An Investigation of Justice in supply chain relationships and their.ppt

1、An Investigation of Justice in supply chain relationships and theirperformance impact,Catalogue,Abstract,B： The role of justice in improving performance in supply chain relationships is an under-investigated subject in the literature,C：The traditional assumption is that the three forms of justice in

2、teract with each other in a multiplicative manner. However, this assumption creates a managerial problem,D：The paper outline a different view of how the justice dimensions interact with one another utilizing the constraining factor model (CFM),A：Justice is important in improving performance of suppl

3、y chain relationships,1 Introduction,You can briefly add outline of this slide page in this text box.,1.Introduction,公平的三个维度,PJ： fairness of the decision process,IJ： focuses on aspects of the communication process,DJ ：equity of rewards commensurate with effort expended,An important question: The nat

4、ure of interactions among justice dimensions and how they affect performance,1 Introduction,管理者面对的两个问题：what and which,协同synergistic,补偿complementary 此消彼长,1.Introduction,1.Introduction,Articulate the constraining factor model (CFM) among the justice dimensions rather than the multiplicative,CFM empiri

5、cally demonstrates the importance of all three justice dimensions in realizing superior relationship performance,Resolve the confusion about the justice dimensions and the inconsistencies regarding their interaction effects.,本 文 的 研 究 立 场 与 贡 献,You can briefly add outline of this slide page in this

6、text box.,2 Theory development,. Multiplicative model 乘数模型,Dimensions of inter-organizational justice 组织公平理论,Constraining factor model 约束因子模型,2 Theory development,Procedural justice (PJ): Fairness with which governance decisions are taken in the exchange relationships Procedurally fair process can h

7、elp in pro-viding “voice” to the stakeholders in the relationship and help in promoting superior performance,Dimensions of inter-organizational justice 组织公平理论,2 Theory development,Distributive justice(DJ): Degree to which fairness of rewards in the relationship is based on effort expended inequity i

8、n effort allocation and reward distributions can lead to harmful consequences for the relationship that include lack of trust and increase in conflict resulting in an unstable partnership,Dimensions of inter-organizational justice 组织公平理论,2 Theory development,Interactional justice(IJ): Degree of open

9、ness shown by parties in communicating relationship relevant information and in managing conflicts IJ promotes harmony, reduces conflict and increases collaboration in a supply chain relationship,Dimensions of inter-organizational justice 组织公平理论,2 Theory development,2.2.1. Multiplicative model The m

10、ultiplicative model of interaction takes 2 different forms: synergistic and compensatory,Multiplicative model Constraining factor model 乘数模型VS约束因子模型,2 Theory development,direct effects two-way interaction effects three-way interaction effects,Multiplicative model Constraining factor model 乘数模型VS约束因子

11、模型,2 Theory development,the impact of PJ on performance varies continuously depending on the levels of IJ and DJ,Multiplicative model Constraining factor model 乘数模型VS约束因子模型,2 Theory development,2.2.2. Constraining factor model H1. When PJ is the constraining factor in a buyersupplierrelationship, fo

12、cusing on PJ will result in significant increase inrelationship performance in contrast to focusing on other justicedimensions. H2. When DJ is the constraining factor in a buyersupplierrelationship, focusing on DJ will result in significant increase inrelationship performance in contrast to focusing

13、 on other justicedimensions H3. When IJ is the constraining factor in a buyersupplier relation-ship, focusing on IJ will result in significant increase in relationship performance in contrast to focusing on other justice dimensions.,Multiplicative model Constraining factor model 乘数模型VS约束因子模型,2 Theor

14、y development,2.2.2. Constraining factor model a dummy variable that is defined to be 1 if PJ (IJ) is the least (or the constraining factor) of the three justice dimensions in an exchange relationship, and 0 otherwise.,Multiplicative model Constraining factor model 乘数模型VS约束因子模型,3.Methodology,3.1 Sam

15、pling frame（样本结构） 分析单位 外包服务中的零售商与供应商关系，被调查者为项目管理学院资格成员（PMI）和国际外包专业协会（IAOP） （a） the respondent must belong to a buyer organization. （b） the respondent must possess an intimate and direct knowledge of the outsourcing engagement. （c） the outsourcing engagement must be on-going to ensure accurate recall

16、 of details concerning the outsourcing engagement,3.Methodology,Table1 Distribution of firm size,3.Methodology,Terms of respondents,3.Methodology,Terms of industry,3.Methodology,The outsourcing activities included,FIRMS,MAUNFACTURING,3.2 Measures（测量） 5-point Likert scale from “strongly disagree” to

17、“strongly agree” 李克特式量表（评分加总式）,3.Methodology,3.Methodology,PJ（procedural justice） Focusing on PJ, our measures capture whether the supplier had a voice in the decision making process or influence over the outcomes (Thibaut and Walker, 1975). Alternatively PJ also indicates “adherence to fair process

18、 criteria, such as consistency, lack of bias, correctability, representation, accuracy, and ethicality.” (Colquitt, 2001, p. 386).,3.Methodology,DJ（distributive justice） Next, focusing on DJ, our measures were adapted from Griffith et al. (2006), to fit the outsourcing context. In line with past stu

19、dies, the items used for measuring DJ captured both effort and reward. IJ indicates the fairness of interactions between the two transacting parties (Bies, 2001; Luo, 2007),3.Methodology,IJ（interactional justice） IJ was measured using a four item scale adapted from Luo (2007). Since all of the items

20、 were adapted to the context of a buyersupplier setting, were fined the instrument using q-sort, described in the next section.,3.Methodology,3.3 Measure validation(测量验证) conducted confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) to assess unidimensionality of the constructs 借助经验性因素分析（CFA）评定单维性假设,3.Methodology,Me

21、asurement model fit was assessed using the following fit statistics：,3.Methodology,3.4 Common method bias,共同方法偏差（common method bias）指因为同样的数据或者评分者、同样的测量环境、项目语境及其项目本身特征造成的变量之间的人为共变。 借助二阶段最小二乘， 引入工具变量分析 共同方法偏差（CMV）， 表明CMV不会影响研究结果,4. Results,M1:Presents estimates with control variables M2: Introduce the

22、 direct effects of PJ, DJ and IJ M3 and M4: Introduce the terms corresponding to the multiplicative model(CFM) corresponding to Eq. (1) (Eq. (3) M5：Present the full model that includes both CFM and multiplicative components,3.Methodology,3.5 Empirical approach Table 4 Regression results.,4. Results,

23、H1. When PJ is the constraining factor in a buyersupplier relationship, focusing on PJ will result in significant increase in relationship performance in contrast to focusing on other justice dimensions.,4. Results,H2. When DJ is the constraining factor in a buyersupplier relationship, focusing on D

24、J will result in significant increase in relationship performance in contrast to focusing on other justice dimensions.,4. Results,H3. When IJ is the constraining factor in a buyersupplier relationship, focusing on IJ will result in significant increase in relationship performance in contrast to focusing on other justice dimensions.,5. Discussion and conclusion,The study make san important contribution to the literature by delineating how justice d