人人文库网 > 图纸下载 > 毕业设计 > 双联齿轮零件机械加工工艺钻中心φ32花键孔夹具设计[含CAD图纸，说明书等全套资料]

Development of Automated Fixture Planning Systems.pdf

双联齿轮零件机械加工工艺钻中心φ32花键孔夹具设计[含CAD图纸，说明书等全套资料]

资源目录

双联齿轮零件机械加工工艺钻中心φ32花键孔夹具设计[含CAD图纸，说明书等全套资料].rar

双联齿轮零件机械加工工艺钻中心φ32花键孔夹具设计

设计说明书.doc---(点击预览)

开题报告.doc---(点击预览)

工艺过程卡和工序卡片.doc---(点击预览)

中期报告.doc---(点击预览)

外文翻译

外文翻译.doc---(点击预览)

Development of Automated Fixture Planning Systems.pdf---(点击预览)

全部CAD图-13张.dwg

压缩包内文档预览：

编号：19572583 类型：共享资源大小：1.44MB 格式：RAR 上传时间：2019-05-29 上传人：好资料QQ****51605 IP属地：江苏

20
积分

版权申诉 word格式文档无特别注明外均可编辑修改；预览文档经过压缩，下载后原文更清晰！ 立即下载

关键词：: 含CAD图纸，说明书等全套资料双联齿轮零件机械加工工艺零件加工工艺含全套CAD 双联齿轮加工工艺夹具设计全套 CAD图纸全套设计图纸全套双联齿轮零件机械加工工艺双联齿轮零件工艺

资源描述：

【温馨提示】购买原稿文件请充值后自助下载。

以下预览截图到的都有源文件,图纸是CAD，文档是WORD，下载后即可获得。

预览截图请勿抄袭，原稿文件完整清晰，无水印，可编辑。

有疑问可以咨询QQ：414951605或1304139763

双联齿轮零件机械加工工艺及其典型夹具设计

摘要

　　　通过对零件的分析，制定一套合理的工艺方案，并设计出可行的夹具。本文主要是围绕双联齿轮零件的机械加工工艺以及对其中两道工序的夹具设计来展开的。其主要内容有：首先分析了零件图，确定生产类型和毛坯，确定加工设备，确定加工方案及装夹方案，刀具的选择，切削用量的选择与计算，数据处理等。本次设计主要是对钻28的孔和滚齿进行夹具设计，对夹具设计方案进行分析和选择。选定方案后，通过查阅相关夹具设计书籍和相关图例，最终完成钻孔和滚齿的夹具设计。试图找出一种简单、实用的加工方法，以提高劳动生产率和降低成本。

关键词：双联齿轮；工艺分析；工艺规程设计；夹具设计

The machining process and fixture design of the Dual gear

Abstract

　　　Part of the analysis,to develop a reasonable process scheme, and design a feasible fixture.This paper is mainly about the Dual gear machining process and fixture design for the two processes to start. Its main contents are: the first analysis of the parts diagram, determine the production type and blank, determine the processing equipment, determine the processing scheme and clamping scheme, tool selection, selection and calculation of cutting parameters, data processing etc.. This design is mainly to drill 28 holes and hobbing fixture design, analysis and selection of design scheme of fixture. The selected solution, by consulting the related jia design books and related legend, fixture design finished drilling and hobbing. Trying to find a processing method of simple, practical, to improve labor productivity and reduce the cost.

Key words：Dual gear; Process analysis; Process design; fixture design

1 绪论 1

1.1设计内容及意义 1

1.2国内外相关研究情况 1

1.3课题背景知识 2

1.4夹具设计 5

2 工艺规程设计 7

2.1工艺分析 7

2.1.1零件的作用 7

2.1.2零件工艺分析 7

2.1.3生产纲领计算 8

2.2毛坯选择 8

2.2.1选择毛坯种类 8

2.2.2确定毛坯尺寸及机械加工总余量 9

2.2.3 绘制毛坯图 10

2.3制定工艺路线 10

2.3.1定位基准选择 10

2.3.2加工阶段划分 11

2.3.3工序的集中与分散 13

2.3.4工序顺序的安排 13

2.3.5工艺路线拟定 13

2.3.6 加工设备及工艺装备选择 15

2.3.7工序尺寸确定 16

2.3.8切削用量及基本工时 17

3 滚齿夹具设计 26

3.1问题的提出 26

3.2确定定位方案 26

3. 3确定夹紧机构 26

3. 4确定其他装置 26

3. 5绘制夹具总图 27

3. 6夹具简要说明 28

4 钻夹具设计 29

4.1问题的提出 29

4.2定位基准的选择 29

4.3确定夹紧机构 29

4.4绘制夹具装配图 29

4.5切削力和夹紧力计算 30

4.6定位误差分析 31

4.7夹具简要说明 31

5 结论 32

参考文献 33

致谢 34

毕业设计（论文）知识产权声明 35

毕业设计（论文）独创性声明 36

1 绪论

1.1设计内容及意义

　　　本次设计是在我们学完了大学的全部基础课，技术基础课以及专业课之后而进行的。此次的设计是对大学期间所学各课程及相关的应用绘图软件的一次深入的综合性的总复习，也是一次理论联系实际的训练。其目的在于：

