首页 人人文库网 > 图纸下载 > 毕业设计 > 电器外壳的注射模设计【优秀】【注射塑模具类】【word+17张CAD图纸全套】【毕设】
附表.doc

电器外壳的注射模设计【优秀】【注射塑模具类】【word+17张CAD图纸全套】【毕设】

收藏

压缩包内文档预览：
预览图 预览图 预览图 预览图 预览图 预览图 预览图 预览图 预览图 预览图 预览图
编号：298494    类型：共享资源    大小：1.94MB    格式：RAR    上传时间：2014-07-23 上传人：QQ14****9609 IP属地：陕西
40
积分
举报
举报 版权申诉
版权申诉 word格式文档无特别注明外均可编辑修改；预览文档经过压缩，下载后原文更清晰！ 立即下载
关 键 词：
电器外壳 注射 注塑模 模具设计
资源描述：

电器外壳注射模设计【优秀】【注射塑模具类】【word+17张CAD图纸全套】【毕业设计】

【带任务书+开题报告+评阅评语表+答辩资格审查表+工作中期检查表+指导教师评阅表+外文翻译】【42页@正文14700字】【详情如下】【需要咨询购买全套设计请加QQ1459919609】

Single gate optimization for plastic injection mold.pdf

任务书.doc

单浇口优化注塑模中文翻译.doc

合计17张装配图及零件图.dwg

工作中期检查表.doc

开题报告.doc

指导教师评阅表.doc

电器外壳注射模设计.doc

答辩及最终成绩评定表.doc

答辩资格审查表.doc

评阅评语表.doc

附表.doc

课题任务书

内容及任务

（1）对电器外壳进行工艺分析，根据塑件的材料、形状与尺寸要求确定合适的成型工艺、选择相应的成型设备和成型工艺参数，完成成型模具的总体设计；

（2）模具零件的设计和装配图及主要零件图的出图；

（3）整套模具的检查修改，编写模具的设计计算说明书。

研究手段主要运用冲压模课程和其它有关先修课程的理论及生产实践的知识去分析和解决模具设计问题，通过计算，运用标准、规范、手册、图册和查阅有关技术资料等，使用AutoCAD和Pro/e绘图软件对设计的模具进行绘图。

拟达到的要求或技术指标

按任务书要求完成规定的任务，撰写设计说明书（论文），一律采用计算机编辑。内容包括设计的意义与作用、设计方案选择和计算、主要零件的受力分析和强度校核、经济技术分析等。

写出不少于400字的中文摘要；至少翻译一篇本专业外文文献（10000个以上印刷符号），并附译文。

需完成不少于3张零号图纸的结构设计图、装配图和零件图，其中应包含一张以上用计算机绘制的具有中等难度的1号图纸，同时至少有折合1号图幅以上的图纸用手工绘制，查阅到10篇以上与题目相关的文献，按要求格式独立撰写不少于12000字的设计说明书。

进度安排起止日期工作内容备注

（1）2010年10月~12月

收集资料，确定选题；

（22011年1月21日~ 2月28日完成开题报告

2011年3月1日~4月30日进行工艺及结构设计、绘制装配草图、零件草图以及中期检查；

2011年5月1日~5月31日图纸及说明书定稿；

2011年6月1日~6月10日毕业设计答辩。

主要参考资料[1] 中国纺织大学工程图学教研室.画法几何及工程制图(第四版)[M].上海：上海科学技术出版社，1997.

[2] 孙文焕.机械CAD/CAM技术概论[M].西安：西安电子科技大学出版社，1995.

[3] 向华，洪光英，张渝.三维动画制作[M].北京：电子工业出版社，2005.

[4] 戈晓岚，洪琢.机械工程材料[M].北京：中国林业出版社，2006.

[5] 朱张校.工程材料[M].北京：清华大学出版社，2003.

[6] 王卫卫.材料成形设备[M].北京：机械工业出版社，2007.

[7] 翁其金，徐新成.冲压工艺及冲模设计[M].北京：机械工业出版社，2004.

[8] 陈嘉真.塑料成型工艺及模具设计[M].北京：机械工业出版社，1995.

