2022下半年公共英语pets_第1页
2022下半年公共英语pets_第2页
2022下半年公共英语pets_第3页
2022下半年公共英语pets_第4页
2022下半年公共英语pets_第5页
已阅读5页,还剩4页未读 继续免费阅读

下载本文档

版权说明:本文档由用户提供并上传,收益归属内容提供方,若内容存在侵权,请进行举报或认领

文档简介

本文格式为Word版,下载可任意编辑——2022下半年公共英语petsAmissisasgoodasamile.以下是我为大家探寻整理的2022下半年公共英语pets-1阅读学识强化训练,梦想能给大家带来扶助!更多精彩内容请实时关注我们我!

PassagesixDropoutsforPh.D.s

EducatorsareseriouslyconcernedaboutthehighrateofdropoutsamongthedoctorofphilosophycandidatesandtheconsequentlossoftalenttoanationinneedofPh.D.s.Somehaveplacedthedropoutslossashighas50percent.Theextentofthelosswas,however,largelyamatterofexpertguessing.Lastweekawell-roundedstudywaspublished.Itwaspublished.Itwasbasedon22,000questionnairessenttoformergraduatestudentswhowereenrolledin24universitiesanditseemedtoshowmanypastfearstobegroundless.

Thedropoutsratewasfoundtobe31percent,andinmostcasesthedropouts,whilenotcompletingthePh.D.requirement,wentontoproductivework.Theyarenotonlydoingwellfinancially,but,accordingtothereport,arenotfarbelowtheincomelevelsofthosewhowentontocompletetheirdoctorates.采集者退散

Discussingthestudylastweek,Dr.Tuckersaidtheprojectwasinitiated‘becauseoftheconcernfrequentlyexpressedbygraduatefacultiesandadministratorsthatsomeoftheinpidualswhodroppedoutofPh.D.programswerecapableofcompetingtherequirementforthedegree.AttritionatthePh.D.levelisalsothoughttobeawasteofpreciousfacultytimeandadrainonuniversityresourcesalreadybeingusedtocapacity.SomepeopleexpressedtheopinionthattheshortageofhighlytrainedspecialistsandcollegeteacherscouldbereducedbypersuadingthedropoutstoreturntograduateschoolstocompletethePh.D.’

“Theresultsofourresearch”Dr.Tuckerconcluded,“didnotsupporttheseopinions.”

1.Lackofmotivationwastheprincipalreasonfordroppingout.

2.Mostdropoutswentasfarintheirdoctoralprogramaswasconsistentwiththeirlevelsofabilityortheirspecialities.

3.Mostdropoutsarenowengagedinworkconsistentwiththeireducationandmotivation.

Nearly75percentofthedropoutssaidtherewasnoacademicreasonfortheirdecision,butthosewhomentionedacademicreasoncitedfailuretopassthequalifyingexamination,uncompletedresearchandfailuretopasslanguageexams.Amongthesinglemostimportantpersonalreasonsidentifiedbydropoutsfornon-completionoftheirPh.D.program,lackoffinanceswasmarkedby19percent.

Asanindicationofhowwellthedropoutsweredoing,achartshowed2%inhumanitieswerereceiving$20,000andmoreannuallywhilenoneofthePh.D.‘swiththatbackgroundreachedthisfigure.ThePh.D.‘sshoneinthe$7,500to$15,000bracketwith78%atthatlevelagainst50%forthedropouts.Thismayalsobeanindicationofthefactthattopsalariesintheacademicfields,wherePh.D.‘stendtorisetothehighestsalaries,arestilllaggingbehindotherfields.

Astothepossibilityofgettingdropoutsbackoncampus,theoutlookwasglum.Themainconditionwhichwouldhavetoprevailforatleast25%ofthedropoutswhomightconsiderreturningtograduateschoolwouldbetoguaranteethattheywouldretaintheirpresentlevelofincomeandinsomecasestheirpresentjob.

1.Theauthorstatesthatmanyeducatorsfeelthat

[A]stepsshouldbetakentogetthedropoutsbacktocampus.

[B]thefropoutsshouldreturntoalowerqualityschooltocontinuetheirstudy.

[C]thePh.D.holderisgenerallyabetteradjustedpersonthanthedropout.

[D]Thehighdropoutsrateislargelyattributabletothelackofstimulationonthepartoffacultymembers.

2.Researchhasshownthat

[A]DropoutsaresubstantiallybelowPh.D.‘sinfinancialattainment.

[B]theincentivefactorisaminoroneinregardtopursuingPh.D.studies.

[C]ThePh.D.candidateislikelytochangehisfieldofspecializationifhedropsout.

[D]aboutone-thirdofthosewhostartPh.D.workdonotcompletetheworktoearnthedegree.

3.MeetingforeignlanguagerequirementsforthePh.D.

[A]isthemostfrequentreasonfordroppingout.

[B]ismoredifficultforthesciencecandidatethanforthehumanitiescandidate.

[C]isanessentialpartofmanyPh.D.programs.

[D]doesnotvaryindifficultyamonguniversities.

4.Afterreadingthearticle,onewouldrefrainfromconcludingthat

[A]optimismreignsinregardtogettingPh.D.dropoutstoreturntotheirpursuitofthedegree.

[B]aPh.D.dropout,byandlarge,doesnothavewhatittakestolearnthedegree.

[C]collegesanduniversitiesemployasubstantialnumberofPh.D.dropouts.

[D]Ph.D.‘sarenotearningwhattheydeserveinnonacademicpositions.

5.Itcanbeinferredthatthehighrateofdropoutsliesin

[A]salaryforPh.D.toolow.

[B]academicrequirementtoohigh.

[C]salaryfordropoutstoohigh.

[D]1000positions.

Vocabulary

1.dropout辍学者,中途退学

2.well-rounded全面的

3.attrition缩/减员,磨损

4.drain枯竭

5.bracket一类人,尤指按收入分类的阶层

6.laggingbehindotherfields落后于其它领域

7.glum阴郁的

难句译注

1.EducatorsareseriouslyconcernedaboutthehighrateofdropoutsamongthedoctorofphilosophycandidatesandtheconsequentlossoftalenttoanationinneedofPh.D.s.

「参考译文」教导工严重关注博士生辍学的高比率;这对迫切需要博士生的国家是一个人才方面的严重损失。

2.Itwasbaseon22,000questionnairessenttoformergraduatestudentswhowereenrolledin24universitiesanditseemedtoshowmanypastfearstobegroundless.

「布局分析」sent过去分词,修饰questionnaires.Who定语从句修饰students.

「参考译文」这份全面调查报告是以22000份调查表分送给以前在24所大学就读的博士生为根基的。这份全面调查报告貌似说明过去大量惦记畏缩是没有根据的。

3.AttritionatthePh.D.leverisalsothoughttobeawasteofpreciousfacultytimeandadrainonuniversityresourcesalreadybeingusedtocapacity.

「布局分析」被动句。Tocapacity满额,全力。

「参考译文」博士水平的人员的缩减被认为是名贵的教授时间的滥用和已经被使用到极限的大学资源的枯竭。

4.Thismayalsobeanindicationofthefactthattopsalariesintheacademicfields,wherePh.D.‘stendtorisetothehighestsalaries,arestilllaggingbehindotherfields.

「布局分析」thefact的同位语that从句中的where是定语从句,修饰academicfields.

「参考译文」这也可能说明这样一个事实:在博士能挣到最高工资的学术领域中,高工资依旧落后于其它领域。

写作方法与文章大意

这是一篇论及“博士生辍学”的文章。采用比较和因果手法。文章一开头就提出教导工严重关注博士生辍学达50%的问题。而调查报告证明,只有31%。辍学造成不良后果,有人建议中途退学者回炉再念博士学位学业。研究说明不行。列出理由并加以分析。

答案详解

1.A.大量教导工感到应采取步骤让辍学者回校学习,更加是有些学科。这在第三段结果一句话:“有些人建议高级专家和大学教师短缺现象可以通过奉劝辍学者返回校园完成博士学位来裁减。”

B.辍学者应回到稍第几的学校去完成学业。

C.有博士学位的人一般比辍学者具有较好的适应性。

D.高辍学率主要理由在于教师方面缺乏刺激激励。这三项文内没有提。

2.D.约三分之一开头就读博士学位的人没有完成学业取得学位。其次段第一句:“辍学率为31%。大多数处境下,辍学人不能完成博士学位学业,就去从事生产性工作”。

A.辍学者的经济收入比博士生低大量。这是错的。见倒数其次段:“作为辍学者干得真不错的证明,统计图表说明2%人文学科的辍学者年收入为20000多没劲,没有一个同样背景的博士生达成这个数字。7000至15000美元年收入水平为博

温馨提示

  • 1. 本站所有资源如无特殊说明,都需要本地电脑安装OFFICE2007和PDF阅读器。图纸软件为CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.压缩文件请下载最新的WinRAR软件解压。
  • 2. 本站的文档不包含任何第三方提供的附件图纸等,如果需要附件,请联系上传者。文件的所有权益归上传用户所有。
  • 3. 本站RAR压缩包中若带图纸,网页内容里面会有图纸预览,若没有图纸预览就没有图纸。
  • 4. 未经权益所有人同意不得将文件中的内容挪作商业或盈利用途。
  • 5. 人人文库网仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对用户上传分享的文档内容本身不做任何修改或编辑,并不能对任何下载内容负责。
  • 6. 下载文件中如有侵权或不适当内容,请与我们联系,我们立即纠正。
  • 7. 本站不保证下载资源的准确性、安全性和完整性, 同时也不承担用户因使用这些下载资源对自己和他人造成任何形式的伤害或损失。

评论

0/150

提交评论