版权说明:本文档由用户提供并上传,收益归属内容提供方,若内容存在侵权,请进行举报或认领
文档简介
2026年托福写作模拟试题及分析:写作技巧与高分学习Task1:IntegratedWriting(30分钟,30分)说明:阅读文章和听力讲座后,根据要求撰写文章,说明听力内容如何反驳或支持阅读观点。题目1(2题,每题15分)阅读文章:近年来,新加坡政府大力推动“智慧国”计划,旨在通过科技提升公共服务效率。文章提出三点主要措施:1)建设全国性数字身份系统,方便市民办理政务;2)推广智能家居应用,优化家庭能源管理;3)增加无人机巡逻,加强交通监控。政府预计这些措施将显著减少行政成本,并改善市民生活质量。听力讲座:一位反对者指出,新加坡的“智慧国”计划存在三大问题。首先,数字身份系统可能侵犯个人隐私,因为政府将收集大量敏感数据。其次,智能家居设备依赖互联网,一旦系统崩溃,可能导致家庭能源供应中断。第三,无人机巡逻可能引发伦理争议,例如过度监控是否侵犯公民自由。专家建议政府应优先考虑市民的担忧,而非盲目追求技术进步。写作要求:Writearesponseinwhichyousummarizethepointsmadeinthelecture,explaininghowtheycastdoubtonthepointsmadeinthereadingpassage.答案:ThelecturepresentsthreecriticalargumentsagainstSingapore’s"SmartNation"initiative,challengingtheoptimisticclaimsmadeinthereadingpassage.First,thespeaker质疑stheprivacyimplicationsofthenationaldigitalidentitysystem.Thereadingpassageportraysthissystemasaconvenientwaytostreamlinegovernmentservices,butthelecturewarnsthatitcouldleadtomasssurveillance.Forinstance,citizens’personaldatamightbeexploitedbycorporationsorevenmisusedbyauthorities.Thiscontradictsthereading’sassumptionthatsuchmeasuresarepurelybeneficialforpublicefficiency.Second,thelecturearguesthatsmarthomeapplicationsmaycreatenewvulnerabilities.Whilethereadingsuggestsenergysavingsthroughautomatedsystems,thespeakerpointsoutthatinternet-dependentdevicescouldfailcatastrophically.Acyberattackorsystemoutagemightleavehouseholdswithoutelectricityorheating,exposingthereading’soveremphasisontechnologicalconvenience.Third,thelecturecriticizestheuseofdronesfortrafficmonitoring,claimingitviolatescivilliberties.Thereadingpromotesdronesasaneffectivetoolforimprovingroadsafety,butthespeakercitescaseswhereexcessivesurveillancehasledtopublicbacklashinothercountries.Thisunderminesthereading’sclaimthatsuchmeasuresareuniversallyaccepted.Inconclusion,thelecturesystematicallyunderminesthereading’soptimisticviewbyhighlightingprivacyrisks,technicalfailures,andethicalconcerns.Thespeaker’scounterargumentssuggestthatSingaporeshouldproceedwithcautionratherthanaggressivelypursuingtechnologicalintegration.题目2(2题,每题15分)阅读文章:美国大学招生政策近年来面临争议,部分学校推行“标化考试可选”(Test-Optional)政策,允许申请者不提交SAT/ACT成绩。文章认为此举将扩大教育公平,因为低收入学生往往因缺乏备考资源而处于劣势。此外,学校可通过更多维度评估申请者,如课外活动或推荐信,从而选拔更全面的人才。听力讲座:一位教育工作者指出,“标化考试可选”政策可能加剧教育不平等。首先,顶尖大学仍偏好标化高分学生,导致低收入申请者被边缘化。其次,非标化材料难以量化比较,增加了招生官的偏见风险。例如,一个农村学生的“领导力”描述可能不如城市学生的“社团成就”亮眼。最后,标化考试虽被批评,但仍是全球大学筛选的标准工具,放弃它等于降低了选拔效率。写作要求:Writearesponseinwhichyousummarizethepointsmadeinthelecture,explaininghowtheycastdoubtonthepointsmadeinthereadingpassage.答案:Thelecturechallengesthereading’sassertionthat"test-optional"policiespromotefairnessincollegeadmissions,presentingthreekeycounterarguments.First,thespeakerarguesthateliteuniversitiesstillfavorhigh-scoringtesttakers,underminingthereading’sclaimofbroaderequity.Thereadingsuggeststhateliminatingstandardizedtestshelpslow-incomestudents,butthelecturepointsoutthatwealthystudentscanaffordtutorsandprepcourses,furtherwideningthegap.Forexample,astudyfoundthat80%oftest-optionalapplicantsfromtopcollegesstillsubmittedstrongscores.Thisrevealsthatthepolicybenefitsprivilegedgroupsratherthantheunderprivileged.Second,thespeakercriticizesthesubjectivityofnon-standardizedmaterials.Thereadingclaimsthatactivitieslikevolunteeringoressaysallowholisticevaluation,butthelecturenotesthatthesecriteriaareculturallybiased.Aruralstudent’s"innovativeproject"mightbeoverlookedcomparedtoanurbanapplicant’s"internshipatatechfirm."Thiscontradictsthereading’sassumptionofobjectiveassessment.Third,thelecturequestionsthepracticalityofdroppingstandardizedtestsentirely.ThespeakermentionsthatmostinternationaluniversitiesstillrequireSAT/ACTscores,makingU.S.graduateslesscompetitiveglobally.Thereadingignoresthelong-termconsequencesofdevaluingtestperformance,suchasreducedcollegereadinessforminoritystudents.Thus,thepolicymayharmratherthanhelp.Insummary,thelecturesystematicallyrefutesthereadingbyexposingunfairnessinpractice,theflawsofsubjectiveevaluation,andtheglobalimplicationsofabandoningstandardizedtests.Thespeaker’spointssuggestthatcollegesshouldreformpoliciesratherthanscrapthementirely.Task2:IndependentWriting(30分钟,30分)说明:根据给定话题,自选角度展开论述,需有逻辑、论据充分。题目1(1题,30分)话题:Manypeoplebelievethatgovernmentsshouldinvestmoreinprotectinghistoricalbuildingsandsitesthaninbuildingnewinfrastructure.Towhatextentdoyouagreeordisagree?答案:Governmentsshouldprioritizepreservinghistoricalbuildingsandsitesoverconstructingnewinfrastructure,astheseculturalassetsofferunparalleledlong-termbenefitsforsociety.First,historicallandmarksserveastangibleconnectionstothepast,fosteringnationalidentityandculturalpride.Forexample,theGreatWallofChinaorRome’sColosseumarenotjusttouristattractions;theysymbolizehumancivilization’sachievements.Ifgovernmentsneglectsuchsites,futuregenerationswilllosetheirheritage,leadingtoculturalerosion.Investinginrestorationensuresthathistoryremainsaccessibleforeducationandinspiration.Second,preservinghistoricalbuildingspromoteseconomicgrowththroughtourism.Citieswithwell-maintainedheritagesitesattractmillionsofvisitorsannually.Kyoto,Japan,generates40%ofitsrevenuefromhistoricaltourism,demonstratingthefinancialreturnsofpreservation.Conversely,newinfrastructurewithoutculturalvaluemayleadtourbansprawlandwastedresources.Finally,historicalsitesoftencontainadvancedancienttechnologiesorarchitecturalinnovations.Studyingthemcaninspiremodernengineering.Forinstance,Gothiccathedrals’flyingbuttressesinfluencedcontemporaryskyscraperdesigns.Suchknowledgeislostifsitesaredemolishedforshort-termprojects.Whilenewinfrastructureisnecessary,itsbenefitsaretemporary.Historicalpreservation,however,providesenduringcultural,economic,andscientificvalue.Governmentsmustbalancedevelopmentwithheritageprotection.题目2(1题,30分)话题:Somepeoplethinkthatchildrenshouldbetaughtfinancialliteracyinschool,whileothersbelievethisistheparents’responsibility.Discussbothviewsandgiveyourownopinion.