云南某度假基地会议展览中心设计【建筑工程毕业说明书论文开题报告外文翻译】.zip
收藏
资源目录
压缩包内文档预览:(预览前15页/共26页)
编号:22399121
类型:共享资源
大小:31.72MB
格式:ZIP
上传时间:2019-10-16
上传人:小***
认证信息
个人认证
林**(实名认证)
福建
IP属地:福建
50
积分
- 关 键 词:
-
建筑工程毕业说明书论文开题报告外文翻译
毕业论文开题报告
毕业设计开题报告
- 资源描述:
-
云南某度假基地会议展览中心设计【建筑工程毕业说明书论文开题报告外文翻译】.zip,建筑工程毕业说明书论文开题报告外文翻译,毕业论文开题报告,毕业设计开题报告
- 内容简介:
-
毕 业 设 计(论 文)任 务 书1本毕业设计(论文)课题应达到的目的: 1、针对会议展览建筑的特殊性,加强理解设计规范,结合大学五年建筑学习的成果,把它运用到实践中。2、本课题采用真实的地形以及周边环境,结合生产实习中的施工图设计经验,熟悉建筑设计程序,提高建筑设计能力。3、充分发挥建筑设计的技术表现水平,熟练掌握并运用AutoCad,photoshop,sketchup,3DMax等建筑设计应用软件。4、了解会议展览建筑设计的原则和基本方法,综合提高对建筑单体及外部空间环境的功能,造型,技术经济评价等方面的分析,设计构思及设计意图表达能力和专业素质。5、了解功能复杂的建筑单体空间组合的设计要求,了解结构选型与建筑设计之间的关系,掌握文化建筑的设计方法。6、熟悉会议展览建筑设计的规范,设计要考虑无障碍设计,满足使用功能要求。 2本毕业设计(论文)课题任务的内容和要求(包括原始数据、技术要求、工作要求等): 1、原始数据:本项目为云南某度假基地会议展览中心设计,总建筑面积约为10000-14000,设计用地见详图。2、技术要求和工作要求:2.1群众活动部分 69602.1.1展览用房 门厅 200 展厅 3000 休息厅 100 卫生间 30 管理室 30 贮藏室 200 2.1.2会议用房 多功能会议厅 2000 可容纳会议,时装展览,文体活动 大型会议室 500 中型会议室 200*2 小型会议室 100*5 2.2专业工作部分 310 排练室 100 音像摄影工作室 30*2 暗室 30 美术室 30 书法室 30 制作室 30 *2 2.3行政管理部分 405 馆长室 30 接待室 90 会议室 90 办公室 15*6 水泵房 15 配电房 15 维修室 15 空调机房 15 监控室 15 仓库 302.5其他辅助面积根据情况自定3、经济技术指标:基地面积约13000建筑面积约9000绿化率30%建筑密度30%绿化要求,利用现有的地势地貌,搭配建筑小品等,创造出怡人的生态景观。 4.2技术设计结构合理,符合建筑防火、节能设计规范,尽可能考虑自然采光与通风。毕 业 设 计(论 文)任 务 书3对本毕业设计(论文)课题成果的要求包括图表、实物等硬件要求: 1、成果要求:1.1总平面布图1.1.1标明道路、绿化、小品、停车位和出入口的位置。1.1.2标明技术经济指标:用地面积、建筑密度、容积率和绿化面积。 1.2建筑平面、立面、剖面设计图1.2.1各层平面图(1:100),标注轴线及开间尺寸,画出墙体、柱、楼梯、门窗洞口及门的开启方向,注写房间名称,在一层平面图中注剖切符号;1.2.2立面图(1:100),正确表示出建筑立面上门窗的尺度其开启方向,标注外立面使用的主要材质。1.2.3剖面图(1:100),剖切位置应选择在楼梯间和能最大限度地表现建筑内部空间的位置。1.3功能分析图,流线组织图。1.4设计说明(包括建筑设计构思、说明、经济技术指标以及对方案设计的理解等内容,字数不少于4000字)。1.5主要经济技术指标。1.6室外透视效果图。1.7规划鸟瞰效果图。2、其他:2.1建筑面积一律按轴线尺寸计算。2.2图纸、文字一律采用计算机绘制,应工整清晰。2.3设计图纸不少于15张,A3版面排版(不包括封面、目录、设计说明)。 4主要参考文献: 1 文灵.会展中心智能化系统规划设计研究D. 大连理工大学 2013 2 侯晓.会展建筑多功能适应性设计研究D. 华南理工大学 20133 郑舒頔.中外会展场馆管理的比较研究以中英会展场馆的个案为例J. 经济研究导刊. 2012(26) .4 张健康.论中小城市会展综合体可持续性发展J. 商业文化(下半月). 2012(07) 5 张娜,刘洋.展厅设计中的艺术因素J. 价值工程. 2012(22) 6 万邦伟,李敏.会展建筑节能设计策略之研究J. 建筑与文化. 2012(06) 7 杨毅.特大型会展建筑分析研究D. 华南理工大学 2012 8 张晓牧.城市语境下的武汉会展建筑D. 华南理工大学 2012 9 王铭艳.中国博览会会展综合体综合交通思考J. 交通与运输. 2011(03) 10 田珂;深圳会展建筑发展状况研究D;华南理工大学;2011年 11 丁荣,段安安.会展型城市综合体的设计探索与实践贵阳国际会议展览中心J. 建筑技艺. 2011(Z4) 12 赵亮星;香港会展建筑发展研究D;华南理工大学;2011年 13 刘羽思,邹越.城市会展建筑的展览空间结构语言创作J. 北京建筑工程学院学报. 2011(01) 14 于航行.当代复合型会展建筑交通空间设计研究D. 青岛理工大学 2011 15 李振宇,邓丰.形式追随生态建筑真善美的新境界J. 建筑学报. 2011(10) 毕 业 设 计(论 文)任 务 书5本毕业设计(论文)课题工作进度计划:2015.10.19- 2015.12.10 毕业设计前期准备,指导学生完成选题工作;2015.12.10- 2015.12.20 完成设计任务书上传,学生撰写开题报告;2015.12.20- 2016.01.25 完成毕业设计开题报告、论文大纲等撰写和审核工作;2016.01.26- 2016.04.05 毕业设计初稿审核提交与审核,填写中期检查表;2016.04.06- 2016.04.12 毕业设计初稿修改,毕设成果定稿提交; 2016.04.13- 2016.05.18 毕业设计定稿审核、成果制作和准备答辩;2016.05.19- 2016.05.25 组织和安排答辩,完成毕业设计答辩工作; 2016.05.26- 2016.06.06 输入成绩和上传毕设终稿,进行相关总结工作。 所在专业审查意见:符合建筑学毕业设计的要求,时间安排合理,审核通过。负责人: 2016 年 1 月6 日 毕 业 设 计(论文) 开 题 报 告 1结合毕业设计(论文)课题情况,根据所查阅的文献资料,每人撰写不少于1000字左右的文献综述: 云南某度假基地拟开发一项旅游度假综合项目,项目的西端拟建一小型会议展览中心,做为项目配套的一部分,也为该地区提供一处公共服务设施,同时作为新的城市经济增长点。随着经济全球化,服务于经济贸易的现代会展中心,将成为全球经济活动新的增长部分,对各国、各地区的城市发展起到推进作用,各国各地区对此十分重视。