IMF-财政整合:评估成功因素、影响和设计(英)_第1页
IMF-财政整合:评估成功因素、影响和设计(英)_第2页
IMF-财政整合:评估成功因素、影响和设计(英)_第3页
IMF-财政整合:评估成功因素、影响和设计(英)_第4页
IMF-财政整合:评估成功因素、影响和设计(英)_第5页
已阅读5页,还剩34页未读 继续免费阅读

下载本文档

版权说明:本文档由用户提供并上传,收益归属内容提供方,若内容存在侵权,请进行举报或认领

文档简介

Fiscal

Consolidation:Taking

Stock

of

Success

Factors,

Impact,and

DesignVybhaviBalasundharam,OlivierBasdevant,DalmacioBenicio,AndrewCeber,Yujin

Kim,LucaMazzone,Hoda

Selim,andYongzhengYangWP/23/63IMF

Working

Papers

describe

research

inprogress

by

the

author(s)

and

are

published

toelicit

comments

and

to

encourage

debate.Theviewsexpressed

inIMFWorkingPapersarethoseoftheauthor(s)anddo

notnecessarilyrepresenttheviewsoftheIMF,itsExecutiveBoard,orIMFmanagement.2023MAR©2023InternationalMonetaryFundWP/23/63IMF

Working

PaperFiscalAffairsDepartmentFiscal

Consolidation:

Taking

Stock

of

Success

Factors,

Impact,

and

DesignPrepared

by

Vybhavi

Balasundharam,

Olivier

Basdevant,

Dalmacio

Benicio,

Andrew

Ceber,

Yujin

Kim,Luca

Mazzone,

Hoda

Selim,

and

Yongzheng

ZhangAuthorizedfordistributionbyJamesDanielMarch2023IMF

Working

Papers

describe

research

in

progress

by

the

author(s)

and

are

published

to

elicitcomments

and

to

encourage

debate.

TheviewsexpressedinIMFWorkingPapersarethoseoftheauthor(s)anddonotnecessarilyrepresenttheviewsoftheIMF,itsExecutiveBoard,

orIMFmanagement.ABSTRACT:

SurgesinpublicdebtinmanycountriessincetheCOVID-19pandemichaverekindledinterest

infiscalconsolidations,whichoftenentaildifficultpolicychoicesinthefaceofeconomicandpoliticalconstraints.Thispaperpresentsfindingsfromasurveyoftheliteratureonfiscalconsolidations,focusingonthepre-existingconditions,

impactanddesignaspectsofpast

consolidationepisodes.Thesefindingsprovideinsightintofactorsthatinfluencethe

chanceofsuccessfulconsolidations,theirgrowthanddistributionalimpact,thepace,phasing,durationandpolicymixofreformstomitigatethe

impact,andtheroleoffiscalinstitutionsandcapacitydevelopmentinsuccessfulconsolidations.JELClassificationNumbers:Keywords:E62,H2,H5,H6FiscalConsolidation;taxation;governmentspending;institutionsVBalasundharam@,OBasdevant@,DBenicio@,ACeber@,YKim9@,LMazzone@,HSelim@,YYang@Authors’E-MailAddresses:*Theauthors

wouldliketo

thankIMFcolleagueswhocommentedon

earlierversionsofthepaperandthosewhoparticipatedinFundseminarsinSeptember2022andJanuary

2023.Specialthanksto

James

DanielandPaoloMauroforextensivecommentsandguidance,andArikaKayastha,

VonAllena,

andZaneGoinsfor

their

excellentresearchandeditorialassistance.IMF

WORKING

PAPERSFiscalConsolidations:

TakingStock

of

theSuccessFactors,

Impact,

andDesignWORKING

PAPERSFiscal

Consolidations:Taking

Stock

of

the

SuccessFactors,

Impact,

and

DesignPreparedbyVybhaviBalasundharam,OlivierBasdevant,DalmacioBenicio,AndrewCeber,YujinKim,LucaMazzone,Hoda

Selim,andYongzheng

YangIMF

WORKING

PAPERSFiscalConsolidations:

