雅思机经作文

1、1.If a five-year old commits a crime (any kind), should his/harents have the responsibility and how punished?what isof a child when parents no longer have the responsibility for childrens behavior?2.It is rightt university graduates should earn higher salaryn less well-educated members，but they shou

2、ldpay all the full cost. To what extend u agree or disagree?3.Some country allow women to johe armed for,well some others think not such as navy ，army doesnt suitfor women，do you agree or disagree? Use your own experience and reasons（已考两次）4.Nowadays,ernational tourism is the biggest industryhe world

3、. Unfortunay,ernational tourism createstenrathern understanding betn people from different cultures. To what extent do you agree ordisagree?（已考 3 次）5.Theernment should control the amount ofin fiand oneviin order to decrease the violentcrimes in society. To what extent do you agree or disagree with t

4、his ie?6.Computers less helpful to childrens study, and some people say computers have a negative effect on childrensphysical and mental development. Disagree or agree?7.he modern world, the school ise unnesary for children to study, they can useernet which have awidely information available for chi

5、ldren. Soor disagree?（已考两次）t children can study at home instead. What extent do you agree8.Difference betn countries haveeless evident, so we can enjoy the same fi, brands and TVprogram, to what extent do you think the disadvantages of this outweigh the disadvantage?（已考两次）9.Some people thinkt a larg

6、e amount of time and money spent on the protection of wild animals and othersthink should be better spent on the human population. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion.10.Some people thinkelligent children should learn with others together, since it will benefit for everyone, wh

7、ileotheople thinkelligent children should learn separay, and also should get spel treatment. Discussboth sides pos and give your own opinion（已考两次）11.Some people think the university education is prepare students for employment, other think iDiscuss and say what other function Do you think.s other fu

8、nction.12.Individual greed and selfishness has been the basis of the modern society. Someone thinkt we must returnto the olds, more traditional values of respect for the family and the local community in order to create a betterworld to live in. To what extent do you agree or disagree?（2004 年已考 2 次）

9、13.Environmental problems are as big as not for individual country or individual people to address. In other word,we have reached the staget environmental problems be solved forernational view. To what extent do youagree or disagree? （2004 年已考 2 次）14.Motorized flight is the most important invention

10、in the modern world. Not any other invention has such asignificant impact on our lives. To what extent do you agree or disagree?15.Unlike other countries,reduce the overallin UK does not carry guns. Some think it leaves citizen unprotected, others think itin our society.Discuss.16.Traffic and housin

11、g problemsajor cities could be solved by moving large companies and factories and theiremployees to the countryside. To what extent do you agree or disagree?17.The high sales of popular consumer goods reflect theer of the advertising and not the really need of thewhole society in which they sell, to

12、 what extent do you agree or disagree.18.What are the causes and solution of the problem of the scarcity of water resource?（澳洲 4.29 已考）19.钱投资在 space research 还是 improving the condition of people in earth20.Some people said theernment shouldnt put money on art such as music and paing, they should spe

13、ndmore money on construction of public facilities. Agree or disagree?21.Qualities of peoplet needodays world cannot be learnt in universities or other academic institutions, towhat extent do you agree or disagree?22.There is an increasing number of juvenile delinquents.yze thesible causet give rise

14、to thisphenomenon, and offer some feasiblemendation.23.Do you think old buildings should be broken down, and give place for modern buildings. How is the old buildingsimportant in our society?24.Should criminals be sent to a jail or let them do some else as punishment instead of sendingo a jail?25.Yo

15、ung people are important resourto their country, buternments may ignore some problems faced byyoung people in running the country. By your experience, what doesernment need to do for supporting orhelyoung people? Please show those problems and give your idea or suggestion to solve the ie.26.It is sa

16、idt peoples life now ising more and more stressful. What are the causes and how to solve it?写作 A 类：1、If a five-year old commits a crime (any kind), should his/harents have the responsibility and how punished? what is theage of a child when parents no longer have the responsibility for childrens beha

17、vior?ContextAt the outset it must be notedt parental responsibility means different things in different contexts.he United Ses and parts of Canada parental responsibility will often refer to a kind of lawt hold parents legally accountable for the actions of their children. In some European countries

18、 and Australia the term refers to the responsibility parents have for the welfare for their children, as oped to aer they have over them. In all of these countries the term is sometimes used to refer to legal custody of a child in situations of marital separation or divorce. In other instanit refers

