雅思(8分级以上)范文精华

经典word整理文档，仅参考，双击此处可删除页眉页脚。本资料属于网络整理，如有侵权，请联系删除，谢谢！-aaaaaaaa1aaaIaI2aaa3aa).aaaaaI4aaaaaaaaA5aaaaourchildren’sa6aaa7aaIaI8IaaaaaIaWhetheraforeignlanguageshouldbemadecompulsoryforschoolpupils?9Nearlyallsecondaryschoolstudents(fromageeleven)inEUcountriesareobligedtostudyatleastonemodernforeignlanguageuptotheirfinalyear.ItisalsothecaseinmanyAsiancountries.InChina,forexample,approximately200millionstudentslearnEnglish.Thequestionaboutwhetherlearningforeignlanguagesshouldremaincompulsoryforallschoolstudentsuptotheageof16,however,remainscontroversial.Learningaforeignlanguagehelpstotacklexenophobia(仇外).Negativestereotypingissadlystillprevalentinthemodernworld.Suchstereotypesleadtoprejudices,xenophobiaand,inextremecases,hatecrimes.Learningforeignlanguages,however,isagoodwaytocombatsuchprejudices,becausethestudentslearnabouttheforeigncultureforthemselves,meetandconversewithitspeople,andhaveafirst-handintroductiontoforeignpeople.Thiswillleavethemmoreopenmindedtowardsotherculturessolesslikelytobexenophobictowardsothercultureswhoselanguagetheyhavenotlearnt.Asmanysociologistsexplain,“discountingstereotypesinvolvesdenyingculturaldifferences”.Masteringaforeignlanguagecanassume,atleast,partly,thisresponsibility.ForeignLanguagesareextremelybeneficialtotheeconomyintwosenses.Infact,languageskillsimproveajobcandidate’schancesofselection,simplybecausethosewhoareexceptionalinforeignlanguagesaregenerallythosewhoareabletocommunicatewiththemanagement,thecolleaguesandtheperformancetargetsofamultinationalcompany.Secondly,ahighnumberofemployees,equippedwithforeignlanguageskillsdiminishingthemisunderstandingofothercountries’cultures,customsandhabits,enhancecompanies’abilitiestoengageintradeandtoexpandtheirbusinessabroad,inturnenhancingexports.Opponentsmightargueonthegroundsthattheoverwhelmingnumberofstudentswhostrugglewithreadingandwritingintheirownlanguagecannotbeexpectedtoacquireasecond,foreignone.Thatistosaythevastnumberofstudentsbeingincompetentintheirmotherlanguageistobeaddressedasamatterofurgency.Thisstandpoint,however,shouldbesubjecttomodification.Ahighnumberofstudentsfailingtosucceedintheirmothertonguearenotavalidreasontomakeforeignlanguagelearningoptional.Studentsfailingincoresubjectsmustbehelpedtoimprove,nothavingaforeignlanguageeradicated.Inaword,foreignlanguageslearningshouldbemadecompulsoryconsideringitsicantroleineliminatingxenophobiaandboostinganation’seconomy.ShouldPEbemadecompulsoryatschools?110aag.,.aaaaeducation.a–aa11MotherathomeManystudiespointtotheyearsbeforeachildstartsschoolasthemostimportantinitseducationalandemotionaldevelopment.Forthisreason,shouldthemotherbeathome,atleastuntilherchildrenstartschool?Orcanchildrendevelopequallywell-orsometimesbetter-withsupportfromothersinadditiontotheirmothers?Iwholeheartedlyendorsetheviewthatmothersshouldbeathomebasedonthefollowingreasons.Inmanyreligionsandculturestheroleofthemotherisasacredone.Asaprophetoncestated,'Paradiseliesatthefeetofyourt,ramothertoearnthisregard,shemuststayinthehomeaboveallelse,whichinvolvesnotgainingemploymentoutsidethehomewhencaringforchildren.Thismeansthatthewomanshouldbeviewedasprivilegedandvaluedasahousemother,agod-givenpositionthatisnotavailabletothefather.Furthermore,itisundeniablethataprofessionalcarerwholooksafteragroupofchildrencannotgiveasmuchsingularattentiontoonechild,orknowallthespecificwhims念头，怪想)ofeachchild.ManyPsychologistsbelievethatthisleavesthechildrendesperateforasingleadulttoshowerthemwithaffection,andadenialofthisdesirecanleadtothehigherlevelsofaggressionbythetimetheyreachprimaryschool.However,ahousemotherwouldbothbeabletogivetheattentionandteachthemhowtobehaveappropriately,suchasexpressingtheiremotionsproperly,whichisespeciallypreciousandpricelessintheirformativeperiodandintheirpathtobegoodandresponsiblecitizens.Inaword,althoughweareintheageofapparentequalitywherewomenareincreasinglyencouragedto“haveitall”,Istandfirmlybytheviewthatwomen’smainroleisathomeforthesakeofcreatingahealthyandproductiveenvironmentfortheirchildren,whoareabsolutelythefutureofanation.12HomeschoolingHomeschoolingistheeducationofchildrenathome.Thepracticeislegalinmostcountriesbuttheextenttowhichitispracticedvaries.Proponentsofthepracticearguethatparentshavearighttodecidewherebesttoeducatetheirchild,andthatthehomeisoftenidealasalearningenvironment.Opponentsarguethatschools,incontrast,offerideallearningenvironmentsandthateducationrequiresproperly-trainedteachersinappropriatesettings,whichahomeandwell-intentionedparentscannotprovide.Iam,personally，infavoroftheideathathomeisabetterlearningplace.Themostcriticalconsiderationforhomeschoolingisthatitallowschildrentolearninanenvironmentthathastheneedsofoneoraveryfewnumberofstudents.Indoingso,specifictextbooksthataretailoredtothechild'smodeoflearningcanbepurchased,whichplaystheirpotentialtothefull.Stateschools,incontrast,areoftenveryill-equippedandunder-funded,leadingtostandardizedtextbooksandteachingmethods,overlookingstudents’differentcharactersandabilities.Thehomealsolacksthemanydistractionsanddisadvantagesofschools:peerpressure,socialstigma（污名）attachedtoachievement,bullying,show-offsandgeneralrowdiness.（吵闹）Anothersolidreasonforsupportingforlearningathomeisthatfamilybondingandthepositiverolesplayedbyparentsaremassivelyimportantelementsofachild'sdevelopmentandareprioritizedbyhomeschooling.Thevalueofthefamilyisconstantlyunderminedinmodernsociety;positiveparentalrolemodelsarefoundlessandlessfrequently.Ifaparentisjudgedbyastatevetting(检查)processtobegoodenough，itisenormouslybeneficialforsocietyasawholetoapprovesuchanenvironmentthatcements（整合）bothapositiverolemodelandfamilybonding.Parentswhotaketheirchildrenoutofschool,orchoosetohome-schoolduetoapprehensionsoverthequalityofstateeducation,shouldbeentitledto(有权利做)dosoprovidedthechildisbetteroffasaresult.However,toensuretheyarenotneglected,parentshopingtohome-schoolmustbothregisterthefacttheyarehome-schoolingtheirchildandsubmittoregular,stateinspectionsofthechild'sprogress.Ifthechildisdeemedtobe（被认为）fallingbehindhisagegroup,theparentsmaybeforcedtoreturnthechildtoaschool.Theparentsshouldbegivenstandardsofteachingthattheymustadhere（遵守）beforetheinspectionsoccur,andthestandardsshouldbesufficientlyflexibletoreflectchildrenlearningatdifferent。