外文原文.pdf

气流输送系统的设计【5张CAD图纸和说明书】

收藏

压缩包内文档预览:
预览图 预览图 预览图 预览图 预览图 预览图 预览图 预览图 预览图
编号:6039398    类型:共享资源    大小:1.15MB    格式:ZIP    上传时间:2017-10-26 上传人:俊****计 IP属地:江苏
40
积分
关 键 词:
气流 输送 系统 设计 5张 cad 图纸 说明书
资源描述:

摘要:气流输送技术是一项综合技术,涉及流体力学、材料力学、自动化技术、制造技术等领域,属高新技术项目。气流输送的应用已有100多年的历史,早在1853年邮局就用来输送信件,1883 年港口用于装卸粮食,到20 世纪初开始用于工业生产。近年来,随着生产发展和生产过程日趋自动化,对节约能源和环境保护的要求越来越高,气流输送技术凭借自身的技术特点得到了迅速发展和应用。在不断地探索和创新过程中,气流输送的对象从早期的谷物,面粉和信件迅速扩展到水泥,砂料,化工原料,煤粉等物料。应用的范围遍及粮食,港口,化工,冶金,电力,铸造,食品,医药等领域。输送方式从原始到如今完善,合理,从稀相悬浮输送到浓相浓度的栓流输送,初步解决了气流输送能耗高,管道磨损及物料破碎等问题,提高了气流输送技术的可靠性和经济性。

本文通过对原始材料的分析,采用了吸送式气流输送。吸送式气流输送装置在气流输送技术中是一种较早发展起来的输送方式,目前在世界上使用十分广泛,这是因为它除了具有广泛适应条件外还有许多突出的优点:生产率高,结构简单紧凑,操作灵活方便易实现自动化等。

根据其原始材料,计算其输料管内径,确定输送风速及其风量,同时要计算系统中各项的压力损失。在这些都确定的情况下,根据上述分析计算结果选定适合的风机及其配备电动机,确定确实合理的管道布置方式,最后得出整套输送装置。   


关键词: 吸送式气流输送   输料管内径  压力损失

目   录

1  绪论

   1.1 气流输送简介与发展………………………………………………………  (01)

   1.2 气力输送的类型和特点………………………………………………………(02)

   1.3 气力输送系统的主要部件和设备……………………………………………(02)

   1.4 选本课题的依据和意义………………………………………………………(03)

1.5负压气流输送的发展概况……………………………………………………(04)

1.6选本课题的依据和意义………………………………………………………(05)

2  吸送式气力输送

   2.1 类型……………………………………………………………………………(06)

   2.2 系统组成………………………………………………………………………(07)

   2.3 技术特点………………………………………………………………………(07)

3  系统的设计计算

   3.1 设计的原始材料………………………………………………………………(09)

   3.2 设计程序………………………………………………………………………(09)

   3.3 计算方法………………………………………………………………………(10)

4  主要部件

4.1 管道和管件……………………………………………………………………(22)

4.2 供料装置………………………………………………………………………(24)

4.3 物料分离器……………………………………………………………………(24)

4.4 除尘器…………………………………………………………………………(27)

4.5 卸料器…………………………………………………………………………(28)

结 论…………………………………………………………………………………(32)

参考文献……………………………………………………………………………(33)

致 谢…………………………………………………………………………………(34) 

气流输送系统 

1  绪  论

1.1   气流输送的概况

  

 气流输送(又称气力输送),即利用气流的能量,在密闭管道内沿气流方向输送颗粒状物料,是流态化技术的一种具体应用。气流输送装置的结构简单,操作方便,可作水平的、垂直的或倾斜方向的输送,在输送过程中还可同时进行物料的加热、冷却、输送和气流分级等物理操作或某些化学操作。与机械输送相比,此法能量消耗较大,颗粒易受破损,设备也易受磨蚀。含水量多、有粘附性或在高速运动时易产生静电的物料,不宜于进行气流输送。当人们从自然风力吹石卷尘和日常生活中见的吮吸现象得到启示后,就设想到利用气流在管道中运送物料。基于这个想法,早在1810年英国Medhurst就提出了利用管道将邮件作气流输送的方案。因此,气流输送技术乃始于成件物品的筒式输送。数十年后气流输送才开始用来卸送谷物,棉花等散状物料,出现了第一台浮船式气流卸船设备以及固定式的吸粮机设备。这些气流卸船设备问世之后曾经在欧洲各国,特别是在当时的粮食输入大国,如英国,荷兰,德国等获得了应用和普及。

