资本市场中的AI:在创新与市场诚信之间寻求平衡_第1页
资本市场中的AI:在创新与市场诚信之间寻求平衡_第2页
资本市场中的AI:在创新与市场诚信之间寻求平衡_第3页
资本市场中的AI:在创新与市场诚信之间寻求平衡_第4页
资本市场中的AI:在创新与市场诚信之间寻求平衡_第5页
已阅读5页,还剩51页未读 继续免费阅读

下载本文档

版权说明:本文档由用户提供并上传,收益归属内容提供方,若内容存在侵权,请进行举报或认领

文档简介

AIinCapitalMarkets:BalancingInnovationandIntegrity

InshortInthisexploratorystudy,AFMpresentshowAIisreshapingeverystageofthetradinglifecycle:pre-trade,execution,andpost-trade,bringingopportunitiesforinsightandefficiency.Atthesametime,itamplifiesexistingmarketintegrityriskswhilecreatingnew

ones.Recognisingthatfurtherresearchisneededinthisfast-movingdomain,marketfunctioningwillrelyevenmoreonthedesignofAImodels,theirinteractions,andthecontextinwhichtheyoperate.Thefindingsofthestudyaimatopeningandguidingfuturedebate.

REPORT

ANALYSIS

APRIL2026

REPORT

Executivesummary

Well-functioningcapitalmarketsareessentialtotherealeconomy,supportinghouseholdwellbeingandbroadereconomichealth.

Whentheyareefficientandrobust,theyenablewealthformation,

facilitaterisk-sharing,andallocatecapitaltoitsmostproductiveuse.

AIisincreasinglyintegraltocapitalmarketsandisexpectedtoremainadefiningelementofmodernmarketfunctioning.Usedresponsiblyandgovernedwithclearprinciples,AIcanstrengthenpriceformation,improveefficiency,andsupportmoreinformedinvestmentdecisions.

YetthesamecapabilitiesthatmakeAItransformativealsomakeit

vulnerable.Adaptivemodelslearnquicklyandatscale,stretching

traditionaloversight.TheydependonmodelsIincentiveswhose

integrityisnotalwaysassured,andmayoptimiseinwaysthatare

narrow,opaque,orunpredictable.Evenwhenindividualactorsfollowsoundpractices,theirmodelsinteractwithinatightlycoupledsystem;behaviourscanamplifyoneanother,creatingoutcomesthatnosingleparticipantcanforeseeorcontrol.Familiarrisksreappearinnewformswhileentirelynewonesemerge,oftenfasterandhardertodetect.

Formarketparticipants,AIreshapesnotonlydecisions,butalso

howtheycanbejustified,audited,andgoverned.Forretailinvestors,generalpurposeAItoolsmayappearauthoritativewithoutthe

protectionsofregulatedadvice.Forsupervisors,theshifttoself-

learningmodelschallengesassumptionsaboutexplainabilityand

accountability.Thesepressuresmakeitcriticaltoupholdtrustand

fairmarkets,ensuringthat,throughtherightactions,technological

progressstrengthensratherthanunderminestheconfidenceonwhichmarketintegritydepends.

Achievingthiswillrequirehumanoversight,transparency,and

accountabilitytoevolveaccordinglysothatAIcanrealiseits

potentialwhilesupportingtrusted,efficient,andfaircapitalmarkets.

Threeconclusionsstandout:

1.MarketintegrityisshapedbyhumanchoicesembeddedinAI

systems,especiallyviamodelobjectivesandconstraints,the

contextinwhichtheyoperate,andthedatatheyingest.Asmodelsbecomemoreautonomous,outcomesincreasinglydependonthemodeldesign,thesysteminwhichtheyoperate,thedataquality,andtheresilienceofalloftheabovetomanipulation.Ongoing

humanoversightisessentialtovalidatethatmodelsareethicalandalignedwiththeirintendedpurpose,andtopreventthemfrom

processingorpropagatingdistortedsignals.

2.Risksemergenotonlyfromtheindividualmodelbutalsofrom

theenvironmentinwhichmodelsoperate.Systeminterdependenciescanamplifyimpactassharedinputsandoptimisationtargetsmay

drivecorrelatedbehaviourandfeedbackloops.Supervisionand

regulationmaythereforeneedtoadvancetogethertoensuretimely,effectiveresponsestoemergingsystem-levelrisks.