[9] 二代龙震工作室 .Pro/SHEETMETAL Wildfire钣金设计[M].北京：电子工业出版社，2004.

[10] 《ProCAST 铸造模拟》(ProCAST)V2005[Bin]. /2006/12/04/0000130643.html，2009-2-10.

[11] 单岩，王蓓，王刚. Moldflow模具分析技术基础(CAD实用技术) [M].北京：清华大学出版社 ，2004.

[12] DiEdifice–模拟软件下载专区–中国铸造模拟分析网./frame.php?frameon=yes&referer=http%3A//forumdisplay.php%3Ffid%3D57，2009-2-10.

[13] 《dynaform用户手册》详细信息./training/42deaaba-550d-4c61-82c3-7eb9c601559f，2009-2-10.

年  月  日

摘要

塑料模具是当今工业生产中利用特定的形状，通过一定的方式来成型塑料制品的工艺装备或工具，它属于型腔模范畴。而注塑模具是其中发展较快的种类。因此，研究注塑模具对了解塑料产品的生产过程和提高产品质量有很大意义。本设计主要进行了电器外壳的注塑模设计。设计过程中介绍了注射成型的基本原理，对注塑产品提出了基本的设计原则。确定了分型面，浇注系统和排气系统等。计算了成型零部件的尺寸。由于制品圆周侧壁上有一个通孔，需采用侧抽芯机构来实现。通过本次毕业设计，使我对注塑模具有了更深一层的认识，了解了模具结构和工作原理。同时也熟练掌握了绘图软件的使用，注意到设计过程中的某些细节问题，也培养了做事的耐心。

关键词： 塑料模具； 注塑模 ；侧抽芯

ABSTRACT

Plastics Mold is a technology equipment or tool .It is use of a specific shape ,through a certain approach to form plastic products at today industrial production .It belongs to die cavity areas .the injection mold is one of the type of rapid developments .therefore, the study of injection mold to the understanding of production process and improve the product quality have a great significance. This paper discuss the designing of the injection mold for a electric shell.this design main introduced the basic principe of design on the injection mold ,specially proposed the basic principle of have a better performance to forming ,determined the type face ,such as the pouring system and exhaust systems and so on ,calaulate the size of the molding components .There are one holes at product circular wall ,so that ,It must be use side core pulling bodies to achieve . though this design ,I have the deeper understanding of the structure and working principle of the injecting mold .in the meantime ,I master the use of graphics software noting the some of the details .at the process of designing cultivate a work patience.

KEY WORDS : Plastic Molds ； Plastic Injection Mould； side pumped core.

