版权说明:本文档由用户提供并上传,收益归属内容提供方,若内容存在侵权,请进行举报或认领
文档简介
CBAM:MARKET-BASEDORMARKETBUST?
CatherineMcBride
TheGlobalWarmingPolicyFoundation
Report64
CBAM:Market-basedorMarketBust?
CatherineMcBrideReport64
©Copyright2026,TheGlobalWarmingPolicyFoundation
Contents
Abouttheauthoriii
Executivesummary1
Introduction2
1.Whatareexternalities?2
2.Commonsolutionstonegativeexternalities2
3.Marketsolutionstonegativeexternalities7
4.Emissionstradingschemesarenotmarketsolutions8
5.Carbonemissiontariffs—CBAM11
6.TheUK’sCBAMversustheEU’sCBAM25
7.AlternativestoCBAM28
8.Conclusions30
Notes33
AbouttheGlobalWarmingPolicyFoundation38
Abouttheauthor
CatherineMcBrideOBEistheCEOoftheGreatBritishBusinessCouncil.Aneconomistspecialis-ingintrade,sherecentlyservedontheUK’sTradeandAgricultureCommission.Beforethis,sheworkedforvariousthinktanks,writingonUKtradepolicyandfinancialservicesregulation,afteracareertradingcommodityderivativesintheCityofLondonforsomeoftheworld’slargestbanksandcommodityhouses.Catherinewasaco-authoroftheInstituteforFreeTrade’spaper:AnEco-nomicallySustainableGlobalClimateAccord.
iii
1
Executivesummary
•Carbontaxes,emissiontradingschemesandCarbonBorderAd-justmentMechanisms(CBAMs)arepresentedastoolsforreduc-ingemissions,butinpracticetheyoftenbecomerevenue-raisingmeasuresthatraisecostswithouteliminatingtheexternality.
•TheUK’sexperiencewithfuelduty,theClimateChangeLevy,theUKEmissionsTradingScheme(ETS)andCarbonPriceSupportshowshowenvironmentaltaxescanbecomeembeddedingov-ernmentfinanceswhileweakeningdomesticindustry.
•Despiteitsname,theUKETSisnotagenuine‘marketsolution’.Thegovernmentcontrolsthesupplyofallowances,manufacturersareforcedtobuythem,andfirmsthatremoveCO₂fromtheatmos-pherecannotsellreductionsintothescheme.
•ThesepolicieshaveincreasedUKproductioncosts,encouragedoffshoringandshiftedemissionsoverseasratherthanreducingthemglobally.Theresultisdeindustrialisation,higherimportsandweakercompetitiveness.
•TheproposedUKCBAMwillnotreversethis.Itisaimedatfiveimportedmaterials:aluminium,cement,fertiliser,hydrogenandferrousmetals.Butforaluminium,steelandfertilisers,muchdo-mesticproductionhasalreadyclosedormovedabroad.AddingaCBAMnowsimplyraisescostsfordownstreammanufacturers.
•Italsofailstosolvethelargerunderlyingproblemsfacedbymanu-facturingbusinesses:expensiveindustrialenergypricesandhighregulatoryburdens.
•Ifcarbontaxesremain,theyshouldaccountforproductlifespan.Long-livedmaterialsusedinaircraft,buildingsorinfrastructureshouldnotfacethesameeffectivechargeasshorter-livedprod-ucts.
•Abetterapproachinvolvesreducingthecostofinvestmentincleaner,moreefficientplantandequipmentsothatreductionsingreenhousegasemissionsbecomeahappyside-effectofeco-nomicgrowth.ProposalsforaGlobalClimateandFreedomAccord(CFA)showhowthiscouldbedoneinpracticethroughpoliciessuchastaxdeductionsforlowemissonsequipmentandRapidIn-novationFunds.
•Thecentralpolicychoiceiswhethertoprotectinefficientdomesticproductionwithbordertaxes,ortomakeUKproductionmoreef-ficient,competitiveandinvestable.Thelatterwouldreduceemis-sions,raiseproductivityandbettersupporteconomicgrowth
•Itwillalwaysbeinamanufacturer’sinteresttooperateasefficientlyaspossible.CementinginplaceinefficientmethodsbyprotectingthemwithemissionsbasedtariffswillnotboostUKproductivityor
UKGDP.