因此,世界上会展业较发达的城市和新兴城市都耗费巨资建设规模巨大的会展中心,以期推进会展业的和贸易活动的发展来带动城市各方面的进步。在这个竞争异常激烈的背景下,拥有先进的会展建筑设计理论和现代化展馆,毫无疑问成为全球贸易经济的重要组成部分,同时带动所在城市的经济发展。改革开放以来,我国在世界经济贸易中的地位日益提高,由于经济的快速发展和国际贸易的日趋频繁,我国的会展业得到了前所未有的发展。虽然起步较晚,但在借鉴国外会展建筑的发展现状的基础上,我国会展业得到了前所未有的发展。在我国,会展中心的发展被看成城市经济的风向标,成为一个城市最具特色的建筑元素之一,对城市建设、城市的经济产生重大影响。会展中心包含两大功能区,展览和会议功能。一般的会展中心重要以展览空间为核心,会议中心是相对独立的组成部分。会议空间的设计受会展中心展览功能、场地条件、交通组织等多方面设计要素的影响,但反过来会议空间的多功能、适应性的灵活设计也会对会展中心的展览功能和其他服务功能起到重要的推动作用。根据不同的市场要求,各部分所占的比重有所不同。全国上万平方的会展建筑多达30个,形成了北上广、武汉、大连等地区中心。然而据调查发现,目前各地区的会展中心,超越了我国当前的经济发展水平,存在盲目开发建设。展馆使用率低,缺乏高质量的成果品牌展,专业性不强,经营模式落后,形成资金浪费。因此急需整体规划,统筹管理。在我国目前的情况,会展经济还是新型产业,只有通过坚持不懈的努力与改进,才能从初级阶段发展到成熟阶段,推进国家经济和社会的进一步发展。本课题在了解国内、外会展建筑设计理论、实践与研究发展方向的基础上提出了基于现代化建设、丰富公共空间、智能化管理以及可续发展的设计理念,将现代建筑与城市经济文化完美结合,创造出符合城市需要的现代化会展建筑。参考文献:1 文灵.会展中心智能化系统规划设计研究D. 大连理工大学 2013 2 侯晓.会展建筑多功能适应性设计研究D. 华南理工大学 20133 郑舒頔.中外会展场馆管理的比较研究以中英会展场馆的个案为例J. 经济研究导刊. 2012(26) .4 张健康.论中小城市会展综合体可持续性发展J. 商业文化(下半月). 2012(07) 5 张娜,刘洋.展厅设计中的艺术因素J. 价值工程. 2012(22) 6 万邦伟,李敏.会展建筑节能设计策略之研究J. 建筑与文化. 2012(06) 7 杨毅.特大型会展建筑分析研究D. 华南理工大学 2012 8 张晓牧.城市语境下的武汉会展建筑D. 华南理工大学 2012 9 王铭艳.中国博览会会展综合体综合交通思考J. 交通与运输. 2011(03) 10 田珂.深圳会展建筑发展状况研究D;华南理工大学;2011年 11 丁荣,段安安.会展型城市综合体的设计探索与实践贵阳国际会议展览中心J. 建筑技艺. 2011(Z4) 12 赵亮星.香港会展建筑发展研究D;华南理工大学;2011年 13 刘羽思,邹越.城市会展建筑的展览空间结构语言创作J. 北京建筑工程学院学报. 2011(01) 14 于航行.当代复合型会展建筑交通空间设计研究D. 青岛理工大学 2011 15 李振宇,邓丰.形式追随生态建筑真善美的新境界J. 建筑学报. 2011(10)毕 业 设 计(论文) 开 题 报 告 2本课题要研究或解决的问题和拟采用的研究手段(途径): 1、研究问题或解决的问题当代会展建筑成为推动会展业发展的重要平台,同时有是城市贸易活动的重要媒介。而会展中心也会显著的影响城市的空间环境与经济文化。由于对会展建筑的普遍认识,今年来,世界上较发达的各国家各地区都耗费巨资打造自己的新型会展建筑,以期获得较为频繁的贸易活动,带动国家的市场经济活力。因此,在这激烈的市场贸易活动中,我国开始了大规模建造属于自己的会展建筑,会展建筑在全国各个城市遍地开花,建设规模和数量大幅增长。然而,与会展中心体量巨大形成对比的是,我国的会展建筑的发展却还在初级阶段,整体水平参差不起,缺乏对会展中心的发展现状和空间构成的研究。因此,研究会展建筑的现状,会展建筑的空间构,组织形式。不仅对我国的展览建筑做出归纳总结,弥补会展建筑理论的缺乏。探讨会展建筑各组成形式的可能性。2.拟采用的研究途径 第一阶段:阅读一些有关会展建筑研究的书籍或期刊,分析一些权威数据,对目前国内外会展建筑的发展现状做详细分析;第二阶段:实地调查走访成功开发的展览建筑,对它的选址、规划布局、功能定位及优劣势作一些分析;第三阶段:对展览建筑功能定位提出自己的观点,并完成初步设计草图,交予老师修改,通过不断完善最终敲定大体框架。毕 业 设 计(论文) 开 题 报 告 指导教师意见:1对“文献综述”的评语:文献综述能够结合设计主题展开,对课题的研究现状和发展趋势有较为深入的研究和探索,并对课题研究的主要方向和内容比较明确,研究的方法及措施具有一定的可行性。2对本课题的深度、广度及工作量的意见和对设计(论文)结果的预测:本课题深度适宜,广度和工作量适中,按期保证质量完成毕业设计。3.是否同意开题: 同意 不同意 指导教师: 2016 年 02 月 19 日所在专业审查意见:符合要求,审核通过。 负责人: 2016 年 02 月 20 日原文:LOUISIANA MANIFESTO Jean Nouvel More than ever before in 2005 architecture is annihilating and violating places,making them banal.Sometimes the landscape is replaced,created in the image of the architecture itself,which is nothing but another way of effacing it.In contrast,however,there is the case of Louisiana,an emotional shock.The living proof of a forgotten truth:architecture has the power to transcend.Architecture can reveal geographies,histories,colours,vegetations,horizons,and qualities of light.Impertinent and natural,architecture is in the world,alive,unique,Louisianan.As a microcosm,a bubble,no image or statement can plumb its depth.You have to be there to experience and believe it.Architecture is an expansion of our world at a time when that world