十年真题词汇一扫而光前四晚讲义学员稿加

11月2-7晚19:00-21:002小时TextFrance,whichpridesitselfastheglobalinnovator创新者offashion,hasdecideditsfashionindustryhaslostanabsoluteright绝对权力todefinephysicalbeauty身体之美forwomen.Itslawmakersgavepreliminaryapproval初步的批准lastweektoalawthatwouldmakeitacrimetoemployultra-thin极瘦modelsonrunways.T台Theparliament议会alsoagreedtoban取缔、查办websitesthat“incite刺激excessive过分的bypromoting促进extreme极度的Suchmeasures措施haveacoupleofuplifting令人振奋的motives.Theysuggestbeautyshouldnotbedefinedbylooks长相thatendupimingonhealth.That’sastart.Andthebanonultra-thinmodelsseemstogobeyondprotectingmodelsfromstarving饥饿themselvestodeath-assomehavedone.Itlsthefashionindustry时尚业thatitmusttakeresponsibilityfor负责thesignal信号itsendswomen,especiallyteenagegirls,aboutthesocialtape-measure卷尺theymustusetodeterminetheirindividualworth.Thebans,iffullyend执行,wouldsuggesttowomen(andmanymen)thattheyshouldnotletotharbiters仲裁人、oftheirbeauty.Andperhapsfaintly隐约地,theyhintthatpeopleshould qualities看不见的品质likecharacter性格andinlect智力ratherthandietingtheirwaytosizezeroorwasp-waist蜂腰般physiques体格.TheFrenchmeasures,however,relytoomuchonseverepunishment严厉的惩罚tochangeaculturethatstillregardsbeautyasskin-deepandbone-showingUnderthelawusingafashionmodelthatdoesnotmeetaernment-definedindex指数ofbodymass身体质量couldresultina$85,000fineandsixmonthsinThefashionindustryknowsithasaninherentproblem固有的问题infocusingonmaterialadornment物质装饰andidealized理想化的bodytypes.InDenmark,theUnitedStates,andafewothercountries,itistryingtosetvoluntarystandards自愿标准formodelsandfashionimagesthatrelymoreonpeerpressure同辈压力forIncontrasttoFrance’sactions,Denmark’sfashionindustryagreedlastmonthonrulesandsanctions批准regardingtheage,health,andothercharacteristicsofmodels.Thenewlyrevised修订DanishFashionEthicalCharterclearlystates陈述:“Weareawareofandtakeresponsibilityfortheimpact影响thefashionindustryhasonbodyideals,especiallyonyoungpeople.’Thecharter’smaintoolofenmentistoaccessfordesignersandmodelingagencies模特公司toCopenhagenFashionWeek,whichisrunbytheDanishFashionInstitute.Butingeneralitreliesonaname-and-shame点名批评methodofcompliance遵Relyingonethicalpersuasion道德说服ratherthanlawtoaddress解决themisuseofbodyidealsmaythebeststep.Evenbetterwouldbetohelpelevatenotionsofbeautybeyondthematerialstandardsofaparticularindustry.Accordingtothefirstparagraph,whatwouldhappeninThephrase“imingon”(Line2,Para2)isclosestinmeaningheighteningthevalueindicatingthestate情况losingfaithngharmWhichofthefollowingistrueofthefashionTheFrenchmeasureshavealreadyNewstandardsarebeingsetinModelarenolongerunderpeerpressure同辈压力Itsinherent与生俱来的problemsaregettingAdesignerismostlikelytoberejectedbyCFWsettingahighagethreshold门槛forcaringtoomuchaboutmodels’pursuing追求perfectphysicalconditions身体状况WhichofthefollowingmaybethebesttitleoftheTheGreatThreatstotheFashionJustAnotherRoundofStruggle奋斗forADilemma两难选择fortheStarvingModelsinAChallengetotheFashionIndustry’sBodyTextForthefirsttimeinhistory,morepeopleliveintownsthaninthecountry乡村.InBritainthishashadacuriousresult.Whilepolls测验showBritonsrate“thecountryside”alongsidetheroyalfamily皇室家庭,ShakespeareandtheNationalHealthService(NHS)aswhatmakesthemproudestoftheircountry,thishaslimitedpoliticalsupport政治支持.AcenturyagoOctaviaHilllaunched发起theNationalTrustnottorescue挽救、施救stylishhousesbutsave“thebeautyofnaturalcesforeveryoneforever.”Itwasspecificallytoprovidecitydwellers居 