 气流输送具有防尘效果好;便于实现机械化、自动化,可减轻劳动强度,节省人力;在输送过程中,可以同时进行多种工艺操作,如混合、粉碎、分选、输送、冷却;防止物料受潮、污染或混入杂物等优点,因而在铸造、冶金、化工、建材、粮食加工等部门都得到应用。近年来,气流输送技术在以往低压气流输送和高压输送技术的基础上进一步开拓应用。例如,将粉料喷吹送入高温熔化的液态金属中;利用港口吸卸谷物的吸粮机原理将气流输送技术用语高温熔渣的吸出清理;对以往难以输送物料的输送技术;磨损性大的物料的输送技术以及塑料成形体中物件的输送技术等。

 我国从1985年就在港口对气流输送技术进行研究实验并应用于卸船,其他各行业也开发了多种形式气流输送装备在生产上获得了应用。如建立了风送系统的面粉厂,气流输送烟丝,铸造车间型砂气流输送技术也逐渐发展起来。

 除此之外,我国其他行业中气流输送的发展也很快,铸造车间中的型砂,新砂,旧砂,煤粉和粘土粉等造型材料均已实现了气流输送,特别是近年来新一代低风速高混合比气流输送装置的开发和成功应用使我国的气流输送技术水品有很大的提高。 我国早已成立中国机械工程学会物料搬运专业分会,并设立了管道物料输送技术专业委员会。在各行业和地方还成立了粮食、铸造行业的气流输送等专业学组,这一切均将促进气流输送技术在我国的应用和进一步发展。  


1.2   气流输送的分类 

 

根据颗粒在输送管道中的密集程度,气流输送分为:①稀相输送。固体含量低于100kg/m3或固气比(固体输送量与相应气体用量的质量流率比)为0.1~25的输送过程,操作气速较高(约18~30m/s)。②密相输送。固体含量高于100kg/m3或固气比大于25的输送过程。操作气速较低,用较高的气压压送。间歇充气罐式密相输送。是将颗粒分批加入压力罐,然后通气吹松,待罐内达一定压力后,打开放料阀,将颗粒物料吹入输送管中输送。脉冲式输送是将一股压缩空气通入下罐,将物料吹松;另一股频率为20~40min-1脉冲压缩空气流吹入输料管入口,在管道内形成交替排列的小段料柱和小段气柱,借空气压力推动前进。密相输送的输送能力大,可压送较长距离,物料破损和设备磨损较小,能耗也较省。