3.Marketparticipantsremainfullyaccountablefortheoutcomesoftheirsystems,regardlessoftechnologicalcomplexity.Theuseofself-learningmodelsdoesnotdilutethisresponsibility,marketparticipantsremainanswerableforhowtheirmodelsbehave.

Systemsshouldalwaysremaincontrollableandcompliant,withmeasuresinplacetopreventdeceptivebehaviourssuchas

exploitingloopholesinthemodel’sobjectivesorconstraints.

ThefutureofAI-drivencapitalmarketsmayevolveintoamixed

ecosysteminwhichtrusted,well-governedAImodelsinteractwith

lesstrustedandopaqueones,whilecapabilitiesanduse-casesdevelopathighspeed.

ANALYSIS

AIinCapitalMarkets:BalancingInnovationandIntegrity2

AIinCapitalMarkets:BalancingInnovationandIntegrity3

TheAFM’saimistoremainagileandinnovation-aware:promotingtrustworthyAIasthenormwhilemonitoringandmitigating

vulnerabilitiesfromungovernedautonomy,unstableinteractions,andbiaseddata.TrustworthyAIshouldbecomethecompetitive

standard,nottheexception.

Basedonthesefindings,theAFMrecognisesthefollowingprioritiesfordebate:

1.TrustedAImodelsasafoundationofmarketintegrity:the

AFMaimsformarketswhereAImodelsarereliableandsafebydesign.Soundmodelvalidation,clearsafeguardsandstrong

datagovernancewillshapecompetitivedynamics,astrustinAIbehaviourbecomesameaningfuldifferentiator.Accordingly,the

AFMframestransparencyandreliabilityassupervisorypriorities,notjustcomplianceexpectations,astheyconstitutecorefeaturesof

marketfunctioning.

2.SupervisingamixedecosystemoftrustedanduntrustedAIsystems:someparticipantswilloperatehighlygovernedandtransparent

AIsystems,whileothersmayrelyonopaqueorunstablemodels.TheAFMaimstoadaptsupervisionaccordingly:well-governed

AIcanbemetwithmorepredictable,proportionateexpectations,whilehigh-riskoropaquesystemsrequirecloserscrutiny,creatingtherightincentivestructure.Moreover,itisimportanttoreassesswhethertoday’scapitalmarketinfrastructureisstillcalibratedformarketsshapedbyincreasinglyautonomousmodels.AndbeforeAItradingagentsaredeployedatscale,supervisoryauthorities

shoulddefineclearaccountabilitystandardsandregulatepossibleunauthorisedtradingenvironments.Accordingly,theAFMintendstoinitiateanopendialoguewiththesector,whilealigningits

REPORT

approachwithEuropeanregulatorsandinternationalstandardsettingorganisations.

3.Addressingsystem-leveldynamicsandpotentialfeedback

loops:marketdynamicsincreasinglydependonhowAImodels

behavebothindividuallyandincombination.Understandingthe

interactionsbetweenthemisessentialtoidentifyingconditionsthatcangenerateself-reinforcingfeedbackloopsandamplifymarket

ANALYSIS

stress.Inthiscontext,abroaderdebateisneeded.Thequestioniswhetheradditionalpossibilitiestoactareappropriateifinteractionsbetweenmodelsdisruptorderlymarketfunctioning.

AIincapitalmarkets:ariskoverview

Thedefinitionofarisk

Crosscuttingandsystem-wide

Poisoneddataasasystemicriskfor

capitalmarkets

AgenticAIexpandstherisksurfacein

high-speedmarkets

Concentration,

correlatedmodels,

andcommondata

sourcesasstructuralmarketvulnerabilities

Readmore

Pre-trade

TreatingGenAIasa

substituteforinvestmentadvice:howinaccuracyandpersonalisation

canharmretailinvestors

AI-washing:misleadinginvestorsthroughfalseorexaggeratedAIclaims

Readmore

Execution

Harmfuloutcomesfromtheuseof

self-learning

algorithmsintrading

Order-flow

exploitationandadeclineinmarketparticipation

Readmore

Post-trade

Opaquemodels:

black-boxbehaviourandpolluted

regulatorydata

Readmore

TheAFMframesriskinaccordancewiththisformat:

“Certaindevelopments,

conditions,andbehavioursofactor(s)thatcanleadtoundesirableoutcomesin

themarkets”.