spacesforleisure休闲wheretheycouldexperience体验“arefreshingair.”Hill’s ledtocreationofnationalparksandgreenbelts绿化带.Theydon’tmakecountrysideanymore,andeveryconcrete混凝土浇灌consumes消耗、消费moreofit.Itneedsconstant持久的Atthenextelectionnoneofthebigpartiesseemlikelytoendorse支持、赞同thissentiment情感.TheConservatives’保守党nningreformexplicitly坦率地givesruraldevelopmentpriority优先于overconservation保守,evenauthorizing“off-n”计划外buildingwherelocalpeoplemightobject.Theconceptofsustainabledevelopment可持续发展hasbeendefinedasprofitable.Labor劳动党likewisewantstodiscontinuelocalnningwherecouncilsopposedevelopment.TheLiberalDemocratsaresilent.OnlyUkip英国独立党,sensing感觉到、嗅到itschance,hassidedwith支持thosepleading恳求foraconsidered慎重的approach方法tousinggreenland.ItsntoProtectRuralEnglandstruck打击terrorintomanylocalConservativeThesensible明智的cetobuildnewhouses,factoriesandofficesiswherepeopleare,incitiesandtownswhereinfrastructure基础结构、基础设施isince.TheLondonagentsStirlingAckroydrecentlyidentified确定了enoughsites地点forhalfamillionhousesintheLondonareaalone,nointrusion不ongreenbelt.WhatistrueofLondoniseventrueroftheprovinces其他省.Theideathat“housingcrisis”房屋equals等同于“concretedmeadows”浇灌混凝土于草地ispurelobby纯talk.Theissueisnottheneedformorehousebut,asalways,wheretoputthem.Underlobbypressure,GeorgeOsbornefavors喜欢、支持ruralnew-buildagainsturban都市renovation更新andrenewal.Hefavorsout-of-townshopsitesagainsthighstreets城市商业街.Thisisnotamarketbutabiased有偏见的one.Ruraltownsandvillageshavegrownandwillalwaysgrow.Theydosobestwherebuildingsticksto坚持theiredges边缘andrespectstheircharacter尊重其特色.Wedonotruinurbanconservationareas城市区WhyruinruralDevelopmentshouldbenned,notletrip.AftertheNetherlands,BritainisEurope’smostcrowded拥挤的country.Halfacenturyoftownandcountrynninghasenabledittoretainanenviable令人嫉妒的ruralcoherence乡村连续性,whilestillpermittinglow-density低密度urbanliving.Thereisnodoubtofthealternative另一面-thecorrupted被破坏的landscapesofsouthernPortugalSpainorIreland.Avoiding避免thisratherthanpromoting促进itshouldunite联合leftandrightofthepoliticalspectrum政治范围Britain’spublicsentimentaboutthedidn’tstarttilltheShakespeareanhasbroughtmuchbenefittotheisfullybackedbytheroyalisnotwellreflected反映inAccordingtoParagraph2,theachievementsoftheNationalTrustarenowgradually逐渐WhichofthefollowingcanbeinferredfromparagraphLaborisunderattackforopposingUkipmaygain获益fromitssupportforruralconservation乡村保护TheauthorholdsthatGeorgeOsborne’srevealsastrongprejudice偏见againsturbanshowshisdisregard不在乎forthecharacterofruralstressesthenecessity必要性ofeasingthehousinghighlightshisfirmstand强场againstlobbyInthelastparagraphtheauthorshowshisappreciation欣赏thesizeofpopulationintheenviableurbanlifestyleinthetown-and-country城乡nninginBritain.