　　　a．巩固我们在大学里所学的知识，也是对以前所学知识的综合性的检验；

　　　b．加强我们查阅资料的能力，熟悉有关资料；

　　　c．树立正确的设计思想，掌握设计方法，培养我们的实际工作能力；

　　　d．通过对双联齿轮零件的机械制造工艺设计，使我们在机械制造工艺规程设计，工艺方案论证，机械加工余量计算，工艺尺寸的确定，编写技术文件及查阅技术文献等各个方面受到一次综合性的训练。初步具备设计一个中等复杂程度零件的工艺规程的能力。

　　　e. 能根据被加工零件的技术要求，运用夹具设计的基本原理和方法，学会拟定夹具设计方案，完成夹具结构设计，初步具备设计出高效，省力，经济合理并能保证加工质量的专用夹具的能力。

　　　f．通过零件图，装配图绘制，使我们对于AutoCAD绘图软件的使用能得到进一步的提高[1]。

全部文件.png

零件图.gif

毛坯图.jpg

全部CAD图纸 13张.jpg

字数统计.gif

钻孔夹具装配图.gif 夹具体底板.jpg

内容简介：: Int J Adv Manuf Technol (1999) 15:171181 1999 Springer-Verlag London Limited Development of Automated Fixture Planning Systems W. Ma, J. Li and Y. Rong Department of Mechanical Engineering, Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Worcester, MA, USA Fixturing is an important manufacturing activity. The computer- aided fi xture design technique is being rapidly developed to reduce the lead time involved in manufacturing planning. An automated fi xture confi gurationdesignsystemhasbeen developed to select automatically modular fi xture components and place them in position with satisfactory assembly relation- ships. In this paper, an automated fi xturing planning system is presented in which fi xturing surfaces and points are auto- matically determined based on workpiece geometry and oper- ational information. Fixturing surface accessibility, feature accuracy, and fi xturing stability are the main concerns in the fi xture planning. The system development, the fi xture planning decisionprocedure,andanimplementationexampleare presented in the paper. Keywords: Accuracy; Clamping; Fixture planning; Locating 1.Introduction Fixturing is an important manufacturing activity in the pro- duction cycle. A computer-aided (or automated) fi xture design (CAFD) technique has been developed as part of CAD/CAM integration 1. The development of CAFD contributes to the reduction of manufacturing lead time, the optimisation of manu- facturing operations, and the verifi cation of manufacturing pro- cess designs 2. CAFD plays an important role in fl exible manufacturing systems (FMS) and computer-integrated manu- facturing systems (CIMS) 3. Figure 1 outlines the activities for fi xture design in manufac- turing systems which include three major aspects: set-up plan- ning, fi xture planning, and fi xture confi guration design 4. The objective of set-up planning is to determine the number of set- ups, the position and orientation of the workpiece in each set- up, and also the machining surfaces in each set-up. Fixture planning determines the locating and clamping points on work- piece surfaces. The task of fi xture confi guration design is to select fi xture components and place them into a fi nal confi gur- Correspondence and offprint requests to: Dr Kevin Rong, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Worcester Polytechnic Institute, Worcester, MA 01609-2280, USA. E-mail: rongK Fig. 1. Fixture design in manufacturing systems. ation to fulfi l the functions of locating and clamping the workpiece. An automated modular fi xture confi guration design system has been developed in which, when fi xturing surfaces and points are selected on the workpiece model, fi xture units are automatically generated and placed into position with the assistance of fi xture component assembly relationships 4,5. This paper deals with fi xture planning when the fi xturing surfacesandpositionsontheworkpieceareselected automatically. Previous papers on fi xture design analysis have been pub- lished, but a comprehensive fi xture planning system which can be used to generate fi xture plans for industrial applications has not been developed. Previous work includes: a method for the automated determination of fi xture location and clamping derived from a mathematical model 6; an algorithm for the selection of locating and clamping positions which provide the maximum mechanical leverage 7; kinematic analysis based fi xture planning 8,9; a fi xturing grade and dependency grade based fi xturability analysis 10; automated selection of set-ups 172W. Ma and Y. Rong with consideration of tolerance factors of orientation errors in fi xture design 11, and fi nally a geometric analysis based 2D fi xture planning system 12. In our previous research, fi xturing features 13, fi xturing accuracy 14,15, geometric constraints 16, and fi xturing surface accessibility 17 have been studied. A framework has been developed for set-up planning and fi xture design 18. In this paper, an automated fi xture planning system, Fix- Planning, is presented where fi xturing surfaces and points are determined when the workpiece model and set-up planning information is input to the system. 