零件图汇总14张.PDF

耳机塑料注塑模具设计【三维PROE】【18张CAD图纸+PDF图】

收藏

资源目录
跳过导航链接。
压缩包内文档预览:
预览图
编号:118636233    类型:共享资源    大小:10.14MB    格式:ZIP    上传时间:2021-03-24 上传人:好资料QQ****51605 IP属地:江苏
45
积分
关 键 词:
三维PROE 耳机 塑料 注塑 模具设计 三维 PROE 18 CAD 图纸 PDF
资源描述:

喜欢这套资料就充值下载吧。。。资源目录里展示的都可在线预览哦。。。下载后都有,,请放心下载,,文件全都包含在内,,【有疑问咨询QQ:414951605 或 1304139763】

内容简介:
毕业设计(论文)中期报告题目:耳机外壳塑料模具设计系 别 机电信息系 专 业 机械设计制造及其自动化班 级 姓 名 学 号 导 师 2013年3月25日1. 设计(论文)进展状况1)分析零件的成形工艺性:通过查阅书籍资料及查阅网络数据,发现聚乙烯塑料重量轻,物理性能、化学性能及电气性能等均很优良,且很容易成型,价格便宜。所以,最终确定所制作塑件材料为低压聚乙烯,并根据实体塑件测量出实际尺寸。2)浇注系统的选择: 根据所选塑料的工艺性及塑件的形状,决定选取点浇法浇注,所选浇口类型为侧浇口。3)分型面的选择: 选择塑件截面最大的部位。4)浇注系统的设计与选择: 包括主流道、分流道、浇注口的设计与选择。5)绘制完成了塑件的CAD二维图和Proe三维图,绘制模具装配图草图。6)设计的耳机塑件图见:图1二维零件图 图2 三维零件图7)方案确定(1)课题名称:耳机模具设计(2)材料选择:聚乙烯(3)生产批量:大(4)精度要求:中(5)塑料等级:6级(6)方案确定:该产品为大批量生产。故设计的模具要有较高的注塑效率,浇注系统要能自动脱模,可采用点浇口自动脱模结构。由于该塑件要求批量大,制件较小,为取得较大的经济效益,所以模具采用一模四腔结构。此方案生产效率高,操作简便,动作可靠,方便脱出流道凝料,经济性价比高,故选此次模具设计选用方案。模具设计图见图3:图3装配图2. 存在问题及解决措施 在本次设计阶段内,我深刻的体会到自己所储备的知识的不足,以及所查阅资料的缺乏和片面性。尤其针对于注塑机的选型过程,大部分的资料里面都只有注塑机的型号和具体性能数据,但是却缺少如何选择与校核的方法,令人百思不得其解。最后,本着求同存异的想法,综合多处查询资料的结果,选择基础结构,进行设计。 我也应该加强自己对塑料模具知识的学习,努力使自己所设计出来的模具更具备可行性和实用性。同时,也应该加强自己与老师、与同学之间的沟通,使自己的设计在互相印证中得到提高和完善,加深自己对本次设计的理解。 最后,我相信自己可以保持积极乐观的态度去继续接下来的设计过程。在老师的悉心教导下,能够快速、有效的完成所有设计流程,并最终顺利结束本次毕业设计。3. 后期工作安排1、 接下来将用两周左右的时间对成型零件的设计计算彻底完成。2、 用两周时间绘制模具各主要零部件的零件图及总体装配图。3、 用两周时间用Proe绘图软件对主要零部件进行三维建模,绘制出爆炸图。4、 用两周时间整理相关资料,撰写毕业论文,准备毕业答辩。 指导教师签字: 年 月 日Int J Adv Manuf Technol (2001) 17:297304 2001 Springer-Verlag London LimitedOptimum Gate Design of FreeForm Injection Mould using theAbductive NetworkJ. C. LinDepartment of Mechanical Design Engineering, National Hu-Wei Institute of Technology, Yunlin, TaiwanThis study uses the injection position and size of the gate asthe major control parameters for a simulated injection-mould.Once the injection parameters (gate size and gate position) aregiven, the product performance (deformation) can be accuratelypredicted by the abductive network developed.To avoid the numerous influencing factors, first the part-lineof the parameter equation is created by an abductive networkto limit the range of the gate. The optimal injection parameterscan be searched for by a simulation annealing (SA) optimisa-tion algorithm, with a performance index, to obtain a perfectpart. The major purpose is searching for the optimal gatelocation on the part-surface, and minimising the air-trap anddeformation after part formation. This study also uses a prac-tical example which has been and proved by experiment toachieve a satisfactory result.Keywords: Abductive network; Injection mould; Simulationannealing (SA)1.IntroductionOwing to the rapid development of industry and commerce inrecent years, there is a need for rapid and high volumeproduction of goods. The products are manufactured usingmoulds in order to save the time and cost. Plastic products arethe majority. Owing to these products not requiring complicatedprocesses it is possible to cope with market demand speedilyand conveniently.In traditional plastic production, the designs of the portionsof the mould are determined by humans. However, because ofthe increased performance requirements, the complexity ofplastic products has increased. First, the geometric shapes ofthe plastic products are difficult to draw, and the internalshape is often complex which also affects the production ofthe product.Injection processing can be divided into three stages:Correspondence and offprint requests to: Dr. J. C. Lin, Departmentof Mechanical Design Engineering, National Hu-Wei Institute ofTechnology, Yunlin 632, Taiwan. E-mail: linrcK.tw1. Heat the plastic material to a molten state. Then, by highpressure, force the material to the runner, and then into themould cavity.2. When the filling of the mould cavity is completed, moremolten plastic should be delivered into the cavity at highpressure to compensate for the shrinkage of the plastic. Thisensures complete filling of the mould cavity.3. Take out the product after cooling.Though the filling process is only a small