目 录

摘要1

ABSTRACT2

目录3

1  塑料成型工艺性分析5

1.1   塑件的分析5

1.2   材料的成型工艺性能5

1.3   PE的注射工艺过程及工艺参数6

1.4PE（聚乙烯）成型的条件7

2   拟定模具的结构形式和初选注射机8

2.1   分型面的选择8

2.2   注射机的选择与校核9

2.2.1   注射机的选择9

2.2.2   注射机的校核10

2.2.3   型腔数目的确定与排列形式11

3   浇注系统的设计14

3.1   主流道设计14

3.2   冷料穴的设计16

3.3   分流道设计16

3.4浇口设计18

4   排气系统设计20

5   成型零件结构设计21

5.1   凹模的结构设计21

5.2   凸模的结构设计21

5.3   成型零件工作尺寸计算22

6成型零件的制造工艺29

6.1定模型芯的制造工艺29

7   模具加工工艺流程30

8   导向机构的设计32

9   脱模机构的设计33

10   模温调节与冷却系统设计34

10.1   模温对塑件质量的影响34

10.2   模温对生产效率的影响34

10.3   冷却系统的设计原则35

10.4   冷却系统的计算36

11模体设计38

参考文献39

致谢40

1  塑料成型工艺性分析

1.1   塑件的分析

⑴塑件的尺寸较小，精度等级一般，性能要求一般，为大批量生产，采用一模四腔来提高生产率，制品不进行二次加工。

⑵浇口采用潜伏浇口，适用于一模四腔，大大提高生产率，浇口截面为圆形。

⑶为了方便加工和热处理，型腔与型芯部分采用镶拼结构。

图一  电器外壳

1.2   材料的成型工艺性能

塑件材料采用PE，PE的主要工艺性能有：

聚乙烯属于结晶型，流动性很好的热塑性塑料。

性能特点：化学稳定性好，耐寒性差，光、氧作用下易降解，机械性能比聚乙烯好。

成型特点：

⑴结晶性料，吸湿性小，可能发生熔体破裂，长期与热金属接触易发生分解；

⑵冷却速度慢，模具宜设浇冷料井与并有冷却系统；

⑶成形收缩范围大，收缩率大，易发生缩孔、凹痕、熔接痕；

⑷加热时间不要太长，佛则会发生分解，烧伤

⑸塑件要壁厚均匀，避免缺口、尖角，以防应力集中；

使用温度：10℃～120℃

模具成型注意事项：因有“铰链”特性，注意浇口位置设计；防缩孔，变形；收缩率为1.5～3.0%

主要用途：板、片、透光薄膜、绳、绝缘零件、日用品等。

参考文献

[1] 中国纺织大学工程图学教研室.画法几何及工程制图(第四版)[M].上海：上海科学技术出版社，1997.

[2] 孙文焕.机械CAD/CAM技术概论[M].西安：西安电子科技大学出版社，1995.

[3] 向华，洪光英，张渝.三维动画制作[M].北京：电子工业出版社，2005.

[4] 戈晓岚，洪琢.机械工程材料[M].北京：中国林业出版社，2006.

[5] 朱张校.工程材料[M].北京：清华大学出版社，2003.

[6] 王卫卫.材料成形设备[M].北京：机械工业出版社，2007.

[7] 翁其金，徐新成.冲压工艺及冲模设计[M].北京：机械工业出版社，2004.

[8] 陈嘉真.塑料成型工艺及模具设计[M].北京：机械工业出版社，1995.

[9] 二代龙震工作室 .Pro/SHEETMETAL Wildfire钣金设计[M].北京：电子工业出版社，2004.

[10] 《ProCAST 铸造模拟》(ProCAST)V2005[Bin]. /2006/12/04/0000130643.html，2009-2-10.

[11] 单岩，王蓓，王刚. Moldflow模具分析技术基础(CAD实用技术) [M].北京：清华大学出版社 ，2004.

[12]DiEdifice–模拟软件下载专区–中国铸造模拟分析网./frame.php?frameon=yes&referer=http%3A//forumdisplay.php%3Ffid%3D57，2009-2-10.

[13] 《dynaform用户手册》详细信息./training/42deaaba-550d-4c61-82c3-7eb9c601559f，2009-2-10.


