版权说明:本文档由用户提供并上传,收益归属内容提供方,若内容存在侵权,请进行举报或认领
文档简介
PAGEPAGE4005/31/07CompetitionandRegulationintheKoreanAutomobileInsuranceIndustryWondonLee*SogaEwedemi***AssociateProfessorofInsurance,DaeguUniversitywlee@daegu.ac.kr**ProfessorofFinance,ClarionUniversityofewedemi@1.IntroductionTheKoreanpropertyandliabilityinsuranceindustryhadassetsofUS$49billionanddirectpremiumswrittenofUS$25billionin2005,whichwasthesecondlargestmarketinAsiaand10thintheworld(SwissRe,2006).Automobileinsuranceaccountedfor35.2%ofthetotalpremiumswritten,whichistheimportantbusinesslineintheKoreanpropertyandliabilityinsuranceindustry.In2005Koreanproperty-liabilityinsurancestatisticsshowsthattheshareofdirectpremiumoflong-terminsuranceis47.9%.However,long-terminsuranceissimplyaproductinwhichanassumedinterestrateisusedforrate-makingandofwhichinsuranceperiodisusuallygreaterthanorequalto3years.Long-terminsuranceproductshavebeenusuallydevelopedforaccidentalandsicknessinsurance,generalpropertyinsurance,andevenindividualannuity.Duetolargepremiumincomeinnaturelong-terminsurancehasgrownuprapidlysinceitsadventin1969.Thatisthereasonwhyaportionofdirectpremiumfromautomobileinsuranceisquitelessthanaround50%unlikeothercountrieswiththefullydevelopedproperty-liabilityinsuranceindustry.Sincethemonopolizedmarketwasopenedtoallthepropertyandliabilityinsurancecompaniesin1983,AlthoughsomepropertyandliabilityinsurancecompanieswerelicensedtosellautomobileinsuranceaftertheKoreanWar(1950-1953),therewasnoactualbusinessduetoalackofexperienceanduncertaintyaboutitsprofitability.In1957thegrowingsocialconcernaboutprotectingpersonsinjuredbyautomobileaccidentsledtoestablishKoreaAutomobileInsuranceCompanyoperatedbytheNationalAutomobileTransportationAssociation.After4yearoperationthecompanywentbankruptcyduetomismanagement.Rightafterthat,in1962,anewKoreaAutomobileInsuranceCompanywasestablishedintheformofaninsurancepoolby10propertyandliabilityinsurancecompanies.Thecompanywasconvertedtoastockcompanyin1968.Since1962,theKoreanautomobileinsuranceindustryhasbeenmonopolizedbyonecompanyunderastrictgovernmentcontroluntiltheindustrywasopenedto13propertyandliabilityinsurancecompaniesincluding2foreigncompaniesin1983.theaveragegrowthrateofdirectpremiumisoverIn2005Koreanproperty-liabilityinsurancestatisticsshowsthattheshareofdirectpremiumoflong-terminsuranceis47.9%.However,long-terminsuranceissimplyaproductinwhichanassumedinterestrateisusedforrate-makingandofwhichinsuranceperiodisusuallygreaterthanorequalto3years.Long-terminsuranceproductshavebeenusuallydevelopedforaccidentalandsicknessinsurance,generalpropertyinsurance,andevenindividualannuity.Duetolargepremiumincomeinnaturelong-terminsurancehasgrownuprapidlysinceitsadventin1969.Thatisthereasonwhyaportionofdirectpremiumfromautomobileinsuranceisquitelessthanaround50%unlikeothercountrieswiththefullydevelopedproperty-liabilityinsuranceindustry.AlthoughsomepropertyandliabilityinsurancecompanieswerelicensedtosellautomobileinsuranceaftertheKoreanWar(1950-1953),therewasnoactualbusinessduetoalackofexperienceanduncertaintyaboutitsprofitability.In1957thegrowingsocialconcernaboutprotectingpersonsinjuredbyautomobileaccidentsledtoestablishKoreaAutomobileInsuranceCompanyoperatedbytheNationalAutomobileTransportationAssociation.After4yearoperationthecompanywentbankruptcyduetomismanagement.Rightafterthat,in1962,anewKoreaAutomobileInsuranceCompanywasestablishedintheformofaninsurancepoolby10propertyandliabilityinsurancecompanies.Thecompanywasconvertedtoastockcompanyin1968.Since1962,theKoreanautomobileinsuranceindustryhasbeenmonopolizedbyonecompanyunderastrictgovernmentcontroluntiltheindustrywasopenedto13propertyandliabilityinsurancecompaniesincluding2foreigncompaniesin1983.Compulsoryautomobileliabilityinsuranceforbodilyinjurybeganin1963andalsoliabilityforpropertydamagewasmandatedin2004.However,automobileinsurancehasnotbeenaprofitablebusinesssincetheadventofcompetitioninthemarketin1983.During23fiscalyearsincludingyear2005theautomobileinsuranceindustryexperiencedunderwritingprofitsonlytwotimesin1997and1998.Althoughunderwritinglosseshavebeentotallyorpartiallyoffsetbyinvestmentprofits,theindustryhasbeenbelievedtoexperiencechronicoperatinglosses.TheKoreanproperty-liabilityinsurancecompaniesdonotdiscloseinvestmentprofitsattributabletothefundfromtheautomobileinsurancesectorsincetheydonothaveseparateinvestmentaccountsaccordingtothebusinesslines.Thehugeaggregatelosseshavebeenbasedoncomplaintsaboutastrictgovernmentregulationanddemandsforchangesandimprovementsintheregulation,includingincreasesinpremium(thepriceofinsurance).InfactthehistoryoftheKoreanautomobileinsuranceindustryisthehistoryofderegulationontheindustry.TheKoreanproperty-liabilityinsurancecompaniesdonotdiscloseinvestmentprofitsattributabletothefundfromtheautomobileinsurancesectorsincetheydonothaveseparateinvestmentaccountsaccordingtothebusinesslines.Thecontinualunsatisfactoryperformancecouldbeascribedtothemorefundamentalproblemsinthisindustry.UnfortunatelyitishardtofindmorethoroughstudyandanalysistofindthefundamentalproblemsabouttheautomobileinsuranceindustryinKorea.Inthispaper,weextensivelyexaminetheKoreanautomobileinsuranceindustryinthecontextofthestructure-conduct-performance(S-C-P)frameworkofindustrialorganization.Thecontentofthisapproachisthatexogenousbasicconditionsdeterminemarketstructureandthatthereisunidirectionalflowofcausalityfrommarketstructure,throughconduct,toperformance.(Reid,1987)Thecontentofthisapproachisthatexogenousbasicconditionsdeterminemarketstructureandthatthereisunidirectionalflowofcausalityfrommarketstructure,throughconduct,toperformance.(Reid,1987)Thestudybeginswithananalysisofthestructureoftheautomobileinsuranceindustrywithabriefhistory.Thischapterdealswithmarketconcentration,entrybarriers,andeconomiesofscaleaswellasproduction.Thethirdchapterexaminesthepricingbehavioroftheindustryunderthetariffsystemimposedbythegovernmentandthepriceliberalizationstartingin1994.Theeffectsofantitrustlawagainstacartel-likepricingbehaviorarepresented.Chapter4examinestheperformanceoftheautomobileinsuranceindustryinthecontextofprofitabilityofbusinessandaffordabilityandavailabilityofinsurancecoverage.Inthefinalchapter,somepolicyimplicationsareproposedbasedontheanalysesandconcludingremarksfollow.2.ThestructureoftheautomobileinsuranceindustryBriefhistoryInKoreaatrueautomobileinsurancebusinesshasbegunwiththeestablishmentofKoreaAutomobileInsuranceCompany(KAIC)in1962,whichwasfundedby10incumbentpropertyandliabilityinsurancecompanies.Before1962Koreanpropertyandliabilityinsurancecompanies’operationhadbeenconfinedmainlytofireandmarineinsurance,eventhoughtheyhadlicensestosellautomobileinsurance.Theythoughtautomobileinsurancewasveryriskyandunprofitablebusinesssincethemarketwasverysmallwithabout30,000carsinthecountryandtherewasnoaccumulateddataforrate-making.However,growingpublicconcernsaboutautomobileaccidentvictimsforcedpropertyandliabilityinsurancecompaniestomakeaninsurancepooltoprovideautomobileinsurancecoverageonavoluntarybasis.Theoutcomewasaninsurancepool,socalledKAIC,whichwasconvertedtoastockcompanyin1968.In1963followingyearoftheestablishment,bodilyinjuryliabilitywithapolicylimitbecamecompulsorybythelaw.Since1963,withrisingautomobileusage,theautomobileinsurancehasbecomeincreasinglyimportantinKoreanpropertyandliabilityinsuranceindustry.Till1997,whenthelong-terminsuranceovertook,theautomobileinsurancehadbeenthelargestpartoftheKoreanpropertyandliabilityinsuranceindustry.<Figure1>showsthepremiumdistributionbylinesofpropertyandliabilityinsurancefrom1963to2005.Since1962,theautomobileinsuranceindustryhadbeenmonopolizedbyonecompanyunderastronggovernmentcontroluntiltheindustrywasopenedto13propertyandliabilityinsurancecompaniesincluding2foreigncompaniesin1983.Evenafterbeingseeminglytheopenmarket,theautomobileinsuranceindustryhadbeenheavilyregulated.Allcompanieswererequiredtousegovernment-authorizedpremiumrates,providingthesameproductsatthesameprice.Theratingbureau,KoreaInsuranceDevelopmentInstitute,hadmadegrosspremiumratesbaseduponwholeindustrydatauntil2001,whentheliberalizationofpremiumloadingswasgettingstartedbyindividualcompanies.TherehadbeennopricecompetitionintheKoreanautomobileinsuranceindustry.Newentriestothemarketwerevirtuallyprohibitedbythevagueprovision,socalled‘EconomicNeedTest’,‘EconomicNeedTest’meansthattheTheratingbureau,KoreaInsuranceDevelopmentInstitute,hadmadegrosspremiumratesbaseduponwholeindustrydatauntil2001,whentheliberalizationofpremiumloadingswasgettingstartedbyindividualcompanies.‘EconomicNeedTest’meansthatthegovernmentarbitrarilyjudgeswhetherthecountryneedsanotherinsurancecompanywhenacompanyappliesforainsurancelicense.However,theregulatoryenvironmentwasdrasticallychangingwiththe1996affiliationwithOECD(OrganizationforEconomicCooperationandDevelopment)andthe1997financialcrisis.In1997toovercomeapossiblemoratorium,theKoreangovernmentborrowedemergencyfundsfromIMF,IBRD,andADB.ByOECD,asaquasi-regulator,andIMF,asacreditor,theKoreangovernmentwasstronglyadvisedor/andrequiredtoremovegovernmentcontrolsoverthefinancialactivities.Deregulationbyexternalforceswasdirectedtoanopencompetition.Oneoftwomajorchangesinregulationwastoremovean‘EconomicNeedTest’fromalicenserule.Nowanybodycandoaninsurancebusinessifclearlyspecifiedentryconditionsaremet.Secondly,pricecompetitionhasstartedsinceAugust,2000whenanexpenseloadingofgrosspremiumwasliberalized.OneyearlaterIn1997toovercomeapossiblemoratorium,theKoreangovernmentborrowedemergencyfundsfromIMF,IBRD,andADB.