2.Basic Requirements of Fixture Planning In engineering practice, fi xture planning is governed by a number of factors, including workpiece geometric information and tolerance; set-up planning information such as machining features, the machine tool and cutting tools to be used in each set-up; initial and resulting forms of the workpiece in each set-up; and available fi xture components. To ensure that the fi xture can hold the workpiece in an acceptable position so that the manufacturing process can be carried out according to the design specifi cations, the following conditions should be satisfi ed for a feasible fi xture plan. 1. The degrees of freedom (DOF) of the workpiece are totally constrained when the workpiece is located. 2. Machining accuracy specifi cations can be ensured in the current set-up. 3. Fixture design is stable to resist any effects of external force and torque. 4. Fixturing surfaces and points can be accessed easily by available fi xture components. 5. There is no interference between the workpiece and the fi xture, and between the cutter tool and the fi xture. In this investigation, we focus on the fi rst four requirements. Fixture planning is carried out based on the following consider- ations: 1. Although the workpiece geometry can be complex in indus- trial production, in most fi xture designs, planar and cylindri- cal surfaces (internal and external) are used as the locating and clamping surfaces because of the ease of access and measurement of these features when the workpiece is fi xed. In this investigation, planar and cylindrical surfaces are used in fi xture planning. 2. Many CNC machines, especially machining centres, can be used to perform various operations within one set-up. In most cases, the cutting-tool axis of the machine tool is fi xed. When considering fi xturing stability, the locating sur- faces are preferably those with normal directions opposite to, or perpendicular to, the cutting-tool axis. For clamping features, the normal directions should be in line with, or perpendicular to, the cutting-tool axis, because, in fi xture design, clamping forces should be against locators. 3. For the surfaces to be machined, there should exist datum surfaces which serve as position and orientation references from which other dimensions and tolerances are measured. In fi xture planning, surfaces with high accuracy grades should be selected preferentially as locating surfaces so that the inherited machining error is minimised and the required tolerances of the machining features are easily attained. 4. In fi xture planning, more than one workpiece surface must be selected for the locating and clamping surfaces for restricting the DOF of the workpiece in a set-up. Therefore, besides the conditions for individual surfaces, the combi- nation status of the available locating surfaces is also important for the accurate location of the workpiece. 5. Since the locators and clamps are in contact with the workpiece, the distribution of fi xturing points plays a critical role in ensuring fi xturing stability. 6. For a feasible fi xture design, the fi xturing surfaces must be accessible to the fi xture components. The usable (effective) area of the fi xturing surface should be large enough to accommodate the functional surfaces of the locators and clamps. Besides considering a fi xturing surface, the accessi- bility of potential fi xturing points on the surface is also important for the determination of the fi nal fi xturing point distribution. 3.Fixturing Surfaces The concept of features has been widely used in design and manufacturing. A workpiece to be machined can be viewed as a combination of features such as planes, steps, pockets, slots, and holes. In a particular operation set-up, features used for fi xturing the workpiece can be defi ned as fi xturing features or fi xturing surfaces. In practice, most fi xturing features are planar and cylindrical surfaces. According to the fi xturing functions, the fi xturing surfaces can be classifi ed into locating, clamping, and supporting features. Unlike design and manufacturing fea- tures, fi xturing surfaces are orientation-dependent. They do not play the same role throughout the manufacturing processes. A set of surfaces may serve as fi xturing surfaces in a set-up, but may not be used for fi xturing or have different fi xturing functions in another set-up. The concept of fi xturing features allows the fi xturing require- ments to be associated with the workpiece geometry. Feature information in a feature-based workpiece model can also be used directly for fi xture design purposes. For manufacturing features, the information necessary for describing a fi xturing feature contains geometric and non-geometric aspects. The former includes feature type, shape and dimensional parameters, and position and orientation of the workpiece. The latter includes the surface fi nish, accuracy level and relationships with machining features, and surface accessibility. 