《傲慢与偏见》与《简爱》中女主角的性格分析

AThesisSubmittedinPartialFulfillmentoftheRequirementsfortheDegreeofBachelorofArtse].3.2.TheDifferenceoftheCharacter3.2.1.TheDifferenceoftheFamilyBackgroundJaneEyre,shealwaysthoughtthatsheisprettyflat,lowstatus,poor,insignificant,onlywithadull,austerelife,likewildflowersandweeds,noonetoclimb,tofendforthemselves.Buttheflamesoflovebetweenherandhermaster.Atfirstsheburiedlovedeepinherheart.Intea,lunchandeveningwalk,sheasfaraspossible,calm,butwhenalone,sheopenedthegateofmemory,theygetalongwiththesceneofaclearreappearance,intoxicatedinthedeephappiness.ShetriedmanytimestotestthemarriageofMr.RochesterandMissIngram,andMr.RochesterpretendedtobeintimatewithMissIngram.Theytesteachotherandexamineeachother,infact,theyhavealreadyinthesoultogether.Mr.Rochester'sunforgettableloveforJane,"Isometimeshaveastrangefeelingforyou-especially,likenow,whenyoucomenearme,somewhereundermyleftrib,thereseemstobeachordwithasimilarstringinthesameplaceasyourlittlebody,anditistightlyclosedandcannotbesolved.Ifthechoppystraitsand200ofmilesoflandhaveseparatedusfar,atthattime,myheartwouldbleedtothewomanwhopleasesmeonlybyappearances,whenIfindthattheyhaveneithersoulnorconscience-whentheyshowmemediocrity,superficiality,andperhapslowenergy,vulgarity,anddryness,Iamatotaldemon.ButIamalwaysgentleandfaithfultoBrighteyes,eloquenttongues,thesouloffire,andthegentleandsteady,docileandsteadfastcharacterthatcanbendandnotbebroken.T3.2.2.TheDifferenceoftheCulturalLevelhewordstouchedbothJaneandthereader.Butjustwhentwopeopleareabouttogetmarried,anunexpectedthinghappenedsuddenly,becauseJaneEyrelearnedthatRochesteractuallyhadawife-eventhoughthewifeisamadman,hasbeenRochesterhidingatThornfieldformanyyears.JaneEyrefinallydecidedtoleaveRochester,tofindtherealhappinessoftheirown.ShecametoSwampHillunderafortuitouscoincidence,revealingDiana,MaryandSt.John.Finallyshefoundthatthethreewerehercousins,heraunt'schildren,JaneEyre,whohadinheritedheruncle'sinheritanceandbecamerich.ButshefinallydecidedtogobacktoRochester.Butaftershehadgone,ThornfieldHallwasburnttoashesbyRochester'smadwife.WhenJaneEyrefoundRochester,hewasblind,butthetwoeventuallylivedtogetherandhadhappiness.3.2.3.TheDifferenceoftheLifeExperienceFewpeoplewillbelikeJaneforloveforthepersonalityofabandonall,andnohesitation.JustlikeElizabeth,shewillrefuseDarcyforavarietyofreasons,andJaneEyreshowsusisakindofsimplification,isakindofreturntosimplicity,isapursuitofthehearttopaythefeeling,isaButherofthesimplefeelings,itislikeaglassoficewater,purifytheheartsofeveryreader,butalsoarousethereaders,especiallythefemalereadersresonate.4.ConclusionWiththereformandopening-upofChinaandthecontinuouscollisionoftheworldeconomy,thecommunicationbetweenculturesisbecomingmoreandmoreclose.Withtheimprovementofeconomiclevel,peoplehavebecomemoreandmorehighdemandforlife,moreandmorepeopleurgentlyneedtoenterthespiritualneedsfrommaterialneeds.People'sdemandforliteraryworksextendsfromdomestictoabroad."PrideandPrejudice"and"JaneEyre"aretheworld'sclassicclassics,writersareJaneAustenandCharlotteBronte,arewell-knownBritishfemalewriters,theirworkshavebeenwidelycirculatedbylatergenerations,isavaluableassetinworldliterature,influencedbythelifetime,Mostoftheirworksarerelatedtotheemancipationofwomen,sowomenhavemanysimilaritiesintheirwritings,"PrideandPrejudice"inElizabethandJaneEyreinthetwoworksoftheclassicimage,theyhavetheirownideasaboutmoney,marriage,atthesametimetherearesimilaritiesanddifferencesinpersonality,Therefore,thestudyofthissubjectpaysattentiontothecomparativeanalysisbetweentheircharacters.Fromthepointofviewofreality,ElizabethBennetandJaneEyrereflectthesocialreality,femininestatusandfeminineconsciousnessoftheirtimesinsomeextent.Throughcomparisonandanalysisoftheirpersonalsplendor,whetheritisElizabethorJaneEyre,theirlifeprocessreflectsdifferentviewsofloveandfemaleconsciousness,Ithinkthatsuchtwodifferentconceptsandconsciousnessareworthyofourcontemporarypeopletoin-depthanalysis.Byanalyzingthem,wecanthinkofourownviewofloveandvalues.Bibliography[1]袁学敏.论女性自我救赎意识之觉醒——从《再生缘》到《傲慢与偏见》[J].攀枝花学院学报，2017，34（04）：47-53.[2]刘亚超.边缘到中心——从《茶花女》、《简爱》、《傲慢与偏见》看女权主义的发展[J].齐齐哈尔师范高等专科学校学报，2016（04）：25-27.[3]王彤.浅析简•奥斯汀的《傲慢与偏见》[J].生物技术世界，2015（05）：163.[4]钟瑜宁，张申艳.女性主义视角下的《简爱》和《傲慢与偏见》[J].语文建设，2014（21）：60-61.[5]沈娟.从人物语言风格论电影《傲慢与偏见》[J].电影文学，2014（10）：80-81.[6]鲍丙琴.平行研究在比较红学中的方法论意义[J].河南教育学院学报（哲学社会科学版），2013，32（06）：6-10.[7]周淑茹.论《傲慢与偏见》中的女性意识——从伊丽莎白拒婚谈起[J].名作欣赏，2013（33）：73-75.[8]李素芬.从女性主义角度分析《简•爱》对《傲慢与偏见》的超越[J].名作欣赏，2013（27）：43-44.[9]张越.论《傲慢与偏见》与《简•爱》中的绅士形象[J].南昌教育学院学报，2013，28（07）：25-26.[10]程永艳，汤建民.科学计量学视野下的《傲慢与偏见》研究——一个案例性的探究[J].浙江科技学院学报，2013，25（02）：81-87.[11]郑奎娥.解读简•奥斯丁《傲慢与偏见》婚恋观思想的应有视角[J].才智，2013（08）：232.[12]赖慈芸.埋名异乡五十载——大陆译作在台湾[J].东方翻译，2013（01）：49-58.[13]魏庭圆.《简•爱》与《傲慢与偏见》中两个叛逆角色之比较[J].群文天地，2012（24）：60.[14]吴颖，廖红燕.论英语头韵修辞的特点及翻译——以《傲慢与偏见》为例[J].湖北第二师范学院学报，2012，29（11）：114-116+120.[15]刘云静.18—19世纪英国女性意识的觉醒及其边缘化特性——以奥斯汀的《傲慢与偏见》为例[J].山西师大学报（社会科学版），2012，39（04）：133-135.[16]高玉秋.居住空间的意象蕴含——《傲慢与偏见》和《简•爱》的相关语境[J].外国问题研究，2012（02）：75-78.[17]韩欣华.《傲慢与偏见》，从小说到电影[J].电影文学，2012（11）：72-73.[18]陈惠君.论女性主义的彰显与不足——兼评《傲慢与偏见》、《简爱》、《德伯家的苔丝》[J].湖北经济学院学报（人文社会科学版），2012，9（04）：117-118.[19]张霞，周盛.女性意识的发展和超越——再读《傲慢与偏见》和《简•爱》[J].长春理工大学学报（社会科学版），2012，25（02）：85-86.[20]刘洁，田建国.简•奥斯丁与夏•勃朗特的女性主义比较研究以《傲慢与偏见》和《简•爱》为例[J].西北工业大学学报（社会科学版），2011，31（03）：35-39.[21]Brownstein,RachelM.1994.IronyandAuthority:NewCasebooksSenseandSensibilityandPrideandPrejudice.NewYork:St.Martin'sPress,Inc.[22]Copeland,Edward&McMaster,Juliet.2001.JaneAusten.Shanghai:ShanghaiForeignLanguageEducationPress.[23]Davis,Philip.2007.TheIrctorians.Beijing:ForeignLanguageTeachingandReseaxchPress.[24]Deborah,L.Madsen.2006.FeministTheoryandLiteraryPractice.Beijing:ForeignLanguageTeachingandResearchPress.[25]Gang,Zhu.2001.TwentiethCenturyWesternCriticalTheories.Shanghai:ShanghaiForeignLanguageEducationPress.[26]Gilbert,Sandra.2000.CriticalConditio