内容简介:
DOI 10.1007/s00170-003-1843-3ORIGINAL ARTICLEInt J Adv Manuf Technol (2005) 25: 551559S.H. Masood B. Abbas E. Shayan A. KaraAn investigation into design and manufacturing of mechanical conveyors systemsfor food processingReceived: 29 March 2003 / Accepted: 21 June 2003 / Published online: 23 June 2004 Springer-Verlag London Limited 2004Abstract This paper presents the results of a research investi-gation undertaken to develop methodologies and techniques thatwill reduce the cost and time of the design, manufacturing andassembly of mechanical conveyor systems used in the food andbeverage industry. The improved methodology for design andproduction of conveyor components is based on the minimisa-tion of materials, parts and costs, using the rules of design formanufacture and design for assembly. Results obtained on a testconveyor system verify the benefits of using the improved tech-niques. The overall material cost was reduced by 19% and theoverall assembly cost was reduced by 20% compared to conven-tional methods.Keywords Assembly Cost reduction Design DFA DFM Mechanical conveyor1 IntroductionConveyor systems used in the food and beverage industry arehighly automated custom made structures consisting of a largenumber of parts and designed to carry products such as foodcartons, drink bottles and cans in fast production and assemblylines. Most of the processing and packaging of food and drink in-volve continuous operations where cartons, bottles or cans are re-quired to move at a controlled speed for filling or assembly oper-ations. Their operations require highly efficient and reliable me-chanical conveyors, which range from overhead types to floor-mounted types of chain, roller or belt driven conveyor systems.In recent years, immense pressure from clients for low costbut efficient mechanical conveyor systems has pushed con-veyor manufacturers to review their current design and assemblymethods and look at an alternative means to manufacture moreeconomical and reliable conveyors for their clients. At present,S.H. Masood (a117) B. Abbas E. Shayan A. KaraIndustrial Research Institute Swinburne,Swinburne University of Technology,Hawthorn, Melbourne 3122, AustraliaE-mail: smasood.aumost material handling devices, both hardware and software, arehighly specialised, inflexible and costly to configure, install andmaintain 1. Conveyors are fixed in terms of their locations andthe conveyor belts according to their synchronised speeds, mak-ing any changeover of the conveyor system very difficult and ex-pensive. In todays radically changing industrial markets, there isa need to implement a new manufacturing strategy, a new systemoperational concept and a new system control software and hard-ware development concept, that can be applied to the design ofa new generation of open, flexible material handling systems 2.Ho and Ranky 3 proposed a new modular and reconfigurable2D and 3D conveyor system, which encompasses an open re-configurable software architecture based on the CIM-OSA (opensystem architecture) model. It is noted that the research in thearea of improvement of conveyor systems used in beverage in-dustry is very limited. Most of the published research is directedtowards improving the operations of conveyor systems and inte-gration of system to highly sophisticated software and hardware.This paper presents a research investigation aimed at im-proving the current techniques and practices used in the de-sign, manufacturing and assembly of floor mounted type chaindriven mechanical conveyors in order to reduce the manufactur-ing lead time and cost for such conveyors. Applying the con-cept of concurrent engineering and the principles of design formanufacturing and design for assembly 4, 5, several criticalconveyor parts were investigated for their functionality, materialsuitability, strength criterion, cost and ease of assembly in theoverall conveyor system. The critical parts were modified andredesigned with new shape and geometry, and some with newmaterials. The improved design methods and the functionality ofnew conveyor parts were verified and tested on a new test con-veyor system designed, manufactured and assembled using thenew improved parts.2 Design for manufacturing and assembly (DFMA)In recent years, research in the area of design for manufacturingand assembly has become very useful for industries that are con-552sidering improving their facilities and manufacturing methodol-ogy. However, there has not been enough work done in the areaof design for conveyor components, especially related to the is-sue of increasing numbers of drawing data and re-engineeringof the process of conveyor design based on traditional methods.A vast amount of papers have been