2
Introduction
Thispaperdiscussesexternalitiesandthegov-ernmentpoliciesusedtomitigatethem.ItreviewstheUK’scurrentCBAMproposal,thepreviousgovernment’sproposals,andtheEU’sCBAM.ItanalysestheindustriescoveredbytheproposedCBAManddiscussesmoreeffec-tivefree-marketsolutionstoreduceindustrialGHGemissionswhileimprovingproductivitythroughinnovationandloweringCAPEXcosts.
ThispaperdoesnotquestionwhetherCO₂isbeneficialordetrimentaltotheenvironment.Instead,itexamineswhethertheUK’sEmissions
TradingScheme(ETS)andproposedCarbonBorderAdjustmentMechanism(CBAM)repre-sentacost-effectivewayofreducingemissionsoriftherearebetteralternatives.
Mosteconomistsagreethatnegativeexter-nalitiesshouldbereducedbutdisagreeonhowtodosoeffectively.Thereiscurrentlyatrendtowardimposingtaxesonthem,butthisrarelydetersthebehaviourthatcausedtheexternal-ity.Instead,thetaxbecomesusefulrevenuestreamforgovernments,whichbecomereliantontheadditionalincome.
1.Whatareexternalities?
Anexternalityoccurswhenamarkettransac-tionaffectspeopleorcommunitieswhoarenotpartiestothetransaction.Externalitiescanbepositiveornegative,andasingleexternalitymaybepositiveforsomepeople,butnegativeforothers.
Forexample,apositiveexternalitycouldbetheeradicationofadiseaseaftermostofthepopulationhasbeenvaccinatedagainstit.Anegativeexternalitycouldbefactorypollutionenteringariver,whichpreventslivestockfromusingthewaterdownstream.Orachildeatingtoomanysweets,sothestatemustpayfortheirdentalcare.Thechildenjoyedthesweets,thesweetcompanymademoney,butthestatewasleftwiththebillfortheexternality—cavities.
Externalitiescanflipfromnegativetopositive.Whenaneighbouringhouseisbeingrenovated,theneighbourssufferthenegativeexternalityofconstructionnoiseandtrafficdis-ruption,buttheymayalsobenefitfromaposi-tiveexternalitywhenthehouseisfinished,iftherenovationincreaseshousevaluesonthe
restofthestreet.
Similarly,theconstructionofanewairport,togetherwithahighwayortrainlineforairpas-sengerstoreachanddepartthecity,wouldhaveapositiveexternalityforpeoplelivingnearthehighwayortrainline,astheywouldbenefitfromimprovedconnectionstothecitycentre.However,peoplelivingundertheflightpathofthenewairportwouldsufferanegativeexternality:increasednoisepollution.Whetheranexternalityispositiveornegativeoftende-pendsontheattitudesofthepartiesinvolved.
Whilepeoplerarelycomplainaboutposi-tiveexternalitiesandoftentakethemforgrant-edwithoutrealisingtheyareawindfallfromsomeoneelse’seffortortransaction,negativeexternalitiesarerarelyacceptedaspartoflife.Negativeexternalitiesgenerallycreateacaseforthegovernmenttoeitherregulatetheac-tivity,taxittomakeitmoreexpensive,orusealternativemethodstopreventitfromcausingthenegativeexternality.
2.Commonsolutionstonegativeexternalities
Taxes
IntheUK,therearemanyexamplesoftaxingac-tivitiestoreduceexternalities.Forexample,tax-ingdriverswhodriveintocentralLondontodis-couragetrafficcongestionortaxingcigarettestolowerhealthcarecosts.Toreducecarbondioxideemissions,carbontaxeshavebeenap-pliedtoelectricityproduction.Theideaisthat
bymakingelectricitymoreexpensive,peoplewilluselessofitandgreenhousegasemissionsfromelectricityproductionwillbelower.
Atleastthatisthetheory.