is getting smaller.At a time when we rush across the world faster and faster,when we listen to and watch the same global networks,share feelings about the same disasters;when we dance to the same hits,watch the same matches;when we are flooded with the same films with their global screen stars;when the president of one country wants to rule the whole world;when we shop in cloned shopping centres,work behind the same eternal curtain walls.and,when whatever aspects of these factors that might be positive are not part of global priorities.Why,for instance,shouldnt education eradicate illiteracy more quickly and surely?Why doesnt the medicine that saves the victims of pandemics get to them in time?Architecture is by no means spared of these new conditions of an efficient,profitable world increasingly marked by an ideology delivered as the baggage of the economy.1.SpecificityThe global economy is accentuating the effects of the dominant architecture,the type that claims,We dont need context.And yet there is no real debate about this galloping frenzy:invoking the limitsof the discipline architectural criticism is content with aesthetic and stylisticreflections devoid of any analysis of the real,ignoring the crucial historical clash thatmore insistently every daysets global architecture against an architecture of situations,generic architecture against an architecture of specificity.Is our modernity today simply the direct descendant of the modernity of the20th century,devoid of any spirit of criticism?Does it simply consist of parachuting solitary objects onto the face of the planet? Shouldnt it rather be looking for reasons,correspondences,harmonies and differences in order to propose an ad hot architecture here and now?Louisiana is the symbolic arena for this new struggle of David and Goliath,between the partisans of situation architecture and the profiteers of de-contextualised architecture.Undoubtedly this confrontation runs deeper and is more complex than theisue of local against global.Specificity is linked to the actualization of knowledge.Architectural knowledge is by nature diverse,given its links with all civilizations.Travel is an essentialel ement in the cultivation of any builder.We are familiar with how journeys to Egypt,Greece and Rome are important toarchitects.Louisiana is the result of a journey to California:the fruit of the grafting of information gathered from afar onto the interpretation of a unique location.Generic architecture is certainly thriving on the compost,the Functionalist droppings of the simplistic modern ideology of the 20th century.The Athens Charter set out to be humanist,but the equally dogmatic caricatures realized by the submissive or the corrupt have left us with an oppressive urban heritage.In the name of the pleasure of living on this earth we must resist the urban ism of zones,networks and grids.Such developments are the auto maticrot that is obliterating the identity of