proportion of thecomplete formation cycle, it is very important. If filling inincomplete, there is no pressure holding and cooling is required.Thus, the flow of the plastic fluid should be controlledthoroughly to ensure the quality of the product.The isothermal filling model of a Newtonian fluid is thesimplest injection mould-flow filling model. Richardson 1produced a complete and detailed concept. The major conceptis based on the application of lubrication theory, and hesimplified the complex 3D flow theory to 2D Hele-Shaw flow.The Hele-Shaw flow was used to simulate the potential flowand was furthermore used in the plasticity flow of the plastic.He assumed the plasticity flow on an extremely thin plate andfully developed the flow by ignoring the speed change throughthe thickness. Kamal et al. used similar methods to obtain thefilling condition for a rectangular mould cavity, and the analyti-cal result obtained was almost identical to the experimentalresult.Plastic material follows the Newtonian fluid model for flowin a mould cavity, and Bird et al. 24 derived mould-flowtheory based on this. When the shape of a mould is complicatedand there is variation in thickness, then the equilibrium equa-tions changes to nonlinear and has no analytical solution.Thus, it can be solved only by finite-difference or numericalsolutions 2,5Of course, as the polymer is a visco-elastic fluid, it is bestto solve the flow problem by using visco-elasticity equations.In 1998, Goyal et al. used the White Metzner visco-elasticitymodel to simulate the disk mould-flow model for centralpouring. Metzner, using a finite-difference method to solve thegoverning equation, fould the visco-elasticity effect would notchange the distribution of speed and temperature. However, itaffects the stress field very much. If it is a pure visco-elastic298J. C. Linflow model, the popular GNF model is generally used toperform numerical simulation.Currently, finite-element methods are mostly used for thesolution of mould-flow problems. Other methods are purevisco-elastic models, such as C-FOLW and MOLD-FLOWsoftware. We used this method as well. Some software employsthe visco-elastic WhiteMetzner model, but it is limited to 2Dmould-flow analysis. Simple mould flow analysis is limited byCPU time. For the complicated mould shapes, Papthanasionet al. used UCM fluid for filling analysis, using a finite-difference method and BFCC coordination system applicationfor the solution of the more complicated mould-shape andfilling problem, but it was not commercialised 6.Many factors affect plastic material injection. The fillingspeed, injection pressure and molten temperature, holding press-ure 712, cooling tube 13,14 and injection gate affect theaccuracy of the plastic product, because, when the injectionprocessing is completed, the flow of material in the mouldcavity results in uneven temperature and pressure, and inducesresidual stress and deformation of the workpiece after cooling.It is difficult to decide on the mould part-surface and gatepositions. Generally, the mould part-surface is located at thewidest plane of the mould. Searching for the optimal gateposition depends on experience. Minimal modification to themould is required if you are lucky. However, the time andcost required for the modification of most injection-mouldsexceeds the original cost, if the choice of the part-line is poor.For the mould part surface, many workers used various methodsto search for the optimal mould part-line, such as geometricshape and feature-based design 1517. Some workers usedfinite-element methods and abductive networks to look for theoptimal gate design for a die-casting mould 18.This study used an abductive network to establish the para-meter relationship of the mould part-line, and used this formulafor searching for 22 points on the injection mould part-line toserve as the location for an injection gate. Abductive networksare used to match injection pressure and pressure holding timeto perform injection