内容简介：
Li et al. / J Zhejiang Univ Sci A 2007 8(7):1077-1083 1077 Single gate optimization for plastic injection mold* LI Ji-quan, LI De-qun, GUO Zhi-ying, LV Hai-yuan (Department of Plasticity Technology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200030, China) E-mail: Received Nov. 22, 2006; revision accepted Mar. 19, 2007 Abstract: This paper deals with a methodology for single gate location optimization for plastic injection mold. The objective of the gate optimization is to minimize the warpage of injection molded parts, because warpage is a crucial quality issue for most injection molded parts while it is influenced greatly by the gate location. Feature warpage is defined as the ratio of maximum displacement on the feature surface to the projected length of the feature surface to describe part warpage. The optimization is combined with the numerical simulation technology to find the optimal gate location, in which the simulated annealing algorithm is used to search for the optimum. Finally, an example is discussed in the paper and it can be concluded that the proposed method is effective. Key words: Injection mold, Gate location, Optimization, Feature warpage doi:10.1631/jzus.2007.A1077 Document code: A CLC number: TQ320.66 INTRODUCTION Plastic injection molding is a widely used, com-plex but highly efficient technique for producing a large variety of plastic products, particularly those with high production requirement, tight tolerance, and complex shapes. The quality of injection molded parts is a function of plastic material, part geometry, mold structure and process conditions. The most important part of an injection mold basically is the following three sets of components: cavities, gates and runners, and cooling system. Lam and Seow (2000) and Jin and Lam (2002) achieved cavity balancing by varying the wall thick-ness of the part. A balance filling process within the cavity gives an evenly distributed pressure and tem-perature which can drastically reduce the warpage of the part. But the cavity balancing is only one of the important influencing factors of part qualities. Espe-cially, the part has its functional requirements, and its thicknesses should not be varied usually. From the pointview of the injection mold design, a gate is characterized by its size and location, and the runner system by the size and layout. The gate size and runner layout are usually determined as constants. Relatively, gate locations and runner sizes are more flexible, which can be varied to influence the quality of the part. As a result, they are often the design pa-rameters for optimization. Lee and Kim (1996a) optimized the sizes of runners and gates to balance runner system for mul-tiple injection cavities. The runner balancing was described as the differences of entrance pressures for a multi-cavity mold with identical cavities, and as differences of pressures at the end of the melt flow path in each cavity for a family mold with different cavity volumes and geometries. The methodology has shown uniform pressure distributions among the cavities during the entire molding cycle of multiple cavities mold. Zhai et al.(2005a) presented the two gate loca-tion optimization of one molding cavity by an effi-cient search method based on pressure gradient (PGSS), and subsequently positioned weld lines to the desired locations by varying runner sizes for Journal of Zhejiang University SCIENCE A ISSN 1673-565X (Print); ISSN 1862-1775 (Online) /jzus; E-mail: jzus * Project (No. 50675080) supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China Li et al. / J Zhejiang Univ Sci A 2007 8(7):1077-1083 1078multi-gate parts (Zhai et al., 2006). As large-volume part, multiple gates are needed to shorten the maxi-mum flow path, with a corresponding decrease in injection pressure. The method is promising for de-sign of gates and runners for a single cavity with multiple gates. Many of injection molded parts are produced with one gate, whether in single cavity mold or in multiple cavities mold. Therefore, the gate location of a single gate is the most common design parameter for optimization. A shape analysis approach was pre-sented by Courbebaisse and Garcia (2002), by which the best gate location of injection molding was esti-mated. Subsequently, they developed this methodol-ogy further and applied it to single gate location op-timization of an L shape example (Courbebaisse, 2005). It is easy to use and not time-consuming, while it only serves the turning of simple flat parts with uniform thickness. Pandelidis and Zou (1990) presented the opti-mization of gate location, by indirect quality measures relevant to warpage and material degradation, which is represented as weighted sum of a temperature dif-ferential term, an over-pack term, and a frictional overheating term. Warpage is influenced by the above