原文.doc

_27m3矿用挖掘机斗杆结构有限元分析(论文+DWG图纸)

收藏

资源目录
跳过导航链接。
_27m3矿用挖掘机斗杆结构有限元分析(论文DWG图纸).rar
_27m3矿用挖掘机斗杆结构有限元分析(论文+DWG图纸)
27m3矿用挖掘机斗杆结构有限元分析
(05)MG132320-W型采煤左牵引部机壳的加工工艺规程及数控编程
说明书.doc---(点击预览)
摘要.doc---(点击预览)
工艺卡片.doc---(点击预览)
任务书.doc---(点击预览)
Thumbs.db
采煤机左牵引部机壳1A0.dwg
采煤机左牵引部机壳2A0.dwg
采煤机左牵引部机壳3A0.dwg
(工艺)CA6140车床后托架加工工艺及夹具设计
140108-21孟凡华毕业设计-李风
论文.doc---(点击预览)
英.doc---(点击预览)
汉.doc---(点击预览)
diansuan.doc---(点击预览)
14030925张庆彬
14108-02史永杰毕业设计-李风
论文
译文
27m³矿用挖掘机斗杆结构有限元分析
6136车床数控改造
ZF041论文1.doc---(点击预览)
6136车床数控改造设计电路原理图.dwg
C618横装配图.dwg
Desktop_.ini
总装图2.dwg
BW-100型泥浆泵曲轴箱与液力端特性分析、设计
CA6140车床尾座体工艺工装设计
毕业设计说明书.doc---(点击预览)
CA6140车床尾座体工艺工装设计
ZL15型轮式装载机
译文.doc---(点击预览)
程序.doc---(点击预览)
毕业设计论文.doc---(点击预览)
cad
三坐标数控磨床设计
论文.doc---(点击预览)
翻译.doc---(点击预览)
目 录.doc---(点击预览)
开题报告.doc---(点击预览)
主轴.bak
主轴.dwg
单片机控制原理图D.bak
单片机控制原理图D.dwg
工作台D.bak
工作台D.dwg
总体图D.bak
总体图D.dwg
五金模具毕业设计盖冒垫片设计说明书.doc
盖冒垫片设计说明书.doc---(点击预览)
~WRL1734.tmp
~WRL1878.tmp
冲压.dwg
盖冒垫片.dwg
冲击回转钻进技术
说明书.doc---(点击预览)
翻译.doc---(点击预览)
开题报告.doc---(点击预览)
专业文献阅读报告.doc---(点击预览)
总装图.bak
拼图.bak
拼图.dwg
装配,拼图.bak
装配,拼图.dwg
钻头.bak
工艺-MG250591-WD型采煤机右摇臂壳体的加工工艺规程及数控编程
毕业设计论文.doc---(点击预览)
摘要.doc---(点击预览)
冷加工工艺过程卡片.doc---(点击预览)
任务书.doc---(点击预览)
采煤机右摇臂壳体A0第一张.dwg
采煤机右摇臂壳体A0第三张.dwg
采煤机右摇臂壳体A0第二张.dwg
工艺-WH212减速机壳体加工工艺及夹具设计
说明书1.DOC---(点击预览)
减速器机座.dwg
减速器机盖.bak
减速器机盖.dwg
工卡.bak
工卡.dwg
钻夹具零件图.dwg
钻孔夹具.dwg
镗夹具零件图.dwg
镗床夹具1.dwg
工艺-曲轴箱零件加工工艺及夹具设计
曲轴箱零件加工工艺设计
带位移电反馈的二级电液比例节流阀设计
带位移电反馈的二级电液比例节流阀设计
手机翻盖注射模的设计
注意.txt---(点击预览)
毕 业 设 计部分内容.doc---(点击预览)
侧滑块零件.dwg
全部 内容.bmp
装配图.dwg
零件.dwg
李鑫
模具-弯管接头塑料模设计
动模板.dwg
定位环.dwg
工件图.dwg
左型心滑块.dwg
弯管接头.dwg
弯管接头装配图.dwg
拉料杆.dwg
推杆.dwg
斜导柱.dwg
楔紧块.dwg
滚针轴承自动装针机设计
图片
开题报告
翻译
设计图
说明书
MODELl_5.bin
model_1.avi
瓶塞注塑模 修改
瓶塞论文最终.doc---(点击预览)
封面.doc---(点击预览)
~$钢鸟.doc---(点击预览)
~$瓶塞论文最终.doc---(点击预览)
Drawing1.dwg
Drawing10.dwg
Drawing2.dwg
Drawing5.dwg
Drawing6.bak
Drawing6.dwg
Drawing7.dwg
Drawing8.dwg
zhong zhi gang.dwg
织机导板零件数控加工工艺与工装设计
毕业设计
胡军雄
设计-MQ100 门式起重机总体
设计-插秧机系统设计
CAD图纸
论文
设计-旋转门的设计
目录.doc---(点击预览)
毕业设计论文.doc---(点击预览)
毕业设计正文.doc---(点击预览)
文献综述.doc---(点击预览)
零件图
门体装配图.dwg
设计-电脑主板回焊炉及控制系统设计
B9912060--论文.doc---(点击预览)
B9912060--目 录.doc---(点击预览)
B9912060--毕业设计论文摘要.doc---(点击预览)
B9912060--任务书.doc---(点击预览)
B9912060--ZJ.dwg
B9912060--大链轮.dwg
B9912060--套筒1.dwg
B9912060--小轴.dwg
B9912060--小链轮.dwg
B9912060--支承角座.dwg
B9912060--毡圈油封.dwg
B9912060--炉.dwg
B9912060--轴.dwg
B9912060--轴承座.dwg
B9912060--轴承透盖.dwg
B9912060--轴承闷盖.dwg
B9912060--部装2.dwg
B9912060--链轮.dwg
车床数控改造
翻译.doc---(点击预览)
毕业论文.doc---(点击预览)
开题报告.doc---(点击预览)
x轴进给系统.bak
x轴进给系统.dwg
z轴进给系统.bak
z轴进给系统.dwg
主轴箱.bak
主轴箱.dwg
回转刀架.bak
回转刀架.dwg
车床外观图.bak
车床外观图.dwg
边旭
CAD
文档
车床数控改造.rar
压缩包内文档预览:
预览图 预览图 预览图 预览图 预览图 预览图 预览图 预览图 预览图 预览图
编号:19294462    类型:共享资源    大小:60.62MB    格式:RAR    上传时间:2019-05-17 上传人:乐****! IP属地:广东
20
积分
关 键 词:
27m3矿用挖掘机斗杆结构有限元分析论文+DWG图纸 27m3矿用挖掘机斗杆结构有限元分析 矿用挖掘机斗杆结构有限元分析 矿用挖掘机斗杆
资源描述:
_27m3矿用挖掘机斗杆结构有限元分析(论文+DWG图纸),27m3矿用挖掘机斗杆结构有限元分析论文+DWG图纸,27m3矿用挖掘机斗杆结构有限元分析,矿用挖掘机斗杆结构有限元分析,矿用挖掘机斗杆
内容简介:
Aspects to improve cabin comfort of wheel loaders and excavators according to operatorsAbstractComfort plays an increasingly important role in interior design of earth moving equipment. Although research has been conducted on vehicle interiors of wheel loa- ders and excavators, hardly any information is known about the operators opinion. In this study a questionnaire was completed by machine operators to get their opinion about aspects which need to be improved in order to design a more comfortable vehi- cle interior. The results show that almost half of the operators rate the comfort of th- eir cabinaverage or poor. According to the operators, cab comfort of wheel loaders can be increased by improving seat comfort. Besides improving seat comfort, cabin comfort of excavators can be improved by changing the cab design (including dimensions, ingress/egress), view, reliability, and climate control.Keywords: Cabin comfort; Operators opinion; Earth moving equipment.1. IntroductionComfort plays an increasingly important role in vehicle