HighereducationfreeNearlyeverycountryinthedevelopedworld,andmoreandmoreinthedevelopingworld,providefreeprimaryandsecondaryeducation.Sucheducationisgenerallyuncontroversialandacceptedasnecessarybybothliberalsandconservativesaround13theworld.Inthecaseofuniversityeducation,however,thereisagreatdealofdisparitybetweencountries’educationpolicies.Debatescenterontheissuesofwhetherthereisinfactarighttouniversityeducation,andonwhetherstatescanfeasiblyaffordtofinancesucheducation.Somepeoplethinkhighereducationcanprovidevaluableknowledge,butitisnottheresponsibilityofthetaxpayertofundit.Thereisnofundamentalrightofindividualstobeallowedtotakefouryearsfreeofchargetolearnnewskillsthatwillbenefitthem.Thestate’sdutyistoprovideabaselineofcare,whichinthecaseofeducationisfreeprimaryandsecondaryschooling.Highereducation,inessence,shouldberegardedasacommodity,whichmeansifindividualswanttogetittheyshouldpayforitthemselves.Otherarmyofpeople,however,arguesthatauniversityprovidesanopportunitythatexistsatnoothertimeinanindividual’slife.Itisatimeofpersonal,intellectual,andoftenspiritual,exploration.Insecondaryschoolandinprofessionallife,however,nosuchopportunitiesexist,astheyareaboutinstructionandfollowingorders,notaboutquestioningnormsandconventionsinthesamewayuniversitysooftenis.Simplyput,auniversityservesasanextremelyvaluableforumfordifferentviews,whicheveryonehasarighttoexperienceshouldtheywish.Alifewithoutthecriticalthinkingtoolsprovidedbyuniversityislessfullbecausethosewithoutitlackthefacilitybywhichtounlockallthedoorsofperceptionandknowledgelaidbeforethem.Theyalsomaintainthatauniversity-educatedpopulaceisofgreatvaluetoanystate.Itprovidesextensiveeconomicboons（裨益）tosociety.Atpresent,manycountries,especiallydevelopingones,arecontinuingtobuilduptechnologicallyandeconomically.Byfacilitatinghighereducation,throughstatefundingofuniversitystudy,countriesincreasethelikelihoodandquantityofinvestmentintheireconomiesbybothdomesticandforeignfirms,asahighlyeducatedandskilledworkforceisacountrytraitmanybusinessesconsiderhighlydesirablewhenmakinginvestmentdecisions.Idefinitelybackuptheviewoffreehighereducation.Inadditiontothefavorableargumentsmentionedabove,freehighereducationenhancesthedevelopmentofleadersinsociety.Statesfunctionbestwhenthebestandbrightesthavetheopportunitytorisetothetop.Thebarriertoentrycreatedbyfeesandothercostsofuniversitywillpreventsomepotentiallyhigh-worthindividualsfromeverreachinglevelsofsuccess.Freeuniversityeducation,however,allowsallindividualstoattenduniversity,guaranteeingthattheleadersoftomorrowhavethechancetoshowtheirworth.Forallthesereasons,itisclearthatthestateandindividualsbenefitsfromprovidingfreeuniversityeducationtoitscitizens.14NationaltestNationaltestingofschoolsrequiresschoolstotesttheirchildreneveryyeartomeasurehowmuchtheyhavelearned.Somepeoplethinkalthoughstandardizedtestingisnotperfect,ithelpstosetsusefulstandardsthathelpstudentlearning.Itisimportantthatanationhasageneralframeofreferencewherestudentsshould,onaverage,beatvariousstagesintheireducation.Standardizedtestinghelpsdothisbysettingabaselinelevelofachievementateachgrade,wheretheaveragestudentisexpectedtobe.Whilesomestudentsmayperformaboveorbelowthisstandard,theimportantthingisjudgingthegeneraleducationaltrendsacrosssociety,sothatgovernmentscanhelpguidetheirnationaleducationalsystemontoagloballycompetitivepath.Otherpeople,however,holdadifferentview.Theyarguethatanysystemofstandardizedtesting(whereeveryoneisgiventhesametest)assumesthatallstudentslearnatthesamerate.Butthisisnotthecase.Talentedstudentsandun-talentedstudentsshouldnotbemeasuredbythesametest.Handingdownastandardnationaltestfromthetopisboundto（注定）endupwitha"one-size-fits-all"result,whichdoesnotadequatelymeasuretheabilityofthestudent,andfailstomotivatestudentsintheireducation.Thebeststudentsfindthemtooeasy;theworststudentsfindthemtoodifficult.Iamnotinfavorofthenationaltestbecauseinadditiontotheargumentintheprecedingparagraph,thiskindoftestingwillresultinteachers"teachingtothetest".Simplyput,studentswillbetaughthowtotaketestsinsteadoflearningskillsandknowledgethatwillhelpthembecomegoodandresponsiblecitizens.Thisisbecauseteacherswillbejudgedbasedonhowwelltheirstudentsdoattests,thusstudentswillbecomegoodtesttakersbutwillmissoutonotherimportantthingslikewhethertheyarebetterbehaved,moreconfidentorlearningfaster,whichisnotinlinewiththemodernandexploratorynatureofeducation.AbolishnuclearweaponsNuclearweaponsfirstdroppedonHiroshimaandNagasakiin1945foreverchangedthefaceofwar,andthehalf-centuryofColdWarwhichfollowedwasdominated,aboveall,bythethreatofnucleardestruction.Iwholeheartedlyendorsethepositionthatnuclearweaponsshouldbeabolished.Thefirstreasonforabolishingnuclearweaponsisthatanyweaponwhichcouldnotpossiblybeusedinaresponsiblemannershouldnotbepermitted.Overthepastfiftyyears,wehaveseenageneraltendencytowardslimitedwarfareandprecisionweapons,allowingmilitaryobjectivestobeachievedwithminimallossofcivilian15life.Theentirepointofnuclearweapons,however,istheirmassive,indiscriminatedestructivepower,whichmeanstheirusecouldkilltensofthousandsofcivilians（平民）directly,andtheircatastrophicenvironmentalafter-effectswouldharmmanymoreallaroundtheworld.Theseeffectscouldneverbemorallyacceptable,particularlyasthebasisofone’snationalsecuritystrategy,becausetheyplacehumanityandmostformsoflifeinjeopardyofannihilation（灭绝）.Anotherreasonfordiscardingnuclearweaponsisthatbyclaimingtheefficacy（功效）ofnuclearweaponsasastrategicdeterrent,thecurrentnuclearpowersencouragetheproliferationofweaponsofmassdestruction.Tobeapartoftheso-called'nuclearclub'isseenasamatterofgreatprestige.Therefore,nationsopposedtoanuclearpowerfeelthattheyneedtodeveloptheirowncapabilityinordertoprotectthemselves.Thedeclarednuclearpowersmust,asaresult,taketheleadindisarmament,asanexamplefortherestoftheworld.Themostcriticalconsiderationformyargumentliesinthefactthatwhilenuclearweaponsexist,theycanfallintothewronghands.Thisisparticularlyprevalentinanenvironmentwherebythereareextremistgroupsactivelyseekingtocauseinstant,egregious（惊人的）harmtotheirl意识形态的）andpoliticalenemies.Thedangerofaweaponbeingstolen,oranuclearbasebeingtakenoverbydisgruntled（不满的）membersofthemilitaryorotherextremists,canonlybeendedbydestroyingtheweapons.Theco-operationbetweenthetwonuclearpowers,theUnitedStatesandRussia,hasmadesomeprogressinthereductioninnuclearstockpiles（储存）.Theprocesswillnotbeswift,butitisplausible（有道理的）.RestrictsmokingTobaccoisoneofthemostwidely-usedrecreationaldrugsintheworld;mainlyintheformofcigarettes,butalsoincigarsandpipes.Althoughmostcountriesput很长的时间)restrictionsonitsuse,overabillionadultssmoketobaccolegallyeveryday,andsupplyingthisdemandisbigbusiness.Aswellashavingserioushealthconsequencesforsmokersthemselves,thepollutionofotherpeople'satmosphereswithcigarettesmokealsomakesthisanenvironmentalissue.Attitudes,however,varyoverthepasttwentyyears.Thosewhoareinfavorofrestrictingsmokingclaimthatitespeciallyprotectsthefamiliesofsmokersandothernon-smokingcitizensfrompotentialhealthrisksandprematuredeath.Smokinghaswidereffects,notsimplyrestrictedtosmokersthemselves.Theso-called'passivesmoking'isbecominganimportantissue:inasmoke-filledenvironment,non-smokersarealsoexposedtotherisksassociatedwithtobacco.Especiallywhenitcomestohomesandfamiliesthereisahighlikelihoodof16"passivesmoking".Researchsuggeststhatpartnersofsmokershaveanincreasedchanceofdevelopinglungcancer,eveniftheydonotusetobaccoproducts.Recentresearchevenshowsthatitisespeciallyharmfultothechildrenlivinginthehouseholdsofsmokers.Theyaremorepronetomentalillness,suchasdepressionandattentiondeficitdisorder.Thosewhoopposerestrictingsmokingargueonthegroundsthatwhileagovernmenthasaresponsibilitytoprotectitspopulation,italsohasaresponsibilitytodefendtheirfreedomofchoice.Inotherwords,thelawshouldnotstepintopreventcitizensfromtakingrisksthemselves,whetherdeliberatelyoraccidentally,whichis,basically,regardedasasacredhumanright.Therefore,banningsmokingwouldbeanunmeritedintrusionintopersonalfreedom.Besides,abanonsmokingmightjustleadtopeopledecidingtoturnontotheblackmarketfortobacco,notsolvingtheproblemofsmokingperse.Also,itistruethatsmoke-filledenvironmentscanbeunpleasantfornon-smokers,buttherearereasonableandresponsiblewaysaroundthis-smokingroomsinofficesandairportsareanexcellentexample.Somebarsandrestaurantsmaychoosetobenon-smokingestablishments,givingcustomersthechoicetoselecttheirenvironment.Smokingornotis,inessence,theindividualdecision.Lawsandregulationsshouldjuststandby,justliketheydowhenfacingsomeotherdangerousactivities,suchasparachutingorbungeejumping.AnimaltestingShouldanimalsbetestedfortheinterestsofhumans?Viewsvaryoverthepastseveraldecades.Thosewhoendorseanimaltestingbasetheirargumentsonthegroundsthatwhilstitistruethatinsomecasesharmtotheanimalsisareasonablyforeseeableconsequenceoftheresearch,thisisminimizedwhereverpossible,withpainkillers,anesthesia,andattemptstouseotherresearchmeans.Moreimportantly,theintentionbehindthisactisheldtomorallyjust,helpingmillionsofpeopletocombatdiseases.Thosewhoopposeexperimentingonanimalsarguethatthedifferencesbetweenusandotheranimalsareamatterofdegreeratherthankind.Notonlydotheycloselyresembleusanatomicallyandphysiologically,butsotoodotheybehaveinwayswhichseemtoconveymeaning,recoilingfrom（畏缩，退缩）pain,appearingtoexpressfearofatormentor（摧残者）andshowingtotakepleasureinactivities.If17animalscanfeelwhatwefeel,andsufferaswesuffer,thentotreatthemasexperimentalsubjectsismorallyunacceptable.I,personally,backuptheviewthatanimaltestingshouldbestopped.Scienceandtechnologyhasmovedfasterthanresearchprotocols(程式)andsothereisnolongeraneedforanimalstobeexperimentedon.Wenowknowthechemicalpropertiesofmostsubstances,andpowerfulcomputersallowustopredicttheoutcomeofchemicalinteractions.Experimentingonlivetissueculturealsoallowsustogaininsightastohowlivingcellsreactwhenexposedtodifferentsubstances,withnoanimalsrequired.Thepreviousnecessityoftheuseofanimalsisnolongeragoodexcuseforcontinueduseofanimalsforresearch.Wewouldstillretainallthebenefitsthatpreviousanimalresearchhasbroughtusbutshouldnotengageinanymore.DeathpenaltyCapitalpunishmentisthesentenceofdeath,orpracticeofexecution,handeddownaspunishmentforacriminaloffence.Thetopic,however,remainshighlycontroversial.Abolitionistgroupsandinternationalorganizationsarguethatitisfruitlessincurbingtheworstcriminalactions,whileproponentsclaimthatitisaneffectiveandnecessarydeterrentforthemostheinous(极凶恶的)crimes.Thosewhoopposedeathpenaltymightdoubtthedeterrenteffectofthedeathpenalty.Theyarguethatmanycriminalsmayactuallyfindtheprospectofthedeathpenaltylessdaunting（使胆怯）(andthus,lesseffectiveasadeterrent)thanspendingtherestoftheirlivessufferinginjail.Deathbyexecutionisgenerallyfairlyquick,whilealifetimeinprisoncanbeseenasamuchmoreintensivepunishment.Otherpeople,however,insistthattheworstcrimesdeservethemostseveresanctions.18Humanlifeissacred;theremustbeadeterrentmechanisminplacethatensuresthatthoseviolatingthatfundamentalprecept（规则）arepunished.Capitalpunishmentsymbolizesthevalueandimportanceplaceduponthemaintenanceofthesanctity（尊严）ofhumanlife.Anylessersentencewouldfailinthisduty.Forexample,first-degreemurderinvolvestheintentionalslaughterofanotherhumanbeing.Suchaheinouscrimecanonlybepunished,inajustandfairmanner,withthedeathpenalty.I,personally,backupthenecessityofcapitalpunishmentonthegroundsthat,inadditiontotheargumentintheprecedingparagraph,deathpenaltycanhelpeasetheproblemofovercrowdedprisonsinmanycountries,wherekeepingpeopleforlifeinprisoncontributestoexpensiveandattimesunconstitutionalovercrowding.Assuch,thedeathpenaltymaybepreferabletolifeinprisonsinceithelpsalleviateapressingprobleminthecriminaljusticesystem.Itisbettertoexecutethosewhodeserveitthantobeforcedtoreleasedangerousoffendersintosocietybecauseprisonsareovercrowdedbypeopleservinglifesentences.SpaceexplorationTheexploitationofspacehasdirectlychangedourworld.SatellitesorbitingtheEarthallowustocommunicateinstantaneouslywithpeopleondifferentcontinents,andtobroadcasttopeopleallovertheworld.TheGlobalPositioningSystemallowsustopinpointourlocationanywhereintheworld.Weathersatellitessavelivesbygivingadvancewarningofadverseconditions,andtogetherwithotherscientificinstrumentsinorbittheyhavehelpedusunderstandourownworldbetter.Spaceexplorationhasalsoledtomanyindirectbenefits.Thechallengeanddifficultyofthespaceprogram,anditsabilitytodrawonsomeofthefinestminds,hasbroughtaboutgreatleapsintechnology.Theneedtoreduceweightonrocketsledtominiaturization,andsotothemicro-chipandthemoderncomputer.Theeffectsofzero-gravityonastronautshavesubstantiallyaddedtoourknowledgeoftheworkingsofthehumanbody,andtheageingprocess.Wecanneverknowexactlywhichbenefitswillemergefromthespaceprograminfuture,butwedoknowthatwewillconstantlymeetnewobstaclesinpursuitofourgoals,andinovercomingthemwe19willfindnewsolutionstooldproblems.Mankindmustalwaysstruggletoexpanditshorizons.Thedesiretoknowwhatliesbeyondcurrentknowledge,thecuriositythatconstantlypushesattheboundariesofourunderstanding,isoneofournoblestcharacteristics，whichisbestillustratedinthespaceexploration.ChildrenusemobilephonesAspricesofbothphonesandcallshavecomedowninthepasttenyearsorsowithincreasedcompetition,theyhavebecomemuchmoreaffordableforyoungpeople.Thishasraisedquestionsaboutwhetherchildrenshouldownphones,andiftheyshouldbeallowedtotakethemintoschool.Viewsvaryfrompersontoperson.SomepeopleinfavorofmobilephonesargueonthegroundsthatMobilephoneskeepchildrensafer,asitiseasierforparentstostayintouchwiththeirchildrenandforchildrentocontactsomeoneinanemergency.Throughcallsandtexts,parentscanknowwheretheirchildisandbereassured（使安心）thatheorsheissafe;allthewhiletheirchildrenknowtheyarenevermorethanaphonecallawayfromhelp.Ultimately,mobilephonesprovideparentsandyoungpeoplewithpeaceofmindandchildrenwithasafetynetinemergencies,whethercallingparentsortheemergencyservices.20Otherpeople,however,maintainthatthelinkbetweenparentsandchildrenthatphonesostensibly（表面上）provideiseasilybroken.Ifachilddoesn’twanttobereached,shecanalwaysturnoffthephoneandplead(借口)the‘noservice’defense（辩词）.Truesafetyisprovidedbymaturityandgoodparentingandgoodcommunicationnotaphoneline.Theyalsoputforwardtheviewthatmobilephonesareadistractionfromtherealworld,havinganegativeimpactonchildreninteractingwiththosearoundthem.Constanttalking,texting,andgamesplayingtaketheplaceofpropersocializing.Youngpeoplegrowupwithoutgoodmanners,unabletorelatetothosearoundtheminanormalway.Parents,anxiousthattheirtraditionalroleastheshouldertoleanonisbeingsuperseded（取代，废弃）byfriendsandaccesstotheinternet,areincreasinglyturningtospyingontheirchildren.Themutualdistrust,fuelled（刺激）byaccesstomoderntechnology,isnotapositivedevelopment.Mobilephones,justlikemanyscientificproductspriortothem,willbecomethefocusofthediscussionintheyearsyettocome.Itisunnecessarytojumptoanyconclusionaboutthebenefitsanddemeritsofmobilephonesonchildren.Timewilltell.EducationisasmuchaboutthegrowthincharacteranddealingwithrisksasitistheaccumulationofknowledgeScienceisathreattohumanityAdvancesintechnologyhaveincreasedthedestructivecapacityofconflictbyenablingkillingtooccurmuchmorerapidly,ascanbeseenbythedestructionoftheFirstandSecondWorldWarswiththeirunprecedentednumberofdeaths.Besides,thepursuitofindustrializationandtheuseofmoderntechnologyrequirethegeneratingofenormousamountsofenergy.Suchproductioncreatesseveredamagetotheenvironmentviapollution.Thedamagetotheenvironmentalsothreatenstoleavetheearthuninhabitable,whichwouldalsoharmhumanity’sinterests.21Thepropositionignoresthecapacityofsciencetoprotecthumanity,byallowingittobypassnaturalphenomenaandsurvive.Theabilityofhumanstocoloniseotherworldsinthefuturecouldbeausefulmeanstoavoidanaturaldisaster(suchastheimpactofmeteorsonearth).Sciencerespondstothedesiresofhumanstoresearchnewareas.Itisbeingusedtoaddresspollutionandcreatesustainablefueltoensurethesurvivaloftheplanet.Humansaredestructive,ratherthanthetoolstheyuse.Developmenthasraisedmillionsofhumansoutofpovertyandimprovedtheirlives.Scientistsaretheverygroupofindividualsattheforefrontofpreventingglobalwarming,sotoblamethemforthemisuseoftheirdevelopmentsisridiculous.adervertistmentsThesheervolumeofadvertisinginoursocietyisincredible.Youcannotwatchtelevision,rideonabusorevenwalkdownthestreetwithoutsomeonetryingtosellyousomethingorinformyouofsomething.Recentresearchsuggestspeoplelivinginacitytodayseeupto5,000advertisementsaday.Advertisinghasgrowntobeanindustryworthmanybillionsofdollarsacrosstheworld.Onlineadvertising.inparticular,isbelievedtobeworth$24billionayear.Thistrendshouldbescrutinizedandanalyzedfrommultipleperspectives.Thosewhoareinfavorofadvertsclaimthatadvertisementsplayacrucialroleinensuringthattheyspendonthemostappropriateproductforthemselves.Ifadvertisementswerenotpermitted,peoplewould