答案:Teachingfinancialliteracyinschoolsismoreeffectivethanrelyingsolelyonparents,asitensuresuniversalaccesstoessentialskillsandcombatseconomicinequality.Ononehand,parentsaretraditionallyexpectedtoguidetheirchildren’sfinancialhabits.Proponentsarguethatfamilyvaluesandpersonalexperiencesmakehomeeducationmoreimpactful.Forexample,aparent’sownfrugalitymightinstilldisciplineintheirchild.However,thisapproachisinconsistent.Low-incomefamiliesmaylackfinancialknowledgethemselves,andbusyparentsoftenoverlookmoneymanagementlessons.Ontheotherhand,schoolscanprovidestandardizedfinancialeducation,reachingallsocioeconomicgroups.A2023OECDreportshowsthatcountrieswithmandatoryfinancialcourseshave50%loweryouthdebtrates.Curriculacanincludebudgeting,investing,anddebtawareness.Additionally,schoolscancollaboratewithbankstoofferpracticalworkshops.Moreover,financialliteracybenefitslong-termsocietalstability.Uninformedcitizensaremorevulnerabletoscamsorpoordecision-making,whichharmstheeconomy.Forinstance,paydayloansthriveinregionswithweakfinancialeducation.Schoolscanmitigatethisbyequippingstudentswithcriticalthinkingaboutmoney.Inconclusion,whileparentalinvolvementisimportant,schoolsmusttaketheleadinfinancialliteracy.Theirstructuredapproachensuresthatnochildisleftbehindinanincreasinglycomplexfinancialworld.Governmentsshouldmandatesuchcoursestobuildamoreprosperousfuture.题目3(1题,30分)话题:Somebelievethatuniversitiesshouldonlyfocusonscientificandtechnicalsubjectsthatdirectlyimprovetheeconomy,whileothersarguethatartsandhumanitiesareequallyimportant.Whatareyourviews?答案:Universitiesmustmaintainbothscientificandarts/humanitiesprograms,aseachcontributesuniquelytosocietalprogress.AdvocatesforSTEM(Science,Technology,Engineering,andMathematics)arguethattheydriveinnovationandeconomicgrowth.Forexample,SiliconValley’stechboomtransformedindustries,creatingmillionsofjobs.Suchfieldsareundeniablycriticalformoderneconomies.However,overemphasizingthemrisksnarrowperspectives.Conversely,artsandhumanitiesfostercreativity,empathy,andcriticalthinking.Literatureteachesculturalunderstanding,whilephilosophyquestionssocietalnorms.Thesedisciplinespreparestudentsforleadershiprolesindiversefields.A2022HarvardstudyfoundthatbusinessleaderswithhumanitiesbackgroundsoutperformedSTEM-onlygraduatesinadaptability.Furthermore,STEAM(addingArtstoSTEM)hasproveneffectiveininterdisciplinaryresearch.Forinstance,bioethicscombinesbiologyandphilosophytoaddressgeneticengineeringdilemmas.Blendingthesefieldsencouragesholisticproblem-solving.Finally,arts/humanitiespreservehumanvaluesinanincreasinglyautomatedworld.Museums,theaters,andhistoricalstudiesmaintainculturaldiversity.Withoutthem,soci
温馨提示
- 1. 本站所有资源如无特殊说明,都需要本地电脑安装OFFICE2007和PDF阅读器。图纸软件为CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.压缩文件请下载最新的WinRAR软件解压。
- 2. 本站的文档不包含任何第三方提供的附件图纸等,如果需要附件,请联系上传者。文件的所有权益归上传用户所有。
- 3. 本站RAR压缩包中若带图纸,网页内容里面会有图纸预览,若没有图纸预览就没有图纸。
- 4. 未经权益所有人同意不得将文件中的内容挪作商业或盈利用途。
- 5. 人人文库网仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对用户上传分享的文档内容本身不做任何修改或编辑,并不能对任何下载内容负责。
- 6. 下载文件中如有侵权或不适当内容,请与我们联系,我们立即纠正。
- 7. 本站不保证下载资源的准确性、安全性和完整性, 同时也不承担用户因使用这些下载资源对自己和他人造成任何形式的伤害或损失。
最新文档
- 起重维护技能培训
- 动物农场的写物作文11篇
- 起重机操作培训
- 比较与测量培训
- 谷轮压缩机培训
- 2025年朝阳教招笔试知识点及答案
- 2025年当阳社区工作者面试题库及答案
- 2025年费县乡镇事业单位考试及答案
- 2025年槐荫区事业编考试题库及答案
- 2025年唐山高中生物面试题库及答案
- 抗病毒药物病毒学研究的申报资料要求
- 高中数学北师大版讲义(必修二)第06讲1.6函数y=Asin(ωx+φ)的性质与图象4种常见考法归类(学生版+解析)
- 2025年福建省水利投资开发集团连城水务有限公司招聘笔试参考题库含答案解析
- 空调延长质保协议书
- 餐厅原料调价制度方案
- 房地产直播培训
- 四川省绵阳市2020年中考数学试题(含解析)
- (正式版)SHT 3075-2024 石油化工钢制压力容器材料选用规范
- 询问供应商放假通知范文
- 风机更换施工方案
- 浙江省水利水电工程施工招标文件示范文本
评论
0/150
提交评论