语言学第六章chapter6_第1页
语言学第六章chapter6_第2页
语言学第六章chapter6_第3页
语言学第六章chapter6_第4页
语言学第六章chapter6_第5页
已阅读5页,还剩61页未读 继续免费阅读

下载本文档

版权说明:本文档由用户提供并上传,收益归属内容提供方,若内容存在侵权,请进行举报或认领

文档简介

Chapter6Pragmatics1

6.1Introduction

6.1.1Background6.1.2Definition

6.2Micropragmatics

6.2.1Reference(指称)6.2.2Dexis(指示)6.2.3Anaphora(照应)6.2.4Presupposition(预设)6.3Macropragmatics

6.3.1Speechacttheory(言语行为理论)6.3.2TheCooperativePrinciple(合作原则)6.3.3ThePolitenessPrinciple(礼貌原则)26.1IntroductionWhenadiplomatsaysyes,hemeans‘perhaps’;Whenhesaysperhaps,hemeans‘no’;Whenhesaysno,heisnotadiplomat.Whenaladysaysno,shemeans‘perhaps’;Whenshesaysperhaps,shemeans‘yes’;Whenshesaysyes,sheisnotalady.Voltaire(Quoted,inSpanish,inEscandell1993.)

speaker’smeaning/languageinuse34567大家应该也有点累了,稍作休息大家有疑问的,可以询问和交流8Amelamed[/mə‘lɑ:məd/,小学教师,Hebrewteacher]discoveringthathehadlefthiscomfortableslippersbackinthehouse,sentastudentafterthemwithanoteforhiswife.Thenotereads:`Sendmeyourslipperswiththisboy`.Whenthestudent

askedwhyhehadwritten`your`slippers,themelamedanswered:`Yold![Fool!]IfIwrote“my”slippers,shewouldread“myslippersandwouldsendherslippers.WhatcouldIdowithherslippers?SoIwrote“your”slippers,she'llread“yourslippersandsendmemine.”9Backgroundof“Pragmatics”

CharlesMorris(1903–1979)wasconcernedwiththestudyofthescienceofsigns,whichhecalledsemiotic.Hedistinguished3branchesofsemiotics(符号三分法):10Syntaxaddressestheformalrelationsofsignstooneanother,semanticstherelationofsignstowhattheydenote,andpragmaticstherelationofsignstotheirusersandinterpreters.11Pragmaticsisthestudyoftherelationshipsbetweenlinguisticformsandtheusersofthoseforms.Inthisthree-partdistinction,onlypragmaticsallowshumansintotheanalysis.12

Definitions1“Pragmaticsisthestudyofspeaker’smeaning.”2“Pragmaticsisthestudyofcontextualmeaning”3“Pragmaticsisthestudyofhowmoregetscommunicatedthanissaid”4“Pragmaticsisthestudyoftheexpressionofrelativedistance.”(Yule:2008).13

Pragmaticsisastudyoflanguageinuse.146.2MicropramaticsIwaswaitingforthebus,buthejustdrovebywithoutstopping.Tostudythemeaningofsuchpiecesoflanguageinsmallercontextsiscalledmicropragmatics.Phenomenasuchasreference,deixis,anaphora,andpresupposition,arethetopicsinthisfield.

156.2.1ReferenceInthereferentialtheory(namingtheory),itisassumedthatthewordsweusetoidentifythingsareinsomedirectrelationshiptothosethings:(1)a:CanIlookatyourShakespeare?b:Sure,it’sontheshelfoverthere.(usenamesofpeopletorefertothings)16Thekeyprocesshereiscalledinference.Aninferenceisanyadditionalinformationusedbythehearertoconnectwhatissaidtowhatmustbemeant.Inpragmatics,theactbywhichaspeakerorwriteruseslanguagetoenableahearerorreadertoidentifysomethingiscalledreference.

176.2.2DeixisDeixis(指示),whichmeans“pointing”vialanguage,theinterpretationofmanywordsandexpressionsbyreferencetothesituationalcontextoftheutterance.Anylinguisticformusedtodothis“pointing”iscalledadeicticexpression,orindexical.