Theriskdescribed

Quantifiesashighrisk

Likelihoodofhappening

Howtoreadthisriskanalysis?

Potentialimpact

REPORT

ANALYSIS

AIinCapitalMarkets:BalancingInnovationandIntegrity4

Contents

Executivesummary2

Introduction6

1.Makingorbreakingmarkets8

2.Threatsspanningthetradelifecycle11

3.Pre-trade16

3.1Pre-tradeopportunities 16

3.2Pre-traderisks 17

4.Execution19

4.1Executionopportunities 19

4.2Executionrisks 20

5.Post-trade23

5.1Post-tradeopportunities 23

5.2Post-traderisks 24

Conclusions26

REPORT

ANALYSIS

AFM

AIinCapitalMarkets:BalancingInnovationandIntegrity6

Introduction

Theambitiontocreateautonomoussystemsisnotnew.InGreek

mythology,Talos,thebronzegiantforgedbyHephaestustopatrol

Crete,embodiedboththepromiseandtheperilofartificialautonomy.

Designedtoprotecttheislandwithouthumanintervention,Taloswasimmenselypowerfulyetultimatelyvulnerable:asinglesealedveinrunningthroughhisbronzeframemeantthatonehiddenflawcouldbringthegiantdown.Thisdualnatureechoestoday’sdebatesonintelligent

systems,whereautonomycanenhanceresilienceorundermineit,

dependingonhowwellitsinnerfragilitiesareunderstoodandgoverned.

Inmodernmarkets,thatancientaspirationhasmovedfromallegorytoinfrastructure.AIsystemsnowinfluencehowinformationis

processed,howtradingdecisionsareformed,andhowordersareexecuted,routed,andreconciled.Whatoncebelongedtomyth,

nowunderpinsfunctionscentraltopriceformation,liquidity,andthetransparencyonwhichsupervisoryoversightdepends.

AIcapabilitiesenhanceanalysis,efficiency,andmarketaccess,buttheyalsointroducevulnerabilitiesrelatedtodataintegrity,explainability,modelbehaviour,andinteractioneffectsacrossparticipants.Asadaptivemodelsreplacefixedrules,marketoutcomesincreasinglydependonthedesignandgovernanceofdatapipelinesandalgorithms.

ThisexploratorystudyexamineshowAIisusedacrossthetrading

lifecycle(pre-trade,execution,andpost-trade)andwhatthese

applicationsmeanforthefunctioningandintegrityofcapital

markets.TheAFMfocusesonconcreteareaswhereAIalreadyshapesmarketbehaviour,operationalworkflows,andthemechanismsthroughwhichpricesareformed.

Figure1:Thelinkbetweenthecapitalmarketandtherealeconomy

Capitalmarkets

Well-functioningcapitalmarketsareessentialtotherealeconomy,supportinghousehold

well-beingandbroadereconomichealth.Whentheyaree代cientandrobust,theyenablecapitalformation,facilitaterisk-sharing,andallocate

REPORT

capitaltoitsmostproductiveuse.

R

e

a

l

e

c

on

o

m

y

Incapitalmarkets,tradingofassetstakeplace,typicallyfollowingthesephases:

123

ANALYSIS

C

a

p

it

a

l

m

a

rk

e

t

Pre-tradeExecutionPost-trade

AIinCapitalMarkets:BalancingInnovationandIntegrity7

REPORT

Theaimofthisstudyisthereforetwofold:toclarifywhereAI

createsvalueinmarketfunctioning,andtoidentifywhererisks

mayconcentrateasAIbecomesembeddedintradingsystems.This

supportsmarketparticipantstomakeresponsibledeploymentchoicesandunderstandwhererisksmayariseintheirownoperations,andhowtoaddressthem.Atthesametime,ithelpsregulatorstoanticipate

emergingmarket-widevulnerabilities.Itdoesnotclaimtobe

exhaustiveordefinitive.Thefindingsofthestudyserveasanopeningandguidanceforfuturedebate.

