforInternationalEconomics.
suggestssimilarlylowsubstitutabilityofblack-marketlabor.
EthanG.Lewisisprofessorof
JELcodes:F22,J61,D22
economicsat
Keywords:low-skillimmigration,USfirms,randomizedlottery,H-2Bvisa,USemployment,low-skilljobs,elasticityofsubstitution
DartmouthCollege.
1750MassachusettsAvenue,NW|Washington,DC20036-1903USA+
1.202.328.9000|
WP26-11|JULY20262
Note:FirmsurveyapprovedbytheDartmouthCollegeCommitteefortheProtectionofHumanSubjects#STUDY00032360.Pre-analysisplanirreversiblyregisteredbeforedatacollection,at
https://osf.io/zdyun
;
AEARCTRegistry:
/trials/16896
,
dataandcodeavailableatClemensandLewis(2025).Webenefited
frominteractionswithSureshNaidu,ThomasChaney,MelanieMorten,
RanAbramitzky,OlivierBlanchard,JeffKling,DeanYang,LeahBoustan,
ChrisWalters,JoanLlull,WilliamCollins,PaoloFalco,ChadSparber,
JeremyWeinstein,ToddSchoellman,NicolasMorales,AnnaMariaMayda,
JoanMonras,GiovanniPeri,MulySan,ParagMahajan,SharatGanapati,
Quy-ToanDo,MartaPrato,BrittaGlennon,JonathanDingel,NelsLind,
StefanoCarattini,FedericoMandelman,HyunjuLee,JustinSandefur,
GregAuclair,andseminarparticipantsattheNBERSummerInstitute,the
NBERConferenceonImmigrantsintheUSEconomy,StanfordUniversity
DepartmentofEconomics,theCESifoVeniceSummerInstitute,the
VanderbiltUniversityDepartmentofEconomics,UniversityofDelaware
DepartmentofEconomics,theFederalReserveBankofRichmond,the
BankofCanadaWorkshoponMacroeconomicImplicationsofMigration,
theFederalReserveBankofAtlanta,theCongressionalBudgetOffice,
GeorgeMasonUniversity,thePetersonInstituteforInternationalEconomics,andtheUniversityofPittsburgh.USCitizenshipandImmigrationServices
andtheUSDepartmentofLaborprovidedpublicdataonthecertificationlottery.ThefirmsurveywasdistributedbytheNationalAssociationof
LandscapeProfessionals,theOutdoorAmusementBusinessAssociation,theSeasonalEmploymentAlliance,andtheAmericanSeafoodJobs
Alliance.WeacknowledgesupportfromOpenPhilanthropyandwethankRevaResstackforresearchassistance.Anyviewsexpressedhereinare
thoseoftheauthorsaloneanddonotrepresentanyorganization.
1
1Introduction
TheefectofimmigrationonU.S.workersremainscontroversial.Ithingescruciallyonthede-greetowhichforeignworkerscomplementorsubstituteforU.S.workersinproduction.Theliteraturegenerallyfindsthatimmigrationforhigh-skillwork—requiringhighereducationandspecializedknowledge—broadlycomplementsnativelabor.Thereislessconsensusaboutimmi-grationforlow-skillwork(
Dustmannetal.2016a
;
Blauetal.2017
,267;
BlauandHunt2019
,174;
Edoetal.2020
).Despitethegreateconomicandpoliticalimportanceofrestrictionsonlow-skillimmigration,estimatesofitsefectrangewidelydependingontheassumptionsusedtoapprox-imatecausalidentification(
Card1990
;
Borjas2003
;
OttavianoandPeri2012
;
Dustmannetal.
2016b
).
Herewestudytheeconomicefectsoflow-skillimmigrationusinganovel,large-scalepolicyexperimentintheUnitedStates:nationwide,firm-level,naturalrandomizationofrestrictionsontheemploymentofimmigrantsinlow-skilljobs.TheUnitedStateshasoneprincipalworkvisaforlow-skilllaborinthenonfarmeconomy—theH-2Bvisa.U.S.employers’accesstothatvisaislimitedbyaquotaandallocatedinpartviaarandomizedlotteryconductedbythefederalgovernment.Thisexogenousvariationallowsunusuallytransparent,policy-relevantestimatesofhowlow-skillimmigrationrestrictionsafectU.S.firmsintheshortrun.