cities on all continents in all climates.These strategies feed on cloned offices,cloned dwellings and cloned shops.They thirst for what has already been thought and seen in order to avoid thinking and seeing.We must replace these generic rules,territorially and architecturally,withot her rules based on the structural analysis of the lived landscape.Yes,architecturally!For architecture exists on all scales and urbanism does not Urbanism is nothing but the mocked-up travesty of a servile architecture on the macro-scale,advancing to prepare the way for the myriad of generic architectures.We must establish sensitive and poetic rules:approaches that speak of colours,essences,characters and the anomalies of the act of creation and the specificities of rain,wind,sea and mountains.Rules that speak of the temporal and spatial continuum that will turn the tideto wards a mutation modifying the inherited chaos and taking account of all the fractal scales of our cities.These sensitive rules cannot but defy the generic ideology that leads to the proliferation of hegemonic,dominant technologies.Creating dependencies and aimed for the bottom line,such a proliferation results in the hypertrophy of all our transportation,energy and hygiene systems.In contrast,the ideology of the specific aspires to autonomy,using there sources of actual place and time and such an ideology also privileges the non-material.How can we use what is here and nowhere else?How can we differentiate without caricaturing?How can we achieve depth?Architectural design on the large scale does not mean inventing ex nihilo.Architecture means transformation,organizing the mutations of what is already there.Architecture means encouraging the embedding in the landscape of places that anyway have a tendency to invent themselves.It means to reveal,to give direction.It means prolonging living history and its traces of past lives.It means listening to the breathing and pulsations of a living place.It means interpreting its rhythms in order to create.Architecture should be seen as the modification of a physical,atomic and biological continuum.As the modification of a fragment situated at the heart of our immense universe amidst the dizzying discoveries made by macro-and nano physics.Whatever the scale of the transformation of a site or place,how can we communicate the unpredictability of the mutation of a living fragment?Can we domesticate the visible componentsclouds,plant-life and living organisms of every sizewith signs,reflections and new plantings?How does one create a vibration that evokes a hidden depth,a soul?This is surely a task for poetry since only poetry can producethe meta physicsof the instant:to work at the limits of the achievable with the mysterious,fragile and natural;to anticipate the weathering of time,i.e.,the resulting patina as materials change and age with character;andto work with imperfection as a revelation of the limits of the accessible.These