DCPSFRESULTSFRAMEWORK：dcpsf结果框架.docx

Darfur Community Peace and Stability Fund Results Framework 2014DCPSF RESULTS FRAMEWORK (2014-15) Version revised in October 2013 in a collaboration effort by the Technical Secretariat, Implementing Partners and DonorsIndicatorBaseline 2014 TargetRisks and assumptionsSourcesPURPOSE: Communities stabilised, trust & confidence and peaceful coexistence between communities is restored, paving the way towards early recovery% of community members sampled stating that trust & confidence is restoredA high proportion of community members, indicate a lack of trust & confidence between diverse communities92% (2012) DCPSF Perception Survey April 2013. The survey was conducted only in the areas where DCPSF projects operate.90%(maintain 2012 level +/- 5%) Different types of conflicts that DCPSF does not address (e.g. conflicts between the national and rebel groups) do not affect the situation (A) Willingness of tribal leaders/local & central government to agree, promote & implement common reconciliation agendas (A) Spoilers interfere (R) Lack of access and insecurity problems (R) DCPSF Perception Survey SenseMaker Focus group meetings with tribal/civil society leaders% of tribal/civil society leaders sampled agreeing to a common and/or collaborative approach on how to address root causes of conflict Polarised opinion exists amongst tribal/civil society leaders vis-vis process for reconciliation 94% (2012)85% (maintain 2012 level +/- 5%)OUTPUT 1: EFFECTIVE COMMUNITY-LEVEL CONFLICT RESOLUTION AND PREVENTION PLATFORMS IN DARFUR ARE IN PLACE1.1 Number of community based resolution mechanisms (CBRM) functioning A high proportion of mechanisms function without adequate legitimacy, authority or capacity160 (2012)To be identified upon the call for proposal 2014 Achievements of the resolution mechanisms are informed (A) Existing community based resolution mechanisms are willing to accommodate the views of vulnerable groups (A) Increased support from government in forming and running the conflict resolution mechanisms (A) Sustainability of capacity of CBRM members (A) Number of different types of conflicts that CBRM does not address (e.g. conflicts between the national and rebel groups) remain unchanged (A) Resolutions delivered by the mechanisms are satisfied by community people (A) Difficulties in monitoring as community members might not be willing to share sensitive information on satisfaction with reconciliation mechanisms (R) Spoilers interfere (R) mechanisms Sustainability of the conflict resolution mechanisms after project completes (R) Though vulnerable groups are represented, their representative are unable to voice the concerns of their constituencies (R) DCPSF monitoring visits DCPSF perception survey Progress reports submitted by DCPSF Implementing Partners SenseMaker1.2 % of community members with access to CBRM95% (2012)70%(for newly targeted communities)1.3 % of the number of cases submitted and resolved. A high proportion of communal cases are not resolved amicably 50%1.4 % of community members stating an increase in the percentage of communal cases reported and solved To be measured in the beginning of 2014.70% of sampled community members1.5 % of community members stating a decrease in communal conflicts because of the presence of CBRMTo be measured in the beginning of 2014.70%1.6 Number of vulnerable group representatives (women, youth, minorities) actively participating within CBRMA high proportion of mechanisms lack adequate representation of vulnerable groups* (2013) This will be consolidated based of the ongoing projects 2013At least one representative of each vulnerable group participate in the CBRM (e.g. 1 woman, 1 male and 1 female youth)1.7 % of vulnerable group representatives contributing to CBRMTo be measured in the beginning of 2014.Proportional representatives of all vulnerable groups in the community 1.8 % of community members stating satisfaction with CBRMA high proportion of community members declare not having access to and dissatisfaction with reconciliation mechanisms83% (2012)80% (maintain 2012 level +/- 5%)OUTPUT 2: COOPERATION BETWEEN COMMUNITIES ENHANCED THROUGH SHARED LIVELIHOOD ASSETS AND INCOME GENERATING OPPORTUNITIES ACTIVITIES2.1 Number of community initiatives An “initiative” is counted as an opportunity created for collaborative livelihood and income generating opportunities (e.g. three training sessions to establish one income generating opportunity are not counted as three but as one. that deliver collaborative livelihoods & income generating opportunities (including joint labour, transactions, community youth and women)98 (2012)To be identified upon the call for proposal 2014 Scope for diversifying and creation on new livelihoods & enhancing income generating opportunities exist (R) Widespread tensions over the sharing of assets & resources, fuelling conflict between communities (A) Markets are managed to facilitate interactions among diverse communities (A) Physical access to market ensured (e.g. existence of roads, transportation, security along the road) (A) Economic transactions between diverse communities are impeded by a lack of trust & confidence (A) Polarised communities have poor economic interactions (A) Increased conflict resolution among diverse communities improves trading between diverse communities (A) Other security situation unchanged (A) Progress reports submitted by DCPSF Implementing Partners DCPSF monitoring visits DCPSF perception survey2.2 Number of new/re-established markets that enable diverse communities to interact/cooperate Whilst markets exist across Darfur, many are segregated by community as a result of the protracted conflict in Darfur, thereby inhibiting the free flow of trade and interaction 15 (2012)To be identified upon the call for proposal 20142.3 % of community members stating an increase in the economic interventions between diverse communitiesTo be measured in the beginning of 2014. 70% OUTPUT 3: COOPERATION BETWEEN COMPETING COMMUNITIES OVER MANAGEMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES AND ACCESS TO BASIC SOCIAL SERVICES INCREASED3.1 Number of community based management mechanisms The information monitored is not the number of infrastructure but the management mechanisms. for natural resource (water, pasture, forest reserves, migration routes, minerals, etc) This to be disaggregated according to activity ie water, pasture, migration route, minerals, etc in reporting To be measured in the beginning of 2014To be identified upon the call for proposal 2014 Access to the social services is equally allocated among the diverse groups (A) Community members have willingness to share social services among divers groups (A) Community responsiveness/willingness to regeneration of pastureland and reforestation (A) Increased enrolment to education facilities will be representative of all communities (A) Lack of availability & equitable access to education/health initiatives are a source of tension (A) Location of facilities built selected in the areas that diverse groups have access (A) Management of water resources is a cause of conflict in the concerned communities (A) New or rehabilitated migratory routes are clear to all communities using the routes or farming along the routes (A) Spoilers interfere in the equitable delivery and management of resources (R) Sufficient educators and primary health care personnel will be available to serve all communities represented (A) There are enforcement mechanisms to implement the agreed migratory routes demarcation (A) SenseMaker Progress reports submitted by DCPSF Implementing Partners DCPSF monitoring visits Statistical data from Ministry of General Education and Ministry of Health DCPSF perception survey3.2 Number of migratory routes demarcated / cleared /rehabilitated through communal consensus Lack of clearly defined migratory routes gives rise to conflicts between farmers and nomads in Darfur * (2013) to be consolidated based on ongoing 2013 projectsTo be identified upon the call for proposal in 20143.3 Number of areas of restoration of communal pasture/fodder/communal forests * (2013) to be consolidated based on ongoing 2013 projectsTo be identified upon the call for proposal in 20143.4 % of community members confirming communal consensus around restoration of migratory routes/pasture/fodder/communal forestsTo be measured in the beginning of 2014.70%3.5 Number of social service infrastructure rehabilitated/newly built This to be disaggregated by the social service rehabilitated or built ie school, clinic, etc in reportingTo be collected in the beginning of 2014To be confirmed upon the call for proposal 3.6 % of community members stating an increase in the number of interactions between diverse communities through basic services (health initiatives, schools, vocational education, water) To be measured in the beginning of 2014.70%OUTPUT 4: A NETWORK OF EFFECTIVE COLLABORATIVE PEACEBUILDING INITIATIVES CREATED AND FEEDING INTO WIDER PEACE FORA AND DARFUR AGENDAS 4.1 Number of civil society organisations develop capacity to prioritise, plan, design and implement projects leading to equitable and sustainable growth (including peacebuilding skills, livelihoods skills, vocational training, etc)Mapping assessments suggest weak institutional capacity of Darfuri civil society in advocating, planning and implementing priority projects leading to equitable and sustainable growth48 These include the 18 running projects that partner with local NGO and CBOs. Each implementing partner has one partner except World Vision has three NEF and CIS have two partners each, and 26 projects are run by the SGPM project. (2012)45 (5 from window 2 and 40 from SGPM) Conflict sensitive approaches are employed by each civil society group (A) DCPSF peace committee link to track peacebuilding actors and state and regional actors (A) Limited absorption capacity and availability of adequate CSOs (R) Such initiatives to compliment other initiatives by actors such as UNAMID, JSMT, DDDC (A) There are approvals from the Governments to implement peacebuilding activities (A) There is an interest amongst key stakeholders including INGO sector to upgrade Darfurian civil society (A) There is support from the federal level Government (A) There is willingness within the high level mechanisms to be