factors, but the relationship between them is not clear. Therefore, the optimization effect is restricted by the determination of the weighting factors. Lee and Kim (1996b) developed an automated selection method of gate location, in which a set of initial gate locations were proposed by a designer and then the optimal gate was located by the adjacent node evaluation method. The conclusion to a great extent depends much on the human designers intuition, because the first step of the method is based on the designers proposition. So the result is to a large ex-tent limited to the designers experience. Lam and Jin (2001) developed a gate location optimization method based on the minimization of the Standard Deviation of Flow Path Length (SDL) and Standard Deviation of Filling Time (SDT) during the molding filling process. Subsequently, Shen et al.(2004a; 2004b) optimized the gate location design by minimizing the weighted sum of filling pressure, filling time difference between different flow paths, temperature difference, and over-pack percentage. Zhai et al.(2005b) investigated optimal gate location with evaluation criteria of injection pressure at the end of filling. These researchers presented the objec-tive functions as performances of injection molding filling operation, which are correlated with product qualities. But the correlation between the perform-ances and qualities is very complicated and no clear relationship has been observed between them yet. It is also difficult to select appropriate weighting factors for each term. A new objective function is presented here to evaluate the warpage of injection molded parts to optimize gate location. To measure part quality di-rectly, this investigation defines feature warpage to evaluate part warpage, which is evaluated from the “flow plus warpage” simulation outputs of Moldflow Plastics Insight (MPI) software. The objective func-tion is minimized to achieve minimum deformation in gate location optimization. Simulated annealing al-gorithm is employed to search for the optimal gate location. An example is given to illustrate the effec-tivity of the proposed optimization procedure. QUALITY MEASURES: FEATURE WARPGE Definition of feature warpage To apply optimization theory to the gate design, quality measures of the part must be specified in the first instance. The term “quality” may be referred to many product properties, such as mechanical, thermal, electrical, optical, ergonomical or geometrical prop-erties. There are two types of part quality measures: direct and indirect. A model that predicts the proper-ties from numerical simulation results would be characterized as a direct quality measure. In contrast, an indirect measure of part quality is correlated with target quality, but it cannot provide a direct estimate of that quality. For warpage, the indirect quality measures in related works are one of performances of injection molding flowing behavior or weighted sum of those. The performances are presented as filling time dif-ferential along different flow paths, temperature dif-ferential, over-pack percentage, and so on. It is ob-vious that warpage is influenced by these perform-ances, but the relationship between warpage and these performances is not clear and the determination of these weighting factors is rather difficult. Therefore, the optimization with the above objective function Li et al. / J Zhejiang Univ Sci A 2007 8(7):1077-1083 1079probably will not minimize part warpage even with perfect optimization technique. Sometimes, improper weighting factors will result in absolutely wrong re-sults. Some statistical quantities calculated from the nodal displacements were characterized as direct quality measures to achieve minimum deformation in related optimization studies. The statistical quantities are usually a maximum nodal displacement, an av-erage of top 10 percentile nodal displacements, and an overall average nodal displacement (Lee and Kim, 1995; 1996b). These nodal displacements are easy to obtain from the simulation results, the statistical val-ues, to some extents, representing the deformation. But the statistical displacement cannot effectively describe the deformation of the injection molded parts. In industry, designers and manufacturers usually pay more attention to the degree of part warpage on some specific features than the whole deformation of the injection molded parts. In this study, feature warpage is defined to describe the deformation of the injection parts. The feature warpage is the ratio of the maximum displacement of the feature surface to the projected length of the feature surface (Fig.1): 100%,hL= (1) where is the feature warpage, h is the maximum displacement on the feature surface deviating from the reference platform, and L is the projected length of the feature surface on a reference direction