大学生英语作文范文三篇

大学生英语作文范文三篇 【篇1】 As college graduates start to seek for the first full-time job, the two factors of high-growth and high-pay are most likely to catch their attention. While an ideal job contains both factors, sometimes students just can choose one of them. On my opinion, as a college graduate, it is better to choose a high-growth job. 当大学毕业生开始找第一份全职工作的时候，发展前景好和高新这两个因素最有可能引起他们的注意。不过一份理想的工作包含了这两个因素，有时候学生只能选择其一。在我看来，作为大学毕业生，选择发展前景好的工作。 Every student wants to earn enough money to buy a beautiful house or a fancy car; they are enjoying what money brings for them. But comparing to these material things, the sense of success occupies more important position. The first job plays an important part in forming students career outlook and ambition. While the high-pay job lacks of vitality and creativity, students will lose themselves easily. 每个学生都想要挣充足的钱来买漂亮的房子和车子，他们享受金钱给他们带来的一切。但是和这些物质相比，成功的感觉占据更重要的位置。第一份工作对养成学生职业观和野心有很大的影响。不过高新的工作缺少活力和创造性，学生很容易迷失自我。 The high-growth job can provide students the chance of promotion. This gives students the motivation to compete for the position, the one who does well will get promoted. For the purpose of getting promoted, students have to fulfill themselves, so they will learn more, even they finish the contract with the company, and they still can find a good job in another company. 高新工作能够给学生带来提升的机会。这给予学生动力来竞争职位，谁做得好谁就能得到升职。为了得到升职，学生不得不提升自我，因为他们能学到很多，即使他们不在这个公司做了，他们在别的工司也能找到一份好的工作。 High-growth jobs and high-pay jobs both are tempting; some students who are with short sight will choose the latter, while the wise students will choose the former. What decision you make will affect you in the rest of your life. 发展前景好的工作和高新工作都很*，一些目光短浅的学生会选择后者，不过聪明的学生会选择前者。你所做的决定将会影响你的一生。 【篇2】 Each year, people burn or cut down 143,000 square kilometers (55,000 square miles) of the forest. People who burn or cut down trees do it for different reasons： farmers cut down trees in order to get more fertilize lands to grow rice or vegetables, and use the woods as fuel. Timber companies cut down trees and turn them into furniture or paper productions. As to goal miners, they remove the forests to find out whether there are goal underground. 每一年，人们都会砍伐14.3万平方千米的森林（约5.5万平方英里）。人们砍伐树木出于种种原因：农民们为了得到更肥沃的空地来种植大米蔬菜，砍下的树木用来取火。木材公司用树木来制作家具或是各类纸制品。至于那些开采煤矿的人，把树木砍掉就是为了检测是否有煤矿在下面。 However, many of us fail to realize that forests are the lungs of the earth. When we cut down trees, we also push ourselves in to a dangerous situation. That is the global warming. When you come to think about it, there are only few ways to solve these negative effects： stop cutting down trees blindly; try to find some clear energy that can replace oil and coal. But these solutions can be impractical to some degreed. 不过，我们中的很多人都没有意识到树木等同于地球的“肺部”。当我们砍伐树木时，我们就把自己推入一个危险的境地会引起世界气候变暖。想到这些，只有为数不多的几个办法能够解决这个问题：停止盲目地砍伐树木；寻找能够代替石油和煤矿的新能源。但是，就当前来看，这几个策略并不可行。 Why trees can be so important to the whole nature? First of all, trees are the habitat of many animals. When we cut down trees, we not only destroy animals habitats but also ourselves. We just gradually destroy natural links. The result is that many spices of animals and plants are dying out. Secondly, cutting down trees cause global warming, to some degree. Naturalists compare forest to humans lungs. The forests absorb the carbon dioxide and other gas that cause global warming, and then give off the oxygen that good for the human beings and other living creatures. Its refreshed the air as well as reduced the noise. If the air quality is bad, people may die from cancers, or the new diseases for which they have no immunity. Forests also play an important role in the prevention of natural disasters. Warmer temperatures cause water to expand and also create more water by melting polar ice caps. Thats to say, the nations which near the ocean may have been flooded by the water. But the forests can prevent water loss and soil erosion, and cool off the global temperatures. Its the key to keep the balance of the nature. 为什么树木对整个生态环境都如此重要呢？首先，树木是小动物们的家园。当我们砍伐树木时，我们不但仅毁掉了它们的家，也毁掉了自己的。一步步的，我们慢慢分解了整个生态链，所造成的结果就是大批的动植物种类灭绝。其二，砍伐树木在某种水准上造成世界变暖。生态学家把森林比作人类的肺。森林能够吸收二氧化碳和其他引起气候变暖的温室气体，然后转化成氧气供地球上的生物呼吸。树木不但能净化空气，也能减少噪音。如果空气质量下降，那么人们就有可能死于肺癌，或者是其他致命菌。森林在预防疾病的过程中起到了重要的角色。气温的上升导致北极的冰层融化，水平面上升。也就是说，临海的城市也许会被海水淹没。但是森林就能够阻止水土流失，使气温下降。它是保证世界生态平衡的关键。 Sometimes people only care about money making; they dont care about the price we pay for the pollution. When the disaster is around the corner, we may be afraid and frustrated. The earth, on which our economies have always been based, is suddenly threatening our existence. All we hope that is this overpopulated, over industrialized planet can carry on for a longer time. And maybe, its time for us to realize that we should protect the earth, stop cutting down trees blindly and madly. 有时候人们只关心挣钱，却对我们所付出的代价不管不问。当灾难来临时，我们会害怕、会彷徨。我们赖以生存的地球，却突然变成了威胁我们生命的东西。我们只希望，在这个人口过度、工业过度的星球能继续撑下去。也许，是时候我们应该保护地球，停止盲目疯狂地砍伐树木了。 【篇3】 At this moment in time, no pollution has received more abuse than PM2.5 which refers to particles with diameter less than 2.5 pm and can easily penetrate the membrane of lung cell. These tiny particles are doomed to cause serious damage to our health. With time going by, theres no denying that our pollution around us is on a rapid rise from last decade. So how can we restrict the emission and reduce the PM2.5 index？ 此时此刻，没有任何一种污染物受到比PM2.5更多的批评了，PM2.5指的是直径小于2.5pm的能够轻易穿过肺部细胞的颗粒物。这些细小的颗粒物必然会对我们的身体健康造成严重的影响。随着时间的流逝，不可否认从十年前开始我们身边的污染正在迅速增加。那么，我们理应如何减少污染排放从而减少PM2.5指数呢？ Attitudes towards this issue vary from person to person. Theres a part of our citizens who always go into raptures at the mere mention of authoritative restriction and punishment. They tend to live under the illusion that more severe punishment will certainly exert more positive effect. 不同的人对这个话题有着不同的看法。有一部分公民往往一提到让政府增大限制和处罚力度就心花怒放。他们似乎错误的认为更增强有力的处罚措施一定会产生更加积极的效果。 From my perspective, what they fail to take into consideration is the basic fact that punishment is only a small part of the measures .Assuming that if the company can bring in more money by emitting arbitrarily, theyll do that consecutively, regardless of fine. 从我的角度来看，他们没有考虑到一个基本的事实是惩罚措施仅仅所有措施中的一小部分。假设如果公司能够通过任意排放赚更多的钱，他们一定会忽视罚款继续这样做下去的。 As far as Im concerned, regulations and restrictions ought to be integrated