Wefirstpre-registeredthehypothesistests,predictedtreatmentefects,andsubgrouphetero-geneitytestsimpliedbyasimplemodelofamonopolistically-competitivefirmfacingapoten-tiallyimperfectly-competitiveinputmarketforforeignandU.S.workers.Wethencollectedsurveydataon472firmscomprisingbothwinnersandlosersoftheH-2Bvisalotteriesformid-2021andmid-2022.Thisallowspre-specifiedtestsofbasictheoreticalpredictionsaboutthemagnitudeandheterogeneityoftheefectoflow-skillimmigrationrestrictions.Itfurthermoreallowspolicy-relevantestimatesofthefirm-level“combined”elasticityofsubstitution(
Hicks
1936
)betweenH-2BandU.S.workers.
1
WefindthatexogenousincreasesinH-2Bworkeremploymentforlow-skillworkcausethe
1Wefollowtheindustry-standarddefinitionof“U.S.workers”tocompriseU.S.citizensorlawfulpermanentresi-dents(green-cardholders).
2
marginalfirmtoexpandoperations.Putdiferently,restrictionsonH-2Bemploymentcausethemarginalfirmtocontract.Losingthelotteryreducesfirms’employmentoflow-skillimmigrantsbyabouthalf(–0.62logpoints).Atthemarginalfirm,thiscausesreducedrevenuewithelasticity0.20–0.22,reducedinvestmentwithelasticity1.5–2.1,andareducedrateofprofitwithelasticity0.15(allstatisticallypreciseatconventionallevels).Acrossallfirmscollectivelythisrestrictioneitherdoesnotafectorcausesareductioninemploymentoflow-skillU.S.workers,withelas-ticity0.06–0.19(statisticallyimpreciseinsomespecifications).Inpre-registeredsubsamplesoffirmslocatedinruralareas,thisreducedemploymentoflow-skillH-2Bworkerscausesreducedemploymentoflow-skillU.S.workers,withelasticity0.61(statisticallyprecise).Weestimatethatthefirm-level,policy-relevantefectiveelasticityofsubstitutionbetweenforeignH-2BlaborandU.S.laborinlow-skillworkisverylow,intherange0.8–2.0.
Overall,thisevidenceisconsistentwithsubstantialnegativeefectsoflow-skillimmigrationre-strictionsoneconomicactivityinsideandoutsiderestrictedfirms—especiallysmallfirmsandthoseinruralareas.Theseefectsarerobusttoseveralprespecifiedchanges,includingalter-nativedefinitionsoftheinstrumentalvariable,controlforthefamilywiseerrorrate,andtestsforglobalanditemnonresponse.Theyarelikewiserobusttoseveralchangesthatwerenotpre-specified,includingsensitivitytoinfluentialobservations,randomizationinference,andforensictestsforunobservedblack-marketemployment.
Wecontributetotheliteratureinthreedimensions.First,wearenotawareofpriorworklever-agingpolicy-relevantrandomizationtotransparentlyidentifytheefectsofrestrictionsonfirms’demandforlow-skillimmigrantlabor.
2
Thestandardapproachintheliteratureistoconstruct‘shift-share’instrumentalvariablesassumingthatpersistenceinimmigrantpresenceactstoex-ogenouslyallocatemorerecentimmigrationacrossregionsorfirms.
3
Butunobservedfactors
2Otherstudieshaveusednaturally-randomizedrefugeeplacementtostudyexogenousvariationinsupply,butnotvariationinrestrictionsondemand(
Glitz2012
;
Couttenieretal.2019
;
OlneyandPozzoli2021
).Somehaveexploitedrandomizedvisaallocationacrossindividualstostudytheefectsofmigrationonmigrantsandtheirfamilies(
Gibsonetal.2011
;
Mergo2016
;
Mobaraketal.2020
;
Buecheletal.2021
).Thehandfulofstudiesexploitingnaturallyrandomizedrestrictionsonfirms’demandforimmigrantlaborfocusexclusivelyonhigh-skillworkers(
Clemens2013
;
Doranetal.2022
;
Dimmocketal.2022
;
Brinattietal.2023
).AlimitationofthatworkisthatintheUnitedStates,naturalrandomizationofhigh-skillworkvisapetitionsoccursattheleveloftheindividualforeignworker,notatthelevelofthefirm.Thiscanonlyproducesubstantialrandomvariationintheimmigrantshareofemploymentacrosssmallfirmswithfewpetitions;themorepetitionsafirmfiles,themorelikelyitistoreceiveauniform,fixedshareofthoseworkers(
Perietal.2015
).Inthelow-skillvisawestudy,randomizationoccursnotattheindividuallevelbutatthefirmlevel(withnuancesdiscussedbelow).