design. As machine operators of earth moving equipment often spend long hours in their vehicle some- times even more than 8 h a daycomfort is a major issue in interior design of these machines.Operating earth-moving machinery is not a physically heavy job and can be sustained for long periods.Nevertheless, operating such a machine appears to be a risk factor for musculoskeletal disorders, especially when the task is not interrupted by other working activities or breaks. Zimmerman et al. (1997) showed that the main problems of earth-moving machinery operators concern physical complaints in the neck/ shoulder and low back region, general fatigue and feelings of discomfort. This might be attributed to a combination of static load during prolonged sitting frequ- ently in awkward posturesexposure to whole body vibrations, and handling and steering the machine(Zimmerman et al., 1997; Tola et al., 1988; de Looze et al., 2000).A comfortable well-designed vehicle interior may reduce awkward postures and provide an environment that stimulates optimal operator performance. Based on a literature review about musculoskeletal disorders and their risk factors, Zimmerman et al. (1997) made four recommendations for reducing work-related musculoskeletal disorders among operators: minimizing of magnitude and frequency of vibration rea- ching the operator; locating controls optimally to minimize reach distances, trunk exion and trunk rotation; providing maximum operator visibility from an upright supported seated posture; and taking regular breaks to minimize the effects of sus- tained postures. Improvements of cab comfort are very often based on reducing the risk factors for work-related musculoskeletal disorders (Zimmerman et al., 1997; Attebrant et al., 1997). Only a few studies have mentioned aspects which operators wishto see improved. Nakada (1997) describes the desirability ranking for dump trucks and wheel loaders given by product creators, designers, design engineers, operators and young people. Nakada, (1997) shows that much design attention has been paid to instrument panel/monitors and meters and the operator seat. Unfor- tunately, the operators opinions cannot be distinguished in Nakadas study (1997).However, in order to design a comfortable vehicle interior, the opinion of the operators is important as they are the end-users of the machines. Their user expe- rience may be of great help designing a more comfortable vehicle interior. The aim of the current study is to nd aspects mentioned by wheel loader and excavator ope- rators, which can be used to improve the comfort of vehicle interiors in the future. In this article we describe the results of a questionnaire given to 273 machine operators. They were asked their opinion about their current machine, their future demands and aspects they considered important to work well with the machine. This allowed us to identify aspects that need improvement in machine design.2. Method2.1. SubjectsA convenience sample was obtained through approaching operators visiting Ba- uma (the worlds largest exhibition for construction equipment). Most of the parti- cipants were wheel loader operators (n = 61) and excavator operators (n=212). The others (n = 65) were operators of several construction machines (e.g., mobile cranes, dozers, tower cranes, off-road trucks). Only the results for wheel loader and excava- tor operators are presented in this article, as they account for 18% and 62.7% of the total number of respondents respectively. Figs. 1 and 2 show a typical wheel loader and excavator.2.2. QuestionnaireData were collected by means of a questionnaire which was completed during an interview. The questionnaire was divided into three parts: (1) characteristics of the population, (2) evaluation of the current machine being operated, and (3) future de- mands on earthmoving machinery. In the rst part we asked the operators age, years of experience as operator, the kind of machinery being