写作高分-课件lesson4-or disagree1笔记版

议议介绍段 段+结尾轻松搞定6-6： Towhatextentdoyouagreeor糟糟糕的心路历(写了100词以后 ！写不下去了要不把两边都写了吧不管了，反正都讨论到了2.pleydisagree---逐一反驳咯(比较高的可能性,怼起来很爽.但是你的怼人能力有限完全赞同的写法并不见，最主要的因是出题时候经常在题目里设定限定词，这就导致完全赞同的写显得比较改写观点，然后表达完全赞同赞同理赞同理赞同理Inconclusion,重复自己的观点Inaddition,thehighlyintenselifestyleinurbanareasisunhealthy.Thisisbecauselivingcostsinthoseareasareextremelyhigh.Inordertobuyanapartmentandraisechildren,peoplehavetospendmostoftheirtimeonwork.Thelackofsocialtimeandexercisemayleadtoavarietyofproblems,rangingfromsleeplessnesstoanxiety,orevendepression.Finally,theunhealthydietaryhabitofpeoplelivinginbigcitiesposesathreattotheirhealth.Junkfoodrestaurantsarelocatedeverywhereinbigcities,andtheyofferfoodinashorttimewithacheapprice.Forthosewhoonlyhaveonehourlunchtime,McDonald'sseemstobeagoodchoice.However,takingtoomuchthosefoodcancauseobesityandInconclusion,livinginurbanareasisharmfultopeople'shealth.Thosewhowanttomigratetobigcitiesshouldtakeairquality,intenselife,andfoodproblemsintoaccount.Somepeoplethinkthatunpaidcommunityserviceshouldbeacompulsorypartofhighschoolprogrammes(suchasworkingforacharity,improvingtheneighbourhoodorteachingsportstoyoungchildren)Towhatextentdoyouagreeor完全不赞同逻辑的使用比例比完全赞同多得多，这是因为有的题目读起来简直丧心病狂。作为作者，只想怼死这个提出观点的人，所以就直接针对题目里的各个点进行反驳就好。不赞同理由-Inconclusion,重复自己的Somepeoplebelievethatwildanimalshavenoplaceinthe21stcentury,soprotectingthemisawasteofresourcesTowhatextentdoyouagreeordisagree?Somepeoplearguethatitispointlesstospendmoneyontheprotectionofwildanimalsbecausewehumanshavenoneedforthem.Icompleydisagreewiththispointofview.Inmyopinion,itisabsurdtoarguethatwildanimalshavenoplaceinthe21stcentury.IdonotbelievethatplanetEarthexistsonlyforthebenefitofhumans,andthereisnothingspecialaboutthisparticularcenturythatmeansthatwesuddenlyhavetherighttoalloworencouragetheextinctionofanyspecies.Furthermore,thereisnocompellingreasonwhyweshouldletanimalsdieout.Wedonotneedtoexploitordestroyeverylastsquaremetreoflandinordertofeedor modatetheworldspopulation.Thereisplentyofroomforustoexistsidebysidewithwildanimals,andthisshouldbeouraim.Ialsodisagreewiththeideathatprotectinganimalsisawasteofresources.Itisusuallytheprotectionofnaturalhabitatsthatensuresthesurvivalofwildanimals,andmostscientistsagreethatthesehabitatsarealsocrucialforhumansurvival.Forexample,rainforestsproduceoxygen,absorbcarbondioxideandstabilisetheEarthsclimate.Ifwedestroyedtheseareas,thecostsofmanagingtheresultingchangestoourplanetwouldfaroutweighthecostsofconservation.Byprotectingwildanimalsandtheirhabitats,wemaintainthenaturalbalanceofalllifeonEarth.Inconclusion,wehavenorighttodecidewhetherornotwildanimalsshouldexist,andIthatweshoulddoeverythingwecantoprotectForeignvisitorsshouldpaymorethanlocalvisitorsforculturalandhistoricalattractionsTowhatextentdoyouagreeordisagreewiththisItissometimesarguedthattouristsfromoverseasshouldbechargedmorethanlocalresidentstovisitimportantsitesandmonuments. ally,Icompleydisagreewiththisopinion.Firstofall,itisunfairtoaskforeigntouriststopaymorewhenvisitingtouristattractions.Althoughlocalpeoplehavehelpwiththemaintenanceofthesesitesthroughtaxes,foreigntouristsalsocontributesignificantlytotheeconomyofthehostcountrywiththemoneytheyspendonawiderangeofgoodsandservices,includingfood,souvenirs, modationandtravel.Therefore,theernmentsandinhabitantsofeverycountryshouldbehappytosubsidizeimportanttouristsitesandencouragemorepeoplefromtherestoftheworldtovisitthem.IndividualscandonothingtochangesocietyIndividualscandonothingtochangesocietyNewdevelopmentscanbeonlybroughtaboutby