paralleling the reference platform. For complicated features (only plane feature discussed here), the feature warpage is usually sepa-rated into two constituents on the reference plane, which are represented on a 2D coordinate system: 100%, 100%,xyxyhhLL= (2) where x, y are the constituent feature warpages in the X, Y direction, and Lx, Ly are the projected lengths of the feature surface on X, Y component. Evaluation of feature warpage After the determination of target feature com-bined with corresponding reference plane and pro-jection direction, the value of L can be calculated immediately from the part with the calculating method of analytic geometry (Fig.2). L is a constant for any part on the specified feature surface and pro-jected direction. But the evaluation of h is more com-plicated than that of L. Simulation of injection molding process is a common technique to forecast the quality of part de-sign, mold design and process settings. The results of warpage simulation are expressed as the nodal de-flections on X, Y, Z component (Wx, Wy, Wz), and the nodal displacement W. W is the vector length of vector sum of Wxi, Wyj, and Wzk, where i, j, k are the unit vectors on X, Y, Z component. The h is the maximum displacement of the nodes on the feature surface, which is correlated with the normal orientation of the reference plane, and can be derived from the results of warpage simulation. To calculate h, the deflection of ith node is evaluated firstly as follows: coscoscos(),iixiyiziAAiBBWWWWWW=+ (3) where Wi is the deflection in the normal direction of the reference plane of ith node; Wix, Wiy, Wiz are the deflections on X, Y, Z component of ith node; , , are the angles of normal vector of the reference; A and B are the terminal nodes of the feature to projecting direction (Fig.2); WA and WB are the deflections of nodes A and B: Fig.1 The definition of feature warpageh Reference plane Surface L Fig.2 The projected length evaluation Feature Y X Lx B A Ly Li et al. / J Zhejiang Univ Sci A 2007 8(7):1077-1083 1080coscoscos ,coscoscos ,AAxAyAzBBxByBzWWWWWWWW=+=+ (4) where WAx, WAy, WAz are the deflections on X, Y, Z component of node A; WBx, WBy and WBz are the de-flections on X, Y, Z component of node B; iA and iB are the weighting factors of the terminal node deflec-tions calculated as follows: 1/ , 1,iAiAiBiALL= = (5) where LiA is the projector distance between ith node and node A. Ultimately, h is the maximum of the absolute value of Wi: 12max|,|,|.khWWW= (6) In industry, the inspection of the warpage is carried out with the help of a feeler gauge, while the measured part should be placed on a reference plat-form. The value of h is the maximum numerical reading of the space between the measured part sur-face and the reference platform. GATE LOCATION OPTIMIZATION PROBLEM FORMATION The quality term “warpage” means the perma-nent deformation of the part, which is not caused by an applied load. It is caused by differential shrinkage throughout the part, due to the imbalance of polymer flow, packing, cooling, and crystallization. The placement of a gate in an injection mold is one of the most important variables of the total mold design. The quality of the molded part is greatly af-fected by the gate location, because it influences the manner that the plastic flows into the mold cavity. Therefore, different gate locations introduce inho-mogeneity in orientation, density, pressure, and temperature distribution, accordingly introducing different value and distribution of warpage. Therefore, gate location is a valuable design variable to minimize the injection molded part warpage. Because the cor-relation between gate location and warpage distribu-tion is to a large extent independent of the melt and mold temperature, it is assumed that the molding conditions are kept constant in this investigation. The injection molded part warpage is quantified by the feature warpage which was discussed in the previous section. The single gate location optimization can thus be formulated as follows: Minimize: min f(X)= ; Subject to: 0()/10,gp p= X , 1,2,.,iXiN=X where is the feature warpage; p is the injection pressure at the gate position; p0 is the allowable in-jection pressure of injection molding machine or the allowable injection pressure specified by the designer or manufacturer; X is the coordinate vector of the candidate gate locations; Xi is the node on the finite element mesh model of the part for injection molding process simulation; N is the total number of nodes. In the finite element mesh model of the part, every node is a possible candidate for a gate. There-fore, the total number of the possible gate location Np is a function of the total number of nodes N and the total number of gate locations to be optimized n: p(1)(1).!N NNnNn= In this study, only the single-gate location problem is investigated. SIMULATED ANNEALING ALGORITHM The simulated annealing algorithm is one of the most powerful and popular meta-heuristics to solve optimization problems because of the provision of good global solutions to real-world problems. The algorithm is based upon that of Metropolis et al. (1953), which was originally proposed as a means to find an equilibrium configuration of a collection of atoms at a given temperature. The connection be-tween this algorithm and mathematical minimization was first noted by Pincus (1970), but it was Kirkpatrick et al.