InApril2001,theUKintroducedtheCli-mateChangeLevy(CCL)onbusinessesforgasandelectricityconsumptiononaper-kWhba-sis.1ThiswassupposedlytoreduceCO₂emis-
3
sionsandencourageUKbusinessestouselessenergyandbecomemoreefficient.TheEUsubsequentlyintroducedtheEmissionsTradingScheme(ETS)in2005,andthentheUKaddeditsCarbonPriceSupport(CPS)carbonemissiontaxin2013.AllweremeanttocurbindustrialCO₂emissions.However,energyisessentialforindustry.So,whileUKemissionshavehalvedsince1990,themanufacturingshareoftheUKeconomyhastoo.
Weshouldn’tbesurprisedbythisresult.Taxesonexternalitiesgenerallydon’tworkandendupservingonlyasasourceofgovernmentrevenue.TheFuelDutyEscalator,introducedin1993,wasexplicitlylinkedtoenvironmentalgoals.YetfueldutyhasbecomesoimportanttoHMRCrevenuesthat,asEVadoptiongrowsandfueldutyreceiptsdecline,thegovernmentisintroducingapay-per-mileroadtaxtoreplacethelostincome.Althoughtheescalator’spur-posewastoencourageashiftfromICEvehiclestoEVs,thetaxburdenisbeingretainedunderadifferentnamebecausetherevenuehasbe-comeindispensabletogovernmentfinances.
TheUKmandateforallnewcarpurchasestobeEVsby20352,3hasbeensosuccessfulthatthegovernmentnowneedstoreplaceitsFuelDutyrevenuewithanewmileage-basedtaxforelectricvehiclesandplug-inhybrids,theElectricVehicleExciseDuty(eVED).ThedutywillstartinApril2028andwillbepricedat3ppermileforEVsand1.5ppermileforplug-inHybrids,andtheOBRexpectsittoraise£1.1billioninitsfirstyearofoperation.4TheOBRalsoexpectsthenewtaxtoreduceEVsalesby440,0005vehiclesby2031.Ironically,thetaxdesignedtodiscour-ageICEvehiclesandpromoteEVuseisnowbe-ingreplacedbyanewtaxthatispredictedtodiscourageEVuse.
Someenvironmentaltaxesintroducedtodiscourageactivitiesthatproducenegativeex-ternalitieshaveoftengeneratedtheirownex-ternalitieswhenpeopleavoidpayingthem.Forexample,fly-tippingisendemicintheUKduetothecostsandregulationsassociatedwithlegallydisposingofconstructionwasteandotherunwantedhouseholditems.6Therewere1.15millionfly-tippingincidentsinEnglandin2023/24,up6%fromtheyearbefore,costinglo-calcouncilsover£13.1milliontoclear.7
Prohibitions
Ifthegoalistoremoveanegativeexternality,prohibitionsaremoreeffectivethantaxeswhenrigorouslyenforced.Someexamplesincludethebanonleadedpetrol,thebanonsmokinginenclosedpublicplaces,andthebanonchildlabour.However,thisimposesacostonthegovernment,whichmustenforcethebanbutreceivesnofinancialbenefitunlesssubstantialfinesareimposedforviolations.Thus,thegov-ernmenttendstoprefertaxestoprohibitions.Governmentsgenerallyprefertherevenuestreamandpoliticalgainfrom‘virtuous’taxa-tionratherthanthecostofenforcingregula-tions,eventhoughprohibitionseliminatetheexternality.
Regulations
Regulationssometimesworkif,likeprohibi-tions,theyareproperlyenforced.Forexample,theU.S.EnvironmentalProtectionAgencyintro-ducedgreenhousegasemissionsstandardsforpassengervehiclesandlighttrucksformodelsmanufacturedfrom2023to2026.Theemis-sionsstandardsreduceeachyearfrom202gofCO₂/milein2023to161gofCO₂/milein2026.8Theseareexpectedtoprevent3billiontonsofGHGemissionsby2050ifthelimitsaremet.
Similarly,theAmericanInnovationandManufacturingActof2020requiresan85%re-ductionintheuseofhydrofluorocarbons(HFCs)by2036.9HFCsareusedinrefrigeration,aircon-ditioning,aerosols,firesuppressionandsemi-conductormanufacturing.HFCsweredevel-opedasareplacementforCFCs,whichhadtheunfortunateexternalityofdepletingtheOzonelayer.However,HFCsaresyntheticgreenhousegaseswithhighglobalwarmingpotential.Thus,thesolutiontooneexternalitynowproducesanotherandneedstobephasedout.