architectures that kill emotion are not Louisianan.They are the work of globetrotting artist-architects,princes of repetition,specialists in the perfect,dry and perennial detail that are the true confession of emotional impotence!The repetition of the controlled detail is proof of their insensitivity to the possible nature of an architecture in the world.Mass construction is used as misconstruction!Weight and emphasis are understood as vectors of architectural pedantry!The detaillike the totalityis an opportunity to invent,dislocate,enrich the world,recompose,reassemble and provoke confrontations of textures,light and unlikely techniques.But generic detail,like generic architecture,manifests the prefabricated.It represents an absence of doubt that takes no risks and holds back as far as possible from the limits of the feasible and sensitive.Its vocation is to exist and sell itself everywhere,spreading uniformity and killing differences in order to proliferate.We are in the domain of simplistic thinkingof the systemic,the reassuring.We are far from the sine qua non of seduction:the natural.An architecture that creates singularity in duality and is invented through the confrontation with a situation is Louisianan.It opposes the attitudes of these artist-architects who follow a recipe of repeating a kind of formal order passed off as thesignature of the artist.It opposes what can be dropped down on the landscape on any occasion in any place.This global phenomenon perpetuates an artistic tradition of the 20th century art that is in essence un situated,dislocated and designed to take its place among the mathematical white boxes of the museums.Unlike these works of art that can function in isolation,autonomous architectures are doomed to the status of static interference,absurd collages and sudden sneezes that disturb their surroundings;and unfortunately Surrealist sensibility is rarely part of the mix.2.adaptation of the conditionsArchitecture means the adaptation of the conditions of a place to a given time by the willpower,desire and knowledge of certain human beings.We never do this alone.We always do it somewherecertainly for some person or persons,but always also for everyone.It is time we stop limiting architecture to the appropriation of a style.Our times need architects who doubt,who seek without thinking they haveal ready found,who put themselves at risk,who rediscover the values of empiricism,who invent architecture as they design it,who surprise themselves,who notice them ildew on their windows and who know how to interpret it.Lets leave the cosmetics of vain cities to the architects who think of themselves as aesthetes.From now on let architecture rediscover its aura in the inexpressible,the cloudy and imperfection of what is invented!The architect is not aware of having come to the end of his work until he slip sand shifts from creation to modification,from assertion to allusion,from building-up to