认知语言学参考书目.doc

认知语言学参考资料Aitchison, J. 1987. Words in the Mind: An Introduction to the Mental Lexicon. Oxford: Basil Blackwell Ltd.Anderson, J. R. 1983. The Architecture of Cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Anderson, J. R. 1995. Cognitive Psychology and its Implications. New York: W. H. Feeman and Company.Bach, K. 1987. Thought and Reference. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Barsalou, L. W. 1982. Context-independent information and context-dependent information in concepts. Memory & Cognition 10: 82-93. Barsalou, L. W. 1983. Ad hoc categories. Memory & Cognition 11: 211-227. Barsalou, L. W. 1987. The instability of graded structure: Implications for the nature of concepts. In U. Neisser (ed.), Concepts and Conceptual Development: Ecological and Intellectual Factors in Categorization. New York: Cambridge University Press, 101-140.Barsalou, L. W. & B. H. Ross. 1986. The roles of automatic and strategic processing in sensitivity to superordinate and property frequency. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 12: 116-134.Barsalou, L. W. & J. W. Hutchinson. 1987. Schema-based planning of events in consumer contexts. In P. F. Anderson & M. Wallendorf (eds.), Advances in Consumer Research, Vol. 14. Provo, UT: Association for Consumer Research, 114-118. Blakemore, D. 1987. Semantic Constraints on Relevance. Oxford: Blackwell.Blakemore, D. 2002. Relevance and Linguistic Meaning: The Semantics and Pragmatics of Discourse Markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Carston, R. 1988. Language and cognition. In F. J. Newmeyer (ed.), Linguistics: The Cambridge Survey, Vol. 3. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 38-68.Croft, W. & A. D. Cruse. 2004. Cognitive Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Fauconnier, G. 1994. Mental Spaces: Aspects of Meaning Construction in Natural Language. New York: Cambridge University Press.Fauconnier, G. 1997. Mappings in Thought and Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Fauconnier, G. & M. Turner. 1998. Conceptual integration networks. Cognitive Science 22: 133-187.Fischer, K. 2000. From Cognitive Semantics to Lexical Pragmatics: The Functional Polysemy of Discourse Particles. New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Fodor, J. A. 1975. The Language of Thought. New York: T. Y. Crowell.Fodor, J. A. 1983. The Modularity of Mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Fodor, J. A. 1998. Concepts: Where Cognitive Science Went Wrong. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Fodor, J. A. & Z. W. Pylyshyn. 1988. Connectionism and cognitive architecture: A critical analysis. Cognition 28: 3-71.Foster-Cohen, S. H. 2000. Relevance: Communication and cognition. Second Language Research 16(1): 77-92.Frege, G. 1977. On Concept and Object. In P. Geach & M. Black (eds.), Translations from the Philosophical Writings of Gottlob Frege. Oxford: Basil Blackwell. Gibbs, R. W. 1987. The relevance of relevance for psychological theory. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 10: 718-719. Goatly, A. 1994. Register and redemption of relevance theory: The case of metaphor. Pragmatics 4: 139-181.Green, D. W. et al. 1996. Cognitive Science: An Introduction. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.Gutt, E.-A. 1991. Translation and Relevance: Cognition and Context. Oxford: Blackwell.Jary, M. 1998. Relevance and the communication of politeness. Journal of Pragmatics 30: 1-19.Jaszczolt, K. M. 1996a. Relevance and infinity: Implications for discourse interpretation. Journal of Pragmatics 25: 703-722. Johnson, M. 1987. The Body in the Mind. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Jordan, M. P. 1998. The power of negation in English: Text, context and relevance. Journal of Pragmatics 29: 705-752. Jucker, A. H. 1997. Review on Relevance: Communication and Cognition. Journal of Pragmatics 27: 107-119.Lakoff, G. & M. Johnson. 1980. Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Langacker, R. W. 1991. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, Vol. 1-2. Stanford: Stanford University Press. Marmaridou, S. S. A. 2000. Pragmatic Meaning and Cognition. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Marten, L. 2002. At the Syntax-Pragmatics Interface: Verbal Underspecification and Concept Formation in Dynamic Syntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Rouchota, V. & A. H. Jucker (eds.) 1998. Current Issues in Relevance Theory. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. Schank, R. & R. P. Abelson. 1977. Scripts, Plans, Goals, and Understanding. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Sperber, D. 1994b. The modularity of thought and the epistemology of representation. In L. A. Hirschfeld & S. A. Gelman (eds.), Mapping the Mind: Domain Specificity in Cognition and Culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 39-67.Sperber. D. 1997. Intuitive and reflective beliefs. Mind and Language 12: 67-83.Sperber, D. 2000. Metarepresentations in an evolutionary perspective. In D. Sperber (ed.), Metarepresentations: A Multidisciplinary Perspective. New York: Oxford University Press, 117-137.Sperber, D. & D. Wilson. 1986. Relevance: Communication and Cognition. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers Ltd.Sperber, D. & D. Wilson. 1990. Rhetoric and relevance. In D. Wellbery & J. Bender (eds.), The Ends of Rhetoric: History, Theory, Practice. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 140-155.Sperber, D. & D. Wilson. 1995. Relevance: Communication and Cognition (2nd ed.). Oxford: Blackwell Publishers Ltd.Sperber, D. & D. Wilson. 1996. Fodors frame problem and relevance theory: A reply to Chiappe & Kukla. Behavioral & Brain Sciences 19: 530-532.Sperber, D. & D. Wilson. 1997. Remarks on relevance theory and the social sciences. Multilingua 16: 145-151.Sperber, D. & D. Wilson. 1998a. The mapping between the mental and public lexicon. In P. Carruthers & J. Boucher (eds.), Language and Thought. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 184-200.Sperber, D. & D. Wilson. 1998b. Irony and relevance: A reply to Drs Seto, Hamamoto and Yamanashi. In R. Carston & S. Uchida (eds.), Relevance Theory: Applications and Implications. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 283-293.Sperber, D. & D. Wilson. 2002. Pragmatics, modularity and mindreading. Mind & Language 17: 3-23. Sperber, D. & D. Wilson. 2005. Pragmatics. UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 17: 353-388.Ungerer, F. & H. J. Schmid. 1996. An Introduction to Cognitive Linguistics. London: Longman.Wilson, D. 1999. Relevance and relevance theory. In R. Wilson & F. Keil (eds.), MIT Encyclopedia of the Cognitive Sciences. Cambridge, MA : MIT Press, 719-722.Wilson, D. 2000. Metarepresentation in linguistic communication. In D. Sperber (ed.), Metarepresentations. New York: Oxford University Press, 411-448. Wilson, D. 2003. Relevance Theory and lexical pragmatics. Italian Journal of Linguistics/Rivista di Linguistica 15(2): 273-291.Wilson, D. 2004a. Relevance and lexical pragmatics. UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 16: 343-60.Wilson, D. 2004b. Relevance, word meaning and communication: The past, present, and future of lexical pragmatics. Modern Foreign Languages (现代外语) 1: 1-13.Wilson, D.2005a. New directions for research on pragmatics and modularity. Lingua 115: 1129-1146.Wilson, D. 2005b. Pragmatics. In F. Jackson & M. Smith (eds.), Oxford Handbook of Contemporary Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 468-501. Wilson, D. & R. Carston. 2008. Metaphor and the emergent property problem: A relevance-theoretic treatment. The Baltic International Yearbook of Cognition, Logic and Communication 3 (2007), 1-40. Wilson, D. & T. Matsu