published that have investi-gated issues related to DFMA and applied to various methodolo-gies to achieve results that proved economical, efficient and costeffective for the companies under investigation.The main classifications of DFMA knowledge can be iden-tified as (1) General guidelines, (2) Company-specific best prac-tice or (3) Process and or resource-specific constraints. Generalguidelines refer to generally applicable rules-of-thumb, relat-ing to a manufacturing domain of which the designer shouldbe aware. The following list has been compiled for DFMguidelines 6. Design for a minimum number of parts Develop a modular design Minimise part variations Design parts to be multifunctional Design parts for multiuse Design parts for ease of fabrication Avoid separate fasteners Maximise compliance: design for ease of assembly Minimise handling: design for handling presentation Evaluate assembly methods Eliminate adjustments Avoid flexible components: they are difficult to handle Use parts of known capability Allow for maximum intolerance of parts Use known and proven vendors and suppliers Use parts at derated values with no marginal overstress Minimise subassembliesFig.1. Layout of conveyor sys-tem for labelling plasic bottles Emphasise standardisation Use the simplest possible operations Use operations of known capability Minimise setups and interventions Undertake engineering changes in batchesThese design guidelines should be thought of as “optimalsuggestions”. They typically will result in a high-quality, low-cost, and manufacturable design. Occasionally compromisesmust be made, of course. In these cases, if a guideline goesagainst a marketing or performance requirement, the next bestalternative should be selected 7.Company-specific best practice refers to the in-house designrules a company develops, usually over a long period of time, andwhich the designer is expected to adhere to. These design rulesare identified by the company as contributing to improved qualityand efficiency by recognising the overall relationships betweenparticular processes and design decisions. Companies use suchguidelines as part of the training given to designers of productsrequiring significant amounts of manual assembly or mainte-nance. Note that most of the methodologies are good at eitherbeing quick and easy to start or being more formal and quanti-tative. For example, guidelines by Boothroyd and Dewhurst 8on DFA are considered as being quantitative and systematic.Whereas the DFM guidelines, which are merely rules of thumbderived from experienced professionals, are more qualitative andless formal 9.3 Conventional conveyor system designDesign and manufacturing of conveyor systems is a very com-plex and time-consuming process. As every conveyor system isa custom-made product, each project varies from every otherproject in terms of size, product and layout. The system design553is based on client requirements and product specifications. More-over, the system layout has to fit in the space provided by thecompany. The process of designing a layout for a conveyor sys-tem involve revisions and could take from days to months or insome instances years. One with the minimum cost and maximumclient suitability is most likely to get approval.Figure 1 shows a schematic layout of a typical conveyorsystem installed in a production line used for labelling ofplastic bottles. Different sections of the conveyor system areidentified by specific technical names, which are commonlyused in similar industrial application. The “singlizer” sec-tion enables the product to form into one lane from multiplelanes. The “slowdown table” reduces the speed of productonce it exits from filler, labeller, etc. The “mass flow” sec-tion is used to keep up with high-speed process, e.g., filler,labeller, etc. The “transfer table” transfers the direction of prod-uct flow. The purpose of these different conveyor sections isthus to control the product flow through different processingmachines.A typical mechanical conveyor system used in food and bev-erage applications consists of over two hundred mechanical andelectrical parts depending on the size of the system. Some ofthe common but essential components that could be standard-ised and accumulated into families of the conveyor system areside frames, spacer bars, end plates, cover plates, inside bendplates, outside bend plates, bend tracks and shafts (drive, tail andslave). The size and quantity of these parts vary according to thelength of conveyor sections and number of tracks correspond-ing to the width and types of chains required. The problems andshortcomings in the current design, manufacturing and assemblyof mechanical conveyors are varied, but include: Over design