(1983) who proposed that it formed the basis of an optimization technique for combina-tional (and other) problems. To apply the simulated annealing method to op-Li et al. / J Zhejiang Univ Sci A 2007 8(7):1077-1083 1081timization problems, the objective function f is used as an energy function E. Instead of finding a low energy configuration, the problem becomes to seek an approximate global optimal solution. The configura-tions of the values of design variables are substituted for the energy configurations of the body, and the control parameter for the process is substituted for temperature. A random number generator is used as a way of generating new values for the design variables. It is obvious that this algorithm just takes the mini-mization problems into account. Hence, while per-forming a maximization problem the objective func-tion is multiplied by (1) to obtain a capable form. The major advantage of simulated annealing algorithm over other methods is the ability to avoid being trapped at local minima. This algorithm em-ploys a random search, which not only accepts changes that decrease objective function f, but also accepts some changes that increase it. The latter are accepted with a probability p /()e,fkTp= where f is the increase of f, k is Boltzmans constant, and T is a control parameter which by analogy with the original application is known as the system “temperature” irrespective of the objective function involved. In the case of gate location optimization, the implementation of this algorithm is illustrated in Fig.3, and this algorithm is detailed as follows: (1) SA algorithm starts from an initial gate loca-tion Xold with an assigned value Tk of the “tempera-ture” parameter T (the “temperature” counter k is initially set to zero). Proper control parameter c (0c 1) in annealing process and Markov chain Ngenerate are given. (2) SA algorithm generates a new gate location Xnew in the neighborhood of Xold and the value of the objective function f(X) is calculated. (3) The new gate location will be accepted with probability determined by the acceptance function acceptnewoldmin 1,exp( ()() .kPk ffT=XX A uniform random variable Punif is generated in 0,1. If PunifPaccept, Xnew is accepted; otherwise it is rejected. (4) This process is repeated for a large enough number of iterations (Ngenerate) for Tk. The sequence of trial gate locations generated in this way is known as Markov chain. (5) A new Markov chain is then generated (starting from the last accepted gate location in the previous Markov chain) for a reduced “temperature” Tk+1=cTk and the same process continues for de-creasing values of “temperature” until the algorithm stops. APPLICATION AND DISCUSSION The application to a complex industrial part is presented in this section to illustrate the proposed quality measure and optimization methodology. The part is provided by a manufacturer, as shown in Fig.4. In this part, the flatness of basal surface is the most important profile precision requirement. Therefore, the feature warpage is discussed on basal surface, in which reference platform is specified as a horizontal plane attached to the basal surface, and the longitu-dinal direction is specified as projected reference Fig.3 The flow chart of the simulated annealing algorithmLi et al. / J Zhejiang Univ Sci A 2007 8(7):1077-1083 1082 N7459 N7379 Fig.5 Finite element mesh model of the part direction. The parameter h is the maximum basal surface deflection on the normal direction, namely the vertical direction, and the parameter L is the projected length of the basal surface to the longitudinal direc-tion. The material of the part is Nylon Zytel 101L (30% EGF, DuPont Engineering Polymer). The molding conditions in the simulation are listed in Table 1. Fig.5 shows the finite element mesh model of the part employed in the numerical simulation. It has 1469 nodes and 2492 elements. The objective func-tion, namely feature warpage, is evaluated by Eqs.(1), (3)(6). The h is evaluated from the results of “Flow +Warp” Analysis Sequence in MPI by Eq.