ToframetheouterboundariesofwhatAIcouldmeanforcapital

markets,thereportbeginswithtwoextremescenarios,one

optimisticandonepessimistic,illustratinghowdifferentdesign

andgovernancechoicesmightshapemarketevolution.Itthen

analysescurrentAIapplicationsstepbystepalongthetradinglifecycle,highlightingwherebenefitsemerge,whererisksmaterialise,and

whatthesedevelopmentsimplyformarketintegrity.Examplesandimplicationboxesillustratehowthesedynamicsappearinpractice.

Thisreport’sobjectiveistoexplainhowAIisreshapingopportunities,risks,andintegrityincapitalmarkets.BroaderAIgovernancetopics,

includingprivacy,consumerprotection,cyberresilience,third-party

dependency,andgeopoliticalandstrategic-autonomyconsiderations,falloutsideofthescopeexceptwheretheydirectlyaffectmarket

integrity.TherisksassessedrepresentaweightedsubsetbasedontheAFM’sanalyticalframework.

AsAIbecomesastructuralfactorinmarketfunctioning,integrityconsiderationsmoveevenmoredecisivelytowardsdataquality,modelgovernance,andtheinteractionofautonomoussystems.

Safeguardingmarketintegrityintheyearsaheadwilldepend

increasinglyontheintegrityoftheinformationfeedingthemodels

thattaketradingdecisions.Additionally,justasmythicalautomatons

reflectedtheintentionsoftheircreators,thesemodelsdonotevolveinavacuum:theircapabilities,constraints,andpotentialbiasesreflectthehumanchoicesandintegritybehindtheirdesignandoversight.

ANALYSIS

AIinCapitalMarkets:BalancingInnovationandIntegrity8

1.Makingorbreakingmarkets

TheimpactofAIoncapitalmarketsisneitherpredeterminednor

unidirectional.Thesametechnologiesthatpromisegainsinefficiency,analyticalpower,andfairnesscanalsocarrythepotentialtoamplify

existingvulnerabilitiesandcreatenewrisksformarketintegrity.SinceAIrepresentsmorethananincrementaltechnologicalstep,this

chapterdeliberatelymovesbeyondlinearprojections.Toillustrate

theouterboundariesofhowAIcouldreshapemarketfunctioning,itopenswithathoughtexperimentthatsketchestwohighlycontrastingscenariosofwhatcapitalmarketsmightlookliketenyearsfromnow.Theseutopiananddystopianscenariosformtheouteredgesofa

spectrumalongwhichreal-worlddevelopmentsmayshiftovertime.Theyserveasareferencepointagainstwhichtoday’sopportunitiesandrisksofAIincapitalmarketscanbeassessed.

Figure2:DivergingfuturesofAIincapitalmarkets

Utopianscenario

Scenariox

Scenarioy

e

e

Fors

lefu

bt

au

Now

Scenarioz

r

e

r

a

F

t

f

u

u

r

e

Dystopianscenario

REPORT

Now2years10years

Morelikelyscenario

Lesslikelyscenario

ANALYSIS

Neitherextremeisarealisticendpointforcapitalmarkets.Themorelikelyoutcomesliesomewheretowardsthemiddleoftheseouter

scenarios,withsomeelementsofbothandtheeventuallandingpointdependingonthechoicesbeingmadetoday.Appropriateregulation,decisionsondatagovernance,modelethics,incentivesanddesign,

andthedegreeofAIautonomymaynudgecapitalmarketsclosertoeitherautopianoradystopiantrajectory.Thequestioniswhether

capitalmarketsaremovingtowardsafutureinwhichAIsupports

ratherthanunderminestheirintegrity,andwhetherhumansremainsufficientlyinthelooptoensurethatoutcome.

Utopianscenario

Inthisscenario,capitalmarketslookclosertotheidealsonce

imaginedinmyth.Theautonomousguardianforgedinbronzeby

HephaestushasbeenrealisedthroughadvancedAIagentsembeddedacrosstheentiretradinglifecycle.Thesesystemsoperatecontinuously,intelligently,andtransparently,shapingmarketswithalevelof

precisiononcereservedfortheory,andtheydosoinwaysalignedwithethicalprinciplesandthebroaderinterestofsociety.