3.1Discretisation of Fixturing Surfaces In most fi xture designs, the fi xturing features, especially the locating surfaces, are planar and cylindrical surfaces. In order toevaluate fi xturingsurfaceaccessibilityanddetermine locating/clamping points on fi xturing surfaces, a candidate fi x- turing surface is sampled into grid-arrayed discrete points with Development of Automated Fixture Planning Systems173 equal interval T. If T is small enough, the discrete sample points will be almost continuous. In order to make the sampling algorithm generic, an outer- bounding rectangle on the surface is used as the sampling region. Since in most cases, the primary locating surface is perpendicular to the other locating surfaces, especially in modu- lar fi xture designs, the fi xturing surfaces are considered as bottom-locating, top-clamping, side-locating, and side-clamping surfaces. For a bottom-locating/top-clamping surface with a normal Z (or 2Z) direction, two edges of the outer-bounding rectangle must be parallel to the X-axis and two other edges parallel to the Y-axis. For a side-locating/clamping surface, there must be two edges parallel to the Z-axis, while the other two edges must be perpendicular to the fi rst two edges. Figure 2 shows an example of sampled candidate fi xturing surfaces with the outer-bounding rectangle. With the assumption that the Z-axis is normal to the surface in the surface local coordi- nate system, the points within the outer-bounding rectangle can be represented as: x = Xmin+ T u,u = 1, 2, %, Nu y = Ymin+ T v,v = 1, 2, %, Nv(1) where Nuand Nvare the numbers of points in the X- and Y- directions, respectively, which are: Nu= int (Xmax2 Xmin)/T and Nv= int Ymax2 Ymin)/T. 3.2Fixturing Surface Accessibility Fixturing surface accessibility is a measure of whether a candi- date fi xturing surface is accessible to a regular fi xture compo- nent. Three major factors must be taken into account: 1. The geometry of the fi xturing surface which involves the effective area and shape of the surface. 2. Possible obstruction of the workpiece geometry along the normal direction and/or around the geometric region of the fi xturing surface. 3. The size and shape of the functional fi xture components. In practical situations, it is possible that a planar surface of the workpiece has a complex shape and has a full/partial obstruction along its normal direction and/or around its geo- Fig. 2. Sampling of a candidate fi xturing surface with an outer-bound- ing rectangle. metric region. It is thus required that the accessibility model should comprehensively refl ect these facts so that a reasonably comparable accessibility value can be applied for every candi- date fi xturing surface. The surface accessibility is defi ned as a statistical value based on the point accessibility (PA) of every valid sample point on the surface, where PA consists of two parts: the point self individual accessibility (SIA) and the point neighbour related accessibility (NRA). The SIA corresponds mainly to the isolated accessibility of the fi xturing point, whereas the NRA refl ects the extended accessibility of the fi xturing point. The SIA of a sample point is defi ned on the basis of three attribute tags. The tag s1is used to indicate whether the square test grid with its centre at the current sample point is inside, on, or outside the outer-loop of the fi xturing surface. Three discrete values are assigned to represent its status, i.e. 0, 1, and 2, respectively. If there exists obstructive workpiece geometry in the surface normal direction or surrounding the sample point, this affects the surface accessibility at the sample point. For example, as shown in Fig. 3(a), on a candidate bottom-locating surface of a workpiece, sample point p1is not accessible because of the obstructive geometry of the workpiece along the bottom-locat- ing direction, and p2is not accessible either because of the obstructions surrounding it. To evaluate automatically whether an obstruction exists in the surface normal direction, a virtual volume is generated by extruding the square test grid to a solid entity in the surface normal direction. By employing a technique for detecting the interference between two solid entities, the obstruction can be identifi ed, as shown in Fig. 3(b). The extruding method is a little different for the square Fig. 3. Obstruction checking at virtual sample points on a bottom- locating surface. (Kpimeans the extrusion is carried out at point pi along its accessible direction.) 