(1), and the L is measured on the industrial part immediately, L=20.50 mm. MPI is the most extensive software for the in-jection molding simulation, which can recommend the best gate location based on balanced flow. Gate location analysis is an effective tool for gate location design besides empirical method. For this part, the gate location analysis of MPI recommends that the best gate location is near node N7459, as shown in Fig.5. The part warpage is simulated based on this recommended gate and thus the feature warpage is evaluated: =5.15%, which is a great value. In trial manufacturing, part warpage is visible on the sample work piece. This is unacceptable for the manufacturer. The great warpage on basal surface is caused by the uneven orientation distribution of the glass fiber, as shown in Fig.6a. Fig.6a shows that the glass fiber orientation changes from negative direction to posi-tive direction because of the location of the gate, par-ticularly the greatest change of the fiber orientation appears near the gate. The great diversification of fiber orientation caused by gate location introduces serious differential shrinkage. Accordingly, the fea-ture warpage is notable and the gate location must be optimized to reduce part warpage. To optimize the gate location, the simulated an-nealing searching discussed in the section “Simulated annealing algorithm” is applied to this part. The maximum number of iterations is chosen as 30 to ensure the precision of the optimization, and the maximum number of random trials allowed for each Fig.4 Industrial part provided by the manufacturerConditions Values Fill time (s) 2.5 Melt temperature (C) 295 Mold temperature (C) 70 Packing time (s) 10 Packing pressure (of filling pressure) (%) 80 Table 1 The molding conditions in the simulation Average fiber orientationTime=31.47 s0.98390.86130.73870.61610.4935100 mm Z XY1562614 Average fiber orientationTime=31.78 s0.98040.85740.73440.61130.4883100 mm Z XY1651814(a)(b)Fig.6 The orientation distribution of the glass fiber withvaried gate location (a) Gate set on N7459; (b) The optimal gate location N7379Li et al. / J Zhejiang Univ Sci A 2007 8(7):1077-1083 1083iteration is chosen as 10 to decrease the probability of null iteration without an iterative solution. Node N7379 (Fig.5) is found to be the optimum gate loca-tion. The feature warpage is evaluated from the war-page simulation results f(X)=0.97%, which is less than that of the recommended gate by MPI. And the part warpage meets the manufacturers requirements in trial manufacturing. Fig.6b shows the fiber orien-tation in the simulation. It is seen that the optimal gate location results in the even glass fiber orientation, and thus introduces great reduction of shrinkage differ-ence on the vertical direction along the longitudinal direction. Accordingly, the feature warpage is re-duced. CONCLUSION Feature warpage is defined to describe the war-page of injection molded parts and is evaluated based on the numerical simulation software MPI in this investigation. The feature warpage evaluation based on numerical simulation is combined with simulated annealing algorithm to optimize the single gate loca-tion for plastic injection mold. An industrial part is taken as an example to illustrate the proposed method. The method results in an optimal gate location, by which the part is satisfactory for the manufacturer. This method is also suitable to other optimization problems for warpage minimization, such as location optimization for multiple gates, runner system bal-ancing, and option of anisotropic materials. References Courbebaisse, G., 2005. Numerical simulation of injection moulding process and the pre-moulding concept. Com-putational Materials Science, 34(4):397-405. doi:10.1016/matsci.2004.11.004 Courbebaisse, G., Garcia, D., 2002. Shape analysis and injec-tion molding optimization. Computational Materials Science, 25(4):547-553. doi:10.1016/S0927-0256(02) 00333-6 Jin, S., Lam, Y.C., 2002. 2.5D
温馨提示:
1: 本站所有资源如无特殊说明，都需要本地电脑安装OFFICE2007和PDF阅读器。图纸软件为CAD,CAXA,PROE,UG,SolidWorks等.压缩文件请下载最新的WinRAR软件解压。
2: 本站的文档不包含任何第三方提供的附件图纸等，如果需要附件，请联系上传者。文件的所有权益归上传用户所有。
3.本站RAR压缩包中若带图纸，网页内容里面会有图纸预览，若没有图纸预览就没有图纸。
4. 未经权益所有人同意不得将文件中的内容挪作商业或盈利用途。
5. 人人文库网仅提供信息存储空间，仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理，对用户上传分享的文档内容本身不做任何修改或编辑，并不能对任何下载内容负责。
6. 下载文件中如有侵权或不适当内容，请与我们联系，我们立即纠正。
7. 本站不保证下载资源的准确性、安全性和完整性, 同时也不承担用户因使用这些下载资源对自己和他人造成任何形式的伤害或损失。
提示  人人文库网所有资源均是用户自行上传分享，仅供网友学习交流，未经上传用户书面授权，请勿作他用。
关于本文
本文标题：电器外壳的注射模设计【优秀】【注射塑模具类】【word+17张CAD图纸全套】【毕设】
链接地址：https://www.renrendoc.com/p-298494.html

官方联系方式

网站客服网站客服      侵权投诉侵权投诉
1:下载资料失败解决办法   
2:不支持迅雷下载,请使用浏览器下载   
3:不支持QQ浏览器下载,请用其他浏览器   
4:下载后的文档和图纸-无水印   
5:文档经过压缩，下载后原文更清晰   
点击下载此资源
关于我们 - 网站声明 - 网站地图 - 资源地图 - 友情链接 - 网站客服 - 联系我们

网站客服QQ：2881952447     

copyright@ 2020-2025  renrendoc.com 人人文库版权所有   联系电话：400-852-1180

备案号:蜀ICP备2022000484号-2       经营许可证: 川B2-20220663       公网安备川公网安备: 51019002004831号

本站为文档C2C交易模式，即用户上传的文档直接被用户下载，本站只是中间服务平台，本站所有文档下载所得的收益归上传人(含作者)所有。人人文库网仅提供信息存储空间，仅对用户上传内容的表现方式做保护处理，对上载内容本身不做任何修改或编辑。若文档所含内容侵犯了您的版权或隐私，请立即通知人人文库网，我们立即给予删除！