[D]thepoliticallifeintoday’sBritain.Text“Thereisoneandonlyonesocialresponsibility社会责任ofbusinesses,”wroteMiltonFriedman,aNobelprize-winningeconomist,“Thatis,touseitsresourcesandengagein从事于activitiesdesignedtoincreaseitsprofits.”ButevenifyouacceptFiredman’spremise前提andregardcorporate公司的socialresponsibility(CSR)policiesasawasteofshareholders’股东money,thingsmaynotbeabsoluyclear-cut一刀切.NewresearchsuggeststhatCSRmaycreatemonetaryvalue金融价值forcompanies-atleastwhentheyareprosecutedforThelargestfirmsinAmericaandBritaintogetherspendmorethan$15billionayearonCSR,accordingtoanestimatebyEPG,aconsultingfirm咨询公司.Thiscouldaddvaluetotheirbusinessesinthreeways.First,consumersmaytakeCSRspendingasa“signal”thata’sproductsareofhighquality高质量.Second,customersmaybewillingtobuya’sproductsasanindirectwaytodonate间接捐赠tothegood好的事业ithelps.Andthird,throughamorediffuse分散的“haloeffect,”wherebyitsgooddeedsearn赢得itgreaterconsiderationfromconsumersandothers.Previousstudies之前的研究onCSRhavehadtroubledifferentiating划分theseeffectsbecauseconsumerscanbeaffectedbyallthree.Arecentstudyattemptsto企图separatethembylookingatbribery贿赂prosecutionsunderAmerica’sForeignCorruptPracticesAct(FCPA).Itarguesthatsinceprosecutors公诉人donotconsumea’sproductsaspartoftheirinvestigations,theycouldbeinfluencedonlybythehaloThestudyfoundthat,amongprosecutedfirms,thosewiththemostcomprehensive包罗万象的CSRprogramstendedtogetmorelenientpenalties惩罚.Theirysisruledout排除thepossibilitythatitwaspoliticalinfluence政治,ratherthantheirCSRstand,thataccountedfor解释theleniency:Co contributedmoretopolitical ns政治竞选didnotreceivelowerfines更低罚款.Inall,thestudyconcludesthatwhereasprosecutorsshouldonlyevaluateacasebasedonitsmerits价值,theydoseemtobeinfluenced影响bya’srecordinCSR.“Weestimatethateithereliminating排除asubstantiallabor-rightsconcern,suchaschildlabororincreasingcorporategiving公司捐赠byabout20%resultsinfinesthatgenerallyare40%lowerthanthetypicalpunishmentforbribing贿赂foreignofficials,”saysResearchersadmit承认（）thattheirstudydoesnotanswerthequestionofhowmuchbusinessesoughtto应该spendonCSR.Nordoesitrevealhowmuchcompaniesarebankingonthehaloeffectratherthantheotherpossiblebenefits利益,whentheydecidetheirdo-goodingpolicies.Butatleasttheyhavedemonstrated展示thatwhencompaniesgetintotroublewiththelaw,evidenceofgoodcharactercanwinthemalesscostlyTheauthorviewsMiltonFriedman’sstatementaboutCSRAccordingtoParagraph2,CSRhelpsawinningtrustfromraisingthequality提升质量ofitsTheexpression“morelenient’(Line2,Para.4)isclosestinmeaningmorelessmoreWhenprosecutorsevaluateacase,a’sCSRhasanimpact影响ontheirincreasesthechanceofbeingconstitutes组成partoftheWhichofthefollowingistrueofCSR,accordingtothelastItsnegativeeffectsonbusinessesareoftenThenecessaryamount总量ofcompanies’spendingonitisIthasbroughtmuchbenefittothebankingindustry银行业TextTherewilleventuallycomeadaywhenTheNewYorkTimesceases结束topublishstoriesonExactlywhenthatdaywillbeisamatterofdebate辩论、讨论.