Promotingalternativegoodsorpro-cesses
Anothermethodofreducingnegativeexter-nalitiesistopromoteorsubsidisealternativeactivitiessothattheybecomepreferabletotheactivitythatproducesthenegativeexternality.
Obviousexamplesincludethesubsidiesavailableforsolarpanelsandwindturbines,whichreducethecosttothegeneratorofpro-
4
5
ducingrenewableelectricity,therebymakingitmorecompetitivewithdispatchablepowerfromgasorcoal.Thisonlyencouragesoff-gridconsumerstoswitchtorenewablepoweriftheyhaveachoicebetweenthetwo.However,mostUKconsumersdon’thavethischoice,asthepowerfromallsourcesis‘mixed’onthenationalgrid.
TheUKalsosubsidisesbyupto£3,750thepurchaseofnewEVs(pricedunder£37,000),10andofferspreferentialcompanycartaxratesandotherdiscounts,includingreducedconges-tionchargesandparkingfeesforEVs.11TheseincentivesaredesignedtomakedrivinganEVcheaperthananICEvehicle.However,ifelec-tricityismoreexpensivethanpetrol,orifpeoplelackoff-streetparkingoraccesstofastchargingfacilities,thefinancialincentivetoswitchtoanEVmaynotbelargeenoughtoencourageachangeinconsumerbehaviour.
Licences,allowancesandcarbontariffs
Inthecaseofgreenhousegasemissions,severalcountrieshaveadoptedasuperficially‘market-based’systeminwhichcompanieswithhighCO₂emissionscanbuypermitsfortheiremis-sions,effectivelyalicencetopollute.Inatruemarket,theseemissionpermitswouldbesoldonlybyindividualsorcompaniesthatownbusi-nessesorlandthatsequestercarbondioxide.
IntheUKandEU’sEmissionsTradingSys-tems(ETSs),therespectivegovernmentscre-atethedemandforemissionsallowancesandcontroltheirsupply.Byreducingthenumberofallowancesavailable,theyaimtoincreasecarbonpricesovertime.Theyalsograntfreeal-lowancestoselectedindustriestoprotectthemfromhighercostsandreducetheriskofproduc-tionmovingabroad.Despitetheseprotections,manybusinesseshaverelocatedmanufacturingtocountrieswithoutcarbontaxes,wheretheyoftenbenefitfromlowerlabourcostsandlessstringentenvironmentalregulations.
TheUKhasfurtherincreasedenergycostsbyimposingadditionalcarbontaxesonelec-tricitygeneration.BusinessesmustpayClimateChangeLeviesandpurchaseETSallowances,whileelectricitypricesalsoreflecttheCarbonPriceSupport(CPS),ataxintroducedin2013onelectricitygeneratedfromfossilfuels.TheCPSwasintendedtoacceleratethephase-outof
coalbyguaranteeingaminimumcarbonpriceforpowergenerators.AlthoughtheUK’slastcoal-firedpowerstationclosedin2024,thetaxremainsinplaceandisscheduledtocontinueuntilApril2028.12TheadditionalburdenpushesUKelectricitypriceshigherthanmostotherEUcountries.
Theoffshoringofmanufacturingtocar-bon-tax-freecountriesisknownascarbonleak-age.Tocombatthis‘carbonleakage’,theEUhasintroducedanewtariffonimportedmaterialsproducedwithhighGHGemissions.ThistariffiscalledtheCarbonBorderAdjustmentMecha-nism(CBAM).
