版权说明:本文档由用户提供并上传,收益归属内容提供方,若内容存在侵权,请进行举报或认领
文档简介
1、Copyright The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. Permission required for reproduction or display.,C H A P T E R 4,Individual Variations,Individual Variations Chapter Outline,Intelligence Individual Intelligence Tests Individual Tests Versus Group Tests Theories of Multiple Intelligence Controversies and Is
2、sues in Intelligence,Individual Variations Chapter Outline, continued,Learning and Thinking Styles Dichotomies of Learning and Thinking Styles Evaluating Learning and Thinking Styles Personality and Temperament Personality Temperament,Individual Variations,Learning Goals for Chapter 4 1.Discuss the
3、concept of intelligence, how it is measured, and some controversies about its use by educators. 2.Describe and evaluate learning and thinking styles. 3.Define personality, identify the “big five” factors in personality, and discuss person-situation interaction. Also, define temperament, identify thr
4、ee types of childrens temperament, and evaluate teaching strategies linked to childrens temperament.,Individual Variations,Intelligence,Controversies and Issues in Intelligence,Individual Tests Versus Group Tests,Theories of Multiple Intelligence,Individual Intelligence Tests,Intelligence,Intelligen
5、ce: Problem-solving skills and the ability to adapt to and learn from lifes everyday experiences,Individual Intelligence TestsThe Binet Tests,Mental Age Intelligence Quotient Normal Distribution,An individuals level of mental development relative to others A symmetrical distribution Majority of the
6、scores falling in the middle Few scores in the extremes,Intelligence The Normal Curve,Individual Intelligence TestsThe Wechsler Scales,Age-related versions provide an overall IQ and also yield both verbal and performance IQs. (WPPSI-P) Wechsler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence-Revised. Ag
7、es 4 to 6 (WAIS-R) Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Revised. Ages 6 to 16 (WAIS-R) Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-Revised,Wechsler Subscales,Group Intelligence Tests,Advantage More convenient and economical Disadvantages Examiner cannot: establish rapport determine students level of anxie
8、ty Student: might not understand instructions might be distracted by other students,Theories of Multiple IntelligenceEarly Views,Spearman (1927): People have both general intelligence (g) and specific types of intelligence (s). Thurston (1938): People have seven specific intellectual abilities (verb
9、al comprehension, associative memory, word fluency, reasoning, number ability, spatial visualization, and perceptual speed).,Theories of Multiple IntelligenceSternbergs Theory,Sternbergs Triarchic Theory of Intelligence Analytical: analyze, judge, evaluate, compare/contrast Creative: create, design,
10、 invent, originate, and imagine Practical: use, apply, implement, put into practice,Theories of Multiple IntelligenceGardners Theory,Gardners Eight Frames of Mind Skills are represented in the following areas: Verbal Musical Mathematical Intrapersonal Spatial Interpersonal Bodily-kinesthetic Natural
11、ist,The various theories have stimulated us to think more broadly about what makes up peoples intelligence and competence.,Theories of Multiple Intelligence Evaluating the Multiple-IntelligenceApproaches,IntelligenceControversies and Issues,Nature and Nurture Genetic components provide a propensity
12、for a particular developmental trajectory. Enriching environments can improve school achievement and the acquisition of skills.,Intelligence Controversies and Issues,Ethnicity and Culture Ethnic comparisons The consensus is that due to environmental factors, on average in the U.S., children from Afr
13、ican American and Latino families score lower than white children on IQ tests.,IntelligenceControversies and Issues,Culturally biased tests favor: Urban over rural children Middle-income over low-income children White children over minority children Culture-fair tests, free of cultural bias: Type 1:
14、 Include items familiar to all SES and ethnic backgrounds Type 2: All of the verbal items are removed,IntelligenceControversies and Issues,Ability Grouping and Tracking Between-Class Ability Grouping groups students based on their ability or achievement. Advantages - Narrows class skill range - Prev
15、ents “less able” students from holding back more talented students Disadvantages - Stigmatizes students in lower track - Segregates students by SES and ethnicity,IntelligenceControversies and Issues,Ability Grouping and Tracking Within-Class Ability Grouping involves placing students in two or three
16、 groups within a class.,Learning and Thinking Styles,Learning and Thinking Styles,Dichotomies of Learning and Thinking Styles,Evaluating Learning and Thinking Styles,Learning and Thinking StylesDichotomies,Reflective Students surpass Impulsive Students at Reading comprehension Remembering structured
17、 information Problem solving and decision making Goal setting Setting high standards for performance,Learning and Thinking Styles Dichotomies,Actively construct knowledge Give meaning to material Focus on internal rewards Are self-motivated,Are passive learners Fail to tie information to a larger fr
18、amework Focus on external rewards,Deep Learners,Surface Learners,Personality and Temperament,Personality and Temperament,Personality,Temperament,Personality and Temperament,Personality: The distinctive thoughts, emotions, and behaviors that characterize the way an individual adapts to the world,Temperament: A persons behavioral style and characteristic way of
温馨提示
- 1. 本站所有资源如无特殊说明,都需要本地电脑安装OFFICE2007和PDF阅读器。图纸软件为CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.压缩文件请下载最新的WinRAR软件解压。
- 2. 本站的文档不包含任何第三方提供的附件图纸等,如果需要附件,请联系上传者。文件的所有权益归上传用户所有。
- 3. 本站RAR压缩包中若带图纸,网页内容里面会有图纸预览,若没有图纸预览就没有图纸。
- 4. 未经权益所有人同意不得将文件中的内容挪作商业或盈利用途。
- 5. 人人文库网仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对用户上传分享的文档内容本身不做任何修改或编辑,并不能对任何下载内容负责。
- 6. 下载文件中如有侵权或不适当内容,请与我们联系,我们立即纠正。
- 7. 本站不保证下载资源的准确性、安全性和完整性, 同时也不承担用户因使用这些下载资源对自己和他人造成任何形式的伤害或损失。
最新文档
- 2025江西万通高级技工学校工作人员招聘考试试题
- 2025江苏省南通中等专业学校工作人员招聘考试试题
- 库内拦挡坝施工指导书
- 太阳能光伏板安装专项施工方案
- 地下水控制专项施工方案
- 2026年航空材料创新报告
- 卵石水系施工指导书
- 2026年银发经济智能老年唱戏机高清大屏创新报告
- 高中生借助地理信息系统模拟城市内涝应急疏散跨区域协作方案设计课题报告教学研究课题报告
- 2026年Q1公募基金转债持仓分析:“被动稀释”与“主动调仓”并行
- DB11∕T 637-2024 房屋结构综合安全性鉴定标准
- 地理(江苏南京卷)(考试版)
- 食堂买菜合同协议
- 2025年学前教育宣传月“守护育幼底线成就美好童年”主题活动实施方案
- TCALC 003-2023 手术室患者人文关怀管理规范
- 国家职业技术技能标准 6-25-04-07 广电和通信设备电子装接工 人社厅发20199号
- 投诉法官枉法裁判范本
- DLT 5285-2018 输变电工程架空导线(800mm以下)及地线液压压接工艺规程
- JBT 14581-2024 阀门用弹簧蓄能密封圈(正式版)
- DZ∕T 0368-2021 岩矿石标本物性测量技术规程(正式版)
- 2024年基金从业资格(含三个科目)考试题库(浓缩500题)
评论
0/150
提交评论