5其他认证及获奖证书PP_Large-scale-FI-benchmark report

PERFORMANCE BENCHMARKResults of a Multi-Issuer FI Benchmark on Windows 2008 R2 & SQL Server 2008 R2Publication HistoryThis section indicates the version history of this document. Refer to the following table for a list of the major revisions made to it since it was first published.Publication dateSummary of major changesMay 2011First publishedS1 Confidential and ProprietaryDocument distribution code: P/1/May-2011/WindowsBenchmarkATMCard/CC/O Available to resellers, customers, and potential customers under NDA with S1.Copyright 2011. S1 Global Limited. All rights reserved. S1 is a trademark of S1 Global Limited or its affiliates. All other registered or unregistered trademarks and service marks are properties of their respective companies and should be treated as such. No part of this document may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, for any purpose, without express written permission of S1.The results set forth herein were achieved in a controlled environment and are set forth as an example of possible results in a controlled environment based on the parameters listed in this document. S1 has provided this information for illustrative purposes only and in no way guarantees these results. Further, S1 does not guarantee your future results (and disclaims any and all representations, warranties, and guarantees of any nature whatsoever) since the actual results in your environment rely on many different factors, settings, and configurations.Contents1Executive Summary12Aims and Objectives23System Configuration33.1Server Hardware33.2System Software34Benchmark Results44.1CPU Utilization44.2Memory Utilization44.3Disk Utilization44.3.1Realtime database data file44.3.2Postcard database data file54.3.3Realtime and Postcard database log files54.3.4TempDB54.4End-to-end transaction response times64.5ftServer Platform Relative Performance75Conclusion8Confidential and ProprietaryS1 Global Limitedi1 Executive SummaryIn April 2011, S1 Corporation (S1) ran a series of benchmarks on a Stratus ftServer 6310 to measure the performance of an of S1s ATM Driving and Card Management solutions in a 64-bit Microsoft Windows Server 2008 R2 / Microsoft SQL Server 2008 R2 environment. The benchmarks simulated the transaction volumes of a large hosting environment with hundreds of financial institutions. It helped to demonstrate that an S1 payments system is able to process a constant, high transaction per second (TPS) workload over a long period of time, in a stable and consistent manner without degradation in resource utilization or in end-to-end transaction response times. The system that was benchmarked processed transactions originating from 10,000 ATMs and simultaneously processed a large volume of switched-in transactions from many networks. These transactions were then authorized by 500 simulated host systems.S1s card authorization database was pre-loaded with 20 million card records evenly distributed across the 500 issuers, i.e. each issuer had 40,000 cards. As transactions were authorized by the back-end host systems, the card balances maintained by the S1 payments system were updated in its card authorization database. The system was configured to authorize transactions locally if one of the back-end host systems became unavailable. Out of the 500 issuers configured on the system, 100 were fully hosted on the S1 payments platform, i.e. they had no connection to a back-end host system.The study consisted of several benchmarks tests. The main benchmark test was configured as follows:1. Over a period of 9 hours transactions were injected at a rate of 250 TPS of which 50 TPS represented transactions originating from directly connected ATMs and the rest consisted of switched-in traffic.2. During the 9 hour benchmark run selective updates to card records were applied to the card bases of the issuers every hour via file loads from disk.3. Occasionally, commands were sent to the transaction processing platform requesting it to reload database configuration data thereby simulating system configuration changes that would typically occur during a normal business day. The results of this study help demonstrate that an S1 payments system is an efficient, available, and scalable transaction processing platform for large financial institutions and financial institution hosting environments, with the ability to manage thousands of ATMs and maintain card authorization databases for hundreds of issuers.2 Aims and ObjectivesThe objective of the study was to help demonstrate that S1s ATM Driving and Card Management solutions can achieve the following: Sustain a high TPS rate (250 TPS) for a long period of time (9 hours). Apply changes to the card bases of the issuers every hour without affecting transaction authorization response times. Occasionally reload system configuration information without affecting transaction authorization response times.Additionally, the study aimed to provide visibility into the configuration, performance, and scalability of S1s ATM Driving and Card Management solutions.All performance testing was done in a non-Active/Active environment.3 System Configuration3.1 Server HardwareThe benchmarks were run on a Stratus ftServer 6310.ResourceValueProcessors2 x Xeon X5570 2.93 GHz with 6 cores per processor and with hyper-threading enabled.Memory48 GB of which 38 GB was dedicated to Microsoft SQL Server.Internal storage4 x 146 GB (15,000 RPM, SAS) External storageftScalable Storage G2 Cache size - 1 GB Disks - 24 x 146 GB (15,000 RPM, SAS) drives configured as 6 disks RAID 10 Realtime database data file. 10 disks RAID 10 Postcard database data file. 4 disks RAID 10 Database log files for Realtime and Postcard. 4 disks RAID 10 TempDB.3.2 System SoftwareThe software listed in the table below was installed on the Stratus ftServer 6310.Component nameVersionDescriptionftServer System Software7.0.0Stratus ftServer system software for Windows.Windows Server 2008 R2 (SP1) (x64)Microsofts server operating systemSQL Server2008 R2 (CU6) (x64)Microsofts database management systemSun JVM1.6 update 24 (x86)Suns Java virtual machineRealtime Frameworkv5.3.sp2 (patch 58)S1s payments platformSSFv5.1 (patch 65)S1s self-service frameworkAtmAppv5.2 (patch 93)S1s ATM driving applicationPostCardv5.2 (patch 26)S1s card authorization application4 Benchmark ResultsResource utilization and transaction response time results are presented below for the 9 hour benchmark run.4.1 CPU UtilizationThe average CPU utilization during the 9 hour benchmark was 40%.4.2 Memory UtilizationThe server was equipped with 48 GB of RAM of which 38 GB was dedicated to MS SQL Server. The rest of the memory was used by the S1 application software and Windows Sever. The amount of Windows free memory varied between 2,214 MB and 3,366 MB during the benchmark run.4.3 Disk Utilization4.3.1 Realtime database data fileThe RAID volume on which the data file of the Realtime database resided was on average busy 12.9% of the time. Disk utilization spiked every 6 minutes duration database checkpoint activity.4.3.2 Postcard database data fileThe RAID volume on which the data file of the Card Management database resided was on average busy 99.4% of the time. Even at this high utilization rate, the average I/O latency was only 10.7 ms. 4.3.3 Realtime and Postcard database log filesThe RAID volume on which the log files of the Realtime and Card Management databases resided was on average busy 54.1% of the time.4.3.4 TempDBThe RAID volume on which the TempDB resided was on average busy 5.7% of the time.4.4 End-to-end transaction response timesT