“Sometimeinthefuture,”thepaper’ssaidbackinNostalgia怀旧情结forinkonpaperandtherustle沙沙声ofpagesaside之外,there’splentyof大量incentive诱因toditch抛弃print.Theinfrastructure基础设施requiredtomakeaphysical实体的newspaper-printingpresses,deliverytrucks投递车—isn’tjustexpensive;it’sexcessive过分的atatimewhenonline-onlycompetitorsdon’thavethesamesetof一套financialconstraints金融限制.Readersaremigrating移民awayfromprintanyway.Andthoughprintandsalesstilldwarf使矮小、远超theironlineandcounterparts对应物,revenue收入fromprintisstilldeclining.Overhead日常开支maybehighandcirculation量lower,butriskingtoeliminate淘汰itsprintedition印刷版本wouldbeamistake,saysBuzzFeedCEOJonahPeretti.PerettisaystheTimes时代shouldn’twastetimegettingoutoftheprintbusiness,butonlyiftheyaboutngittherightway.“Figuringout想出awaytoaccelerate加速thattransition转变wouldm forthem,”hesaid,“butifyoudiscontinueit,you’regoingtohaveyourmostloyalcustomers忠 者reallyupsetwithyou因为你恼火.”Sometimesthat’sworthmakingachangeanyway.PerettigivestheexampleofNetflixdiscontinuingitsDVD-mailingservicetofocusonstreaming流.“Itwasseenasablunder错误,”hesaid.ThemoveturnedouttobeforesightedAndifPerettiwereincharge掌管attheTimes?“Iwouldn’tpickayeartoendprint,”hesaid.“wouldraisepricesandmakeitintomoreofalegacyproduct遗产性产品Themostloyalcustomers忠诚的用户wouldstillgettheproducttheyfavor喜欢,theideagoes,andthey’dfeelliketheywerehelsustainthequality支撑了质量ofsomethingtheybelievein.“Soifyouareoverpaying过高支付forprint,youcouldfeellikeyouwerehel,”Perettisaid,“Thenincreaseitatahigherrate率eachyearandessentiallytrytogenerateadditionalrevenue产生增加的收益.”Inotherwords,ifyou’regoingtomakeaprintproduct,makeitforthepeoplewhoarealreadyobsessed痴迷withit,WhichmaybewhattheTimesisngalready.Gettingtheprintedition印刷版本sevendaysaweekcostsnearly$500ayear—morethantwiceasmuchasadigital-onlysubscription订阅.“It’sareallyhardthingtodoandit’satremendous巨大的luxury奢侈品thatBuzzFeeddoesn’thavelegacybusiness遗产性商业,”Perettiremarked.“Butwe’regoingtohavequestionslikethatwherewethingswe’rengthatdon’tmakesensewhenthemarketchangesandtheworldchanges.Inthoseit’sbettertobemoreaggressive有上进心的，敢闯的thanlessTheNewYorkTimesisconsideringendingit’sprinteditionpartlyduetothecomintsfromitstheincreasingonlineadPerettisuggeststhatinfaceofthepresentsituation当前情况theTimesendtheprinteditionforseeknewsourcesofItcanbeinferredfrontParagraphs5and6thatalegacyproduct遗产性产品willhavethecostofprintingismeantfor意指themostloyalcustomers忠诚客户helpsrestore恢复thegloryofformerexpandsthepopularityofthePerettibelievesthatinachangingaggressiveness上进bettermeetscautiousness谨慎facilitates使容易problem-legacybusinesses遗产性商业are ingoutdated.40.WhichofthefollowingwouldbethebesttitleofthetextKeepYourNewspaperForeverinCherish珍惜theNewspaperStillinYourShifttoOnlineNewspapersAllatTEXTKingJuanCarlosofSpainonceinsisted坚持“kingsdon’tabdicate,theydieintheirsleep.”Butembarrassingscandals令人尴尬的andthepopularityoftherepublicansleft