formation analysis, and to establish arelationship between these parameters, and the output result ofthe injection process.It has been shown that prediction accuracy in abductivenetworks is much higher than that in other networks 19.Abductive networks based on the abductive modelling tech-nique are able to represent complex and uncertain relationshipsbetween mould-flow analysis results and injection parameters.It has beeen shown that the injection-strain and injection-stressin a product can be predicted, with reasonable accuracy, basedon the developed networks. The abductive network has beenconstructed once the relationships of gate location that areinput and simulated have been determined; an appropriateoptimisation algorithm with a performance index is then usedto search for the optimal location parameters.In this paper, an optimisation method for simulated annealing20 is presented. The simulated annealing algorithm is asimulation of the annealing process for minimising the perform-ance index. It has been successfully applied to filtering inimage processing 21, VLSI layout generation 22, discretetolerance design 23, wire electrical discharge machining 24,deep-draw clearance 25, and casting-die runner design 26,etc. It provides an experimental foundation based on theoryfor the development and application of the technologies.2.Mould-Flow TheoryThe mould flow analysis include four major parts:1. Filling stage.2. Pressure holding stage.3. Cooling and solidification stage.4. Shrinkage and warp, i.e. stress residue stage.Thus, the major mould flow equations are divided into fourgroups. In the filling stage, the mould cavity is filled withmolten plastic fluid at high presssure. Thus, the governingequations include:1. Continuityequation. The plasticdeformation or shapechange accompany the flow during the filling process(mass conservation):rt+ = (=V) = 0(1)r = plastic density; V = vector velocity2. Momentum equation. Newtons second law is used to derivethe momentum (acceleration condition) or force balancegenerated by plastic flow:rFVt+ (V =)VG= VP + = t + rf(2)P = flow pressure; f = body force; t = stress tensor.3. Energy equation. The energy conservation of system andlaws of conservation of flow material, if the fluid is incom-pressible:rCPFTt+ (V =)TG= = q + t: =V(3)T = temperature; CP= specific heat of constant pressure; q= heat flux4. Rheology equationt = fn(g, T, P, %)(4)g= =V + (=V)T(5)=V = deform tensor; (=V)T= transport vector.Holding pressure analysis. The holding pressure process isto maintain the pressure after the mould cavity is filled inorder to inject more plastic, to compensate for the shrinkagein cooling.rV1t= Px1+Ft11x1+t21x2+t31x3G(6)rV2t= Px2+Ft12x1+t22x2+t32x3G(7)rV3t= Px1+Ft13x1+t23x2+t33x3G(8)Optimum Gate Design of FreeForm Injection Mould299Cooling analysis. The analysis of the cooling process con-siders the relationship of the plastic flow distribution and heattransmission. The homogenous mould temperature and thesequence of filling will be affected by the shrinkage of theproduct formed. If the temperature is distributed non-uniformly,it tends to produce warp. This is mainly due to heat-transferand crystallisation heat of the plastic.rCPTt= kF2Tx21+2Tx22+2Tx33G+ rCPrDH(9)r = crystallisation rate; DH = crystallisation heat3.Abductive Network Synthesis andEvaluationMiller 22 observed that human behaviour limits the amountof information considered at a time. The input data are summar-ised and then the summarised information is passed to a higherreasoning level.In an abductive network, a complex system can be decom-posed into smaller, simpler subsystems grouped into severallayers using polynomial function nodes. These nodes evaluatethe limited number of inputs by a polynomial function andgenerate an output to serve as an input to subsequent nodesof the next layer. These polynomial functional nodes arespecified as follows:1.NormaliserA normaliser transforms the original input variables into arelatively common region.a1= q0+ q1x1(10)Where a1is the normalised input, q0, q1are the coefficientsof the normaliser, and x1is the original input.2.White nodeA white node consists of linear weighted sums of all theoutputs of the previous layer.b1= r0+ r1y1+ r2y2+ r3y3+ % + rnyn(11)Where y1, y2, y3, ynare the input of the previous layer, b1isthe output of the node, and the r0, r1, r2, r3, %, rnare thecoefficients of the triple node.3.Single, double, and triple nodesThese names are based on the number of input variables. Thealgebraic form of each of these nodes is shown in thefollowing:single: c1= s0+ s1z1+ s2z21+ s3z31(12)double: d1= t0+ (t1n1+ t2n21+ t3n31)+ (t4n2+ t5n22+ t6n32) + (t7n1n2)(13)triple: e1= u0+ (u1o1+ u2o21+ u3o31)+ (u4o2+ u5o22+ u6o32) + (u7o3+ u8o23+ u9o33)+ u10o1o2+ u11o2o3+ u12o1o3+ u13o1o2o3(14)where z1, z2, z3, %, zn, n1, n2, n3, %, nn, o1, o2, o3, %, onare the input of the previous layer, c1, d1, and e1are theoutput of the node, and the s0, s1, s2, s3, %, sn, t0, s1, t2, t3,%, tn, u0, u1, u2, u3, %, unare the coefficients of the single,double, and triple nodes.These nodes are third-degree polynomial Eq. and doublesand triples have cross-terms, allowing interaction among thenode input variables.4.UnitiserOn the other hand, a unitiser converts the output to a realoutput.f1= v0+ v1i1(15)Where i1is the output of the network, f1is the real output,and v0and v1are the coefficients of the unitiser.4.Part-Surface ModelThis study uses an actual industrial product as a sample, Fig.1. The mould part surface is located at the maximum projectionarea. As shown in Fig. 1, the bottom is the widest plane andis chosen as the mould part surface. However, most importantis the searching of gate position on the part surface.This study establishes the parameter equation by using anabductive neuron network, in order to establish the simulatedannealing method (SA) to find the optimal gate path position.The parameter equation of a part-surface is expressed byF(Y) = X. First, use a CMM system to measure the XYZcoordinate values (in this study z = 0) of 22 points on themould part-line on the mould part-surface as illustrated inTable 1, and the gate position is completely on the curve inthis space.Prior to developing a space-curve model, a database has tobe trained, and a good relationship msut exist between thecontrol point and abductive network system. A correct andFig. 1. Injection-mould product.300J. C. LinTable 1. X, Y coordinate.Set numberX-coordinateY-coordinate10.024.621.634.3333.283.545.292.0457.310.5669.340.9711.332.35812.983.94913.855.571014.127.341113.699.671212.9611.91310.0021.03149.3323.16158.6425.28167.9827.39177.8728.31187.8029.29197.8330.34207.6031.30217.0732.15226.1132.49precise curve Eq. is helpful for finding the optimal gatelocation.To build a complete abductive network, the first requirementis to train the database. The information given by the inputand output parameters must be sufficient. A predicted squareerror (PSE) criterion is then used to determine automaticallyan optimal structure 23. The PSE criterion is used to selectthe least complex but still accurate network.The PSE is composed of two terms:PSE = FSE + KP(16)Where FSE is the average square error of the network forfitting the training data and KPis the complex penalty of thenetwork, shown by the following equation:KP= CPM2s2pKN(17)Where CPM is the complex penalty multiplier, KPis a coef-ficient of the network; N is the number of training data to beused and s2pis a prior estimate of the model error variance.Based on the development of the database and the predictionof the accuracy of the part-surface, a three-layer abductivenetwork, which comprised design factors (input: various Ycoordinate) and output factors (X coordinate) is synthesisedautomatically. It is capable of predicting accurately the spacecurve at any point under various control parameters. All poly-nomial equations used in this network are listed in AppendixA. (PSE = 5.8 103).Table 2 compares the error predicted by the abductive modeland CMM measurement data. The measurement daa is excludedfrom the 22 sets of CMM measurement data for establishingthe model. This set of data is used to test the appropriatenessof the model established above. We can see from Table 2 thatthe error is approximately 2.13%, which shows that the modelis suitable for this space curve.Table 2. CMMS-coordinate and neural network predict compared (itis not included in any original 22 sets database).ItemsCMMSneural networkError valuescoordinatepredict(CMMS-predict)/coordinateCMMSCoordinate(11.25, 16.0)(11.01, 16.0)2.13%5.Create the Injection-Mould ModelSimilarly, the relationship is established between input para-meters (gate location and gate size) and the output parameter(deformation) during the injection process. To build a completeabductive network, the first requirement is to train the database.The information given by the input and the output data mustbe sufficient. Thus, the training factor (gate location) forabductive network training should be satisfactory for makingdefect-free products. Figure 2 shows the simulation of FEMmould-flow. Table 3 shows the position of the gate and themaximum deformation of the product obtained from mould-flow analysis.Based on the development of the injection-mould model,three-layer abductive networks, which are comprised of injec-tion-mould conditions and the injection-results (deformation),are synthesised automatically. They are capable of predictingaccurately the product strain (the result of injection-mouldedproduct) under various control parameters. All polynomialequations used in this network are listed in Appendix B (PSE= 2.3 105).Table 4 compares the error predicted by the abductive modeland the simulation case. The simulation case is excluded fromthe 22 sets of simulation cases for establishing the model. Thisset of data is used to test the appropriateness of the modelestablished above. We can see from Table 4 that the error isFig. 2. The deformation of FEM mould-flow.Optimum Gate Design of FreeForm Injection Mould301Table 3. Gate location and the maximum strain relationship.Set numberX-coordinateY-coordinateGate widthGate lengthProduce max. strain10.024.60.5251.14750.34821.634.330.71.530.315333.283.50.8751.91250.271045.292.041.052.2950.285857.310.560.5251.14750.301769.330.526711.332.350.8751.91250.2369812.983.941.052.2950.2517913.855.570.5251.14750.27881014.127.340.71.530.27731113.699.670.8751.91250.29881212.9611.91.052.2950.29971310.0021.030.5251.14750.2576149.3330.2624158.6425.280.8751.91250.2542167.9827.391.052.2950.2495177.8728.310.5251.14750.2503187.8029.290.71.530.2456197.8330.340.8751.91250.2596207.6031.301.052.2950.2457217.0732.150.5251.14750.2499226.1132.490.71.530.2511Table 4. Mould-flow simulated and neural network predict compared(it is not included in any original 22 set database).ItemsFEM mould-flowNeural networksimulationpredictX-coordinate11.0111.01Y-coordinate16.016.0Gate width1.81.8Gate height0.90.9Produce max. deformation0.31780.3325Error values4.62%(FEM-predict)/FEMapproximately 4.62%, which shows that the model is suitablefor this model requirement.6.Simulation Annealing TheoryIn 1983, a theory that was capable of solving the globaloptimisation problem was developed for the optimised problem.The concept was a powerful optimisation algorithm based onthe annealing of a solid which solved the combinatorialoptimisation problem of multiple variables. When the tempera-ture is T and energy E, the thermal equilibrium of the systemis a Boltzman distribution:Pr=1Z(T)expSEKBTD(18)Z(T) = normalisation factor; KB= Boltzman constant;Exp(E/KBT) = Boltzman factorMetropolis 24 proposed a criterion for simulating the cool-ing of a solid to a new state of energy balance. The basiccriterion used by Metropolis is an optimisation algorithm called“simulated annealing”. The algorithm was developed by Kirk-patrick et al. 20.In this paper, the simulation-annealing algorithm is used tosearch for the optimal control parameters for gate location.Figure 3 shows the