3Usingregions:
Card
(
1990
);
AltonjiandCard
(
1991
);
Burchardietal.
(
2018
);
Monras
(
2020
);
Piyapromdee
(
2020
);
3
thatshapeeconomicoutcomescanalsopersist,withpotentialforbiasedestimation(
Jaegeretal.
2018
;
Adãoetal.2019
;
Goldsmith-Pinkhametal.2020
;
Borusyaketal.
2021
).Ouruseofnaturalrandomizationfurthermoreaddressestheliteratureonhowfirmsrespondtoshocksmoregen-erally(
BaqaeeandFarhi2019
;
BilbiieandMelitz2021
;
Buttersetal.2022
;
Guerrierietal.2022
;
Kumaretal.2022
).
Second,weexploreefectsatthefirmlevel.Within-firmresponsesarecentraltotheoveralleconomicefectofimmigration(
CardandLewis2007
;
LewisandPeri2015
;
Dustmannetal.
2015
;
Peri2016
).Recentstudyoffirm-levelefectsfocusesonhigh-skillimmigration,especiallyitsefectsoninnovationandentrepreneurship.
4
Thisworkconsidersimmigrationforlow-skillwork,complementingongoingresearchby
Amuedo-Dorantesetal.
(
2024
).
5
Anadvantageoffirm-levelresearchisthatitdoesnotrequirethestrongassumptionofrulingoutspecializationacrossfirmswithintheaggregates—suchasskill-cellsorgeographicareas—thataretypicallytheunitofanalysis(
Card2009
,2).
6
Third,wecontributeestimatesbasedonexogenouschangesinpolicy.TheLocalAverageTreat-mentEfect(LATE)estimatedfromstandard‘shift-share’instrumentalvariables,evenwhenin-ternallyvalid,maybesubstantiallybiasedasanestimateofthePolicy-RelevantTreatmentEfect(PRTE;
HeckmanandVytlacil2001
;
HeckmanandVytlacil2005
;
Carneiroetal.2011
).Intuitively,the‘supplypush’LATEofvaryingthesupplyofimmigrantsregardlessofcurrentdemandfortheirlabor—asthe‘shift-share’approachisdesignedtodo—neednotequaltheLATEfrompolicy-inducedrestrictionsoncurrent,realizeddemandfortheirlabor.Arelativelysmallandrecent
literaturefocusesinsteadonexogenouschangesinpolicyrestrictions.
7
Kimetal.
(
2022
).Usingfirms:
Lewis
(
2011
);
Olney
(
2013
);
DustmannandGlitz
(
2015
);
Mitaritonnaetal.
(
2017
);
Bursteinetal.
(
2020
);
Grayetal.
(
2020
);
Imbertetal.
(
2022
);
Mahajan
(
2024
).
4
KerrandLincoln
(
2010
);
HuntandGauthier-Loiselle
(
2010
);
Hunt
(
2011
);
Hornung
(
2014
);
Kerretal.
(
2015
);
Maydaetal.
(
2018
);
Boundetal.
(
2017
);
Maydaetal.
(
2023
);
Baharetal.
(
2020
);
KhannaandLee
(
2019
);
Glennon
(
2020
);
Glennonetal.
(
2021
);
Raux
(
2021
);
Azoulayetal.
(
2022
).
5
Amuedo-Dorantesetal.
likewisestudytheefectsofH-2Bvisaaccessonfirms,usingadministrativedataontheuniverseofH-2Bvisasponsoringfirmsin2018,butwithafundamentallydiferentidentificationstrategythatleveragesasuddenchangeintheavailabilityofvisas.Wecomparethetwostudies’resultsbelow.
6Resultsfrommoreaggregateapproachescanbesensitivetothedefinitionoftheaggregates,embodyingas-sumptionsaboutwithin-andcross-cellsubstitution(
Boustan2009
;
Dustmannetal.2016a
,33).Firm-levelstudiescanalsoclarifythemechanismofadjustmenttoimmigration,suchastherelativeimportanceofshiftsinproductiontechniqueswithinfirmsandshiftsinthesizedistributionoffirms(
DustmannandGlitz2015
;
FogedandPeri2016
).