operated and its age. In the se- cond part of the questionnaire, operators evaluated their machine by rating overall comfort and their opinion of specic parts of the machine on a four-point scale (very good, good, average, poor). Finally, two open questions asked about the operators f- uture demands: what improvements would make the machine more comfortable and what aspects are the most important to work well with the machine.2.3. Data analysisData were sorted by machine type, after which the responses of wheel loader operators and excavator operators were separately analyzed. Within these groups, operators of older machinery (4 years old) were separated from operators of newer machinery (4 years old). In addition, the categories very good andgood were combined (very good/good) and the categories average and poor were com- bined(average/poor).Frequency tables were made of the operators opinions about overall machine comfort and about their opinions about specic parts of their machines. Chi-square was calculated between age of machine and overall comfort and between age of ma- chine and the operators opinion of specic parts of the machine. We assumed that if fewer than 80% of the operators rated a part of the machine good/very good, im- provement of this part could contribute to a more comfortable vehicle interior. In part three of the questionnaire, the operators indicated aspects to improve machine com- fort and aspects they found necessary to work well with the machine. We classied these aspects into categories and calculated the percentage responses.3. Results3.1. Characteristics of the populationBoth the wheel loader operators (mean age: 36.59.4 years) and the excavator operators (mean age: 36.39.3 years) who participated in this study, were experien- ced with a mean of 12.3 (8.1) and 13.4 (9.2) years of service, respectively. Half of the operators operate machines less than 4 years old (53% of the wheel loader and 50% of the excavator operators).3.2. Evaluation of current machine57.4% of wheel loader operators and 55.9% of the excavator operators rated the overall cabin comfortgood/very good. It shows that operators of newer machinery (4 years old) rated the overall cab comfort as good/very good more often than operators of older machines (4 years old). This was found both among wheel load- ers (2(1)=8.5,p0.04) and among excavators (2(1)=23.0,p0.001).Seventy-eight percent of the operators driving wheel loaders less than 4 years old, rated the comfort of their machine as good/very good.With excavator operators this gure was 81%. These results show that during recent years the experienced cab comfort of excavat- ors and wheel loaders has improved.It illustrates the opinion of the operators about specic parts of the machines less than 4 years old.Fewer aspects of wheel loaders are ratedaverage/poor by more than 20% of the operators, than excavators. Com- mon aspects which can contribute to increase of cab comfort are dashboard and dis- plays, adjustability of seats and controls, vibration and damping, noise reduction, and seat comfort. Excavator operators would also like to see improvement of climate co- ntrol, improved machine appearance, and better cab dimensions (including interior space, ingress/egress),view, and reliability.3.3. Future demandsThe participants generated 467 items desired to improve the machines comfort. We classied these aspects into 15 categories (see Table 2). It shows which features should be improved according to the operators. Seat comfort, climate control and ac- cessories are often mentioned for both wheel loaders (20%, 12%,15%, resp.) and ex- cavators (21%, 19%, 12%, resp.).Excavator operators also mention cab design (inc- luding dimensions, ingress/egress; 19%).The aspects considered most important to work well with the machine are sum- marized . Machine performance is by far the most important issue if we look at the averages. Other aspects like view and reliability play less