InEnglish,wordslikehere,there,this,that,now,andthen,aswellasmostpronouns,suchasI,we,you,he,her,them.(2)You’llhavetobringthatbacktomorrow,becausetheyaren’there

now.18Fivetypesofdeixis1.Persondeixis:me,you,him,them.2.Timedeixis:now,then,tonight,lastweek.3.Space/spatial/placedeixis:here,there,andyonder.4.Discoursedeixis:temporal/spatialintheprevious/nextparagraph,orHaveyouheardthisjoke?inthischapter.5.Socialdeixis:honorifics(敬语,ProfessorLi);kinshiprelationship(LiJie[李姐]inChinese

)19Amelamed[小学教师,Hebrewteacher]discoveringthathehadlefthiscomfortableslippersbackinthehouse,sentastudentafterthemwithanoteforhiswife.Thenotereads:`Sendmeyourslipperswiththisboy`.Whenthestudent

askedwhyhehadwritten`your`slippers,themelamedanswered:`Yold![Fool!]IfIwrote“my”slippers,shewouldread“myslippersandwouldsendherslippers.WhatcouldIdowithherslippers?SoIwrote“your”slippers,she'llread“yourslippersandsendmemine.”20Anaphora(照应)iscoreferenceofoneexpressionwithitsantecedent.Theantecedentprovidestheinformationnecessaryfortheexpression’sinterpretation.

Thisisoftenunderstoodasanexpression“referring”backtotheantecedent.6.2.3Anaphora21(3)A:CanIborrowyourdictionary?B:Yeah,it’sonthetable.antecedent,anaphororanaphoricexpression.indirectanaphororbridgingreference:(4)Iwalkedintotheroom.Thewindowslookedouttothebay.226.2.4PresuppositionPresupposition

(预设):

Theinformationthataspeakerassumestobealreadyknown.(TheCambridgeEncyclopaediaofLanguage,1987)

(5)Susan’ssisterboughttwohouses.

ThissentencepresupposesthatSusanexistsandthatshehasasister.

23Inanylanguage,therearesomeexpressionsorconstructionswhichcanactasthesourcesofpresuppositions.Thiskindofexpressionsorconstructionsiscalledpresupposition-triggers.

24presupposition-triggers(预设触发语)(>>for“presupposes”):A.Definitivedescriptions(限定性描述)(6)Johnsaw/didn’tseethemanwithtwoheads.>>Thereexistsamanwithtwoheads.B.Factiveverbs(叙述动词)(7)Johnrealized/didn’trealizethathewasindebt.>>Johnwasindebt.C.Changeofstateverbs(状态改变类动词)(8)Joanbegan/didn’tbegintobeatherhusband.>>Joanhadn’tbeenbeatingherhusband.25D.Iteratives(重复)(9)Theflyingsaucercame/didn’tcomeagain.>>Theflyingsaucercamebefore.E.Temporalclauses(时间小句)(10)WhileChomskywasrevolutionizinglinguistics,therestofsocialsciencewas/wasn’tasleep.>>Chomskywasrevolutionizinglinguistics.F.Cleftsentences(分裂句)(11)Itwas/wasn’tHenrythatkissedRosie.>>SomeonekissedRosie.G.Comparisonsandcontrasts(比较与对比)(12)Carolis/isn’tabetterlinguistthanBarbara.>>Barbaraisalinguist.266.3 MacropragmaticsMoreoftenthannot,wedon’tconfineourstudytoindividualutterances,butextendouranalysistolargerpiecesoflanguage,forthesimplereasonthatlanguageuseisanintricateprocess.

27Theresearchontheanalysesoflargerchunksoflanguage,suchasawholeconversation,anarticleorevenachapterofanoveloroneactofaplayintheuserinteractionconcerningthemechanismsbywhichspeakers/writersencodetheirmessageinskilfulwaysandhowhearers/readersarriveattheintendedmeaningsinspiteofthedifferencesbetweentheliteralmeaningandtheintendedmeaningiscalledmacropragmatics.