TheUKGovernmentalsoproposestointro-duceaCBAMfromJanuary2027,andtheLabourgovernmenthaverecentlypublishedapolicyupdateoftheConservativegovernment’spro-posedCBAM.13BoththepresentLabourandtheformerConservativegovernmentsbelievethataCBAMonimportswouldprotectUKindustrieswithhighCO₂emissions.TheseindustriesmustpurchaseemissionallowancesontheUK’sETSmarketbutalsocompetewithimportedgoodsproducedincountrieswithoutcarbontaxes.14WhilethecurrentLabourGovernmenthasalsoproposedthattheUKshouldjointheEU’sETSandCBAM,whichwillbediscussedinmorede-tailinChapter5.15,16
Promotinginvestmentinefficientequipmentandinnovation
Themosteffectivemethodofreducinganex-ternalityistoencouragethedevelopmentofin-novationsthateliminateitandtoencouragein-dustriesandmanufacturerstoadoptthem.Thisisanotherwayofreducingexternalities,butitistheoppositeoftaxingemissions,whichre-ducesthemoneyavailabletomanufacturersforinvestmentinresearchanddevelopmentandnewequipment.Studiesshowthatcompetitivemarketsdecarbonisefasterthanregulatedmar-ketsbecausetheymakeiteasier,cheaper,andfasterforcompetitorstodeployinnovations.
Forexample,theaverageinternalcombus-tionenginecarin2025ismorethantwiceasfuel-efficientasonein1975.Theaveragefuelefficiencyofa1975carwasjust13milespergal-lon(mpg),butitisnow28mpg.17Thisfigurein-cludescars,SUVsandpickups.ThemodernICE
6
caralsoproduces95%lessCO,90%lessNOx,99%fewerhydrocarbonsand99%fewerpar-ticulatesthana1975car.EncouragingdriverstoupgradetothelatestICEvehicleswouldsig-nificantlyreducefuelconsumptionandharmfulemissions,andmaywellbeaneasier‘sell’thanEVmandates,whichforcedriversandcompanyfleetstoconverttoEVs.ForcedconversiontoEVsisespeciallydifficultifdriversregularlytrav-ellongdistancesordon’thaveoff-streetpark-ingandeasyaccesstocheap,fastcharging.
EncouragingupgradestomodernICEcarshastheaddedbenefitofnotplacingexcessivestrainontheUK’selectricitygrid.TherecentweekofrecordtemperaturesinJune2026forcedtheUKtoincreaseitsgaselectricitygen-erationtocopewithincreasedairconditioninguse,partiallyoffsettingtheCO₂reductionfromdriversconvertingtoEVs.IfallUKdrivershadconvertedtoEVsovernightthecountrywouldhavebeenbroughttoastandstill.FuelefficientICEcarswouldnotputthisadditionalpressureontheelectricitygrid.Tocopewiththeextrademand,NESOwasforcedtopay20timesthepriceforimportedelectricitythanitpaidinJune2025.18
Similarly,industrialmachinery,plant,andequipmenthavebecomemorefuel-efficientandsafer,andproducefeweremissions.Inno-vationdrivesenergyefficiency,whichlowerscostsandserendipitouslylowersemissions.Re-ducingbusinesscostsiskeytobothimprovingcompetitivenessandacceleratinginnovation.
Onewaytoencouragethisisbytaxde-ductionsortaxratecutsforinvestmentsinthelatest,mostefficientplantandequipment,acceleratinginnovationanddecarbonisationsimultaneously.MuchoftheUK’slackofindus-trialcompetitivenessstemsfromitsoutdatedfactories,oldblastfurnaces,smelters,refineries,andpowerplants.HighcarbontaxesandhighindustrialelectricityandfuelcostshaveleftUKcompanieswithinsufficientcashflowtoinvestinupgrades;replacingthetaxeswithtaxratecutsfornewequipmentinvestmentswouldre-duceemissionswhileboostingGDP.
Itwillalwaysbeinamanufacturer’sinter-esttooperateasefficientlyaspossible.Anditwillalwaysbeinacountry’sinteresttohaveef-ficientindustries.
Encouraginginnovationandinvestmentin
new,moreefficientplantandequipmentisaneffectivewaytoloweremissionsandislikelytoyieldbetterresultsthanprotectinginefficientequipmentandproductionmethodswithcar-bontariffsonimportedmaterials.Especiallycarbontaxesonimportedmaterialsthatarenecessaryinputsusedbydownstreamindus-tries.