7Onhigh-skillimmigrants:
Beerlietal.
(
2021
);onlow-skillimmigrants:
Dustmannetal.
(
2016b
);
Clemensetal.
(
2018
);
Ayromlooetal.
(
2020
);
IftandJodlowski
(
2022
);
LuoandKostandini
(
2022
);
San
(
2023
);
Eastetal.
(
2023
);
Abramitzkyetal.
(
2023
).
4
2TheUnitedStates’low-skill,nonfarmworkvisaprogram
Westudynatural,firm-levelrandomizationofaccesstotheprincipalworkvisaforlow-skilllaborintheU.S.nonfarmeconomy,the‘H-2B’visa.Itistheonlyemployment-basedvisaavailabletoforeignworkerswithoutacollegeeducationworkingoutsideagriculture,withimmaterialexceptions.98%ofallH-2Bjobsdonotrequireahighschooleducation;themeanmonthsofexperiencerequiredbyemployersis1.2.
8HaalandandRoth
(
2020
)usepoliticalsupportforexpandingtheH-2Bvisaasaproxymeasureofsupportforlow-skillimmigrationingeneral.Thisvisahasundergonerelativelylittlestudydespiteitsimportance.U.S.county-yearswhereemployerspetitionformoreH-2BworkersdonotexhibithigherunemploymentorlowerwagesonaverageforU.S.workersinrelatedlow-skillserviceoccupations(
Amuedo-Dorantesetal.
2021
),butfurtherinvestigationofthatobservedcorrelationiswarranted.
ThelegaloriginofthevisaistheImmigrationandNationalityActof1952.Itcreatedalow-skillnonimmigrantworkvisaforbothfarmandnonfarmwork—named‘H-2’aftertheAct’srelevantparagraph(66Stat168§101(a)(15)(H)(ii)).Aseparate‘H-2B’visafornonfarmlow-skillworkwascreatedbytheImmigrationReformandControlActof1986(
Pickral2007
).AnH-2Bworkerisdefinedbylawas“havingaresidenceinaforeigncountrywhichhehasnointentionofabandoningwhoiscomingtemporarilytotheUnitedStatestoperform...temporary[non-agricultural]serviceorlaborifunemployedpersonscapableofperformingsuchserviceorlaborcannotbefoundinthiscountry.”WagesforH-2Bworkersarefixedbythefederalgovernmentattheprevailingwage,“themeanwagefortheoccupationinthepertinentgeographicareaderivedfromtheBureauofLaborStatisticsOccupationalEmploymentStatisticssurvey”.
9
Foreignworkersreceivedanaverageof84,383H-2Bvisasperyearduringthefivefiscalyearsendingin2021.88%aremale.
10
TheleadingindustriesemployingH-2BworkersareAdmin-istrativeandSupportServices(especiallygroundskeeping/landscaping);Hospitality(includingrestaurants);Arts,Entertainment,andRecreation;Forestry,FishingandHunting;Construction;
8Dept.ofLaborclassificationofcertifiedpositionsinFY2021disclosuredata.
9“WageMethodologyfortheTemporaryNon-AgriculturalEmploymentH-2BProgram”,FederalRegister
80FR
24145
.
10Infiscal2021,thelatestdatareleasedatthetimeofwriting,DHSreports123,046entries(I-94only)onH-2Bvisas,ofwhich15,374women:DHS,“
NonimmigrantAdmissionsbySelectedClassesofAdmissionandSexandAge
”.
5
Figure1:WoRksITEsoFH-2BvIsApETITIoNsByU.S.couNTy,2021–2022(uNIvERsE)
Fulluniverseofcap-subjectpetitionscertifiedbytheDept.ofLabor,fiscalyears2021and2022(
DOL2022
).Countyofworksite,notnecessarilyofthepetitioningfirm.Therewerecertifiedpetitionsfromall50statesplustheDistrictofColumbiaandPuertoRico.Boundarycoordinatesfrom
USCensusBureau
(
2016
).
andFood,Beverage,Textile,andApparelManufacturing(
Barnes2020
,12).Theseroughlycor-respondtothelow-skillserviceindustrieswiththehighestprevalenceofimmigrantworkersintheUnitedStates,ledbylandscaping(
Cortés2008
,387).ThelargemajorityofworkersarecitizensofMexico(75%inFY2021);mostoftherestarecitizensofJamaica,Guatemala,Ukraine,Honduras,Serbia,thePhilippines,andElSalvador.