Real-timedataisdigestedanddistributedquicklyandefficientlybyAIagents,increasinglysupportedbyquantumenhancedcomputation.Allparticipants,eitherhumanormachine,seethesamesignalsatthesamemoment.Firmsdiscloseinsideinformationultrarapidlyandpre-tradeintegritychecksensurethatsuchinformationcannotbeexploitedin

trading.Fairnessispreservedwhilemaintainingtheroleofmarkets

inpriceformation,thelatterofwhichbecomesremarkablyaccurate,adjustinginstantlyasnewinformationemerges.Quantumnetworks

alsoacceleratethesynchronisationofmarketdata,allowinginformationtobevalidatedanddistributedacrossparticipantswithaspeedand

fidelitythatcollapsesthelastremnantsofinformationalfriction.

Marketabuse,longachallengeforregulators,evolvesinawaythat

makesitstraditionalformsineffective.Tradingagentsarebuiltwith

embeddedethicalconstraintsandoperatewithinmarketarchitecturesthatmakemanipulationtechnicallychallenging.Theyflaganomalies,coordinatetopreventharmfulpatterns,andrefusetoexecute

manipulativeorders,removingtheincentivesformisconduct.Yetthedisappearanceofabusivestrategiesdoesnotflattenthemarketor

stripitofitsmeaningfuldynamics.Eveninthishighlytransparentand

ethicalenvironment,participantscontinuetotradeduetodifferingexpectations,riskappetites,liquidityneeds,andinvestmenthorizons.

Operationally,humaninterventioninday-to-daytradingrecedesintothebackground.Portfolioconstruction,tradeexecution,monitoringandpost-tradecompliancearenowallmanagedbyinteroperable

AIsystemsthatauditthemselvesandeachotherinrealtime.Inthisenvironment,supervisiondoesnotdisappearbutevolves;regulatorsareconnectedtomarketsthroughrealtime,interoperableoversightsystems,ratherthandetectingabuseafterthefact.Thisreduces

supervisoryburdenandcosts,whileincreasingeffectiveness.

Forinvestorsandfirms,thisenvironmentbringsstabilityand

unprecedentedtrust.Volatilitydrivenbybehaviouralbiasesdiminishes,capitalallocationbecomeslongertermandefficient,andinvestmentflowsgravitatemorereliablytowardsproductiveopportunities.With

informationreflectedinstantlyandaccuratelyinprices,markets

contributemoredirectlytoeconomicgrowthandgeneratesustainedvalueforinvestors.Theyservethepublicinterestbysupportingfair,

well-functioningmarketsthatbenefitsocietyasawhole.Competitionshiftsfromexploitinginefficienciestoenhancingcollective

intelligence.IntodayIsmarketagentsoperatewithanembedded

commitmenttofairconduct.Theirautonomyenhancesthesystem

withouteverbendingitsrules,embodyingaformofintelligencethatishelpfulbydesign.

Thisistheutopianfrontierwheremarketsfunctionaseconomictheoryidealised:fair,transparent,andself-correcting,andwhereAIamplifieshumanvaluesratherthanhumanerrors.

REPORT

Dystopianscenario

Inadystopianscenariotenyearsfromnow,capitalmarketsresembletheotherfaceofTalos:highlyautomatedandautonomous,yet

governedbyintricatesystemswhosevulnerabilitiesliehiddendeep

ANALYSIS

withintheirdesign.TheimmensepowerandcomplexityembeddedinAI-drivensystemsbecomethethreat:notbecauseautonomycomeswithmaliciousintent,butbecausethearchitecturethatsustainsit

containshiddenpointsoffailure.Eachstepmakessense,eachtrade

appearsrational,andoptimisationislocallyoptimal.Yetcollectively,

theinterplayturnsouttobedisastrous.Thesystemrewardsspeedandstrategicopacityoverdisclosure,solidjudgmentandtrust,privilegingnarrow,one-dimensionalinterestsratherthanthebroaderfunctioningoffairandinclusivemarkets.

Inthissituation,theroleofinformationhasfundamentallychanged.