of some parts High cost of some components Long hours involved in assembly/maintenance Use of non-standard partsTable 1. Conveyor critical parts based on parts cost analysisProduct description Qty Material used Cost (%) Improvement possible (Yes/No)Leg set68 Plastic leg + SS tube 20.22 YesSide frame80 2.5 mm SS 16.07 YesSupport channel400 C channel SS 15.00 YesBend tracks 8 Plastic 14.36 NoRt. roller shaft139 20 dia. SS shaft 6.70 YesTail shaft 39 35 dia. Stainless steel 6.27 NoSpacer bar135 50X50X6 SS 5.43 YesSupport wear strip400 40 10 mm plastic 5.36 YesSupport side wear strip132 Plastic 3.01 YesEnd plate 39 2.5mm/SS 1.88 YesCover plate 39 1.6 mm S/S 1.57 NoBend plates 8 2.5mm/SS 1.29 YesTorque arm bracket 18 6 mm S/S plate 1.21 YesSlot cover 97 Stainless steel 0.97 YesInside bend plate 8 2.5mm/SS 0.66 YesTotal 100.00Critical parts4 Areas of improvementIn order to identify the areas of cost reduction in material andlabour, a cost analysis of all main conveyor parts was conductedto estimate the percentage of cost of each part in relation to thetotal cost of all such parts. The purpose of this analysis was toidentify the critical parts, which are mainly responsible for in-creasing the cost of the conveyor and thereby investigate meansfor reducing the cost of such parts.Table 1 shows the cost analysis of a 50-section conveyor sys-tem. The analysis reveals that 12 out of 15 parts constitute 79%of the total material cost of the conveyor system, where furtherimprovements in design to reduce the cost is possible. Out ofthese, seven parts were identified as critical parts (shown by anasterisk in Table 1) constituting maximum number of compo-nents in quantity and comprising over 71% of overall materialcost. Among these, three components (leg set, side frame andsupport channel) were found to account for 50% of the totalconveyor material cost. A detailed analysis of each of these 12parts was carried out considering the principles of concurrent en-gineering, design for manufacture and design for assembly, anda new improved design was developed for each case 10. De-tails of design improvement of some selected major componentare presented below.5 Redesign of leg set assemblyIn a conveyor system, the legs are mounted on the side frame tokeep the entire conveyor system off the floor. The existing designof conveyor legs work, but they are costly to manufacture, theyhave stability problems, and cause delays in deliveries. The delayis usually caused by some of the parts not arriving from over-seas suppliers on time. The most critical specifications requiredfor the conveyor legs are:554 Strength to carry conveyor load Stability Ease of assembly Ease of flexibility (for adjusting height)Figure 2 indicates all the parts for the existing design ofthe conveyor leg. The indicated numbers are the part numbersdescribed in Table 2, which also shows a breakdown of cost an-alysis complete with the labour time required to assemble a com-plete set of legs. The existing leg setup consists of plastic legbrackets ordered from overseas, stainless steel leg tubes, whichare cut into specified sizes, leg tube plastic adjustments, whichare clipped onto the leg tube at the bottom as shown in Fig. 2.Lugs, which are cut in square sizes, drilled and welded to the legtube to bolt the angle cross bracing and backing plate to supportleg brackets bolts. The # of parts in Table 2 signifies the numberof components in each part number and the quantity is the con-sumption of each part in the leg design. Companies have usedthis design for many years but one of the common complaintsreported by the clients was of the instability of legs.From an initial investigation, it became clear that the connec-tion between the stainless steel tube and plastic legs bracket (partFig.2. Existing leg design assembly with partnames shown in Table 1Table 2. Cost analysis for old leg design assemblyPart no. Part description # of parts Qty Cost Source1 Plastic leg bracket 2 2 $ 30.00 Overseas5, 6 Leg tube plastic adjustment 4 2 $ 28.00 Overseas4 Lug 2 2 $ 4.00 In-house7 Angle cross bracing 1 1 $ 5.00 In-house2 Backing plate 2 2 $ 4.00 In-house3 Leg tube 2 2 $ 25.00 In-house8 Bolts 6 6 $ 3.00 In-houseTotal assembly cost (welding) $ 15.00 In-houseTotal 19 17 $ 114.001 and part 3 in Fig. 2) was not rigid enough. The connectionsfor these parts are only a single 6 mm bolt. At times, when theconveyor system was carrying full product loads, it was observedthat the conveyor legs were unstable and caused mechanical vi-bration. One of the main reasons for this was due to a single boltconnection at each end of the lugs in part 3 and part 7. The sta-bility of the conveyor is considered critical matter and requiresrectification immediately