174W. Ma and Y. Rong test grid on the side-locating/clamping surface, where the square test grid is fi rst stretched along the bottom-locating direction, and then the stretched grid is extruded along the side-locating/clamping direction as illustrated in Fig. 4. The attribute tag s2is used for recording the result of obstruction checking at a sample point. When such an obstruction is detected, s2= 1, otherwise, s2= 0. If the test grid at the sample point is found to be not obstructed, its individual accessibility is largely dependent on the contact area between the test surface and the fi xture components, which is represented by the attribute tag s3. The defi nition of s3is s3= Area1 T2 ,s3P 0, 1(2) where AreaIis the contact area and T is the edge length of the test grid. On the basis of above three attribute tags, the SIA of a sample point pu,vcan be given by a numerical value according to the following rules: if s1= OutsideOuterLoop, SIA = 21 (inaccessible); if s1 OutsideOuterLoop AND s2= Obstructed, SIA = 2 1 (inaccessible); if bottom-locating/top-clamping AND S1 OutsideOut- erLoop AND s2= NotObstructed, SIA = s3; Fig. 4. Obstruction checking at sample points on a side-locating/ clamp- ing surface. if side-locating/clamping AND s1 OutsideOuterLoop AND s2= NotObstructed, SIA = 0.5vs3; where v refl ects the height effect of the point in side locating/clamping. The accessibility in the surrounding area of the sample point also affects the accessibility of the point. On a fi xturing surface, the positional relationship between the current sample point and all the neighbouring sample points can be represented by a 3 3 map where Pcis the current sample point with a discrete position of (u, v), P1| P8are 8-neighbour sample points, and their locations are all labelled in Fig. 5. The NRA at sample point pu,vcan be calculated using the equation: NRA(u, v) = O 8 k=1 Fk 8 (3) where Fkis the related-access factor of kth neighbour, which can be determined based on the SIA as well as its measure (s1, s2, s3). For bottom-locating/top-clamping, F9k=5 21,s2(pk) = 1 0,s1(pk) = 2and s2(pk) = 0 IA(pk), s1(pk) 2 and s2(pk) = 0 (4) Fk=5 F9k,k = 1, 3, 5, 7 F9k,k = 2, 4, 6, 8, F9k21$ 0and F9k+1$ 0 21, k = 2, 4, 6, 8, F9k21= 2 1 or F9k+1= 2 1 (5) For side-locating/clamping, F9k=5 21,s2(pk) = 1, k = 1, 5, 6, 8 20.5,s2(pk) = 1, k = 2, 3, 4 0,s1(pk) = 2and s2(pk) = 0 SIA(Pk), s1(pk) 2 and s2(pk) = 0 (6) Fk=5 F9k,k = 1, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8 F9k,k = 2, 4,F93$ 0 20.5, k = 2, 4,F93= 20.5 (7) For a valid sample point, once the SIA and NRA are obtained, the PA can also be calculated according to the equation: Fig. 5. 3 3 position map of current point Pcand 8-neighbour sample points P1| P8. Development of Automated Fixture Planning Systems175 PA = SIA + NRA,if PA , 0,then PA = 0(8) From the defi nitions of SIA and NRA, SIA is in the range of 0 | 1 and NRA is in the range of 21|1. Therefore, PA must be in the range of 21|2. When the value of PA is less than zero, the sample point is severely obstructed and is not a feasible fi xturing point. The overall accessibility (OA) of the fi xturing surface is defi ned as the sum of the PA values at all valid sample points, i.e., OA =O Nvalid PAu,v,sample point pu,vis tested valid(9) As OA is statistically measured by the overall effect of the accessibility of the sample points on the surface, the infor- mation about the effective area and shape complexity of the surface is represented in the model. Generally, the model satisfi es the criterion that the surface with the larger OA is more accessible than the one with the smaller OA. 3.3Generalised Accuracy of the Fixturing Features One of the most important tasks for fi xture planing is to guarantee that the tolerance requirements are met when the workpiece is machined. The accuracy of features can be charac- terised by their tolerance and surface fi nish, and the tolerance between features. Generally, the tolerance of features can be classifi ed into two types: dimensional tolerance and geometric tolerance. The magnitude of the dimensional tolerance may express the relationship between two features on the workpiece. If there is a feature with a tight dimensional tolerance with respect

温馨提示:
1: 本站所有资源如无特殊说明，都需要本地电脑安装OFFICE2007和PDF阅读器。图纸软件为CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.压缩文件请下载最新的WinRAR软件解压。
2: 本站的文档不包含任何第三方提供的附件图纸等，如果需要附件，请联系上传者。文件的所有权益归上传用户所有。
3.本站RAR压缩包中若带图纸，网页内容里面会有图纸预览，若没有图纸预览就没有图纸。
4. 未经权益所有人同意不得将文件中的内容挪作商业或盈利用途。
5. 人人文库网仅提供信息存储空间，仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理，对用户上传分享的文档内容本身不做任何修改或编辑，并不能对任何下载内容负责。
6. 下载文件中如有侵权或不适当内容，请与我们联系，我们立即纠正。
7. 本站不保证下载资源的准确性、安全性和完整性, 同时也不承担用户因使用这些下载资源对自己和他人造成任何形式的伤害或损失。

人人文库网所有资源均是用户自行上传分享，仅供网友学习交流，未经上传用户书面授权，请勿作他用。