important roles.4. DiscussionThe aim of the current study was to nd aspects mentioned by wheel loader and excavator operators which can be used to improve the comfort of vehicle interiors in future. In order to nd these aspects, we asked questions about three issues.about comfort of specic aspects of the cab (rating on a four-point scale);about aspects necessary to improve the cab comfort (open question);about aspects important to work well with the machine (open question).Excavator and wheel loader operators mentioned improved seat comfort, clim- ate control and accessories as ways to increase cab comfort. Excavator operators also mentioned cab design (including dimensions, ingress/egress). These aspects were al- so rated asaverage/poor by more than 20% of the operators (except accessories be- cause this was not an item in the second part of the questionnaire). Other aspects wh- ich can be taken into account with cab design are those which operators mention as most important aspects to work well with the machine. Especially when these aspects are also rated as average/poor by more than 20% of the operators, they need spec- ial attention.Improving these aspects have priority in designing a more comfortable cab.In our study, we collected our data among visitors to the Bauma exhibition in 2001. The advantage of this collection method is that it is possible to reach a large group of operators within a short period of time, at the same time getting a large re- sponse, which would normally be very difcult. A disadvantage might be that the va- st majority of respondents were German which could mean that the results have a li- mited validity among operators in other countries. The German operators may have other ideas about cab comfort than operators, who work in other countries. The de- mands of the operators on their machine depend on the working environment (e.g., climate, landscape, dust) and their tasks (e.g., driving off road, driving on the main road), which can be different between countries. Besides, the operators based their opinion on their current machine. It is possible that in Germany certain brands are overrepresented compared to other countries and that the operators opinion might vary according to the brand. The most common brands would therefore inuence the results of our study as many operators use one of these machines (Excavators: brand A 22.6%, brand B 22.2%;Wheel loaders: brand A 21.3%, brand B 18%, brand C 11.5 %).Since we used a short questionnaire to collect the data, no detailed information could be asked. The goal of our study was to get a global view on the operators opi- nion. The open questions gave the operators the opportunity to think open-minded which may render valuable information. Open questions are less suitable for data an- alysis, because we needed to categorize answers. Inevitably information is lost in this process, but the goal of obtaining a global view was nevertheless achieved.Our results show that seat comfort, climate control, accessories (for wheel load- ers and excavators) and cab design (including dimensions, ingress/egress), view, and reliability (for excavators only) are the aspects which can improve cab comfort. All these aspects are ratedaverage/poor by more than 20% of the operators and they a- re also mentioned as aspects which need improvement in order to increase cab com- fort. In our opinion designers should give priority to these items when redesigning cabs. It is interesting that operators did not mention vibration as an aspect which can improve comfort, as it was ranked high on the list of machine parts rated average/p- oor. Besides, whole body vibration is a serious health hazard (Houtman et al., 200 1). It is possible that the operators did not mention vibration because they may see vibration as an engine property or an inevitable consequence of working on earth- moving equipment. Operators might have the idea that vibration cannot be reduced by redesigning only