to satisfy customer expectations.Considering the problems of the existing conveyor leg de-sign and the clients preferences, a new design for the conveyorleg was developed. Generally the stability and the strength ofthe legs were considered as the primary criteria for improve-ment in the new design proposal but other considerations werethe simplicity of design, minimisation of overseas parts and easeof assembly at the point of commissioning. Figure 3 shows, thenew design of the conveyors leg assembly, and Table 3 gives adescription and the cost of each part.Figure 3 shows that the new design consists of only five mainparts for the conveyors leg compared to eight main parts in theold design. In the old design, the plastic leg bracket, the legtube plastic adjustment and the leg tube were the most expensiveitems accounting for 72% of the cost of leg assembly. In the new555Fig.3. New design for leg assembly with partnames in Table 3Table 3. Cost analysis for new design leg assemblyPart no. Part description # of parts Qty Cost Source1 Stainless steel angle (50503 mm) 2 2 $ 24.00 In-house3 Leg plastic adjustment 2 2 $ 10.00 Overseas4 Cross brassing 1 1 $ 7.00 In-house5 Bolts 8 4 $ 4.00 In-house2 Backing plate 2 2 $ 4.00 In-houseTotal assembly cost $ 10.00 In-houseTotal 15 11 $ 59.00design, those parts have been replaced by a stainless steel angleand a new plastic leg adjustment reducing the cost of leg assem-bly by almost 50%. Thus the total numbers of parts in the leghave been reduced from 19 to 15 and the total cost per leg setuphas been reduced by $ 55 in the new design.The new conveyor leg design, when tested, was found to bemore secure and stable than the old design. The elimination ofpart number 1 and 5 from old conveyor design has made the newdesign more stable and rigid. In addition, the width of the crossbracing has also been increased with two bolts mount instead ofone in old design. This has provided the entire conveyor leg setupan additional strength.6 Redesign of the side framesThe side frame is the primary support of a conveyor systemthat provides physical strength to conveyors and almost all theparts are mounted on it. The side frame is also expected to havea rigid strength to provide support to all the loads carried onthe conveyor. It also accommodates all the associated conveyorcomponents for the assembly. The critical considerations of sideframe design are: Size of side frame (depth) Strength of the material Ease for assembly Ease for manufacturingFigure 4 shows the side frame dimension and parameters.The side frame used in existing design appears to be of rea-sonable depth in size (dimension H in Fig. 4). From the initialinvestigation, it was found that the distance between spacer barholes and return shaft (dimensions G and F in Fig. 4) could bereduced, as there was some unnecessary gap between those twocomponents. The important point to check before redefining thedesign parameters was to make sure that after bringing those twocloser, the return chains would not catch the spacer bar while theconveyor is running. The model of the new side frame design wasdrawn on CAD to ensure all the specifications are sound and theparts are placed in the position to check the clearances and thefits. Using the principle of design for manufacturing the new sideframe design was made symmetrical so that it applies to all typesof side frames. This change is expected to reduce the size of sideframe significantly for all sizes of chains.Table 4 shows a comparison of dimensions in the old designand the new design of side frames for the same chain type. It556Fig.4. Side frame dimensionsTable 4. New and old
温馨提示:
1: 本站所有资源如无特殊说明,都需要本地电脑安装OFFICE2007和PDF阅读器。图纸软件为CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.压缩文件请下载最新的WinRAR软件解压。
2: 本站的文档不包含任何第三方提供的附件图纸等,如果需要附件,请联系上传者。文件的所有权益归上传用户所有。
3.本站RAR压缩包中若带图纸,网页内容里面会有图纸预览,若没有图纸预览就没有图纸。
4. 未经权益所有人同意不得将文件中的内容挪作商业或盈利用途。
5. 人人文库网仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对用户上传分享的文档内容本身不做任何修改或编辑,并不能对任何下载内容负责。
6. 下载文件中如有侵权或不适当内容,请与我们联系,我们立即纠正。
7. 本站不保证下载资源的准确性、安全性和完整性, 同时也不承担用户因使用这些下载资源对自己和他人造成任何形式的伤害或损失。
提示  人人文库网所有资源均是用户自行上传分享,仅供网友学习交流,未经上传用户书面授权,请勿作他用。
关于本文
本文标题:气流输送系统的设计【5张CAD图纸和说明书】
链接地址:https://www.renrendoc.com/p-6039398.html

官方联系方式

2:不支持迅雷下载,请使用浏览器下载   
3:不支持QQ浏览器下载,请用其他浏览器   
4:下载后的文档和图纸-无水印   
5:文档经过压缩,下载后原文更清晰   
关于我们 - 网站声明 - 网站地图 - 资源地图 - 友情链接 - 网站客服 - 联系我们

网站客服QQ:2881952447     

copyright@ 2020-2025  renrendoc.com 人人文库版权所有   联系电话:400-852-1180

备案号:蜀ICP备2022000484号-2       经营许可证: 川B2-20220663       公网安备川公网安备: 51019002004831号

本站为文档C2C交易模式,即用户上传的文档直接被用户下载,本站只是中间服务平台,本站所有文档下载所得的收益归上传人(含作者)所有。人人文库网仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对上载内容本身不做任何修改或编辑。若文档所含内容侵犯了您的版权或隐私,请立即通知人人文库网,我们立即给予删除!