flowchart of the simulated annealing search.First, the algorithm is given an initial temperature Tsand afinal temperature Te, and a set of initial process vectors Ox.The objective function obj is defined, based on the injectionparameter performance index. The objective function can berecalculated for all the different perturbed compensation para-meters. If the new objective function becomes smaller, thepeturbed process parameters are accepted as the new processparameters and the temperature drops a little in scale. That is:Ti+1= TiCT(19)where i is the index for the temperature decrement and the CTis the decay ratio for the temperature (CT, 1).However, if the objective function becomes larger, the prob-ability of acceptance of the perturbed process parameters isgiven as:Pr(obj) = expFDobjKBTG(20)Where KBis the Boltzman constant and Dobj is the differentin the objective function. The procedure is repeated until thetemperature Tiapproaches zero. It shows the energy droppingto the lowest state.Once the model of the relationship among the functions ofthe gate location, the input parameters and output parametersare established, this model can be used to find the optimalparameter for the gate location. The optimal parameter for theprocess can be obtained by using the objective function to serve302J. C. LinFig. 3. Flowchart of the simulated annealing searching.as a starting point. The objective function obj is formulated asfollows:obj = w1 (X-Coordinate) + w2 (Y-Coordinate)(21)+ w3 (Gate-wide size) + w3 (Gate-height size)Where w1, w2, and w3are the weight functions.The control parametric of the X, Y location should complywith the part-surface parameter equation. That means the basiccondition of optimisation should fall within a certain range:1. The X-coordinate value obtained from optimisation shouldbe larger than the minimum X-coordinate value, and smallerthan the maximum X-coordinate value.2. The Y-coordinate value obtained from optimisation shouldbe larger than the minimum Y-coordinate value, and smallerthan the maximum X-coordinate value. The X, Y-coordinatedepends on the Appendix A neural network equation.3. The gate-wide size obtained from optimisation should belarger than the minimum size of gate-width, and smallerthan the maximum gate-width size.4. The gate-height size obtained from optimisation should belarger than the minimum size of gate-height, and smallerthan the maximum gate-height size.The inequalities are given as follows:The smallest X coordinate value , X coordinate value, the largest X coordinate value(22)The smallest Y coordinate value , Y coordinate value, the largest Y coordinate value(23)The smallest gate-width size , gate-width size, the largest-width gate size(24)The smallest gate-height size , gate-height size, the largest-height gate size(25)The upper-bound conditions should be kept to an acceptablelevel so as to find the optimal (acccurate) gate coordinate.7.Results and DiscussionAn example of the simulation is used to illustrate the processof optimising the gate location. In the first case, the weightfuntion w1= w2= w3= w4= 1 (the gate location and size isequal weight). In this case, the parameters used in the simu-lation annealing algorithm are given as: initial temperature Ts= 100C, final temperature Te= 0.0001C, decay ratio CT=0.98, Boltzman constant Ks= 0.00667, and the upper boundof the X-coordinate is 0.0276 mm, upper bound of Y-co-ordinate is 32.49 mm (X depends on the Y-coordinate).Simulated annealing is used for finding the optimal gatecoordinates and gate size, as shown in Table 5. When gatesize is w = 1.8 mm and h = 0.9 mm, the optimal gate locationis Y = 30.0 mm, and X = 7.824 mm. Predicting the minimumdeformation using the optimal parameters is about 0.2563 mm(minimum, Table 5).In Fig. 4, for a fixed gate size w = 1.8 mm and the h =0.9 mm, the optimal value is found by using the Y-coordinatevariation. In Fig. 4, the Y-coordinate has the minimum de-formation when the optimal parameter of the Y-coordinate is30.0 