TakingStock

of

theSuccessFactors,

Impact,

and

DesignContentsIntroduction

4Pre-Existing

Conditions

for

Successful

Fiscal

Consolidations7Growth

and

Distributional

Impacts

of

Fiscal

Consolidations9Approaches

to

Fiscal

Consolidations18Policy

Implications26References28BOXES1.Self-DefeatingFiscalConsolidations

102.Portugal:Cushioningthe

DistributionalandSocialImpactof2011-14FiscalConsolidation133.MethodologiesforEstimatingFiscalMultipliers

174.RoleofClimatePoliciesin

SupportingFiscalConsolidation225.ImpactofInflationonFiscalConsolidation23TABLES1.SummaryofKeyLiteratureFindingsonFiscalConsolidations52.SelectedMultiplierEstimates16INTERNATIONALMONETARYFUND2IMF

WORKING

PAPERSFiscalConsolidations:

TakingStock

of

theSuccessFactors,

Impact,

and

DesignGlossaryAEsAdvancedEconomiesCDCapacityDevelopmentIMFInternationalMonetaryFundFTEFiscalTransparencyEvaluationECBEMsEuropeanCentralBankEmergingMarketEconomiesERMIEOExchangeRateMechanismIndependentEvaluationOfficeoftheInternationalMonetaryFundLow-IncomeDevelopingCountriesOrganisationforEconomicCo-operationandDevelopmentPublicFinancialManagementLIDCsOECDPFMPEFAPIMASDGsTADATZLBPublicExpenditureandFinancialAccountabilityPublicInvestmentManagementAssessmentSustainableDevelopmentGoalsTaxAdministrationDiagnosticAssessmentToolZero-LowerBoundINTERNATIONALMONETARYFUND3IMF

WORKING

PAPERSFiscalConsolidations:

TakingStock

of

theSuccessFactors,

Impact,

andDesignIntroductionUnprecedentedsurgesinpublicdebt

inmanycountriessincetheCOVID-19pandemichaverekindledinterest

infiscalconsolidation.Althoughdebt-to-GDPratioshavedeclined

somewhatinmanycountriesinthewakeofeconomicrecoveryandhigherthanexpectedinflation

in2022,theyremainelevatedandabove

pre-pandemiclevelsinmostcountries.Inthecomingyears,manycountrieswillneedto

bringdownfiscaldeficitsto

rebuildfiscalspace,andforsome,thistaskis

urgentastheircurrentpublicdebtlevelshavebecomeunsustainable.Infact,about60percentoflow-incomecountriesand30

percentofemergingmarketeconomiesareathighriskof

oralreadyindebtdistress(IMF,2022a).Moreover,manycountrieswillhavetoaddressmounting

spendingpressuresoverthecoming

years,includingthosefrominfrastructureinvestment,

climate

changemitigationandadaption,andageingpopulation,whichwillincreasespendingonpensionandhealthcare,especiallyinadvancedeconomies(AEs)andemergingmarketeconomies(EMs)(IMF,2022b).1

Formanylow-incomedevelopingcountries(LIDCs),it

isdauntingchallengetomeettheirsustainabledevelopmentgoals(SDGs)inthefaceofeconomicscarringcaused

bythepandemicwhilekeepingtheirdebtatasustainable

level.Fiscalconsolidation

isacomplexundertakingandoftenentailsdifficultpolicychoicesto

achievepolicyobjectives.Thefiscal

consolidationdebateisnotnewandhasinitiallyfocusedontheshort-termoutputimpact.Overtime,however,ithasevolvedtounderstandmorespecificaspectsofconsolidationdesign.

Forexample,policymakershavetodecidehowmuchtheyhavetoreducethefiscaldeficit,

whetherthedeficitreduction

shouldcomefromraisingadditionalrevenueorcutting

expenditureorfromboth,whenisthebesttimetostarttheconsolidationprocess,

howlongandhowfasttheconsolidationeffortshouldbe,whethertofrontloadorbackloadthepolicymeasures,aswellaswhatrole,ifany,togivetofiscalinstitutionalreform.Inmakingthesechoices,policymakerswillalsoneedto

considerpoliticalandsocialfeasibilityandramificationsinaddition

totheireconomicimpact.Thispaperaimstoprovidean

overviewofthelessonslearnedfrompastfiscal

consolidationepisodesbasedonaliteraturesurvey.InternationalinstitutionssuchastheIMFandOECDundertakeperiodicreviewsandad