28Differenttheoriesinmacropragmatics:Speechacttheory(言语行为理论)TheCooperativePrinciple(合作原则)ThePolitenessPrinciple(礼貌原则)Philosophers,intheirsearchforanswerstotheirphilosophicalpuzzles,turnedtolanguagestudies.Theycameupwithseveralapproachestohowlanguageisusedandhowcertainproblemsseemtobeexplainedbylanguageinuse.Theyoftenrefertotheseapproachesasphilosophyoflanguagebutlinguistsprefertocallitpragmatics(macropragmatics).296.3.1SpeechacttheorySpeechacttheorywasproposedbyJ.L.AustinandhasbeendevelopedbyJ.R.Searle.Basically,theybelievethatlanguageisnotonlyusedtoinformortodescribethings,itisoftenusedto“dothings”,toperformacts.Speechacts:actionsperformedviautterances.(13)Youarefired.30J.L.AustinPerformativesandConstativesTrichotomyofSA(三分法)Illocutionaryact(言外行为)311)PerformativesandConstatives

(施为语:“做事”;陈述语:“陈说”)

Iannounceyouhusbandandwife.Ibetyoutendollarsitwillraintomorrow.Ideclarethemeetingopen.Ineedthesalt.Constatives:sentencesthatareusedtostateordescribethings.Performatives:sentencesthatareusedtodothings.Thiskindofsentencescannotbetrueorfalse.32Itisarguedthatevennon-performativesentencesareusedtoperformacts.(14)“It’ssuchafinedaytoday.”(suggestinganouting)Soitisclaimedthatallsentences,inadditiontowhatevertheymean,performspecificactionsor“dothings”throughspecificforces.332)ThreetypesofspeechactsAfterrejectingthedistinctionbetweenperformativesandconstatives,Austinputforwardhisnewmodel:aspeakerwhileproducinganutteranceisinmostcasesperformingthreeactssimultaneously.3435Canyoutellthedifferentspeechactsperformedintheutterances?(练习题)(15)Ibelieveheisinnocent.(16)Getoutofhere!(17)Nexttime,I’llarriveontime.(18)I’msorryforthetroubleIbroughttoyou.(19)Iannounceyouhusbandandwife.36Infact,wemightutterittomakeastatement,arequest,anexplanation,orforsomeothercommunicativepurposes.Thisisalsogenerallyknownastheillocutionaryforceoftheutterance.Buthowdopeopleknowwhichspeechactisintended?Apossibleansweristospecifyfelicityconditions—circumstancesunderwhichitwouldbeappropriatetointerpretsomethingasaparticulartypeofspeechact.Forexample,ifagenuineorderhasbeengiven,thehearermustbephysicallycapableofcarryingitout(“Getmeastar”isnot),andmustbeabletoidentifytheobjectinvolved.37

Theliteralmeaningistakencareofbysemanticsandtheeffectofanutteranceissubjecttomanyfactors,includingsocialpsychology,morethanlinguisticscancopewith.So,whatspeechacttheoryismostconcernedwithisillocutionaryact.Itattemptstoaccountforthewaysbywhichspeakerscanmeanmorethanwhattheysay.Itisalsodesignedtoshowcoherenceinseeminglyincoherentconversations.(20)a.Husband:That’sthephone.b.Wife:I’minthebathroom.(illocutionaryact)c.Husband:Okay.383)ClassificationofillocutionaryactsJ.R.Searle:suggestsfivebasiccategoriesofillocutionaryacts39404)IndirectspeechactsAdifferentapproachtodistinguishingtypesofspeechactscanbemadeonthebasisofthethreebasicsentencestypes:(21)a.declarative:Youwearaseatbelt.(statement)b.interrogative:Doyouwearaseatbelt?(question)c.imperative:Wearaseatbelt!(command/request)Wheneverthereisadirectrelationshipbetweenastructureandafunction,wehaveadirectspeechact.41Adeclarativeusedtomakeastatementisadirectspeechact,butadeclarativeusedtomakearequestisanindirectspeechact.Forexample:(22)It’scoldoutside.a.Iherebytellyouabouttheweather.(statement:directspeechact)b.Iherebyrequestofyouthatyouclosethedoor.(request/command:indirectspeechact)42(23)

Youdon’twanttheaddresseetostandinfrontoftheTV.Whatwillyousay?练习题a.Moveoutoftheway!b.DoyouhavetostandinfrontoftheTV?c.Ican’tseethescreen.d.It’sharmfultoyoureyes.