Investmentinnewplantandequipmentcanbefurtherenhancedbyofferinginvestorstax-freereturnsoninvestmentfundsspecifi-callyusedtolendmoneytocompaniesinvest-inginnewplantandequipmentortofinanceresearchanddevelopment.Someofthesepro-grams,suchasRapidInnovationFunds,aredis-cussedindetailinChapter7.
Balancingeconomicactivityandexternalitysolutions
Apartfromcompleteprohibition,themethodsofdealingwithexternalitieslistedabovedon’tpreventexternalitiesfromoccurring,althoughsomereducethem.However,unlessanalter-nativeprocessormethodisreadilyavailable,prohibitionwouldalsopreventconsumersfrombenefitingfromtheactivity,therebycre-atinganotherexternality.Examplesofeffectiveprohibitions:banningleadedpetrol,smokingindoors,andchildlabourallworkedbecauseeffectivealternativeswereavailable:unleadedpetrol,smokingoutdoors,andmechanisedpro-duction.
However,thegovernmentcannotprohibitallCO₂emissions,asthiswouldprohibit:mostmanufacturingindustries;34%ofUKelectricityproduction;78%ofUKdomesticheating;80%ofUKcars;96%ofUKvans;99%ofUKtrucks;andalmostallnitrogen-basedfertilisers.So,thenegativeexternalitytotheUKpopulationoflostgoodsandservicesandlostjobsandincomeswouldbeimmense,farexceedingthecostoftheexternality.ThisiswhyreducingCO₂emissionshasbeensodifficult.
Theeconomycannotfunctionwithouthydrocarbon-basedenergy,manufacturing,foodproduction,transport,andheating;there-fore,wecannotsimplybangreenhousegasemissions.Buttaxingemissionsandemissionstradingschemeshaven’tworkedeither.Atleasttheyhaven’tworkediftheintentionwas
7
tolowerglobalemissions(seeGraph1,below),buttheyhavepushedupUKpricesofenergy,manufacturedgoods,foodproduction,trans-port,andheating,andhavehelpedindustrialiseChinaandotherdevelopingAsianeconomies.Althoughunintended,thedevelopmentandrisingincomesinAsiancountrieshavedonemore‘good’thancuttingCO2emissionswouldhaveachieved.
Unfortunately,muchofthepurportedemis-sionsreductionhasmerelyshiftedemissionsfromthedevelopedworldtothelessdevelopedworld,asisevidentinFigure1below.Therehasalsobeenconsiderablegreenwashing,withcompaniesindevelopedcountriespurchasing‘carboncredits’frompurportedownersoffic-tionalforestsinSouthAmerica.
40
BilliontonnesofCO₂
30
20
10
0
1750180018501900195020002024
InternationalaviationAsia(excl.ChinaandIndia)AfricaUnitedStates
InternationalshippingChinaSouthAmericaEuropeanUnion(27)
OceaniaIndiaNorthAmerica(excl.USA)Europe(excl.EU)
Figure1:GlobalCO₂emissions
Source:OurWorldinData.
3.Marketsolutionstonegativeexternalities
Pseudo-marketversusgenuinemarketsolutions
Iflow-emissiontechnologiesbecomecheaper,moreproductive,andmorereliablethanexist-ingalternatives,businessesandconsumerswilladoptthemvoluntarily.Theprincipalpolicyob-jectiveshouldthereforebetoreducethecostofinnovationandinvestmentwhileincreasingtherewardsforsuccessfulemissions-reducingtechnologies.
Broadlydefined,‘market-based’policies
includemanycoerciveinstrumentswhichusepseudo-marketmechanismstopursuegov-ernment-definedobjectives.Forexample,anemissionstradingscheme(ETS)inwhichthegovernmentcreatesdemandforemissional-lowancesthroughregulationandcontrolsthesupplyofallowancesissued,therebyinfluenc-ingtheprice.
Agenuinefree-marketsolution,bycon-trast,seekstoreduceexternalitiesbystrength-eningpropertyrights,encouraginginnovation,allowingpricestoreflectrealcostsandbenefits,
8
promotingvoluntaryexchange,andremov-ingbarrierstoinvestmentandtechnologicaldevelopment.Ratherthanforcingbehaviouralchange,free-marketapproachesfocusoncreat-ingtheconditionsinwhichcleanerandmoreefficienttechnologiesemergebecausetheyareeconomicallysuperior.