hoc

studiesoffiscalconsolidation

issuestoguidetheiroperationalwork(OECD,2010,2012and2013;IMF,2014a;EyraudandWeber,2013;IMF,2010a;IMF,2010b,andDanieletal.,2006),buttherehasbeen

no

comprehensiveupdateinrecentyears.Therearealsostreamsofresearchfocusing

onspecificissuesrelatedtofiscalconsolidations,suchasfiscalmultipliers(AuerbachandGorodnichenko,2012;Ilzetzki,Mendoza,andVégh,2013)andtheir

economicimpact(Carrière-Swallow,David,andLeigh,2021;Guajardo,Leigh,Pescatori,2014).Moreover,theglobaleconomiclandscapehaschangedsubstantiallysincetheGlobalFinancialCrisis,whichpromptedanincreaseintheresearchonfiscalconsolidationissuesfocusing

initiallyonAEs.A

clearerunderstandingofthelessonslearnedfromthepastexperiencescouldhelppolicymakersformulateappropriatestrategiesforfiscalconsolidationinmeetingboththeirshort-andlong-termchallenges.Thispapercontributestothe

literatureonfiscalconsolidationacrossseveraldimensions.First,itprovidesacomprehensive

stocktakingof

theliterature,includingthe

considerableamountofresearchsincetheGlobalFinancialCrisis.Second,theliterature

surveycoversallincomegroupsofcountries—LIDCs,EMs,andAEs—andattemptstodifferentiatelessonslearned

forthesegroups.Third,giventheincreasinginterest

intheissueof

inequalityamongpolicymakers,thissurveyalsocoverstheimpactoffiscalconsolidationson

incomedistributioninadditiontoeconomicgrowth.Fourth,effortsarealsomadetoshedlightonthe

politicaleconomyoffiscalconsolidations,anareathatis

notyetasdevelopedas

otherareasintheliterature,eventhoughithasbeenincreasinglyrecognizedasanimportantaspectofprogramimpactanddesign.Finally,areviewof

theroleoffiscalinstitutionsandcapacitydevelopment—anincreasingfocusofpolicymakersanddevelopmentpartnersinLIDCs—isalsoprovided.Therestoftheworkingpaperisorganizedasfollows.SectionIIexaminesthehistoricalrecordoffiscalconsolidationsandfactorsthatinfluencetheir

chancesof

success,followedbyasurveyofgrowthanddistributional1IMF(2022b)MethodologicalandStatisticalAnnex,Tables23–25.INTERNATIONALMONETARYFUND4IMF

WORKING

PAPERSFiscalConsolidations:

TakingStock

of

theSuccessFactors,

Impact,

andDesignimpactsoffiscalconsolidations—includingestimatesoffiscalmultipliers—inSectionIII.Issuesrelatedtoapproachestofiscalconsolidation

intermsofsize,pace,duration,phasing,andcompositionofthe

adjustmentaretakenupinSectionIV,andthoseonhowfiscal

institutionsand

capacitydevelopmentcan

supportfiscalconsolidationarediscussedin

SectionV.Thepaperconcludesin

Section

VIwithkeytakeawaysonpolicyimplications.Itshouldbenotedattheoutsetthat,despiteavoluminousempiricalliterature,anypatternsinthe

surveyedstudiesanddatashouldbeseenassuggestiveratherthanconclusive.

Specifically,many

empiricalregularitiessummarizedinthispaperaretentative,andnotnecessarilyrobusttochangesin

sampleormethodology.Moreover,thefocusoftheliteraturehasbeenonAEs.Thereadershouldthusexercisecaution,particularlywheninterpretingandusingthefindingsonAEsinthecontextofan

EMandLIDC,withthelattertwogroupsalsopossiblyneedingdifferentiation.Table1below

providesasummaryofthe

keyfindingsofthissurveyand

servesasaquickguide.Thereaderisencouragedtoread

thecorrespondingsectionsofthispapertofullyappreciatethenuancesofthesefindings.Table

1.

