海峡两岸经济合作框架协议论文：海峡两岸经济合作框架.doc

海峡两岸经济合作框架协议论文：海峡两岸经济合作框架协议（ECFA）争端解决机制研究【中文摘要】海峡两岸签订ECFA,开启了两岸经济合作的新时代。此举对于两岸政治、经济、社会发展都将产生深远影响。但是,我们必须看到,一个有利于两岸经贸发展的合作协议,并不能掩盖贸易争端的存在,贸易争端存在于所有贸易领域。基于两岸关系的特殊性,我们很难从既往的区域性贸易组织争端解决机制中寻找出一套完全适用于两岸之间的贸易争端解决办法。因此,只有深入对比分析现有贸易争端解决机制的内容和特点,结合两岸自身的特殊性,才能找到适合两岸现实状况,科学合理的争端解决机制,真正成为助推ECFA有效实施的便利条件。本文从对ECFA的相关介绍入手,探讨了过往两岸经贸争端解决的状况,在全面分析现有区域贸易组织争端解决机制的基础上,对海峡两岸贸易争端解决机制的构建提出了自己的看法和意见。本文共分为四个部分：第一部分介绍了ECFA签订的背景、内容和意义。对于ECFA的相关介绍,有助于厘清有关概念,为后续分析问题、解决问题提供必要准备。第二部分详细介绍了海峡两岸之间的贸易发展的形势,并对现有争端解决机制的状况和不足进行了剖析,以突显两岸签订ECFA后应尽速建立有效的争端解决机制的必要性,为后续构建更加合理的ECFA争端解决机制提供了有利经验。第三部分重点分析了WTO争端解决机制,中国与东盟自由贸易区(CAFTA)争端解决机制,北美自由贸易区(NAFTA)争端解决机制和内地与港、澳关于建立更紧密的经贸关系的安排(CEPA)争端解决机制的内容和特点。通过对比分析,更加明晰了ECFA争端解决机制的特殊性。第四部分是本文的创新之处,也是撰写本文的所在。该部分通过总结前几部分的研究成果,进一步概括ECFA争端解决机制应该坚持的原则,提出构建ECFA争端解决机制的具体制度设计,为海峡两岸贸易争端的有效解决建言献策。【英文摘要】A new era of cross-strait economic cooperation has been opened since ECFAs signing. It generates a profound impact on cross-straits political, economic and social development. However, we must see that the cooperation agreements which are beneficial to the development of cross-strait economic and trade cannot conceal the existence of trade disputes, and trade disputes still exist in all trade areas. Based on the special relations of Mainland-Taiwan, it is difficult to find a set of fully applicable to trade between the two sides dispute settlement from the dispute settlement mechanism of the previous Regional Trade Organization. Therefore, a suitable reality to cross-strait, scientific and reasonable dispute settlement mechanism can be find out to become the really effective conveniences for boosting ECFAs implementation, only when the analysis of existing trade dispute settlement mechanism of the content and features are compared deeply, and with the combination of own special cross-strait. This paper related to the introduction of ECFA, discussing the past status of cross-strait economic dispute settlement, it put forward the views and opinions on cross-straits trade dispute settlement mechanism of the construction on the basis of a comprehensive analysis for the existing dispute settlement mechanism of the Regional Trade Organization.This paper has been divided into four parts:The first part introduces the background of ECFAs signing, content and significance. In regard to the ECFAs related presentations, it will be helpful to clarify the concept, and it provides the necessary preparation for the follow-up problem analyzing and solving.The second part describes the development of cross-strait trades situation, and analyzes the existing conditions and deficiencies to the dispute settlement mechanisms, in order to highlight the necessity of establishing an effective dispute settlement mechanism after ECFAs signing, and then, it provide a favorable experience to build the more reasonable dispute settlement mechanism of the ECFA. The third part mainly analyzes the dispute settlement mechanism of WTO, the dispute settlement mechanism of China and the ASEAN Free Trade Area (CAFTA), the dispute settlement mechanism of North American Free Trade Area (NAFTA) and with regard to Mainland, Hong Kong and Macaos Closer Economic Partnership Arrangements (CEPA) dispute settlement mechanism of the content and features.The fourth part is the innovation, which is also the purpose of this writing. It gives the further generalization to the dispute settlement mechanism of ECFA that the principles that should be persisted, it proposes the specific system design of building the dispute settlement mechanism of ECFA, and offers an effective advice and suggestion to the cross-strait trade disputes solution.【关键词】海峡两岸经济合作框架协议 争端解决机制比较 制度构建【英文关键词】Cross-Strait Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement The comparison of the dispute settlement mechanism System construction【目录】海峡两岸经济合作框架协议（ECFA）争端解决机制研究摘要3-4ABSTRACT4-5引言8-9一、海峡两岸经济合作框架协议(ECFA)签订的背景、内容及其意义9-15(一) 海峡两岸经济合作框架协议(ECFA)签订的背景9-121. 两岸经贸交往的发展历程9-102. 两岸签订ECFA的现实需求10-113. 两岸签订ECFA的具体过程11-12(二) 海峡两岸经济合作框架协议(ECFA)的具体内容12-131. 关于贸易和投资领域的规定122. 关于经济合作领域的规定12-133. 关于早期收获清单的规定134. 关于贸易争端解决机制的规定13(三) 海峡两岸经济合作框架协议(ECFA)签订的意义13-151. ECFA的签订对于两岸经贸交往的推动作用142. ECFA的签订对于两岸和平发展的推动作用14-15二、海峡两岸贸易及争端解决模式发展情况15-21(一) 海峡两岸贸易发展情况15-171. 两岸贸易情况分析15-162. 两岸投资情况分析16-17(二) 海峡两岸贸易争端解决模式发展情况17-211. 海峡两岸在签订ECFA前的争端解决模式及其不足18-192. 海峡两岸目前贸易争端解决模式及其存在的问题19-21三、现有区域性贸易组织争端解决机制的比较21-31(一) WTO争端解决机制分析21-231. WTO争端解决机制的具体制度设计21-222. WTO争端解决机制的特点22-23(二) 中国东盟自由贸易区争端解决机制分析23-251. 中国东盟自由贸易区争端解决机制的具体制度设计23-242. 中国东盟自由贸易区争端解决机制的特点24-25(三) 北美自由贸易区争端解决机制分析25-271. 北美自由贸易区争端解决机制的具体制度设计262. 北美自由贸易区争端解决机制的特点26-27(四) 内地与香港、澳门关于建立更紧密经贸关系的安排(CEPA)争端解决机制分析27-291. CEPA争端解决机制的具体制度设计282. CEPA争端解决机制的特点28-29(五) 上述区域性贸易争端解决机制与构建ECFA争端解决机制的关系29-311. 上述区域性贸易争端解决机制在制度设计上对构建ECFA争端解决机制的可借鉴性29-302. 构建ECFA争端解决机制与上述区域性贸易争端解决机制的特