EmployerscaninprincipleemployanygivenH-2Bworkerindefinitelyprovidedthattheyapplysuccessfullytoextendthevisaonceayear,andthattheworkerappliestorenewthevisaonceeverythreeyearsbydepartingtheUnitedStatesforthreemonths.ButinpracticetheDepart-mentofLaborisunlikelytoapprovelong-termrehiringassatisfyingatemporaryneed.H-2Bjobsmustoferfull-timeemployment,definedasatleast35hoursperweekandatleast75%oftheworkdaysineach12-weekperiod.Workers’spousesandminorchildrencanaccompanythemintothecountry,butmaynotwork(anddonotcountagainstthevisacap).Themigrants’worksitesarewidelydistributedacrossthecountry,inall50statesplustheDistrictofColumbia,andspanningbothruralandurbanareas(
Figure1
).
6
TohireanH-2Bworker,employersmustsuccessfullypetitiontwofederalgovernmentagencies,inorder:theDepartmentofLabor(DOL),andtheDepartmentofHomelandSecurity(DHS).DOLmustcertifythattheH-2Bjobcomplieswithlaborlaw;DHSmustauthorizeissuanceofaworkvisa.Foreachemployer’spetition,DOLcertifiesthathiringtheforeignworkerwillnotadverselyafectthewagesoremploymentofU.S.workers,andthatthehiringneedis‘intermittent’,‘peakload’,‘one-timeoccurrence’,or‘seasonal’.
11
Ontheaveragepetition,88.1%ofrequestedworkerswerecertifiedinfiscalyear2021and78.8%infiscalyear2022.ForDOL-certifiedworkers,em-ployersmustthenpetitionDHS,whichdecideswhethertherearesufficientvisasforthepetitionandwhetheranythingdisqualifieseachworkerfromreceivingavisa.Afirmhiringagroupofworkerstoprovidethesameserviceatthesamelocationcanlistupto25workersonthesame
12
petition.
Thisregulatoryprocesswascreatedtoaddresslawmakers’enduringsuspicionsofnegativelabor-marketefectsfromlow-skillworkvisas.Between1885and1952,thecontracthiringoflow-skillforeignworkerswasbannedoutrightbytheForanAct,
13
becausehiringofthistypewasconsideredharmfultotheemploymentprospectsoflow-skillU.S.workers(
Orth1907
).Thesame1952lawthatreversedthisban,creatingtheH-2visa,requiredDOLtocertifythattherewereinsufficientU.S.workers“able,willing,andqualified”toperformeachindividualjobforwhichaforeignworkerwastobecontracted(
Wasem2003
).
Theefficacyofthatcertificationprocesshasbeenfrequentlyquestionedsincethen,notablybytheinfluential
Hesburgh
(
1981
,226)Commission.Itsrecommendationsculminatedinthe1990lawtightlyrestrictingallvisasbasedonlow-skill,nonfarmemployment—cappingtheH-2Bvisa(
Schuck1992
,53;
ChishtiandYale-Loehr2016
)aswellasallbuteliminatingemployment-basedgreencardsforlow-skillwork(
Aragones1991
,125;
AdlerandJarrett1992
,791).Whetherornotthoserestrictionsachievedtheirexplicitobjective—toraiseemploymentforU.S.workersrelative
tothecounterfactual—doesnotappeartohaveundergonesystematicempiricaltests.
11Thisroughlyfour-monthadministrativeprocessisdetailedby
Bruno
(
2018
),
Barnes
(
2020
)and
Bier
(
2021
).12
8CFR214.2(h)(2)(ii)
.
13
23Stat.332
,48thCongress,Sess.II,Chap.164.
7
3Firm-levelrandomizationoflow-skillimmigrantemployment
TwofeaturesoftheinstitutionalprocessforH-2Bvisaallocationcreatethenaturalexperimentthatwestudy.
First,theH-2Bvisaissubjecttoastatutorycapof66,000peryear.ThiscapwaswrittenintolawbytheImmigrationActof1990,andremainsinforce(8USC§1184(g)(1)(B)).In2005itwassplitintoalimitof33,000visasforthefirsthalfofeachfiscalyear(October–March)and33,000forthesecondhalf(April–September)(
Bruno2018
).ThecapwassetwithoutanyquantitativeempiricalevidenceofitsefectsontheU.S.labormarket.By2022thestatutorycapwasoversubscribedbyseveralhundredpercent:Forthe33,000visasinthestatutoryquotaforthesecondhalfofFY2022,employerspetitionedDOLfor136,555workers.