intherecentEuro-electionshavedhimtoeathiswords食言andstanddown.So,doestheSpanishcrisissuggestthatmonarchy君主制isseeingitslastdays?DoesthatmeanthewritingisonthewallforallEuropeanroyals,withtheirmagnificentuniforms华丽andmajesticlifestyles尊贵的生活方式?TheSpanishcase案例providesargumentsbothforandagainstmonarchy君主制.Whenpublicopinionisparticularlypolarized两极化,asitwasfollowingtheendoftheFranceregime政体,monarchscanriseabove“mere”纯粹的politicsand“embody”使具体、表现aspiritofnationalunity.Itisthisapparent明显的transcendenceofpoliticsthatexinsmonarchy’scontinuingpopularityasofstate.Andso,theMiddleEastexcepted,Europeisthemostmonarch-infested君主滋生的regioninth with10kingdoms(notcountingVaticanCityandAndorra).Butunliketheirabsolutist主义者cou rtsintheGulfandAsia,mostroyalfamilieshavesurvived存活becausetheyallowvoters投票者toav edifficultsearchforanon-controversial没有争议butrespectedpublicfigure公众人物.Evenso,kingsandqueensundoubtedlyhaveadownside、缺点.Symbolicofnational astheyclaim宣称tobe,theirveryhistory-andsometimesthewaytheybehavetoday-embodies体现tdated过时的andindefensible无力防御的privilegesandinequalities.AtatimewhenThomasPikettyandothereconomistsarewarningofrisinginequalityandtheincreasingpowerofinheritedwealth,itisbizarre奇怪thatwealthyaristocratic的familiesshouldstillbethesymbolicheartofmoderndemocraticstates现代国家.ThemostsuccessfulmonarchiesstrivetoabandonorhidetheiroldaristocraticwaysPrincesandprincesseshaveday-jobsandridebicycles,nothorses(orhelicopters直升飞机).Evenso,thesearewealthyfamilieswhopartywiththeinternational1%,andmediaintrusivenessmakesitincreasinglydifficulttomaintaintherightimage.WhileEurope’smonarchieswillnodoubtbesmartenoughtosurviveforsometimetocome,itistheBritishroyalswhohavemosttofearfromtheSpanishexample.ItisonlytheQueenwhohasp 保持themonarchy’sreputation声誉withherratherordinary(ifwell-heeled)grannystyle.ThedangerwillcomewithCharles,whohasbothanexpensivetaste品味oflifestyleandaprettyhierarchicalviewoftheworld.Hehasfailedtounderstandthatmonarchieshavelargelysurvivedbecausetheyprovideaservice-asnon-controversialandnon-politicalheadsofstate.CharlesoughttoknowthatasEnglishhistoryshows,itiskings,notrepublicans,whoarethemonarchy’sworstenemies.AccordingtothefirsttwoparagraphsKingJuanCarlosofSpain[A]easedhisrelationshipwithhisrivals对手.[B]usedtoenjoyhighpublicsupport.[C]wasunpopularamongEuropeanroyals.[D]endedhisreign结束了inembarrassment尴尬MonarchsarekeptasheadofstateinEuropemostly[A]togivevotersmorepublicfigurestolookupto敬重.[B]toachieveabalancebetweentraditionandreality.[C]owingtotheirundoubtedandrespectablestatus.[D]duetotheireverlastingpoliticalembodiment政治体现.Whichofthefollowingisshowntobeodd奇怪accordingtoParagraphTheroleofthenobilityinmodernThenobility’sadherencetotheirTheBritishroyalshavemosttofearbecauseCharles[A]takesatoughline强硬的onpoliticalissues.[B]failstochangehislifestyleasadvised.[C]takesrepublicansashispotentialallies盟友.[D]failstoadapthimselftohisfutureWhichofthefollowingisthebesttitleofthetext?