Summary

of

Key

Literature

Findings

on

Fiscal

ConsolidationsTopicFindingsApplicability*AEsPre-existingconditionsconducivetosuccessoffiscalconsolidations:Inadditiontoprogramdesign(seebelow),whatfactorsmaycontributetothesuccessoffiscalThesuccessrateofhistoricalconsolidationepisodesisfoundtobe1/5–2/3,dependingontheapproachesandcriteriausedtoassesstheoutcome.Factorsthatincreasetheprobabilityofsuccessinclude:•highincome

levels,•

favorableglobalanddomesticenvironment,•

strongfiscalinstitutions,AllAllconsolidations?•

astrongtrackrecordinfiscalmanagement,and•

broad-basedpolitical

supportandgoodcommunication.Growthanddistributionalconsequences:Howdofiscalconsolidationsaffecteconomicactivityandincomedistribution,andhowdotheoutcomesinturnaffecttheconsolidationprocess?Fiscalconsolidationsoftenhaveshort-termadversegrowthanddistributionalimpactscomparedtothepre-consolidationperiod.Even

so,consolidationsmayimprovegrowthperformance

relativetothecounterfactualofno-consolidation.Short-termgrowthimpactasmeasuredbythefiscalmultiplierdependsonstructuralcharacteristicsandcyclicalconditionsoftheeconomy,e.g.,largerimpactinmoreclosedeconomiesand

duringeconomicdownturns.AllInpastepisodes,expenditure-basedconsolidationswidenedincomeinequalitymorefrequentlythantax-basedconsolidations;fasterconsolidationsalso

moreoftenworsenedinequality.AEs;AllAccommodativemonetaryandexchangeratepoliciesandreformstofacilitateadjustmentinlaborandproductmarkets,andtargetedsocial

assistancecanalleviateshort-termadverseoutputanddistributionalimpactsoffiscalconsolidation.AllAllConsolidationscanboostgrowthandimproveequalityinthelongrun,especiallyifpublicinvestmentand

socialspendingareprotected.INTERNATIONALMONETARYFUND5IMF

WORKING

PAPERSFiscalConsolidations:

TakingStock

of

theSuccessFactors,

Impact,

andDesignGrowthanddistributionalimpactsfeedbacktotheconsolidationprocessandaffectfinaloutcomesviasocialandpoliticalrepercussions,as

wellaseconomicchannels.AllAllApproachestofiscalProgramdesignshouldreflectcredible

commitmenttofiscalreforms.Acredibleplaneasesfinancingconstraintsandallowsforgreaterpolicy

space.consolidation(programdesign):whatdoweknowaboutthesize,pace,duration,phasing,andpolicycompositionofpastfiscalconsolidationsandtheirimplications?Mostconsolidationepisodesimprovedthecyclicallyadjustedprimarybalance(CAPB)by1-2percentofGDPperyearandlasted3-4years;fasterconsolidationswerelikelydrivenby

largerandmoreurgentneedsforreform.AllFront-loadedconsolidationswereoftendrivenbyconcernsaboutfiscalsustainabilityand/orcreditriskpremia(financingconstraints).EMsandAEsGradualandback-loadedconsolidationstendtostabilizedebtmorepermanentlywithmorecontainedoutputlosses;theyalsoallowtimeforcapacitydevelopmentinLIDCs.However,suchconsolidationsrequireexternalfinancingandmarketconfidence.All,butmorerelevantforEMsandLIDCsRevenue-raisingmeasuresarefoundtobemoredurableindeveloping

countrieswhererevenue-to-GDPratiosaremodesttobeginwith.EMsandLIDCsLargeconsolidationsgenerallyrequirebothrevenueandexpendituremeasures.AllAllProtectingthevulnerablehelpsmitigatethe

short-termdistributionalimpactsandminimize

socialandpoliticalcostsoffiscalconsolidation.Cutsincapitalinvestment,education,andhealthshouldbeavoidedtopreservegrowthpotentialinthelongrun.AllAllTaxmeasuresshould

ideallytargetlessdistortionarybasessuchaspropertytaxes,excisedutiesonsingoods,andenvironmentaltaxes.Aneffective

communication

strategyshouldbepartofthedesignandimplementationof

fiscalconsolidationprograms.AllAllTheroleofinstitutionsandFiscalconsolidationprogramsshouldbeunderpinnedbyacapacitydevelopment:what

crediblemedium-termfiscalframeworksupportedbyroledotheyplayinprogram

soundinstitutions.designandimplementationSoundfiscalrulesandpublicfinancialmanagement(PFM)throughtheirimpactonsystemshelpstrengthenfiscaldisciplineandmeetAllAllcapacity,transparency,andadjustmenttargets.accountability?Transparencycontributesto

successfulfiscalconsolidationsby

improving

programdesign(e.g.,realisticINTERNATIONALMONETARYFUND6IMF

WORKING

PAPERSFiscalConsolidations:

TakingStock

of

theSuccessFactors,

Impact,

andDesignmacro-forecastsandpublicdebate)andgovernmentaccountability.Building

strongbudgetaryinstitutionstakestimeandLIDCsandEMsneedstobewellsequenced

andundertakenearlyon.Capacitydevelopmentshouldbepartofthedesignoffiscalconsolidationprograms,tailoredtothecountries’needs,andstartasearlyaspossible.LIDCsandEMsLDICsCapacitydevelopmentshouldfocusonrevenuemobilizationandcorePFMfunctionsinlow-capacitycountries.*Findings

areindicatedto

beapplicabletoaparticularcountry

groupeitherbecausetheresults

arebasedonresearchonthatgrouporconsideredtobebroadly

relevantforthat

group.All—all

countries;AEs—advancedeconomies;EMs—emergingmarket

economies;LIDCs—low-incomedevelopingcountries.Sources:Authors’compilationofthefindings

inthis

paper.Pre-Existing

Conditions

for

Successful

FiscalConsolidationsThis

survey

suggests

that

the

success

rate

of

historical

fiscal

consolidations

ranges

from

1/5

to

2/3,

depending

on

theapproaches

and

criteria

used

to

assess

its

outcomes.

Several

factors

increase

the

chances

of

success,

including

asupporting

global

and

domestic

environment,

strong

fiscal

institutions

as

reflected

by

a

good

track

record

in

fiscalmanagement,

and

broad-based

political

support

and

effective

communication.Whatmakesafiscalconsolidationsuccessful?Afiscalconsolidationis

consideredsuccessfulwhenaminimumlevelofex-postcontroloverfiscalbalanceand/ordebtratioisachievedormaintained

overaspecifiedperiod,includingwhencomparedwithex-anteobjectives.Itis

usuallymarkedby

sustainedimprovementsinthecyclicallyadjustedprimarybalance(CAPB)2

and/orinthegrosspublicdebt-to-GDPratiotomeetcertainthresholdforsomeperiodaftertheconsolidation.However,thechanceofsuccessforafiscalconsolidationisinfluencednotjustbyitsdesign.3

Knowingtheircontributingfactorsandrisksoffailurewouldhelpstrengthenprogramdesignandprepareremedialactionsandcontingencyplans.Successratesoffiscalconsolidationrangefromabout1in5episodesto2in3,

largelydependingontheapproachtakenandthethresholdappliedtodefinesuccess.4

Amongthetwobroadapproachesfordefinitionsofsuccessfulfiscalconsolidationsintheliterature,thefirstapproachexamineswhetherafiscalconsolidationepisodeachievesex-postoutcomesinlinewithex-anteobjectives/targets.Thesecondapproachfocusesexclusivelyonex-postachievementofaminimumthresholdimprovementin

keymacro-fiscaloutcomes(i.e.,fiscalbalanceanddebtratio)andassesseswhethertheyareachievedoveraspecifiedtimeorlonglasting.Thereviewoftheliteraturebasedonthefirstapproach(Mauro

andVillafuerte,2013;andMauro,ed.,2011)suggeststhatthesuccessraterangesfrom38tounder50percent,whereasthatunderthesecondapproachrangesfrom21to65

percent(McDermottandWestcott,1996;Alesinaand

Perotti,1995;AfonsoandJalles,2011;Afonso,2010;IMF,2010a;andLambertiniand2TheCAPBmeasures

discretionaryfiscalpolicy

andothernoncyclicalfactors

by

excluding,inadditiontointerestpayments,theautomatic

effects

of

businesscyclefluctuations(throughtransfersand

taxes)onthebudget.34Policychoices,asreflectedinthe

designfeaturesof

afiscaladjustment

program,

arediscussedinSectionIV.Thestudiesexaminingpre-existingconditionsfor

successfulconsolidationssurveyedherecoveredonlyconsolidationexperiences

ofadvancedcountries

overbroadlysimilarperiods,mostly

rangingfrom1960/70sto

mid/late1990s,with

some

studiesspanninga

longertime

periodfrom1970to

2010s.INTERNATIONALMONETARYFUND7IMF

WORKING

PAPERSFiscalConsolidations:

TakingStock

of

theSuccessFactors,

Impact,

andDesignTavares,2000).Notsurprisingly,forthelatterapproach,themorestringentthecriteriathelowerthesuccessrate,andvice

versa.5

Thatsaid,thedifferentcriteriaappliedonlyexplainpartofthewidelydispersingsuccessrates.MauroandVillafuerte(2013)foundthatfortheG7during1976-2007

andEUcountriesduring1991-2007,deviationsofex-postoutcomesfromex-ante

planswerefrequentandlargeand

oftenstemmedfromunforeseenmacroeconomicshocksthataffectgrowth,interestrates,andexchangerates.Highincomelevelsandfavorableglobalanddomesticconditionsarefoundtoincreasetheprobabilityofsuccess.High-incomeOECDcountriesaremorelikelytosucceedintheirconsolidationeffortsrelativetoEMs

andthesamefindingholdsforEMs

relativetoLIDCs(AdamandBevan,2003;andHeylenandEveraert,2000).Thiscouldbebecausehigherincome

isoftenassociatedwithstrongerinstitutionsandthusagreatercapacitytodesignandimplementfiscalreforms.Additionally,strongglobalanddomesticgrowth,lowinterest

rates,acompetitivelyvaluedcurrencyandrisingnetexportdemandincreasetheprobabilityofsuccess.6

Theliteratureisnotconclusiveontheroleofanexchangerateregimeinimprovingsuccessrates.However,LambertiniandTavares(2000)findthatsuccessfulconsolidationamongOECDcountriesis

almostalwaysprecededbylargenominaland

realexchangeratedepreciationwhileunsuccessfulonesareprecededbyrevaluationandfollowedbydepreciation.Moreover,theyfindthatdepreciationisa

significantpredictorofthepersistenceofadjustments.Thequalityoffiscalinstitutionsis

keytothesuccessofconsolidationprograms.7

IMF(2014b)examinedG-20countriesandfoundthatthosewithstrongerfiscal

institutionsi)deliveredasignificantlystrongerfiscaladjustment,

ii)werequickertoputtogetherafiscaladjustmentplan,iii)tendedtoprotectpublicinvestmentintheconsolidation,

iv)tendedtoimplementtheplan

betterbecausetheyadheredtotheirannualbudget,andv)werebetteratresponding

toexternalshocksandabletoreallocateexpenditureandsticktotheoriginaladjustment

plan.Further,astrongtrackrecordinfiscalmanagementcanimprovethelikelihoodof

successfulconsolidation.In

contrast,ahistoryofpoorfiscalmanagementasmeasuredbyrecurringlargedeficitsandelevateddebtseemstohaveadverseeffectsonachievingandmaintainingasustainablefiscalstance.

ApoorlegacydissipatesrapidlyforOECDandmiddle-incomecountries,butnotforLIDCs(Adamand

Bevan,2003).Thisfinding

maypointtotheimportance

ofinstitutions,commitmenttoreform,andcredibilityforsoundpolicymaking.Moreover,theseobservationssuggestthattheremaybeaminimumthresholdofinstitutionalqualityabovewhich

capacitytocarryoutfiscal

consolidationcanincreaserapidly.Broad-basedpoliticalsupportisconduciveto

successfulconsolidationefforts.MauroandVillafuerte(2013)findthatwhereascross-countryevidence

yieldsmixedresultsontheroleofpoliticalfactors,thepresenceorbuildupofpublicsupport,lowerparliamentaryfractionalizationandperceptionsofgreaterpoliticalstabilityaretosomeextentassociatedwithbetterviabilityorimplementationof

consolidationplans.Baldaccietal.