ernmentsandlargeinstitutionsTowhatextentdoyouagreeorOpinionsaredividedonwhetheritispossibleforindividualstomakechangestosociety.Ibelievetherearemanyexamplesofindividualscientists,inventorsorevenpoliticalactivistswhohavemadesignificantcontributionswhichhavebenefitedtheirsocietiesormankindingeneral.Therefore,Icompleydisagreewiththegivenstatement.Onefieldinwhichindividualshavemadepositivechangesisthatofscience,examplesofwhicharemedicineandelectricity.Withregardtotheformer,aBritishscientistscalledSirAlexanderFlemingaccidentallydiscoveredpenicillinwhenhenoticedthatbacteriacouldnotsurvivenearcertainfungi.Thisdiscovery,thefirstantibiotic,hassavedmillionsoflives.Asfaraselectricityisconcerned,perhapsthegreatestscientistofallwasNicolaTesla,withoutwhoseinventionsinthisfieldwemightnothavethesafesystemofdistributingelectricitybyalternatingcurrentthatwehavetoday.AmonghisotherinventionswereradiowaveswhichareusedtobroadcastTVandradio,andofcoursewifi.ApartApartfromscience,anumberofpoliticalactivistshavealsomadesignificantcontributionstotheirsocieties,andhavehelpedtowinfreedomfortheirpeople.PerhapsthemostfamousofthesewasMahatmaGandhi,an nlawyerwhohelpedtowinindependenceforhisnationfromtheBritishwithhisuniquestyleofpeaceful ,whichwaslateraninspirationtootherleadersinthe20thcentury.Forexample,intheUS,ablackcivilrightsleadercalledMartinLutherKingacknowledgedtheinfluenceofGandhi.Kingspassionatestyleandnon-violent sagainstsegregationhelpedtobringaboutpoliticalchangeforblackpeopleinthatcountry.Inconclusion,thescientists,inventors,andactivistsmentionedaboveshowclearlythatindividualscancontributegreatlytotheirsocieties,soitisnottruethattheycannotchangesociety.思考这个问在历在历史上女性来承是否赞同此观点.者带来了很多和有人认为如角色的话，她们能创造一个更和平的世界。Manywarsandviolentincidents,liketheSecondWorldWarandNanjingMassacre,wereledbymaleleaders.Somepeoplesaythatfemaleleaderswouldcreateamorepeacefulworld,butIcompleydisagreewiththisopinion.Inmyopinion,notallfemaleleaderswouldadoptsoftwaystosolveproblemsandalotofthemmay,liketheirmalecounterparts,escalatesbymakingcrueldecisions.Inordertostrengthentheirpositions,somewomenareverylikelytousemoreviolentandevenbloodymeanstoerntheForexample,asthefirstfemaleempireinChinesehistory,WuZetianslaughteredthousandsofpeoplewhowereagainstherruling.Inaddition,throughouthistory,femaleleaderscouldalsoruleviolentlybecausetheybelievedthatitisthebestwaytosettleproblems.Femaleleaders,suchasMrs.Sauer,thePrimeMinisteroftheUK,didnotbuildamorepeacefulworldfortheircountry.思考这个问一一分为二写法最重要的是第一段不用回答agreeordisagree，而是需要用一个明确 覆盖更全面的一分改写陈述题目观点。Ibelievethat一句话写出你的清晰观点(前面所提到的三种方法Itistruethat…/Iacceptthat…/Iadmitthat…(这里n种方法来写topicHowever/Nevertheless,Iwouldarguethat开始做出补充或者选择Inconclusion,重复自己的观点和看法。，但 有人认为保护老建筑浪费钱，所以应该拆了盖新改写+我认 Iaccept In Whenchoosingajob,thesalaryisthemostimportantconsiderationTowhatextentdoyouagreeordisagreeManypeoplethinkthatmoneyisthekeyconsiderationwhendecidingonacareer.Whilejobhuntersmusttakesalariesintoconsideration,IbelievethatotherfactorsareequallyOntheonehand,itistruethatmoneyisnecessaryforpeopletomeettheirbasicneeds.Weallneedmoneytopayforhousing,food,bills,healthcare,andeducationsomostofusconsideritaprioritytoatleastearnasalarythatallowsustocovertheseneedsandhaveareasonablequalityoflife.Ifpeoplechosetheirjobsbasedonenjoymentorothernonfinancialfactors,theymightfinditdifficulttosupportthemselves.Artistsandmusicians,forinstance,areknownforchoosingacareerpaththattheylove,butthatdoesnotalwaysprovidethemwithenoughmoneytolivecomfortablyandraisea1.改写原题观点+自己的观点---最常2.事实背景+改写原题观点+自己的观点---容易重复词3.事实背景+自己的观点---是否赞同的介绍段Increasingthepriceofpetrolisthebestwaytosolvegrowingtrafficandpollutionproblems.Towhatextentdoyouagreeordisagreewiththisopinion?版本：Itissometimesarguedthattheincreaseinthepriceoffuelscanbethebestsolutiontoproblemsrelatedtotrafficandenvironment.Icompleydisagreewiththisopinion.版本：Itissometimesarguedthattheincreaseinthepriceoffuelscanbethebestsolutiontoproblemsrelatedtotrafficandenvironment.AlthoughIbelievethathigherfuelpricescanreducethenumberofcarsonthestreet,IdonotagreethatasimpleriseinthepriceisSomepeoplethinkthatinsteadofpreventingclimatechange,weneedtofindawaytolivewithit.Doyouagreeordisagree?(As(Asaresultofhumanactivities,climatehasneverstoppedchanging.)Somepeoplebelievethathumanbeingsshouldexplorenewtechnologytolivewithclimatechangeratherthanstopitfrom ingworse.Myviewisthatwhilewehavenochoicebuttoadapttothechangingenvironment,justngsoisnotenough是否赞同的介绍段用Inorderto来引出话Somepeoplethinkthatmedia shouldbebannedtoreducecrimes.Towhatextentdoyouagr