14
Second,anaturallyrandomizedlotteryconstrainsfirms’accesstoH-2Bvisasunderthestatu-torycap.BecauseDOLcertificationisrequiredbeforefirmscanpetitionDHSforavisa,andbecausethedemandforvisasatDHSgreatlyexceedsthesupply,firms’abilitytoobtainavisaatDHSishighlydependentonhowquicklytheycancompleteprocessingatDOL.Knowingthis,andtoensureequitableaccesstovisasacrossfirms,DOLbeginsprocessingfirms’petitionsinrandomizedorder.Itbegandoingthisafteranunprecedentednumberofpetitionswerereceivedforthesecondhalfoffiscalyear2019,causingtheDOLservertocrashandmakingitimpossibletodeterminetheorderinwhichpetitionshadbeenfiled.
15
DOLrandomlyassignseachpetitionaletter:AthroughEin2021,AthroughGin2022.ItbeginsprocessingtheApetitionsfirst,andstartstheBpetitionswhenstafbecomeavailablebuttherearenonewApetitionslefttobegin(butotherstafmaystillbefinishingsomeApetitions).ItthenproceedstopetitionswithletterC,D,Eandsoforthinorder(
Figure2
).PetitionsreceivinganAresultarehighlylikelytoemergefromDOLprocessingbeforethevisacapisreached;petitionswithallotherresultsarenot.TheresultisthatthereisalargerandomcomponenttotheorderinwhichfirmsgetpasttherequiredDOLadministrativestep,andthustheirabilitytopetitionDHSforvisasbeforethestatutoryquotaofvisasisexhausted.
14FederalRegisterMay18,2022,
87FR30334
.Notethatthevisaquotaverytightlybindsnotjustdemandbutsupply:ThereislittleconstraintonlaborsupplygiventhatH-2Bjobscommonlyofermigrantworkersover1,000%oftheirhome-countryreservationwage(
Brodbecketal.2018
).
15FederalRegister,March4,2019,
84FR7403
.
8
Figure2:H-2BFoREIGNwoRkERpETITIoNDEcIsIoNDATEsByLoTTERyREsuLT,uNIvERsEoFFIRms
(a)Fiscalyear2021,secondhalf
Petitionsperday
Lo性eryAGuaranteedvisaSupplemental
endsquotaexhaustedvisasannounced
B
C
D
E
Jan.1Feb.1Mar.1Apr.1May1Jun.1
Decisiondate,2021
125
100
75
50
25
0
(b)Fiscalyear2022,secondhalf
Petitionsperday
E
DF
C
G
Jan.1Feb.1Mar.1Apr.1May1Jun.1
Decisiondate,2022
Lo性eryends
A
B
125
100
75
50
25
0
Guaranteedvisaquotaexhausted
Supplemental
visasannounced
Theunitofobservationispetitions.ShownistheuniverseoffirmsenteringtheJanuarylotteryforworktobeperformedinthesecondhalfofeachfiscalyear(April1–September30).Epanechnikovkerneldensities,bandwidth2days.‘Decisiondate’isthedateoftheDepartmentofLabor’sdecisiononwhetherornottocertifyeachpetition,anecessaryconditionofproceedingtopetitionUSCISforavisa.
9
Inthisnaturalexperiment,weconsider‘treatment’aseachU.S.firm’semploymentoflow-skillimmigrantworkersonH-2Bvisas.Randomizationintotreatmentatthefirmleveliscontinuousandfuzzy.
Treatmentiscontinuousbecauserandomizationisatthepetitionlevel,notnecessarilythefirmlevel.Formostfirms,thisdoesequatetorandomizationatthefirmlevel,becausethelargema-jorityoffirmsfileasinglepetitionforagroupofworkers(median11workersperpetition).Butgroupsofworkersperformingdiferentoccupationsatdiferentworksitescanberequestedonmultipleseparatepetitionsbythesamefirm.Sincelargerfirmsaremorelikelytofilemultiplepe-titions,wemeasuretreatmentbythefractionofworkerspetitionedforbyeachfirm—acrossoneormultiplepetitions—thatreceivetimelyDOLcertification.Thatfractionisrandomlyassignedatthefirmlevel.RandomizationoccursacrosstheuniverseofH-2Bemployersnationwide,ob-viatingsiteselectionbias(
Allcott2015
).
TreatmentisfuzzybecausetherearewaysforsomefirmstohireH-2BworkersregardlessoftheirDOLlotteryresult—thatis,therearesome‘always-taker’firms(
Angristetal.
1996
).First,theworkersonapetitionareexemptfromthevisacapiftheyarealreadypresentintheUnitedStates(12.7%ofworkersinthelottery).ForthemtherandomizedtimingofDOLprocessingdoesnotafecttheiraccesstovisas.Second,firmsthatare“cappedout”—thatis,firmsthatreceiveDOLcertificationafterthe33,000visaquotaforthatsemesterisexhausted—cansometimesobtainanH-2Bvisafroma“supplemental”visaallocationcreatedinthemiddleoftherelevantsemester.Bythetimesuchsupplementalallocationsareannounced,almostallfirmshavecompletedDOLprocessing,sotheiraccesstoanysupplementalvisasisnotlegallyrestrictedbytheDOLlottery.Butthelotteryresultneverthelessstronglyinfluencesfirms’H-2Bhiring.Thisisbecause1)itisexanteuncertainwhetherasupplementalallocationwilloccuratall,andifthereisone,2)itisexanteuncertainhowlargeanysupplementalallocationwillbe,but3)supplementalallocationsaregenerallyfarlowerthanemployerdemand.
16
16DHShasdiscretionunderlawtoapprovesupplementalH-2Bvisas.Itinterpretsthislegalauthoritytoallowissuanceofamaximumof64,716supplementalvisasperyear,toreflect“theneedsofAmericanbusiness”(FederalRegister,May25,2021,
86FR28205
).Butinpractice,thenumberofsupplementalvisasapprovedisfarlessthanthemaximumallowedandfarlessthanthenumberrequestedbyemployers—ifanysuppleme
温馨提示
- 1. 本站所有资源如无特殊说明,都需要本地电脑安装OFFICE2007和PDF阅读器。图纸软件为CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.压缩文件请下载最新的WinRAR软件解压。
- 2. 本站的文档不包含任何第三方提供的附件图纸等,如果需要附件,请联系上传者。文件的所有权益归上传用户所有。
- 3. 本站RAR压缩包中若带图纸,网页内容里面会有图纸预览,若没有图纸预览就没有图纸。
- 4. 未经权益所有人同意不得将文件中的内容挪作商业或盈利用途。
- 5. 人人文库网仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对用户上传分享的文档内容本身不做任何修改或编辑,并不能对任何下载内容负责。
- 6. 下载文件中如有侵权或不适当内容,请与我们联系,我们立即纠正。
- 7. 本站不保证下载资源的准确性、安全性和完整性, 同时也不承担用户因使用这些下载资源对自己和他人造成任何形式的伤害或损失。
最新文档
- 2026景区英文面试题库及答案
- (2026年)骶尾部藏毛窦患者护理查房课件
- 人工智能证券风险管理-第15篇
- 人工智能风险评估模型-第36篇
- 交易行为模式识别-第73篇
- 成都市青白江区八所“两自一包”公办学校2026年公开招聘编外教师(167人)考试参考题库及答案详解
- 2026年白银市平川区住房和城乡建设局人员招聘考试备考题库及答案详解
- 2026年福建省莆田市住房和城乡建设局人员招聘笔试备考试题及答案详解
- 2026云南曲靖市沾益区教育体育局所属事业单位招聘学科教师5人考试模拟试题及答案详解
- 2026年黄石市铁山区住房和城乡建设局人员招聘笔试备考试题及答案详解
- 2025年新疆生产建设兵团兴新职业技术学院辅导员招聘笔试试题附答案
- T∕CNCIA 01043-2025 粉末涂装涂层质量技术要求 农林及工程机械
- 《会计审计专业英语》课件
- 油井清蜡维护课件
- 内河造船厂可行性研究报告
- 重症创伤的评估与ICU管理
- 互联网营销师(视频创推员)上岗证考试题库及答案
- 机关军训活动方案
- 2025年中考数学总复习《二次函数与反比例函数》专项检测卷(附答案)
- HGT 6332-2024《液体脲醛缓释肥料》
- 校园文印室外包服务投标方案(技术标)
评论
0/150
提交评论