(2004)andClements,Gupta,andJalles(2022)provideevidencethatgovernmentswith

aparliamentarymajorityand

facingnoimminentelectionsaremorelikelyto

succeed

in

fiscalconsolidations.Thisis

consistentwiththetheorythatpoliticalcyclesdrivefiscaloutcomes(PerssonandTabellini,2003)andtheevidencethatnewlyelectedgovernmentsaremorelikelytosustainaconsolidation(Molnár,2012).Moreover,varioustypesofgovernmenthaveundertakensuccessfulconsolidations,butcoalitiongovernmentsseem

tohavealess

successfultrackrecord(AlesinaandPerotti,1995),perhapsowingtoinherentchallengesforacoalitiongovernmentinconsensusbuildingandsustainedimplementationofconsolidationmeasures.Itshouldalsobe

notedthatthereisatwo-wayrelationshipbetweenfiscalconsolidationsandpoliticaldynamics.Largedeficitspriortoelectionyearsarefound

toreducetheincumbent’sre-electionchancesindemocracies(BrenderandDrazen,2005).Andfiscalretrenchmentisfoundtocorrelate

withincreasedsocialinstabilityandpotentiallycarrieslargeelectoralcosts,therebyunderminingthedurabilityoffiscalconsolidations(Alesinaetal.,2021;PonticelliandVoth,2020;andChen

etal.,2019).5Amongthesurveyedstudies,AlesinaandPerotti(1995)reportedthelower-endsuccess

rateof21percent

usingthecriteriaof

atleast

5percent

ofGDPdeclineingross

debt

threeyearsfollowingconsolidationand

anincreaseinthestructuralprimarybalancebyatleast

1.5percent

ofGDPperyearduring1960-92.

Bycontrast,AfonsoandJalles

(2011)identifiedtheupper-boundsuccessrateof

65percentbasedonthecriteriaof

two-yearimprovementintheCAPB

by

at

leastonestandarddeviationof

thesample(1.6percentofGDP).Thisassumesthattheprimacy

of

maintainingsoundmonetaryandexchangeratepolicies

is

notcompromisedinsuch

policysettings.Foramoredetaileddiscussionofinstitutions

inthecontext

of

fiscalconsolidation,see

SectionV.67INTERNATIONALMONETARYFUND8IMF

WORKING

PAPERSFiscalConsolidations:

TakingStock

of

theSuccessFactors,

Impact,

andDesignThesefindingsonthepoliticaleconomyoffiscalconsolidationssuggestthatpolicymakersshouldhaveaneffective

communicationstrategyforfiscalconsolidationprograms.Giventhatcertainrevenueandexpendituremeasureshavepredictable

impactonvariousinterestgroups,policymakersneedtoengagewithkeystakeholdersearlyonduringprogramdesignandstriketherightbalanceinthepolicymixtoovercomepoliticalheadwindstoconsolidation,ratherthandelaynecessaryreforms.Inthisregard,Mauro

(2011)stressesthecriticalroleofacomprehensiveplan

inshapingpublicopinionsregarding

fiscalconsolidation.Thestudyhighlightstheroleofinternationalinstitutions,internationalratingagencies,nationalresearchinstitutions,andthemediainstressingtheurgencytoaddressunsustainabledebt.8

Aspoliticalandeconomicshocksarefrequentduringafiscalconsolidation,policymakersalsoneedtoensurethatprogramdesignis

robustbyhavingcontingencyplansinplacetodealwithshocksandmaintainpoliticalsupportforreform.

Finally,strongfiscal

institutions,whichshouldbebuiltearlyonasittakestimetobearfruit,wouldhelppolicymakersmitigate

politicalpressuresby

increasingtransparencyandcredibilityofreformmeasures.Growth

and

Distributional

Impacts

of

FiscalConsolidationsFiscal

consolidations

generally

have

a

negative

short-term

impact

on

economic

activity

relative

to

t

温馨提示

  • 1. 本站所有资源如无特殊说明,都需要本地电脑安装OFFICE2007和PDF阅读器。图纸软件为CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.压缩文件请下载最新的WinRAR软件解压。
  • 2. 本站的文档不包含任何第三方提供的附件图纸等,如果需要附件,请联系上传者。文件的所有权益归上传用户所有。
  • 3. 本站RAR压缩包中若带图纸,网页内容里面会有图纸预览,若没有图纸预览就没有图纸。
  • 4. 未经权益所有人同意不得将文件中的内容挪作商业或盈利用途。
  • 5. 人人文库网仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对用户上传分享的文档内容本身不做任何修改或编辑,并不能对任何下载内容负责。
  • 6. 下载文件中如有侵权或不适当内容,请与我们联系,我们立即纠正。
  • 7. 本站不保证下载资源的准确性、安全性和完整性, 同时也不承担用户因使用这些下载资源对自己和他人造成任何形式的伤害或损失。

评论

0/150

提交评论