Informationisnowdesignedandtradedon.Beliefscanbeengineeredandtruthbecomesaparameter.GenerativeAIfloodstheinformationecosystemwithplausible,tailorednarratives.Someinformation

isplainlywrong,whereasotherinformationisoptimisedtosteer

attentioninacertaindirection.Asmodelsdemandevermoredatathantherealworldcansupply,syntheticdatafillsthegap.Misinformation

isdeletedtoevadedetection,butoncelargelanguagemodelshaveabsorbedit,itpersists,reappearinginnewcontexts.Themarketiseasilymanipulatedbytamperingwiththeinputsofthealgorithms

themselves.

Asquantumcomputingbecomesembeddedincapitalmarkets,the

problemdeepens:quantum-enhancedmodelsgenerate,synthesise,andarbitrageinformationatspeedsnohumancanmeaningfullyauditnorreliablydetect.Theseinferenceenginesdonotjustprocessdatabutsimulateitaswell,producinghyper-plausiblesignalsthatblurthedistinctionbetweengenuineinformationandengineeredbelief.Thelastboundarybetweentruthandoptimisationerodes.

Atthesametime,self-learningtradingalgorithmscontinuouslyretrainonalternativedataandlearnabouttheinformationproductionprocess.Subtlenuancessuchasvoicestressinearningscalls,micro-delaysoncorporatewebsiteupdates,andtoneofvoiceduringinvestorQ&As

haveenormouspricefluctuations.Significantshiftsoccurwithout

AIinCapitalMarkets:BalancingInnovationandIntegrity9

headlines,withoutidentifiablemisconduct,andwithoutidentifiableabuse.Marketparticipationbecomesacontestofspeedofinferenceandnarrativecontrol.Equalaccesstoinformationdoesnotsurvive.

Asthisdynamictakeshold,retailandinstitutionalinvestorsrationally

stepbackfrompublicmarkets.Larger,long-horizoninvestorswithdrawandmoveover-the-counter(OTC),whereliquidityconcentratesoutsidethevisiblelandscape.Publicvenuesarehollowedout,leavingbehindaregulatoryghosttownanddestroyingtransparency.Whatremains

onpublicmarketsisbasedonspeedandspeculation,andthepriceismerelyacoordinationsignal.Marketabusenolongerappearsonlyasinsidertradingormanipulationbutalsoemergesendogenouslyasacollectiveoutcomeofmillionsofself-learningalgorithms.

Whatisleftofcapitalmarketsisfree-for-all.AIagentsareallowedtoplan,execute,adapt,andrevisetradingstrategieswithouthumanintervention.Thetradinglifecycle,traditionallydividedintopre-trade,executionandpost-trade,dissolvesaltogether.Agentsmaynotbeexplicitlytrainedtomanipulatemarketsbutsimplylearnthatcertainsequencesofactionssystematicallymovepricesinprofitableways.

Tradingstrategiesemergethatmaximisereturnsbyexploiting

microstructuralfragilities,suchassynchronisedliquiditywithdrawaloramplificationofvolatility.Asignalwarfareemergesbetweenlargetradingfirms.

Supervisionstrugglestokeeppace.Bythetimeariskordeceptivepracticeisunderstoodoridentified,modelshavealreadyevolved.

Complianceandlegislativelogicarenolongerexternallyimposed

becauseAIagentsbegintodraftandenforcetheirowndefactorulesfromwhichtheyoperate.Indoingso,self-learningsystemsminimiselegalexposureratherthanmaximisemarketintegrity.Overtime,theyinferwhichbehaviourstriggersalertsandwhichtradingpaternsare

easiesttojustify.Ineffect,regulatoryreportingissystematicallygamed.Whensuchpracticesbecomewidespread,data-drivensupervision

REPORT

losesitsdiagnosticpower.

Ultimately,capitalmarketsspectacularlyfailtoperformtheircore

function:allocatingcapitaltowardstheirmostproductiveuseand

aggregatinginformationintotrustworthyprices.Theconsequences

extendbeyondmarketintegrity.Capitalflowstowardswhat

ANALYSIS

autonomousmodelscanmosteasilyoptimiseandmonetise.Economicgrowthslowsandbecomesmoreuneven,aslong-termwealth

increasinglyaccruestothosewhocontroldata,computingpower,

andaccesstoproprietaryAIsystems.Savingsandinvestmentsare

coordinatedelsewhere,decentralized,withouttransparencyorhumanagency.Inthisenvironment,thefairnessofpublicmarketscollapses

entirely.Marketsnolongeroperateinthepublicinterest,norserveasacommongood.Atthatpoint,thequestionisnolongerhowtofix

AIinCapitalMarkets:BalancingInnovationandIntegrity10

capitalmarkets,butwhethertheystillserveameaningfulpurposeatall.

