对比分析论文：中美达人秀节目评委批评策略对比分析

1、 对比分析论文：中美达人秀节目评委批评策略对比分析【中文摘要】言语行为是人们最常用的交流方式之一。言语交流在人们的生活中起着举足轻重的作用。对言语行为的研究,也深受研究者们关注,但目前主要集中在对请求,道歉,恭维,拒绝等方面的研究,对批评策略的研究还不够充分。批评作为一种威胁面子的行为,使用得恰当就很可能达到目标效果,使用不当,不仅很难达到目标效果,甚至可能会恶化说话者和听话者的关系。由此可见,对批评策略的研究有着深远的意义。本文以言语行为理论,礼貌理论以及霍夫斯泰德的国家文化维度理论为基础,对中国达人秀与美国达人秀节目评委的批评策略进行了对比研究。前人对批评策略的研究基本上采取调查问卷的方法

2、收集语料。这种方法能在短时间获取大量的语料,但是这种语料的语境都是假设的,缺少真实的语境,因而语料的说服力不够强。本文以中国达大秀第一季前六集和美国达人秀第三季中的七集批评性语料建立封闭语料库,并对语料库当中的中国达人秀评委与美国达人秀评委的批评策略进行了对比分析。通过语料分析共得出17种批评策略,其中9种为公开策略,8种为非公开策略。中国达人秀评委共用到了其中的14种批评策略,美国达人秀评委用到16种批评策略。通过批评策略对比研究,发现中美达人秀节目评委均偏爱使用公开策略,但美国达人秀评委的公开策略的使用比率明显大于中国达人秀评委(中国达人秀节目评委的公开策略比率为52.1%,而美国达人秀评

3、委使用的公开策略比率为80.6%)。根据研究结果,论文进一步讨论了中美达人秀节目评委批评策略使用异同的原因。研究发现,文化维度在中美达人秀评委批评策略的不同点方面起着相当重要的作用。中美达人秀节目评委的批评策略使用情况一定程度的反应了两国的文化异同,在达人秀节目越来越受欢迎的今天,节目评委的批评策略很可能影响甚至引导观众的批评策略。因此,本文作者希望通过对中美达人秀节目评委的批评策略使用情况的对比分析,在一定程度上揭开批评策略的神秘面纱。同时本研究为批评策略研究,跨文化研究,以及跨文化交流,做出了一定的贡献。当然,本文仅涉及了批评策略的对比研究,对批评其他方面的研究还需要进一步探讨,如对批评应

4、答语的研究等。【英文摘要】Speech act is one of the most common used ways of communication, which plays an important role in peoples life. It is also one of the study focuses for researchers. The previous speech act studies mainly focus on request, apology, compliment and reject, etc. However, the researches on c

5、riticism strategies are still inadequate. Criticism is a face threatening speech act. If it is used appropriately, the expected criticism effect can be achieved; if it is misused, the relationship between the speaker and the hearer might be hurt. Therefore, the research on criticism strategy has far

6、-reaching significance.Based on Speech Act Theory, Politeness Theory and Hofstedes Theory of National Cultural Dimension, the paper conducts a contrastive analysis of judgescriticism strategies in Chinese and American talent shows. The data of previous researches on criticism strategies were almost

7、collected through the way of questionnaires. The researchers can obtain a large number of data in a short time by such a way. However, the context of this data is assumed. For lacking of real context, the corpus is not persuasive enough. Based on the self-built closed corpus, which is composed by si

8、x episodes in Season 1 of Chinas Got Talent and seven episodes in Season 3 of Americas Got Talent, the paper conducts a contrastive study of judgescriticism strategies in Chinese and American talent shows.17 criticism strategies have been obtained from the self-built corpus, which includes 9 On-reco

9、rd Strategies,8 Off-record Strategies. The judges of Chinas Got Talent employed 14 criticism strategies among the 17 strategies, and the judges of Americas Got Talent adopted 16 criticism strategies. By criticism strategies contrast, it seems that both the Chinese and American talent showsjudges pre

10、fer On-record Strategies. But there are big frequency differences between the two parties (the frequency of On-record Strategies adopted by Americas Got Talent judges is as high as 80.6%, while the Chinese is 52.1%). After Discussing the similarities and differences of criticism strategies employed

11、in the two shows, the paper presents the interpretation of the similarities and differences of criticism strategies in the following. The study finds that National Cultural Dimension plays a very important role in the interpretation. Nowadays, talent show becomes more and more popular, and the judge

12、s criticism strategies are likely to influence and even to guide the audience how to use criticism strategies. Therefore, the writer hopes to reveal the mystery of criticism strategies to some extent. This paper may contribute to criticism strategies study, cross-cultural study and communication in

13、a certain degree. Of course, this study only touches on contrastive research of criticism strategies, and more aspects about criticism are still waiting for further studies and discussions, such as the response of criticism strategies, etc.【关键词】对比分析 言语行为 批评策略 达人秀【英文关键词】contrastive analysis speech ac

14、t criticism strategy talent show【目录】中美达人秀节目评委批评策略对比分析 摘要 3-4 Abstract 4-5 List of Tables and Figures 6-9 Chapter 1 Introduction 9-11 1.1 Background of the Study 9-10 1.2 Objectives of the Study 10 1.3 Structure of the Thesis 10-11 Chapter 2 Literature Review and Theoretical Framework 11-23 2.1 Liter

15、ature Review 11-16 2.1.1 Definition of Culture 11-13 2.1.2 Definition of Criticism 13-15 2.1.3 Previous Studies on Criticism Abroad 15-16 2.1.4 Previous Studies on Criticism at Home 16 2.2 Theoretical Framework 16-23 2.2.1 Speech Act Theory 17-19 2.2.2 Politeness Theory 19-20 2.2.3 Hofstedes Nationa

16、l Cultural Dimension Theory 20-23 Chapter 3 Research Methodology and Data Description 23-26 3.1 Methodology of the Study 23 3.2 Data Description 23-26 3.2.1 Data Resource 23-25 3.2.2 Reasons for Choosing the Two Talent Shows 25-26 Chapter 4 Judges Criticism Strategies Analysis and Discussion 26-49 4

17、.1 Overall Criticism Strategies Contrast 26-28 4.2 On-record Strategies 28-36 4.2.1 Bald Statement 28-29 4.2.2 Questioning 29-30 4.2.3 Sarcasm 30-31 4.2.4 Consequence 31-32 4.2.5 Order/Command 32-33 4.2.6 Comparison 33-34 4.2.7 Insult 34-35 4.2.8 Expression of Negative Feeling 35 4.2.9 Hedging 35-36

18、 4.3 Off-record Strategies 36-44 4.3.1 Instruction/Suggestion 36-37 4.3.2 Enquiry 37-38 4.3.3 Empathy 38-39 4.3.4 Figuration 39-40 4.3.5 Stroking 40-41 4.3.6 Hope/Encouraging 41-42 4.3.7 Humor 42-44 4.3.8 Hesitation 44 4.4 Similarities of the Two Shows 44-46 4.4.1 Analysis of the Similarities 44-45 4.4.2 Interpretation of the Similarities 45-46 4.5 Differences of the Two Shows 46-49 4.5.1 Analysis of the Differen