Requestsareoftenperformedindirectly.Whydopeopletendtouseindirectspeechactsindailycommunication?43Toensureasuccessfulcommunication,collaborationisanecessaryfactor.Inmuchoftheprecedingdiscussion,wehaveassumedthatspeakersandlistenersinvolvedinconversationsaregenerallycooperatingwitheachother.Forexample,inacceptingspeakers’presuppositions,listenersnormallyhavetoassumethataspeakerwhosays‘mycar’reallydoeshavethecarthatismentionedandisn’ttryingtomisleadthelistener.6.3.2Thecooperativeprinciple441)TheCooperativePrinciple(p.154)

H.P.Grice(1975)suggeststhatthereisasetofassumptionsguidingtheconductofconversation.TheCooperativePrinciple(CP).Thecooperativeprincipleisstatedinthefollowingway:Makeyourconversationalcontributionsuchasisrequired,atthestageatwhichitoccurs,bytheacceptedpurposeordirectionofthetalkexchangeinwhichyouareengaged.Simply,CPmeansweshouldsaywhatistrueinaclearandrelevantmanner.452)ThemaximsA.Themaximofquantity1.Makeyourcontributionasinformativeasisrequired(forthecurrentpurposesoftheexchange).2.Donnotmakeyourcontributionmoreinformativethanisrequired.B.ThemaximofqualityTrytomakeyourcontributiononethatistrue.1.Donotsaywhatyoubelievetobefalse.2.Donotsaythatforwhichyoulackadequateevidence.46C.ThemaximofrelationMakesurethatwhateveryousayisrelevanttotheconversationathand.D.ThemaximofmannerBeperspicuous.1.Avoidobscurityofexpression.2.Avoidambiguity.3.Bebrief(avoidunnecessaryprolixity).4.Beorderly.47Examples:(24)Husband:Wherearethecarkeys?Wife:They’reonthetableinthehall.Inthemiddleoftheirlunchhour,onewomanasksanotherhowshelikesthehamburgersheiseating,andreceivestheanswerin:(25)Ahamburgerisahamburger.(quantity)Doyouthinkthisutteranceiscooperative?Whatcanyouinferredfromthesentence?483)Conversationalimplicature会话涵义AccordingtoGrice,utteranceinterpretationisnotamatterofdecodingmessages,butratherinvolves(i)takingthemeaningofthesentencestogetherwithcontextualinformation,(ii)usinginferencerules,and(iii)workingoutwhatthespeakermeansonthebasisoftheassumptionthattheutteranceconformstothemaxims.ThemainadvantageofthisapproachfromGrice’spointofviewisthatitprovidesapragmaticexplanationforawiderangeofphenomena,especiallyforconversationalimplicatures—akindofextrameaningthatisnotliterallycontainedintheutterance.49However,inactualspeechcommunication,itisoftenthecasethatspeakerscannotordonotobservetheCPanditsmaxims.(26)Heisatiger.(27)Tomhaswoodenears.Metaphorsandironyarestandardexamplesofthefloutingofthemaximofquality(违反质准则).50Violationofthemaximofquantitybyprovidinglessormoreinformationthanisrequired(违反量准则):(28)Girlsaregirls.(tautology.)(29)I’mAlexfromLeeds,26,unmarried.In(28),thehearerwouldinferfromthespecificcontextthatthespeakerprobablymeanthatgirlsarecareful,thoughtful,andconsiderateorliketotalkaboutshoppingandfashion.Ifamanintroduceshimselftoagirlataparty,asin(29),hewouldmakethegirlsuspiciousofhismotive.51Themaximsofrelationandmannercanalsonotbeobserved(违反关系、方式准则):(30)A:I’moutofpetrol.B:Thereisgarageroundthecorner.(31)A:Shallwegetsomethingforthekids?B:Yes.ButIvetoI-C-E-C-R-E-A-M.[p157]526.3.3Thepolitenessprinciple(PP)(32)Youdon’twanttheaddresseetostandinfrontoftheTV.Whatwillyousay?(练习题)a.Moveoutoftheway!b.DoyouhavetostandinfrontoftheTV?c.Ican’tseethescreen.d.It’sharmfultoyoureyes.