<Table1:RecentStatusoftheKoreanAutomobileInsuranceMarket>200020012002200320042005#ofregisteredcars(1,000)(growthrate)12,210(8.1%)13,181(8.0%)14,211(7.8%)14,677(3.3%)14,990(2.1%)15,537(3.6%)PremiumsWritten(bil.KRW)(growthrate)6,487(17.3%)7,321(12.9%)7,895(7.8%)7,942(0.6%)8,506(7.1%)8,781(3.2%)NumberofFirms,EntryandMarketconcentrationIn1983whentheautomobileinsurancemarketwasshiftedtoacompetitivemarketfromthemonopoly,13propertyandliabilityinsurancecompaniesincluding2foreigncompaniestookpartinthemarket.Alldomesticcompanieswerestockcompanies.ThereisnomutualcompanyintheKoreaninsurancemarket.Until1999whenoneforeigncompanywithdrewanautomobileinsuranceline,therehadbeennochangeinthenumberoffirmsintheautomobileinsuranceindustry.Inyear2000onedomesticcompanywentintobankruptcy.Thiscompanywasactuallyaforeigncompanysincethecompanywaspurchasedbyaforeigncapitalayearago.Thiscompanywasactuallyaforeigncompanysincethecompanywaspurchasedbyaforeigncapitalayearago.In2001thefirstautomobilemono-lineinsurancecompanyenteredthemarketaftertheentryregulationwaschanged.Twomoremono-linecompaniesjoinedtheautomobileinsuranceindustryin2003.Mono-linecompaniesattackedthemarketwithlowerpricesbyusingtele-marketingandinternetmarketingchannels.Withtheadventofmono-linecompanies,realpricecompetitionstartedintheKoreanautomobileinsurancemarket.AsofMarch,2006,14outof28propertyandliabilityinsurancecompaniessellautomobileinsuranceinKorea.<Table2:MarketConcentrationinAutomobileInsuranceIndustry>FiscalYearNo.ofFirmsCR1CR4HHI1962-19821100%-10,00019831389.7%94.7%805919841359.6%75.4%372519851345.1%67.2%235819861335.2%63.3%170419871327.5%60.6%134919881322.4%58.8%119619891319.9%59.2%117119901319.3%59.4%118019911318.2%58.3%116019921316.8%57.7%113519931316.1%57.0%112019941315.9%57.5%112519951319.3%60.3%118919961323.4%64.1%130719971325.9%66.5%139819981327.9%66.8%146019991328.2%68.7%149620001229.3%70.1%156020011231.3%72.3%169220021230.8%70.5%163020031430.0%68.8%156220041429.6%68.5%153220051428.0%68.3%1467*KoreaFairTradeCommissionconsidersamarketconcentratedifCR10.5andCR30.75.**TheHorizontalMergerGuidelinesissuedbytheUSDepartmentofJusticeandtheFederalTradeCommissionclassifymarketsasunder:0<HHI<1000,notconcentrated,1000<HHI<1800,moderatelyconcentrated,and1800<HHI,concentrated.ScaleeconomiesThereisabigrangeinthesize(intermsofpremiumswrittenaswellasassets)ofinsurancecompaniessellingautomobileinsuranceinKorea.Thereare4companieswithtotalannualpremiumsofover1trillionKRWand10companieswithlessthan1trillionKRW.Theso-called“Big4”companiesaccountforabout70%ofthemarket.Usuallyitisofinteresttoaskwhetherornotthelargercompanieshaveacostadvantageoverthesmallercompanies.Substantialcostadvantagescouldindicatebarrierstoentryandthepossibilitythatlargecompaniescouldsetpricessubstantiallyabovemarginalcostwithoutprovokingcompetitiveentry.However,itishardtoexpectthatkindofpricingbehaviorsincetherewasnopricecompetitioninthemarketbeforeyear2000whenthetariffsystemwaspartiallylifted.Ifthereareeconomiesofscalepresent,wewouldexpecttheexpenseratiotodeclinewithfirmsize.Theeconomiesofscaleanalysisperformedhererelatesexpenseratiostodirectpremiumswrittenofonly10outof14companies.Sinceoneinbankruptcyandthreenewlyenteredcompanieshaveshownabnormalexpenseratios,thesecompaniesareexcludedintheanalysis.Sinceoneinbankruptcyandthreenewlyenteredcompanieshaveshownabnormalexpenseratios,thesecompaniesareexcludedintheanalysis.(Year1999)ER=38.72-0.0000035DPW(29.45)(-1.811)R2=0.29(Year2000)ER=40.99-0.0000059DPW(13.69)(-1.601)R2=0.24(Year2001)ER=33.66-0.0000012DPW(23.99)(-0.827)R2=0.08(Year2002)ER=34.14-0.0000017DPW(19.88)(-0.976)R2=0.11(Year2003)ER=34.82-0.0000026DPW(36.18)(-2.656)R2=0.47(Year2004)ER=33.48-0.0000011DPW(20.91)(-0.749)R2=0.07(Year2005)ER=38.34-0.0000043DPW(12.77)(-1.498)R2=0.22,whereER=ExpenseRatioandDPW=DirectPremiumWritten.Theresultsofsimpleregressionanalysisprovideonlyweakevidenceofscaleeconomies.Althoughthecoefficientofthepremiumvolumevariableisnegativeinallcases,itissignificantatthe5percentlevelonlyinyear2003.Addingonemorevariable,aratioofnetpremiumtodirectpremiumtoreflectreinsuranceactivitydoesnotyieldanybetterresults.DistributionChannels<Table3:PremiumDistributionbyChannelsinAutomobileInsurance>(KRWinbillions)YearDirectWritingSolicitorsAgentsBrokersTotal2001243(3.3%)2,608(35.6%)4,486(61.1%)-7,3372002367(4.6%)2,534(32.0%)5,013(63.4%)-7,9142003604(7.6%)2,427(30.5%)4,923(61.8%)6(0.1%)7,9602004724(8.5%)2,519(29.6%)5,267(61.8%)11(0.1%)8,5212005950(10.8%)2,635(30.0%)5,189(59.0%)16(0.2%)8,790<Table4:ExpenseRatiosofOn-lineCompanyvs.TraditionalCompanyFirm2003200420051on-linecompany24.2%26.7%26.7%Averageoftraditionalcompanies31.4%31.9%32.3%<Table5:PremiumShareofOn-lineProducts>Year20012002200320042005On-lineFirms0.4%2.0%3.3%5.3%6.6%IncumbentFirms-0.3%1.2%1.9%3.6%Total0.4%2.3%4.5%7.2%10.2%3.TheconductintheindustryHowpriceissetThewayinwhichthevolume,quality,andrangeofproductsaredetermined4.ThePerformanceoftheIndustryProfitabilitySince1983whentheautomobileinsurancebusinesswasopenedtotheincumbentpropertyandliabilityinsurers,theinsurershavecomplainedthattheyareconsistentlylosinglargesumsofmoneyinoperatingtheautomobileinsuranceline.Iftheysuccessfullyconvincedregulators,theywereallowedtoincreasepremiumratesandimprovedlossratiosandunderwritingprofits.However,discussionsofpremiumrateshaveoftenbeenbasedonmisinformationaboutprofitabilityintheindustry.Atraditionalprofitmeasureusedinthepropertyandliabilityinsuranceindustryisthecombinedratio.Thisratioisveryhandyandprovidessomeusefulinformationabouttheinsuranceindustry.However,ithasoftenledtoincorrectconclusionsaboutprofitability.Thecombinedratio,whichisthesumofthelossratioandtheunderwritingexpenseratio,isusedasanindicatorofprofitability.Thelossratioisanestimateofexpectedpaymentsforreportedandunreportedclaims,expressedasaratiotoearnedpremiums.Itisconventionalthatexpectedclaimspaymentsincludelossadjustmentexpenseswhichareincurredtoinvestigateandsettleclaims.InKorea,however,theseexpenses,about2%ofearnedpremiums,areconsideredapartofunderwritingexpenses.Thispracticeallowstheinsurerstounderestimatelossreserves.Theunderwritingexpenseratioconsiderstheexpensesassociatedwithwritinginsurancepoliciesexpressedasaratiotoearnedpremiums.Acombinedratioover100%indicatesanunderwritingloss.However,aninsurancecompanycanhaveacombinedratioover100%Itisconventionalthatexpectedclaimspaymentsincludelossadjustmentexpenseswhichareincurredtoinvestigateandsettleclaims.InKorea,however,theseexpenses,about2%ofearnedpremiums,areconsideredapartofunderwritingexpenses.Thispracticeallowstheinsurerstounderestimatelossreserves.<Figure2>showsthecombinedratiosoftheautomobileinsuranceindustryfromyear1983toyear2005.Asawaytocorrectthecombinedratioforinvestmentincometheoveralloperatingratiowasintroduced.Theoperatingratioisthecombinedratiominustheratioofinvestmentincometopremiumsearned.Investmentincomeisusuallyallocatedbylineonthebasisofreserves(CumminsandWeiss,1991)becausedataarenotdirectlyavailableontheinvestmentincomeattributabletoaparticularline.Toallocateaggregateinvestmentincometotheautomobileinsuranceline,weassumethattheshareoftotalinvestmentincomeisproportionaltotheshareoftotalinvestedassetsonthebasisofthesumofunearnedpremiumreserve,lossreserveandcontingencyreservefortheautomobileinsuranceline.<Figure3>showstheoperatingratiosfromyear1983toyear2005.Theoperatingratioisobviouslyabettermeasureofprofitabilityaslongastheinsurersearninvestmentincomefromtheirinvestedassetsfundedbyreservestooffsetunderwritinglosses.<Table5>showstheestimatedprofitabilityofautomobileinsurancefromyear1998toyear2005.Thereasonwechooseyear1998isthatmarketvaluationinassetsandloanqualityclassificationshavebeenusedintheKoreaninsuranceindustrysince1998.However,thefairvaluationmethodisnotusedinreservevaluations.Ifthereservesarenotdiscounted,theclaimpaymentsthatmaynotbemadeforseveralyearsarerecognizedascostsinthecurrentyear,therebyunderstatingannualincome.<Table6:EstimatedProfitabilityofAutomobileInsurancefrom1998to2005>(KRWinbillions)YearPremiumsEarnedIncurredLosses<L/R>NetExpenses<E/R>UnderwritingGains<C/R>InvestmentIncome<I/R>OperatingGains<O/R>19985,0843,134<61.6>1,650<32.4>300<94.0>295<5.8>595<88.2>19994,7783,477<72.8>1,719<36.0>(418)<108.8>400<8.4>(19)<100.4>20005,3603,904<72.8>1,880<35.1>(425)<107.9>186<3.5>(239)<104.4>20016,2184,177<67.2>2,007<32.3>34<99.5>360<5.8>393<93.7>20026,8654,692<68.3>2,200<32.0>(27)<100.3>253<3.7>227<96.6>20037,0815,434<76.7>2,227<31.5>(580)<108.2>298<4.2>(282)<104.0>20047,2345,268<72.8>2,321<32.1>(354)<104.9>344<4.8>(10)<100.1>20057,5605,792<76.6>2,439<32.3>(671)<108.9>332<4.4>(339)<104.5>Note:Underwritinggains/lossesandoperatinggains/lossesmaynotaddorsubtractduetorounding.