mm (X = 7.824 mm), and the deformation is 0.2563mm (minimum).Table 5 shows a comparison between the simulation mould-flow error and the optimal value predicted by the model. Theerror is approximately 5.4%. In the foregoing discussion, itTable 5. SA optimal parameters and FEM prediction compared (it isnot included in any original 22 set database).ItemsFEM mould-flowSA optimalsimulationpredictX-coordinate7.8247.824Y-coordinate30.030.0Gate width1.81.8Gate width0.90.9Produce max. deformation0.2710.2563Error values5.4%(FEM-SA)/FEMOptimum Gate Design of FreeForm Injection Mould303Fig. 4. Deformation and Y-coordinate relationship.has been shown clearly that the process parameters for optimumbend performance can be systematically obtained through thisapproach.8.ConclusionThis paper describes a neural network approach for modellingand optimisation of injection-mould gate parameters.1. Comparing the value of errors using the finite-elementmethod and abductive-network prediction we have designedthe injection-mould model. Based on the best modellingusing an abductive network, the complicated relationshipsbetween the injection-gate coordinate parameters and defor-mation performance can be obtained.2. A global optimisation algorithm, called simulated annealing(SA), is then applied to the abductive network to obtain theoptimal process parameters based on an objective function.3. Lastly, a comparison is made between the FEM simulationmould-flow error values and model predicted values by theoptimisation process. It shows that the model fits the FEMsimulation mould-flow data and the finite-element andabductive-network predictions. Therefore, the rapidity andefficiency of determining optimal designing prameters forinjection-moulding can be used successfully to improve theaccuracy of the injection-mould design process.References1. S. M. Richardson, “Hele-Shaw flow with a free surface producedby the injection of fluid into a narrow channel”, J. Fluid Mech.56, pp. 609618, 1972.2. M. J. Crochet, A. R. Davies and K. Walters, Numerical Simulationof Non-Newtonian Flow, Elsevier, 1984.3. R. B. Bird, R. C. Armstrong and O. Hassager, Dynamics ofPolymeric Liquid, 1, Fluid Mechanics, 2nd edn, Elsevier, 1987.4. R. B. Bird, R. C. Armstrong and O. Hassager, Dynamics ofPolymeric Liquid, 2, Fluid Mechanics, 2nd edn, Elsevier, 1987.5. Lapidus and G. F. Pinder, Numerical Simulation of Partial Differ-ential Equation in Science and Engineering, McGraw-Hill, 1982.6. L. T. Mazione, Applications of Computer Aided Engineering inInjection Molding, Hanser, 1987.7. W. C. Bushko and V. K. Stokes, “Solidification of thermo-viscoelastic melts. Part II: Effect of processing conditions onshrinkage and residual stress”, Polymer Engineering and Science,36, pp. 352364, 1996.8. W. C. Bushko and V. K. Stokes, “Solidification of thermoviscoel-astic melts: Part III: Effect of molds temperature difference onwarpage an
温馨提示:
1: 本站所有资源如无特殊说明,都需要本地电脑安装OFFICE2007和PDF阅读器。图纸软件为CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.压缩文件请下载最新的WinRAR软件解压。
2: 本站的文档不包含任何第三方提供的附件图纸等,如果需要附件,请联系上传者。文件的所有权益归上传用户所有。
3.本站RAR压缩包中若带图纸,网页内容里面会有图纸预览,若没有图纸预览就没有图纸。
4. 未经权益所有人同意不得将文件中的内容挪作商业或盈利用途。
5. 人人文库网仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对用户上传分享的文档内容本身不做任何修改或编辑,并不能对任何下载内容负责。
6. 下载文件中如有侵权或不适当内容,请与我们联系,我们立即纠正。
7. 本站不保证下载资源的准确性、安全性和完整性, 同时也不承担用户因使用这些下载资源对自己和他人造成任何形式的伤害或损失。
提示  人人文库网所有资源均是用户自行上传分享,仅供网友学习交流,未经上传用户书面授权,请勿作他用。
关于本文
本文标题:耳机塑料注塑模具设计【三维PROE】【18张CAD图纸+PDF图】
链接地址:https://www.renrendoc.com/paper/118636233.html

官方联系方式

2:不支持迅雷下载,请使用浏览器下载   
3:不支持QQ浏览器下载,请用其他浏览器   
4:下载后的文档和图纸-无水印   
5:文档经过压缩,下载后原文更清晰   
关于我们 - 网站声明 - 网站地图 - 资源地图 - 友情链接 - 网站客服 - 联系我们

网站客服QQ:2881952447     

copyright@ 2020-2025  renrendoc.com 人人文库版权所有   联系电话:400-852-1180

备案号:蜀ICP备2022000484号-2       经营许可证: 川B2-20220663       公网安备川公网安备: 51019002004831号

本站为文档C2C交易模式,即用户上传的文档直接被用户下载,本站只是中间服务平台,本站所有文档下载所得的收益归上传人(含作者)所有。人人文库网仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对上载内容本身不做任何修改或编辑。若文档所含内容侵犯了您的版权或隐私,请立即通知人人文库网,我们立即给予删除!