AIinCapitalMarkets:BalancingInnovationandIntegrity11

2.Threatsspanningthetradelifecycle

ThecontrastingscenariosinthepreviouschapterillustratehowAI

couldreshapethefunctioningofcapitalmarkets.Startingfromthis

chapter,thefocusnarrowsfromlong-termscenariostotheconcretevulnerabilitiesalreadyemergingtoday.Whilemanyarefamiliar,AIcantransmitthemmorequicklyandthroughchannelsthatwerenotpresentinearliergenerationsofautomation.Thiscreatesnewpathwaysthroughwhichlocaldisruptionscanspilloverintobroadermarketfunctioning.

Beforeturningtothreatsthatarisewithinspecificphasesofthe

tradinglifecycle,crosscuttingandsystem-widevulnerabilitiesthat

spanmultiplecyclesareevaluated.AIsystemsandagentsincreasinglyoperateacrosstraditionalboundaries,blurringtheonce-distinct

separationbetweentradingstages.Asmodelscovertheentiretradinglifecycle,riskscanmovemorefreelythroughcapitalmarkets,allowingsmallfrictionstoescalateintoamplificationchainsthatundermine

marketintegrityandresilience.

REPORT

Threetradingphases

1

23

Pre-trade

Pre-trade

ExecutionPost-trade

Activitiesinthepre-tradephasetakeplacepriortosendinganorder,includingresearchinto

whatinstrumentstotradewhenandinwhichquantity.

Execution

Here,tradingstrategiesmeettherealworld:

abstractdecisionsaretranslatedintoactual

trades,interactingwithothermarketparticipants.

ANALYSIS

Poisoneddataasasystemicriskforcapitalmarkets

Thesaying“garbagein,garbageout”appliesespeciallywelltoAI

models,includinggenerativeAI.Thesemodelsaretrainedonvast

datasetsandcontinuetolearnfromnew,oftenunlabelleddataonce

deployed.Iftheintegrityofthisinputiscompromised,thebehaviourofthemodelcanbemanipulated,creatingsystemicvulnerabilities.

Attackscanoccuratmultiplestages.Duringtraining,maliciousactorsmaypoisondatasetsoralterlabels,embeddingharmfulbiasesor

misleadingpatterns.Duringdeployment,badactorscantargetthe

modelsIlivedatainputs,introducingmanipulatedsignalsthatdistort

predictionsandskewoutputs.Withoutmanipulatingthepricedirectly,theymanipulatethedatapointsthatareusedbythemodelsandthusmanipulatingtheirbehaviour.Suchdatapoisoningandadversarial

manipulationareamongthemostcriticalthreatstoAIreliabilityand

trustworthiness,astheyunderminethemodel’sabilitytoproduce

accurateandconsistentresults.Theyalsoweakenauditability,becauseanintegrity-compromisedinputlayermakesithard

温馨提示

  • 1. 本站所有资源如无特殊说明,都需要本地电脑安装OFFICE2007和PDF阅读器。图纸软件为CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.压缩文件请下载最新的WinRAR软件解压。
  • 2. 本站的文档不包含任何第三方提供的附件图纸等,如果需要附件,请联系上传者。文件的所有权益归上传用户所有。
  • 3. 本站RAR压缩包中若带图纸,网页内容里面会有图纸预览,若没有图纸预览就没有图纸。
  • 4. 未经权益所有人同意不得将文件中的内容挪作商业或盈利用途。
  • 5. 人人文库网仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对用户上传分享的文档内容本身不做任何修改或编辑,并不能对任何下载内容负责。
  • 6. 下载文件中如有侵权或不适当内容,请与我们联系,我们立即纠正。
  • 7. 本站不保证下载资源的准确性、安全性和完整性, 同时也不承担用户因使用这些下载资源对自己和他人造成任何形式的伤害或损失。

评论

0/150

提交评论