[A]Carlos,Glory光荣andDisgraceCombined[B]Charles,AnxioustoSucceedtotheThrone王位[C]Charles,SlowtoReacttotheComingThreats[D]Carlos,aLesson教训forAllEuropeanMonarchsTEXTJusthowmuchdoestheConstitutionprotectyourdigitaldata?TheSupreme illnowwhethercansearchthecontents内容of phonewithoutawarrant委 ifthephoneisonoraroundaduringanCaliforniahasaskedthejusticestorefrain克制fromasweeruling裁决,particularlyonethatupsets推翻theoldassumptionsthat maysearchthroughthepossessionsofsatthetimeoftheirarrest.Itishard,thestateargues,forjudgestoassess评估theimplications意义ofnewandrapidlychanging.ThecourtwouldberecklesslymodestifitfollowedCalifornia’sadviceEnoughoftheimplicationsarediscernable可以发现的,evenobvious,sothatthejusticecanandshouldprovideupdatedguidelines的指导to,lawyersanddefendants.TheyshouldstartbydiscardingCalifornia’slame蹩脚的argumentthatexploring勘察thecontentsofasmartphone-avaststorehouse仓库ofdigitalinformationissimilartosay,goingthrougha’spurse钱包.Thecourthasruledthatdon'tviolatethe Amendmentwhentheygothroughthewalletorpocketbook钱包,ofanarrestee者withoutawarrant.Butexploringone’ssmartphoneismorelikeenteringhisorherhome.Asmartphonemaycontainanarrestee’sreadinghistory,financial金融history,medical医疗historyandcomprehensiverecords包罗万象的记录ofrecentcorrespondence通信.Thedevelopmentof“cloudcomputing.”meanwhile,hasmadethatexploration勘察somuchtheeasier.Americansshouldtakestepstoprotecttheirdigitalprivacy.Butkeesensitiveinformation敏感onthesedevices设备isincreasinglyarequirementofnormallife.Citizensstillhavearighttoexpect storemainprivateandprotectedbytheConstitution‘sprohibition 情况往往是, 阐明原则doesn‘teasethechallengeofline-drawing.Inmanycases,itwouldnotbeoverlyonerous繁重的 toobtainawarranttosearchthroughphoneTheycouldstillinvalidateAmendmentprotectionswhenfacingsevere,urgentcircumstances,andtheycouldtakereasonablemeasurestoensurethatphonedataarenoterased抹去oralteredwhileawarrantispending待决定的Thecourt,though,maywanttoallowroomfortocitesituationswheretheyareentitledtomoreButthejusticesshouldnotswallow吞California’sargumentwhole.New,disruptive破坏性的technologysometimesdemandsnovelapplications应用oftheConstitution’sprotections.OrinKerr,alawprofessor,comparestheexplosionandaccessibility易获得性ofdigitalinformationinthe21stcenturywiththeestablishmentofautouseasadigitalnecessityoflifeinthe20th:Thejusticeshadtospecifynovelrulesforthenew ofthepassengercarthen;theymustsortout理清howthe todigitalinformationnow.TheSupremecourt,willworkoutwhether,duringanarrest,itislegitimatesearchfor寻找 phoneswithoutacheck检查s’phonecontentswithoutbeingauthorized被preventsfromdeletingtheirphoneprohibitsfromusingtheirhandlingone’shistoricalInParagraph5and6,theauthorshowshisconcernprinciplesarehardtobeclearlythecourtisgivinglessroomforphonesareusedtostoresensitiveOrinKerr’scomparisonisquotedtoindicatetheConstitutionshouldbeimplementedflexibly灵活地PrinciplesoftheConstitutionshouldneverbealtered.Text3ThejournalScienceisaddinganextraroundofstatisticalcheckstoitspeer-reviewprocess,editor-in-chiefMarciaMcNottannounced宣称today.Thefollowssimilareffortsfromotherjournals期,afterwidespreadconcernthatbasicmistakesindataysis数据分析arecontributingto有助于theirreproducibility非性ofmanypublishedresearchfindings.