2026年托福英语考试写作练习题

2026年托福英语考试写作练习题Task1:IntegratedWriting(30分钟，综合写作，30分)本部分包含一篇学术文章和一段讲座，要求考生根据文章和讲座的内容，写作一篇总结并对比分析的文章。共2题。题目1(15分):背景:近年来，中国部分高校推行“双一流”建设计划，旨在提升国际学术竞争力。某篇学术文章讨论了该计划实施后的积极影响，如科研经费增加、国际合作项目增多等。然而，在一场关于此话题的讲座中，一位教育专家指出，该计划可能加剧资源分配不均，导致部分非“双一流”院校发展受阻。写作要求:根据学术文章和讲座内容，总结文章的主要观点，并说明讲座中专家提出的反驳或不同意见。答案与解析:答案:TheacademicarticlehighlightsthepositiveimpactsofChina's"DoubleFirst-Class"initiativeonhighereducationinstitutions.Accordingtothearticle,theprogramhasledtoincreasedresearchfunding,moreinternationalcollaborations,andimprovedacademicrankings.Forinstance,universitiesdesignatedas"DoubleFirst-Class"haveseenasignificantriseinoverseaspartnershipsandgrantallocations.ThearticlearguesthatthisinitiativehasstrengthenedChina'spositioninglobalacademiabyfosteringinnovationandattractingtoptalent.However,thelecturepresentsacounterargument.Theexpertsuggeststhattheinitiativemayexacerbateresourceinequality,asadisproportionateshareoffundingandattentionisdirectedtowardaselectfewinstitutions.Thiscouldleaveotheruniversities,particularlythoseoutsidethe"DoubleFirst-Class"list,under-resourcedandlesscompetitive.Theexpertpointstocaseswherenon-designatedschoolshaveexperiencedstagnationinresearchoutputandstudentopportunities.Additionally,thelecturecriticizestherigidevaluationcriteriaoftheprogram,arguingthattheydonotfullyaccountforregionaldisparitiesorspecializedfields.解析:1.文章总结:准确概括学术文章的核心观点，如“双一流”计划带来的资金、合作、排名提升等具体成果。2.讲座反驳:清晰转述讲座中专家的质疑，如资源分配不均、非“双一流”院校发展受限等。3.逻辑衔接:使用过渡词（e.g.,"However,""Forinstance,""Additionally"）自然连接两段内容，体现对比关系。4.细节支撑:引用讲座中的具体例子（如“非设计院校研究产出停滞”）增强说服力。题目2(15分):背景:美国某研究论文探讨了城市绿化对居民心理健康的影响，指出公园和绿植能降低焦虑、提升幸福感。但一位城市规划师在讲座中质疑，在人口密集的城市中，大规模绿化可能因维护成本高、土地有限而难以持续。写作要求:总结研究论文的主要论点，并阐述讲座中提出的挑战或替代方案。答案与解析:答案:Theresearchpaperemphasizesthepsychologicalbenefitsofurbangreenery.Theauthorsarguethataccesstoparksandgreenspacessignificantlyreducesstressandenhancesoverallwell-being.Evidencefromthestudyincludeslowercortisollevelsinresidentsofneighborhoodswithabundantvegetationcomparedtothoseinurbancenterswithminimalgreenareas.Thepaperalsohighlightssocialoutcomes,suchasimprovedcommunitycohesionandreducedcrimeratesingreenerdistricts.Incontrast,thelecturechallengesthefeasibilityoflarge-scaleurbangreening.Thecityplannerpointsoutthatmaintainingextensivegreenspacesisexpensive,requiringregularlandscaping,waterconservationmeasures,andpestcontrol.Moreover,indenselypopulatedcitieslikeNewYorkorTokyo,landscarcitymakesitimpracticaltoallocatelargeplotsforparks.Thespeakerproposesalternativesolutions,suchasverticalgardensonbuildingsorintegratinggreeneryintourbaninfrastructure,whichcouldachievesimilarmentalhealthbenefitsatlowercosts.解析:1.论文观点:概括研究论文的核心论点（绿化对心理健康的积极影响），并提及具体证据（如皮质醇水平变化）。2.讲座挑战:转述城市规划师的质疑（成本高、土地不足），并说明其提出的替代方案（垂直花园、基础设施绿化）。3.论证逻辑:通过"Contrastingly"等词汇对比两方观点，强化分析性。4.实用建议:讲座中的替代方案体现现实性，符合托福写作对解决方案的要求。Task2:IndependentWriting(30分钟，独立写作，30分)本部分要求考生就某一话题发表个人观点，需清晰论证并支持论点。共2题。题目1(30分):背景:近年来，中国部分城市推行“步行友好”政策，如增加人行道、减少汽车道宽度。有人认为这能促进健康生活方式，但也有人担忧会影响商业运营。写作要求:你是否支持城市推广“步行友好”政策？请给出理由。答案与解析:答案:Istronglysupporttheimplementationofpedestrian-friendlypoliciesincities.Theseinitiativesnotonlyenhancepublichealthbutalsofostersustainableurbandevelopment.First,pedestrian-friendlycitiesencouragehealthierlifestyles.Byprioritizingwalking,residentsreducerelianceonmotorvehicles,leadingtolowerobesityratesandimprovedcardiovascularhealth.Forexample,Copenhagen’sextensivebikelanesandpedestrianzoneshavesignificantlydecreasedtraffic-relatedemissionswhilepromotingactivetransportation.Similarly,inChina,citieslikeShanghaihaveseenincreasedwalkingratesinareaswithwidersidewalksandfewertrafficlights,reducingsedentarybehavior.Second,suchpoliciesboostlocaleconomies.Pedestrian-friendlyareasattractmorefoottraffic,benefitingsmallbusinesses,cafes,andretailstores.StudiesshowthatshopownersinLondon’sOxfordStreet,withitswalkablelayout,reporthighersalescomparedtocar-centricdistricts.EveninChinesecities,pedestrianzonesinareaslikeNanjingRoadinShanghaihavebecomepopularfordiningandshopping,generatingrevenueforlocalentrepreneurs.However,criticsarguethatthesepoliciesmayharmbusinessesthatrelyoncartraffic.Whilethisconcernisvalid,citiescanmitigateitbyphasedimplementation,offeringincentivesforbusinessestoadapt(e.g.,subsidiesforaccessibilityimprovements).解析:1.立场明确:开头直接表明支持立场，并给出总论点（健康与经济双重效益）。2.分论点展开:-健康:引用国际案例（哥本哈根）和中国数据（上海步行率），结合具体效益（减排放、促健康）。-经济:用伦敦案例佐证商业收益，并联系中国实际（南京路）。3.反驳与平衡:承认潜在问题（影响汽车相关企业），并提出解决方案（分阶段实施、政策补贴），体现辩证思考。4.语言连贯:使用"First,""Second,""However"等逻辑词串联段落，确保论证流畅。题目2(30分):背景:随着科技发展，部分学校允许学生在课堂上使用电子设备（如平板电脑、手机）。有人认为这能提升学习效率，但也有人担心会分散注意力。写作要求:在课堂使用电子设备利大于弊吗？请说明理由。答案与解析:答案:Theintegrationofelectronicdevicesinclassroomspresentsmoreadvantagesthandisadvantages,providedthereareproperguidelines.Thesetoolsenhancemoderneducationbyprovidingimmediateaccesstoinformationandinteractivelearningopportunities.Ontheonehand,electronicdevicesimprovelearningefficiency.Studentscanresearchtopicsinreal-timeduringlessons,accessdigitaltextbookswithmultimediacontent,anduseeducationalappsforpersonalizedpractice.Forinstance,inJapan’s"FutureSchools,"tabletshavereplacedtraditionalnotebooks,allowingstudentstocollaborateonprojectsviacloudplatforms.Thisapproachnotonlysavespaperbutalsocaterstovisualanddigitallearners.Ontheotherhand,criticshighlighttheriskofdistraction.Withoutstrictrules,studentsmightmisusedevicesforsocialmediaornon-educationalpurposes.However,thisissueismanageablethroughclassroompolicies.Teacherscanenforce"device-freezones"duringlecturesorassigntas