filling-in,from construction to infiltration,from positioning to super-positioning,from clearness to the nebulousness,from addition to deviation,from calligraphy to etching,to erasure.Instead of the archaic architectural goal of domination,i.e.,making a permanent mark,today we should prefer to seek the pleasure of living somewhere.Let us remember that architecture can also be an instrument of oppression,a tool for conditioning behaviour.Let us never permit anyone to censure this pursuit of pleasure especially in the domain of the familiar and intimate that is so necessary to our well being.Let us identify ourselves.Everyone bears a potential world within himself or herself.Let us be aware of our potential,which is equal to that of any human beinglargely unexplored,often poetic and therefore disquieting.No more corsets,no more ready-to-wear lives!No more architecture-by-numbers that turns us into numbers!No more cloned cities,global offices,pre-occupied homes!We want to be able to keep on travelling:to listen to spontaneous music,to live in landscapes as inhabited as a personality to meet men and women who invent their own culture,to discover unknown colours.Architecture is the vehicle for variations.Architecture is permanence changed by life and events.Unchangeable architecture is not involved with the place and those who live there.3.in harmony Architecture has to be impregnated and to impregnate in order:to be impressionable and impress and to absorb and emit.Let us love architecture that knows how to focus,that:shines like a light;can let you read the topography,the lay of the land;can let you feel the wind,sky,soil,water,fire,flavours,trees,grass,flowers,moss.remembers the usages and customs of the place and at the same time interfaces with the information terminals of our world;and,shows us the historical ages and those who have journeyed through them.Such an architecture is built up in harmony with its time.The stragglers who are still constructing the archetypes of the 20th century are dia chronically ill,refusing to live their lives.Architecture is dated.We know it to be mortal and endangered as sure as we know it is alive.And so we watch it emerging from the darkness and imagine that it will return there one day.The architectures of situation,of the specific,the Louisianan architectures weave bonds between the past and the future,the mineral and the vegetal,theinstantaneous and eternity,and the visible and the invisible.They are the loci of emergence and disappearance.They distil the essence of their own slow,poignant ruin.This consciousness of time overlays the surprises of the new lives lived in the place,the great rhythms of dawn and twilight,the indifference of the in evitable hours of idleness and decay.Louisianan architectures are dreamed architectures,full of silencesno tonly places of forgetfulness but also of archaeology.They become the cue for reinterpretations of an ambivalent past.Louisianan