“Readersmusthaveconfidenceintheconclusionspublishedinourjournal,”writesMcNuttinaneditorial.WorkingwiththeAmericanStatisticalAssociationtheJournalhasappointedsevenexpertstoastatistics统计boardofreviewingeditors(SROBE).Manuscript手稿willbeflaggedupforadditionalscrutiny详细审bytheJournal’seditors,orbyitsexistingBoardofReviewingEditorsorbyoutsidepeerreview.TheSBOREpanel专家小组willthenfindexternalstatisticians统计学家toreviewthesemanuscripts.Askedwhetheranyparticularpapershadimpelled促进thechange,McNuttsaid,“Thecreationofthe‘statisticsboard’wasmotivated动机byconcernsbroadlywiththeapplication应用ofstatisticsanddataysisinscientificresearchandispartofScience’soveralldrive整体努力toincreasereproducibilityintheresearchweGiovanniParmigiani，abiostatistician生物统计学家attheHarvardSchoolofPublicHealth,amemberoftheSBOREgroup,saysheexpectstheboardto“yprimarilyonadvisoryrole.”Heagreedtojoinbecausehe“foundtheforesight远见behindtheestablishmentoftheSBOREtobenovel新颖,uniqueandlikelytohavealastingimpact持久的影响.ThisimpactwillnotonlybethroughthepublicationsinScienceitselfbuthopefullythroughalargergroupofpublishingcesthatmaywanttomodel模仿theirapproach方法afterScience.”JohnIoannidis,aphysicianwhostudiesresearchmethodology方法论,saysthattheis“amost stepforward”and“longoverdue到期未到的,”“Mostjournalsareweakinstatisticalreviewandthisdamagesthequalityofwhattheypublish.Ithinkthat,forthemajorityofscientificpapersnowadays,statisticalreviewismoreessential本质的、必要的thanexpertreview,”hesays.ButhenotedthatbiomedicaljournalssuchasAnnalsofInternalMedicine,theJournaloftheAmericanMedicalAssociationandTheLancetpaystrongattentiontostatisticalreview数据检查.Professionalscientistsareexpectedto被希望应该knowhowtoyzedata分析数据,butstatisticalerrealarmingly令人警醒地commoninpublishedresearch，accordingtoDavidVaux，acellbiologist. shouldimprovetheirstandards,hewrotein2012，butjournalsshouldalsotakeatougherli reviewerswhoarestatisticallylite认字能力andeditorswhocanverify证实theproceauxsaysthatScience’sideatopasssomepaperstostatisticians“hassomemerit,butaweaknessisthat ontheboardreviewingeditorstoidentify‘thepapersthatneedscrutiny’inthefirstItcanbelearnedfromParagraphIfewjournalsareblamedformistakesindatalackofdataysisiscommoninresearchThephraseflaggedupPara.2)istheclosestinmeaningto[A]found发现.[B]revised修订.[C]marked标记.[D]stored.GiovanniParmigianibelievesthattheestablishmentoftheSBoREmay[A]poseathreattoallitspeers.[B]meetwithstrongopposition.[C]increaseScience’scirculation量.[D]setanexampleforotherjournals.DavidVauxholdsthatwhatScienceisng[A].addstoresearchers’[B].diminishestheroleof[C].hasroomforfurtherimprovement提升.[D].istofailintheforeseeablefuture可预见的未来.Whichofthefollowingisthebesttitleofthetext?