Requestsareoftenperformedindirectly.Whydopeopletendtouseindirectspeechactsindailycommunication?合作原则只说明了交际者有意违反合作原则及其准则可以获得特殊的会话涵义。但是,却并未解释交际双方为什么要这样说话。53Inmostcases,theindirectnessismotivatedbyconsiderationsofpoliteness.Politenessisusuallyregardedbymostpragmatistsasameansorstrategywhichisusedbyaspeakertoachievevariouspurposes,suchassavingface,establishingandmaintainingharmonioussocialrelationsinconversation.Leech(1983:80)looksonpolitenessascrucialinaccountingfor“whypeopleareoftensoindirectinconveyingwhattheymean”.HethusthePolitenessPrinciple:54FollowingGrice’spresentationoftheCP,LeechputsforwardsixmaximsofthePolitenessPrinciple:Minimize(otherthingsbeingequal)theexpressionofimpolitebeliefsandmaximize(otherthingsbeingequal)theexpressionofpolitebeliefs.55MaximofTact得体/策略准则(indirectivesandcommissives)(i)Minimizecosttoother使他人受损最下(ii)Maximizebenefittoother使他人受惠最大(33)Travelandexpenseswillbepaidforand,ifyouwish,youcouldalsogiveaplenarypaper.(会议邀请函)MaximofGenerosity慷慨准则(indirectivesandcommissives)(i)Minimizebenefittoself(ii)Maximizecosttoself(34).Theidealthingwouldbetodoatelnetchat,ifitweretobepossible.Butsinceyouareathome.That’sapromise.(为对方代劳工作)56MaximofApprobation赞扬准则(inexpressivesandassertives)(i)Minimizedispraiseofother(ii)Maximizepraiseofother(35)Goodtohearfromyou.I’vejusthadaquicklookatyourwebpages.Looksgood!!MaximofModesty谦虚准则

(inexpressivesandassertives)(i)Minimizepraiseofself(ii)MaximizedispraiseofselfThemaximofmodestyaccountsforthebenignnatureofutteranceslike(36)andtheoffensivenatureof(37).(36)Howstupidofme!(37)Howcleverofme!57

MaximofAgreement一致准则(inassertives)(i)Minimizedisagreementbetweenselfandother(ii)MaximizeagreementbetweenselfandotherRegulatedbythemaximofagreement,peopletendtoexaggeratetheircommongroundfirst,evenwhenmuchdifferenceistofollow:(38)A:Thebookisverywellwritten.B:Yes,wellwrittenasawhole,buttherearesomeratherboringpatches,don’tyouthink?58Ifexpressingdisagreementisinevitable,thenspeakersattempttosoftenitinvariousways,byexpressingregretatthedisagreement.e.g.(39)I’msorry,butIcan’t

温馨提示

  • 1. 本站所有资源如无特殊说明,都需要本地电脑安装OFFICE2007和PDF阅读器。图纸软件为CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.压缩文件请下载最新的WinRAR软件解压。
  • 2. 本站的文档不包含任何第三方提供的附件图纸等,如果需要附件,请联系上传者。文件的所有权益归上传用户所有。
  • 3. 本站RAR压缩包中若带图纸,网页内容里面会有图纸预览,若没有图纸预览就没有图纸。
  • 4. 未经权益所有人同意不得将文件中的内容挪作商业或盈利用途。
  • 5. 人人文库网仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对用户上传分享的文档内容本身不做任何修改或编辑,并不能对任何下载内容负责。
  • 6. 下载文件中如有侵权或不适当内容,请与我们联系,我们立即纠正。
  • 7. 本站不保证下载资源的准确性、安全性和完整性, 同时也不承担用户因使用这些下载资源对自己和他人造成任何形式的伤害或损失。

评论

0/150

提交评论