the cab. It is,however, unclear why operators did not mention vibration. When comparing excavators and wheel loaders, improving seat comfort is an is- sue for both wheel loaders and excavators. Although seat comfort in excavators has been improved during recent years (see Table 1), improvements are still necessary. However,this is not easy as sitting comfort depends on many other factors more or less related to seat design: e.g., adjustability of seat and controls, vibration and dam- ping, and view. For example, a bad view from the cabin can result in awkward body postures, which reduces comfort in spite of a comfortable seat.Beyond the common aspect seat comfort, many differences exist between wheel loaders and excavators. One difference we found between the excavator and the wh- eel loader was that excavator cab design (including dimensions and ingress/egress) needs improvement. This difference may be explained by access and space. Firs- t,there is a difference in machine access with grips generally quite wide apart and steps to the cabin far from optimal, being either too high or too narrow. Operators could experience this as a problem. Secondly, there is a fundamental difference be- tween wheel loaders and excavators in the space available for the cab. With the pre- sent design, excavators have a limited width available for the cab as it must be posi- tioned between the boom and the left machine side, leaving approximately 1 m for the cab.Another difference is that improving view can increase the cab comfort of the excavator. View is a very important aspect to work well with the excavator. The boo- m of the excavator has a wide range of motion and the operator needs to see the bu- cket for the full range. A comfortable cab provides a clear view of the work place and the bucket, without necessitating awkward postures.In the introduction, we stated that comfort plays an important role in cab design. It is therefore interesting to nd that the operators did not mention comfort as one of the most important aspects to work well with the machine. They mentioned aspects such as the machines performance, reliability, view and operability. It seems that operators think rst about the basic requirements needed to perform their task and apparently do not see comfort as one of them.If we compare our results with the results of Nakada, (1997), in both studies the operator seat is ranked as important. Instrument panel, monitors and meters are also ranked as important in Nakadas study. In our study vibration, dashboard and disp- lays are high on the list of parts rated as average/poor by more than 20% of the operators, but they are not seen as aspects that can improve cab comfort. Nakadas study did not mention vibration at all. A reason for this may be that in our study, ex- perienced operators played a larger role than in Nakadas and because that study w
温馨提示:
1: 本站所有资源如无特殊说明,都需要本地电脑安装OFFICE2007和PDF阅读器。图纸软件为CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.压缩文件请下载最新的WinRAR软件解压。
2: 本站的文档不包含任何第三方提供的附件图纸等,如果需要附件,请联系上传者。文件的所有权益归上传用户所有。
3.本站RAR压缩包中若带图纸,网页内容里面会有图纸预览,若没有图纸预览就没有图纸。
4. 未经权益所有人同意不得将文件中的内容挪作商业或盈利用途。
5. 人人文库网仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对用户上传分享的文档内容本身不做任何修改或编辑,并不能对任何下载内容负责。
6. 下载文件中如有侵权或不适当内容,请与我们联系,我们立即纠正。
7. 本站不保证下载资源的准确性、安全性和完整性, 同时也不承担用户因使用这些下载资源对自己和他人造成任何形式的伤害或损失。
提示  人人文库网所有资源均是用户自行上传分享,仅供网友学习交流,未经上传用户书面授权,请勿作他用。
关于本文
本文标题:_27m3矿用挖掘机斗杆结构有限元分析(论文+DWG图纸)
链接地址:https://www.renrendoc.com/p-19294462.html

官方联系方式

2:不支持迅雷下载,请使用浏览器下载   
3:不支持QQ浏览器下载,请用其他浏览器   
4:下载后的文档和图纸-无水印   
5:文档经过压缩,下载后原文更清晰   
关于我们 - 网站声明 - 网站地图 - 资源地图 - 友情链接 - 网站客服 - 联系我们

网站客服QQ:2881952447     

copyright@ 2020-2025  renrendoc.com 人人文库版权所有   联系电话:400-852-1180

备案号:蜀ICP备2022000484号-2       经营许可证: 川B2-20220663       公网安备川公网安备: 51019002004831号

本站为文档C2C交易模式,即用户上传的文档直接被用户下载,本站只是中间服务平台,本站所有文档下载所得的收益归上传人(含作者)所有。人人文库网仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对上载内容本身不做任何修改或编辑。若文档所含内容侵犯了您的版权或隐私,请立即通知人人文库网,我们立即给予删除!