[AScienceJoinsPushtoScreenStatisticsinPapers[B].ProfessionalStatisticiansDeserveMoreRespect[C].DataysisFindsItsWayontoEditors’Desks[D].StatisticiansAreComingBackwithScienceTwoyearsago.RupertMurdoch’sdaughterspokeatthe“unsettlingdearthofintegrity正直acrosssomanyofourinstitution机构”.Integrityhadcollapsed倒塌,sheargued,becauseofacollectiveacceptancethatthemechanism机制“insocietyshouldbeprofitandthemarket.butit’sus,humanbeings,wethepeoplewhocreatethesocietywewant,notprofit.”Drivingherpointhome,she “It’sincreasinglyabsenceofpurpose目标,ofamorallanguagewithinernment,could eoneofthemostdangerousgoalsforcapitalism资本anddom.”Thissameabsenceofmoralpurposewaswoundingcompanies,suchasNewsInternational,shethought,makingitlikelythatitwouldloseitswayasithadwithwidespread ephonehackingAsthehackingtrial审判concludes-findingguiltyoneex-editoroftheNewsoftheWorld,AndyCoulson,forconspiring合谋tohackphones,andfindingthepredecessor前任,RebekahBrooks,innocent无罪ofthesamecharge指控-thewidedearth缺乏ofintegrity正直stillstands.Journalistsareknowntohavehackedphonesofupto5,500people.Thisishackingonanindustrialscale行业规模,aswasacknowledgedb Mulcaire,themanhired雇佣bytheNewsoftheWorldin2001tobethepoint 关键人物 hacking.Othersawaittrial.Thislongstorystillunfolds徐徐展开.Inmanyrespects方面,thedearthofmoralpurposeframes制造notonlythefactofsuch preadphonehackingbuttheterms术语onwhichthetrial审判tookce.OneoftheastonishingreveswashowlittleRebekahBrooksknewofwhatwentoninhernewsroom,howlittleshethoughttondthefactthatsheneverinquiredhowthestoriesarrived.ThecoreofhersuccessfuldefensewasthatsheknewIntoday’sworld,ithas enormalthatwell-paidexecutives经理人shouldnotbeaccountablefor负责whathappensintheorganizationsthattheyrunPerhapsweshouldnotbesosurprised.Forageneration一代人,thecollectivedoctrinehasbeenthatthesortingmechanismofsocietyshouldbeprofit.Thewordsthathavemattered有所谓areefficiency效率,flexibility灵活性,shareholdervalue股东价值,business-friendly,wealthgeneration,sales,impactand,innewspapers,circulation.Wordsdegradedtothemarginhavebeenjustice,fairness,tolerance,proportionality均衡andaccountability责任.ThepurposeofeditingtheNewsoftheWorldwasnottopromotereaderunderstanding,tobefairinwhatwaswrittenortobetrayanycommonhumanity.Itwastoruinlivesinthequest寻求forcirculationandimpact.Ms.Brooksmayormaynothavehadsuspicionsabouthowherjournalistsgottheirstories,butsheaskednoquestions,gavenoinstructions指示-norreceivedtraceable可追溯的,recordedanswers.AccordingtothefirsttwoparagraphsElisabethwasupsetby[A].theconsequences结果ofthecurrentsortingmechanism.[B].companies’financiallossduetoimmoralpractices[C].ernmentalineffectivenessonmoralissues.[D].thewidemisuseofintegrityamonginstitutions.ItcanbeinferredfromParagraph3[A].GlennMulcairemaydenyphonehackingasa[B].morejournalistsmaybefoundguiltyofphonehacking.[C].AndyCoulsonshouldbeheldinnocent无罪ofthecharge.[D].phonehackingwillbeacceptedoncertainoccasions情形.TheauthorbelievesthatRebekahBrooks’sdefense[A].revealedacunning狡猾 [Bcenteredontrivialissues.[C].washardlyconvincing令人信服.[D].waspartofaconspiracy合谋.Theauthorholdsthatthecurrentcollectivedoctrineshows[A].generallydistortedvalues的价值观.[C]amarginalizedlifestyle边缘化的生活方式.[D].arigidmoralcode道德准则.40Whichofthefollowingissuggestedinthelastparagraph?[A].Thequalityofwritingsisofprimaryimportance.[B].Commonhumanityiscentraltonews[C]Moralawarenessmattersineditinganewspaper.[D].Journalistsneedstricterindustrialregula