architectures move us because they have been dreamed into life,insecurity,resistance and sometimes despair;ruined or assassinated,but never forgotten because like the Phoenix disappearing in the flames only to be reborn they make us dream of eternally recurring points of light.The uncertainty,simplicity and even the modesty of the Louisianan material sand resources hold out the hope that Louisianan architecture can continue to exist in any economic condition even filtering through to the shameful shantytown so four global politics.中文译文:路易斯安那宣言让努维尔2005年,建筑更加倍地在消除地方的特征,把它们变得平庸无奇,蛮横地对待它们。它有时会取代风景,独自创造风景,这不过是另一种抹去风景的方式。但是,相反,路易斯安那是情感的震撼。体现出一个很快被遗忘的真理:建筑具有超越的能力。建筑能够显露地理、历史、色彩、植被、视野、光线。它以桀敖不驯、自然不做作的姿态来到这世界、并活着。它独一无二。它体现了路易斯安那精神。它是一个小世界,一个气泡。没有任何形象、没有任何言论能够彰显它的深度。你必须身临其境才能体验到这一切,才会相信。建筑是我们世界的延伸,当世界不断在缩小时。当我们用愈来愈快的速度在全球到处跑;当我们聆听和观看相同的全球网络,分享相同的灾难所引起的震动;当我们随着相同的畅销歌曲的节奏跳舞,看着相同的球赛;当全球充斥着相同的影片,明星是全球人物;当一国总统想要统治世界;当我们到克隆商场购物,在同样的幕墙后头上班以及,当世界变小理当产生的好处不被列为全球重点课题时好比说,为什么教育无法通过相同的全球网络,更快速、确实地消除文盲?为什么能够拯救世界性流行病患者的药品无法及时送达?在这个追求高效率和盈利、配有一整套经济概念的意识形态特征愈来愈明显的世界,面对这些新情况,建筑同样难以幸免。一、特殊性今天,全球化的影响不断深化,主流建筑旗帜鲜明地主张要“去脉络化”。然而,没有人去讨论这个急剧发展的形势所具有的意义:建筑评论,以建筑学科的界限为由,满足于美学和风格上的笼统论述,缺乏对现实的分析,并且忽略了重要的历史课题,亦即全球性建筑和“因地制宜”的建筑、普通性建筑和特殊性建筑之间日益强烈的对峙和冲突。今天的现代性难道只是直接继承20世纪的现代性、而不带任何批判精神?它难道只是在世界各地散播大量孤立存在的事物?它难道不应该去寻找理由、对应、相同、差异,以提出针对此时此地的特殊性建筑?路易斯安那作为具象征意义的角斗场,被选来进行这场犹如大卫对抗巨人歌利亚、“因地制宜”建筑的拥护者对抗“去脉络化”建筑的受益者的新战斗。毫无疑问,这场对抗比全球与地方之间的对抗更为深沉、复杂。特殊性与知识的更新有关。建筑知识本质上就是多元多样、与所有文明发生联系的;旅行是建造者的文化素养上一个重要的组成部分。我们熟知希腊、罗马或埃及旅行对建筑师多么重要。路易斯安那则是加州之旅的结晶:在这里,同样是透过对照和汇整距离遥远的不同讯息,构思出能够诠释一个独特情况的建筑方案。当然,普遍性建筑在20世纪简单化的现代主义意识形态所遗留下来的功能主义这块粪肥上蓬勃发展。雅典宪章当初也提倡人文主义精神,然而,狂热人士、犬儒者和腐败者进行大量教条式地歪曲模仿,留给了我们一个灾难性的都市遗产。以生活在这个世界的快乐之名,我们必须抗拒建立在区块、网络、格网基础上的城市主义。这样自动的腐化堕落,让世界各地、不论何种气候形态的城市失去了身份。它以克隆办公大楼、克隆住家、克隆商场为食。它渴求别人事先想好的想法、别人事先创造的景观,以避免自己去思考和观察。对于这些普遍性和建筑上的领土整治规则,我们必须用建立在对有生命经验的景观所做的结构性分析的基础上所产生的其他规则来取代它们。没错,建筑!因为建筑存在于各个层次,而城市主义则不存在;那不过是卑屈顺服的建筑在宏观层次上所做的拙劣变装演出,它的发展是为了替大量普遍性建筑的到来铺路。我们必须建立敏感的、诗意的规则:谈论色彩、本质、个性、无拘无束地创造,结合雨、风、海、山相关的特殊性的建筑方向。会谈论时空的连续,会为传承下来的混乱指引转变、修改的方向,会关注我们城市的分形结构中每一个层级的规则。这些敏感的规则不得不去挑战普遍的意识形态;普遍的意识形态有不断扩散霸权主流技术、以产生依赖的趋势,它倾向将所有的交通、能源和卫生体系变得愈来愈巨大,制造出一个庞然大物。相反地,特殊的意识形态渴望自主,渴望使用当地和不同时候所提供的资源,渴望对非物质的侧重。我们该如何使用当地、而不是别处的资源?我们该如何创造具差异性的建筑,而不落入对刻板印象的夸张模仿?我们该如何进行深化?建筑设计并非从无到有的创造。建筑意味着在现有和已存在的基础上加以改造、转化。建筑意味着激励深藏于场所自身的特质,而由此具有自我创造的倾向。它意味着揭示、指引方向。它意味着延续活的历史以及它过往的轨迹。它意味着倾听一个有生命的地方的呼吸和脉动。它意味着诠释这些律动用于创造。建筑必须被视为对一个物质、原子、生物连续体的改造。它是在宏观与纳米物理学愈来愈令人头晕目眩之际,对我们这个广大世界里的某个片断的改造。不论转变、场所、建筑的规
- 温馨提示:
1: 本站所有资源如无特殊说明,都需要本地电脑安装OFFICE2007和PDF阅读器。图纸软件为CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.压缩文件请下载最新的WinRAR软件解压。
2: 本站的文档不包含任何第三方提供的附件图纸等,如果需要附件,请联系上传者。文件的所有权益归上传用户所有。
3.本站RAR压缩包中若带图纸,网页内容里面会有图纸预览,若没有图纸预览就没有图纸。
4. 未经权益所有人同意不得将文件中的内容挪作商业或盈利用途。
5. 人人文库网仅提供信息存储空间,仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理,对用户上传分享的文档内容本身不做任何修改或编辑,并不能对任何下载内容负责。
6. 下载文件中如有侵权或不适当内容,请与我们联系,我们立即纠正。
7. 本站不保证下载资源的准确性、安全性和完整性, 同时也不承担用户因使用这些下载资源对自己和他人造成任何形式的伤害或损失。

人人文库网所有资源均是用户自行上传分享,仅供网友学习交流,未经上传用户书面授权,请勿作他用。