道路交通事故论文：道路交通事故责任主体的认定

1、道路交通事故论文:道路交通事故责任主体的认定【中文摘要】道路交通事故人身损害赔偿纠纷案件已成为当前各基层法院民商事案件中的主要案件类型之一。在司法实践中,正确认定道路交通事故责任主体对处理此类纠纷有着极为重要的理论及实践意义。鉴于司法实践中对交通事故责任主体的认定面临的诸多困境,在侵权责任法中,就专章立法对机动车交通事故责任主体进行了较为详细的规定,使得上述问题得到了很大程度上的统一,在审判实务中具有重要的现实意义。但是由于立法的局限性和现实生活的复杂多样性,虽然侵权责任法在一定程度上改变了我国原有的民事诉讼法及道路交通安全法,等法律法规过于粗略的问题,但仍然存在诸多不足。本文除了引言外,主要

2、包括案情介绍、案件焦点与分歧意见、研究结论三个部分。引言部分:主要说明研究道路交通事故责任主体认定的实践意义。第一部分:案情介绍。主要是介绍一起道路交通事故案件的案情。包括法院对案件事实的认定、原告的诉称、被告的辩称及法院的裁判结果。第二部分:案件焦点与分歧意见。包括法院对案件焦点的归纳和双方当事人对案件的分歧意见。第三部分:研究结论。此部分为论文的核心。主要涉及以下六个方面的内容: 1、银色轿车与张华驾驶的货车之间的法律关系认定:通过对共同侵权、共同危险行为和无意思联络的数人侵权之间的分析比较,最终认定案件中两侵权车之间成立无意思联络的数人侵权。2、雇员在从事雇佣活动中发生道路交通事故时责任

3、主体的认定:通过对侵权责任法与人身损害赔偿解释中关于雇主责任的分析比较,最终认定雇员张华无须对在从事雇佣活动过程中致人损害的后果承担赔偿责任,应由雇主李飞对外承担全部赔偿责任。3、挂靠机动车发生道路交通事故时责任主体的认定:鉴于当前理论和实务中对挂靠机动车发生交通事故时责任主体认定上存在的争议较大,加之侵权责任法对此也未作出明确规定,本文从挂靠业务的性质和出发,最终认定挂靠单位应当对挂靠机动车发生交通事故时致人损害的后果承担连带责任。4、保险公司在道路交通事故人身损害赔偿纠纷案件中诉讼地位的认定:通过对相关法律法规的分析比较,最终认定保险公司可以以承保机动车交通事故责任强制保险(以下简称交强险

4、为由在道路交通事故人身损害赔偿纠纷中作为被告进入诉讼,不能以承保商业第三者责任保险为由在道路交通事故人身损害赔偿纠纷中作为被告进入诉讼。5、机动车驾驶员肇事后逃逸时对受害人的救济:通过目前对驾驶员肇事后逃逸时对受害人权益维护上存在的制度缺失,提出应当尽快建立和完善机动车社会救助基金制度和其他社会保障机制。6、对案件的处理意见:结合对上述问题的探讨分析,就本案的处理上提出自己的看法。【英文摘要】Nowadays, the cases of compensation for damage of traffic accidents have become one of the mainly type

5、 of civil cases in the basic peoples courts. In judical practice, tortfeasors could be properly and effectively affirmed in traffic accidents has important significance boththeoretically and practically to deal with this sort of cases. Due to the responsibility affirmation in traffic accident has in

6、volved in dilemmas in judical practice so that Tort Law of the Peoples Republic of China proposes much more specific rules and provisions to handle these issues and creates practical significance in the process of trial practice issues. However, although Tort Law of the Peoples Republic of China has

7、 offset some shortages of Law of Civil Procedure and The traffic Safety Law of PRC to some extent, it still leaves much to be improved on the basis of the limitation of law and the rich diversity of life. This paper includes four dimensions:introduction, the background of the case, case central poin

8、t and different opinions, and a conclusion.A introduction of the practical significance of responsibility affirmation in traffic accident.Describing the background of a traffic accident, which including affirmation of the case, prosecutors allegation and respondents allegation, as well the juridical

9、 result of the court.Focusing on the summary and conclusion of case central point from the court and the disagreement between both parties.The fourth dimension is the core of the paper and consists of six parts.a. The identification of civil legal relationship between the silvercar and Zhang Huas lo

10、rry:It is affirmed that the case belongs to the number of people without meaning contact for infringement through the analysis and comparison of contributory infringement, joint dangerous behavior and the number of people without meaning contact for infringement.b. The identification of the tortfeas

11、or when the employer involves in the traffic accident in the process of employment. It is affirmed that Li Fei(employer should take all of responsibilities of the case rather than Zhang Hua(employee through analyzing the employers responsibilities on the basis of Tort Law of the Peoples Republic of

12、China and Compensation for Personal Injury explanation.c. The identification of the tortfeasor when the join-operated vehicle involves in the traffic accident:Owing to there s a great debate about the responsibility affirmation of the join-operated vehicle in traffic accident in the theory and pract

13、ice, and there is no clear and specific rules and provisions in Tort Law of the Peoples Republic of China, so that the paper affirms that the organization hung rely on by the join-operated lorry shall bear joint liabilities from the perspectives of quality and purpose.d. The identification of the pr

14、oceeding position of the insurance company in the case concerning personal damagecompensation with traffic accidents. It is certified that the insurance company can be regarded as the respondent based on the motor vehicle traffic accident responsibility compulsory insurance instead of business insur

15、ance through analyzing relevant law rules.e. Taking immediate measures to offer help to victims after the hit-and-run driver escape. It is necessary to consummate social assistance funds for road traffic accident function and motion pattern and other live insurance systems for lack of safeguarding t

16、he right of victims.f. Taking the above factors into consideration, a possible judgment would be provided by the paper.【关键词】道路交通事故责任主体运行支配运行利益共同侵权共同危险无意思联络的数人侵权【英文关键词】Traffic Accident Tortfeasor Operated Control Operated Profit And joint Dangerous Contact the Number of People Without Meaning Infringement【目录】道路交通事故责任主体的认定摘要6-8Abstract8-9引言11-12一、案情介绍12-14二、案件焦点与分歧意见14-16(一 案件焦点14(二 分歧意见14-16 1. 银色轿车驾驶员与被告张华之间的法律关系认定14-15 2. 本案中责