Thisperspectiveseessustainableenviron-mentalimprovementsasbeingmostlikelytocomefrominnovation,economicgrowth,andcapitalinvestmentratherthanfromcoerciverestrictionsonproductionandconsumption.Inshort,itholdsthatcompetitionandinnovation,ratherthancoercion,arethebestwaytoloweremissions.
Analternativeframeworktoreduceemissions
TheClimateandFreedomAccord(CFA)propos-alasoutlinedbytheInstituteforFreeTrade19providesanalternativeframeworkforreducingmarketdistortionsaswellasemissionsthroughfree-marketprinciples.Itarguesthatconven-tionalclimatepoliciessuchasemissionstradingschemesandrenewableenergysubsidieshavedistortedinternationalmarketsbyincreasingcostsfordomesticproducers,reducingtheirinternationalcompetitiveness,encouragingtheoffshoringofproduction,andshiftingemis-sionsgeographicallyratherthansignificantlyreducingglobalemissions.
TheCFAframeworkenvisagesthedevelop-mentofasystemofpositiveincentivesdesignedtoaccelerateinnovationandinvestment.Inthisway,reductionsofGHGemissionsbecomeahappyside-effectofgrowth,ratherthansome-thingthathastobetradedoffagainstmodernlifestylesasiscurrentlybeingproposedbythe
UKgovernment.
Tradeliberalisationandinternationalco-operation
Climatepolicyhasincreasinglybecomeassoci-atedwithtraderestrictions,carbontariffs,andborderadjustmentmeasures.Suchpoliciesre-ducecompetitiveness,raiseconsumerprices,andimpedethespreadofnewtechnologies.TheEUhasaddedcarbonemissionsallowanc-estomaritimetransport,whichhasincreasedcostsformostimportedgoods;thisisi
温馨提示
- 1. 本站所有资源如无特殊说明,都需要本地电脑安装OFFICE2007和PDF阅读器。图纸软件为CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.压缩文件请下载最新的WinRAR软件解压。
- 2. 本站的文档不包含任何第三方提供的附件图纸等,如果需要附件,请联系上传者。文件的所有权益归上传用户所有。
- 3. 本站RAR压缩包中若带图纸,网页内容里面会有图纸预览,若没有图纸预览就没有图纸。
- 4. 未经权益所有人同意不得将文件中的内容挪作商业或盈利用途。
- 5. 人人文库网仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对用户上传分享的文档内容本身不做任何修改或编辑,并不能对任何下载内容负责。
- 6. 下载文件中如有侵权或不适当内容,请与我们联系,我们立即纠正。
- 7. 本站不保证下载资源的准确性、安全性和完整性, 同时也不承担用户因使用这些下载资源对自己和他人造成任何形式的伤害或损失。
最新文档
- 综合配电箱(JP 柜)性能评价报告示例
- 多媒体技术在小学音乐教学中的应用-以湘文艺版小学音乐六年级上册《花好月圆》为例
- 绿化种植土回填施工方案
- 2026年十八项医疗核心制度考试题库(含参考答案)
- 综合体项目结构预应力加固施工方案-施工作业指导书
- 卫生院年度工作述职总结
- 会展安全与危机概论
- 变电所安全管理员装卸作业安全操作规程
- 文物保护工程从业资格全真模拟精练(带评分标准)
- 烧伤烫伤我会防安全
- 重庆石柱县2026年专职社区工作者与后备人员招聘考试试卷-含答案解析
- 广东深圳市2025-2026学年高一下学期7月期末考试生物试卷
- 2026年湖南省中考数学真题
- 贝恩 -2026年中国购物者报告系列一 增长承压中国快消品市场显现新格局 消费者追求“质价比”新渠道争夺战打响 202606
- 2026新版生产安全事故应急预案
- 【高考语文】2026年高考语文试题及答案解析(全国Ⅰ卷)
- 2026年餐厨垃圾处理项目运营成本控制与核算
- 疟疾患者的个案护理
- 射箭动作图解
- 工程土石方作业安全教育培训课件
- 高级经济师《知识产权事务》综合练习4
评论
0/150
提交评论