<Table7:EstimatedProfitabilityofPropertyandLiabilityInsurance(exceptAutomobileandLong-termInsurance)from1998to2005>(KRWinbillions)YearPremiumsEarnedUnderwritingGainsCombinedRatioInvestmentIncomeOperatingGainsOperatingRatio19987,269-899112.469-830111.419997,094-979113.893-885112.520007,918-838110.645-793110.020018,241-600107.387-512106.220029,193-382104.264-319103.520039,727-257102.679-178101.8200410,814-422103.995-327103.0200512,536-408103.3100-308102.5<Table8:EstimatedProfitabilityofPropertyandLiabilityInsurancefrom1998to2005>(KRWinbillions)YearPremiumsEarnedUnderwritingLossesCombinedRatioInvestmentIncomeOperatingGainsOperatingRatioNetProfit(ROE)199812,353-599104.896536697.0219(7.84)199911,872-1,397111.81,51111499.072(2.11)200013,278-1,263109.5709*-554104.2-551(-18.08)200114,459-566103.91,53196593.3820(20.48)200216,058-409102.51,11370495.6425(9.28)200316,808-837105.01,42759096.5301(6.11)200418,048-776104.31,71694094.8541(9.76)200520,096-1,079105.41,78770896.5450(7.37)*Arateofreturnoninvestedassetswasonly3.67%comparedto8.12%ofyear1999duetostockmarketdepression.**Rateofreturnsoninvestedassets:6.05%(1998),6.62%(2001),4.33%(2002),5.03%(2003),5.48%(2004),5.11%(2005)AffordabilityandAvailability5.PolicyImplicationsandConcludingRemarks<References>Cummins,J.D.andM.A.Weiss,1991,“TheStructure,Conduct,andRegulationoftheProperty-LiabilityInsuranceIndustry,”TheFinancialConditionandRegulationofInsuranceCompanies,editedby:Kopcke,R.W.andR.E.Randall,Boston,FederalReserveBankofBoston,pp:117-154.Joskow,PaulL.,1973,“Cartels,CompetitionandRegulationintheProperty-LiabilityInsuranceIndustry,”TheBellJournalofEconomicsandManagementScience,Vol.4,No.2,pp.375-427.Reid,GavinC,,1987,TheoriesofIndustrialOrganization,Oxford,UK,BasilBlackwellLtd.Scherer,F.M.andD.Ross,1990,IndustrialMarketStructureandEconomicPerformance,3rdedition,Boston,MA,Smallwood,DennisE.,1975,“Competition,Regulation,andProductQualityintheAutomobileInsuranceIndustry,”inPromotingCompetitioninRegulatedMarkets,editedbyA.Phillips,Washington,SwissRe,2006,“WorldInsurancein2005,”Sigma,No.5.,p.35.Viscusi,W.K.,JohnM.Vernon,andJosephE.Harrington,Jr.,1992,EconomicsofRegulationandAntitrust,Lexington,MA,D.C.HeathandCompany.05/31/07竞争与监管在韩国汽车保险业Wondon李*苏我Ewedemi***副教授保险,大邱大学,韩国教授
wlee@daegu.ac.kr**的金融学教授,克拉里昂宾夕法尼亚大学,美国
ewedemi@
1。导言韩国的财产和责任保险业在美国的资产四百九十〇点零零零亿美元和书面美国在2005年二百五十点零零零亿美元直接保费,这是亚洲第二大市场,在世界上10个(瑞士再保险公司,2006年)。汽车保险次的占35.2%的总承保保费,这是在韩国财产和责任保险业重要的业务线。由于垄断市场开放于1983年2直接保费平均增长率的所有财产和责任保险的公司超过118%。这种快速的增长速度主要归因于汽车的使用和强制汽车责任保险的急剧增加。3不过,汽车保险一直以来,没有在市场上的竞争在1983年出现一门有利可图的生意。在23日,包括2005年的汽车保险业的承保利润只有经历两次在1997财年和1998年虽然承保亏损已完全或。投资收益部分抵消,业界一直认为,经历长期经营亏损。4巨大的损失总额已在一个严格的政府规章,提出修改和改进监管,包括要求增加保费的投诉(此价格保险)。是事实上,在韩国汽车保险业历史上放宽对业界的历史。然而,在放松管制的情况并没有很大改善,一系列触目惊心。不断表现欠佳可能归因于该行业的更为基本的问题。遗憾的是,很难找到更多的深入研究和分析,了解在韩国汽车保险业的根本问题。在本文中,我们广泛审查在结构方面韩国汽车保险业的一行为一绩效(SCP)的工业组织的框架。5我们还分析了监管环境,行业经营和管制和放松管制可能带来的影响对工业表现,以及对工业结构和行为。这项研究开始于对汽车保险业的结构,一个简短的历史的分析。与市场集中,进入壁垒本章交易,以及规模经济以及生产。第三章探讨了在业界的定价行为关税制度所规定的政府和价格自由化在1994年开始。对一个卡特尔的影响反托拉斯法,如给出的定价行为。第四章探讨了汽车保险业的公司业务和盈利能力和可用性方面的表现保险覆盖面。在最后一章,有些政策影响的基础上,提出了分析和总结发言跟进。2。在汽车保险业的结构简史在韩国一个真正的汽车保险业已经开始与1962年成立的韩国汽车保险(KAIC),是由10个现任财产和责任保险公司提供资金。1962年之前,韩国的财产和责任保险的公司的运作已主要限于火灾海上保险,即使他们已经授权销售汽车保险。他们认为汽车保险是非常危险和不赢利的业务,因为市场非常小的约3万辆,并在该国的利率有没有积累的数据决策。但是,有关车祸的受害者越来越多的公众关注被迫财产和责任保险公司的保险,使池,提供自愿的基础上汽车保险服务。其结果是保险联营,所谓KAIC这是在1968年转为股份公司。下列在1963年编制,身体的伤害赔偿责任限制的政策成为法律的强制性。自1963年以来,不断上升的汽车使用,汽车保险已成为越来越多在韩国财产和责任保险业重要的。直到1997年,当长期保险超越,汽车保险一直是朝鲜财产和责任保险业。<Figure1>最大部分,显示了从1963年的财产和责任保险保费的分配线到2005年。自1962年以来,汽车保险业已经由一家公司垄断下,一个强大的政府控制,直到该行业开放13财产和责任保险的公司,包括2在1983年的外国公司。即使在目前似乎在公开市场上,汽车保险业被严格管制。都必须使用政府授权的保险费率所有公司,提供同样的价格相同的产品。6目前并未在韩国汽车保险业的价格竞争。新项目到市场几乎所禁止的含糊规定,所谓的'经济需求测试',7,其中政府的唯一有权作出许可销售汽车保险。然而,监管环境的急剧变化与经合组织(经济合作和发展组织)和1997年金融危机的1996年归属。经合组织8,作为一个准监管机构,基金组织,作为债权人,韩国政府强烈建议或/并要求取消对金融活动的控制。外部势力的干预是针对一个开放的竞争。监管的两个重大变化之一是,删除一个'经济需求测试',从许可的规则。现在,任何人都可以做一个保险业务项明确规定,如果条件得到满足。第二,价格竞争已经从2000年8月启动时的毛保费支出负荷为开放。一年后的预期索赔费用,纯保费,都可以由个别公司对自己的损失经验为基础。<Table1:韩国汽车保险Market>近况2000年2001年2002年2003年2004年2005年#的(1000注册车辆)(增长率)12210(8.1%)13181(8.0%)14211(7.8%)14677(3.3%)14,990(2.1%)15537(3.6%)签单保费(bil.韩元)(增长率)6487(17.3%)7321(12.9%)7895(7.8%)7942(0.6%)8506(7.1%)8781(3.2%)企业数量,进入和市场集中1983年,当汽车保险市场转移到市场竞争的垄断,13财产和责任保险的公司,包括2外国公司参加了市场的一部分。所有国内企业为股票的公司。没有在韩国保险市场的相互公司。直到1999年一外国公司退出了汽车保险线,没有发生对公司在汽车保险业的数量变化。一个在2000年国内企业进入破产。9日,只有11家公司开始于2001年。2001年,第一辆汽车单线保险公司进入后进入市场调节的变化。另外两个单行公司于2003年加入汽车保险业。单系列的公司较低的价格袭击使用电话营销与市场网络营销渠道。随着单出现线的公司,真正的价格竞争开始在韩国汽车保险市场截至2006年3月,14。在28财产和责任保险的公司在韩国销售的汽车保险。<Table2:市场集中在汽车保险Industry>会计年度企业号红细胞CR1CR4的H股指数1962年至82年1100%-10,0001983年1389.7%94.7%80591984年1359.6%75.4%37251985年1345.1%67.2%23581986年1335.2%63.3%17041987年1327.5%60.6%13491988年1322.4%58.8%11961989年1319.9%59.2%11711990年1319.3%%59.411801991年1318.2%58.3%11601992年1316.8%57.7%11351993年1316.1%57.0%11201994年1315.9%57.5%11251995年1319.3%60.3%11891996年1323.4%64.1%13071997年1325.9%66.5%13981998年1327.9%66.8%14601999年1328.2%68.7%14962000年1229.3%70.1%15602001年1231.3%72.3%16922002年1230.8%70.5%16302003年1430.0%68.8%15622004年1429.6%68.5%15322005年1428.0%68.3%1467*韩国公平贸易委员会认为,市场集中,如果第一台0.5和Cr30.75。**在横向合并准则由美国司法部和联邦贸易委员会发出根据市场划分为:0“现代重工”100
温馨提示
- 1. 本站所有资源如无特殊说明,都需要本地电脑安装OFFICE2007和PDF阅读器。图纸软件为CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.压缩文件请下载最新的WinRAR软件解压。
- 2. 本站的文档不包含任何第三方提供的附件图纸等,如果需要附件,请联系上传者。文件的所有权益归上传用户所有。
- 3. 本站RAR压缩包中若带图纸,网页内容里面会有图纸预览,若没有图纸预览就没有图纸。
- 4. 未经权益所有人同意不得将文件中的内容挪作商业或盈利用途。
- 5. 人人文库网仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对用户上传分享的文档内容本身不做任何修改或编辑,并不能对任何下载内容负责。
- 6. 下载文件中如有侵权或不适当内容,请与我们联系,我们立即纠正。
- 7. 本站不保证下载资源的准确性、安全性和完整性, 同时也不承担用户因使用这些下载资源对自己和他人造成任何形式的伤害或损失。
最新文档
- 拼宽路基标准化施工工艺的设计设计工法
- 植树节活动内容记录
- 法律职业资格考试2023年综合考点习题及答案
- 防踩踏应急演练知识培训方案范文
- 嵌入式系统设计规范与硬件选型技巧
- 2026届陕西省榆林市靖边中学高三下学期3月质量检测(二模)历史试题(含答案)
- 2026三国演义阅读测试题及答案
- 2026年吉林高考文科综合卷及答案
- 2026年高考地理新高考二卷真题试卷(含答案)
- 2025年内蒙古巴彦淖尔市中小学教师招聘考试试卷带答案
- 大学美育(上海电机学院)知到智慧树网课答案
- 2025年西安市事业单位招聘考试教师招聘考试语文学科专业知识试卷(初中语文教师)
- 行车工考试题库及答案
- 2025内蒙古能源集团智慧运维公司运维人员社会招聘105人笔试参考题库附带答案详解
- 2026年中考数学压轴题专项练习-阿基米德折弦定理(学生版+名师详解版)
- 电影欣赏社团课件
- 2025年辽宁省交通高等专科学校单招职业技能考试试题及答案解析
- 2025年凉山州中考语文试题答案解析卷
- 《智慧物流概论》试卷及答案 共2套
- 税务讲解社保费课件
- T/CI 467-2024复合集流体(铜箔)
评论
0/150
提交评论