19、 to a legal mandatet anyone biologically connected to a child holds permanent responsibility for, or has a voice in, decis about the welfare oft child.Recent legislation related to parental responsibility has been enacted in Britain, several American ses and Canadian provin, aswell as Australia. The

20、 European Union has developed s ements and mlaws relating to theof children throughout the Union.Washington 范文（类似题）If children behave badly, should their parents take the responsibility and also be punished? S e your answer and give your reasons.There is a controversial discus on the i e of whether

21、parents should take the responsibility and also be punished for their childrens bad behavior. Some people agreedrawn hastily and parents being punished or not depends on how they teach their children and how badly their children behave.he place, if parents have been teaching their children very care

22、fully, they have been taking the duty of not only raising but also educating them. If children still behave badly despite their parents efforts it is the childrens fault on their own, having nothing to do with their parents. Therefore, the poor parents should not be punished for childrens wronghe se

23、cond place, if childrens bad behavior results from parents negligence of education them, then both children and their parents should be punished. These parents, as their children pervisors, dont fulfill their responsibilities of educating their children to behave properly. Therefore, they deserve th

24、e punishment.he third place, if children behave very badly resulting in serious damages, in particular killing others, parents should answer for their failure he basic moral education to children. No crime is more serious n taking the innocent peoples live. If children even heir childhood can be so

25、brutal, there must be something wrong with their parents education.To conclude, wheth arents should be punished for the immatures misbehaviors or not, it cant be judged by ord but depends on different situations. Parents should answer for their negligence of education in some serious cases committed

26、 by the immature. Whereas, if parents have put their heart and soul in educating their children, punishment should not be im ed on them.Because of the different national contexts of the use of this term, students should be prepared to debate a range of proitions dealingwith lawst mandate parentheere

27、sts of their children, remainhe lives of their children, or be held accountable for thecriminal or civil liabilities of their children. Naturally these concerns have some overlap. While some arguments will occur in differentcontexts more oftenn others, the central principle remains the same. If we a

28、ffirm the importance of parental responsibility we be vet parents have a sol and moral - if not a legal - obligation to see to the welfare of their children until they reachof majority(ost lawsof 18).consThis argument stems from two flawed amptions:,t parents from separated or divorced fami s cannot

29、 act responsibly, and second,ng the right thing,nesarily equates withitive family values. A parent maytLawst enshrine parental responsibility improve family life. As parents are encouraged to take responsibility for their children, and such responsibilityes a cultural norm, fami s will develop close

30、r bonds, marriages willeWhile generally true, there are instanwhere the influence of parents over a childs life is probably not realistic. Some children run away from home or forcibly separate themselves from their parents on their own accord. On occa, juveniles commit crimes so heinous, and so unex

31、pected,t no reasonablewould thinkt the parents were ultima y responsible. There are also significant differenbetn cultures as to what age constitutes adulthood. While many western countries consider an 18-year-old an adult, other cultures see the onset of adulthood as being much ear r. The arrival o

32、f adulthood cso be regarded as a continuum of increasing responsibility, asany countriesof majority varies, with differing ages set for leaving school, having sex, getting married without parental permis, joining the armed for, driving, drinking, voting and standing for public office. Thus, multinat

33、ionallobal accords on parental responsibility or childrens rights are potentially problematic.Minor children should not be held legally accountable for their actions, nor should they be obligated to provide for themselves until they have reachedof majority.ernments have established laws drawing dist

34、inctions betn adults and juveniles for a reason. Theseernments be vet juveniles make mistakes and are not nesarily prepared to be fully responsible for their actions. Parents, and the communityarge have a responsibility to raise children to actappropria y in society. If society, or more specifically

35、, parents fail he task it is not reasonable for the children to suffer sole responsibility for these acts.The causes at the core of juvenile delinquency, abusive fami s, and child neglect are not nesarily the kind of problemst can be solved by the leverage of criminal or civilsanctions. In instanwhe

36、re parents are absent or neglectful, deep sol problems are often the cause. Problemch as alcoholism, poverty, poor education, poor health care, and family histories of abuse can lock a familyo a cycle of problemst continue to petuate behaviours others might view as irresponsible. There is a dangert

37、the proed sanctions will make fami s trapped in such problems afraid to seek help from sol servi for fear of punishment.Legal requirements for parental action, particularly thoset include sanctions for non-action provide an incentive for parents to act in a responsible fashion. If parents be ve they

38、 will be held liable for their inaction, or the inappropriate actions of their children, they are more likely to make sure their children are supervised and well cared for.2、It is rightt university graduates should earn higher salaryn less well-educated members，but they should pay all thefull cost.

39、To what extend u agree or disagree?Robert 范文：Paragraph 1: Topic- I agree with it.Paragraph 2: SupportsCollege students have contributed muore to get their degrees sot they should get more back in compensation.What the college graduates have learned and mastered is more suitable of having jobs of big

40、ger responsibilities whichurn provide a better return.Paragraph 3: The other side of the “Coin” Paragraph 4:Some people thinkt college graduates should have higher salaryn comparatively less well-educated people, while others be vet the pay should be based on their separate performance rathern their

41、 educational background. From my poof view the formermotionsThis house be ves parents should be held criminally liable for the illegal activities of their children This house be ves parents should be held civilly liable for the illegal activities of their childrenThis house be vest on balance parent

42、s are more responsible for the actions of childrenn the children themselvesThis house be ves anernational convention on child welfare should be adoptedChildren prone to engage in acts of serious juvenile delinquency are rarelyerestedhe feelings of or effects on parents. In fact, the worst juvenile d

43、elinquents are probably more likely to act out if they be ve,t the action will result in harm to parents they seek to rebel against, and second,t their parents will be held responsible in place of them.Children are less likely to engage in acts of delinquency if they feelt their parents are likely t

44、o be held legally responsible for their actions.Decades of legal experience in countriest order child support from separated or divorced parents have demonstratedt parents who want to sever ties (finanl or otherwise) can do so, either by defaulting on payments or hiding from the law. These laws may

45、even have a reverse effect by fostering resentment toward the child or otharent on the part of the parent compelled to provide support. Child support orders may also harm any subsequent children an estranged parent may have by impoverishing a second family in favour of the.Parental responsibility la

46、ws help to compel parents who are delinquentheir support for a child toe involved - at least on a finanl level. This cso discourage irresponsible men from indulging in promiscuous and reckless sexual behaviour, fathering a number of children by different mothers.play a very active rolehe lives of th

47、eir children, yet still have a horrible marriage or be mentally or physically abusive to the children. A parent who is not married to a childs otharent may still play an active and valuable rolehe life of the child they conceived, even if they do not livehe same home.stronger, and the problems of br

48、oken fami s will decrease.sounds more reasonable and commonsensical. (46)College students have contributed mu ore to get their degrees so t they should get more back in compensation when they start to work. This contribution, obviously, includes all the painstaking endeavors made during the school t

49、ime, the finan l loans gained from the ernment or their parents to cover the full cost of their education, as well as the valuable time sacrificed to study rather n make a living early. Taken all these o consideration, its no doubt t these students should earn more n those who havent tried so much,

50、as long as the famous saying, “No pains, no gains”, holds water. On the other hand, in comparison with the blue-collar workers, who are less well-educated, what the college graduates have learned and mastered is more suitable of having jobs of bigger responsibilities and challenges, which urn give a

51、 better return. (143)But it doesnt mean t the less educated people are destined to “get a small iece of th e”. There is, as a matter o ct, no distinction bet n man and man, but the divi of jobs requires different responsibilities and skills. So what finally counts erms of performance and achievement

52、s are the individual trying and attempts rather n “ t piece of p r” gained in school. (67)All in all, the university graduates should earn higher salary n less well-educated members, which ay or another imp s t the more you pay the more you earn later. Be ve it or not, you can try and find out the a

53、nswer of your own. (45)University graduates should pay full fees.Topic: University graduates have highayn those people who have lower education. Therefore, some people sayt they should pay the full tuition. To what degree do you agree or disagree?Because University graduates receive higher wagesn pe

54、ople who have lower education, they should pay the full tuition fees. I agree with this sly,hese times where we have an increasingly competitive world, University graduates find it easier to obtain a job. When they begin, they begin on a higher salaryn those people who do nove their higher education

55、. Therefore, University students should pay the whole tuition fees instead of their fees being subsidized by theernment. It is unfair to expect the taxes of the less qualified to subsidize the education of those who will soon earn moreSecondly, it is reasonable to expectt the University students pay

56、 for their instruction fees for this will help improve the sol equality. With their higher education, University graduates will soon moveo the higher socio-economic group. Thewith the lower education, lessere and poorer standard of life wille bitter espelly if they understand it is their taxesve pro

57、vided the education for the University graduate. This will cause disharmony and dissatisfaction within our society because it is unfair for the people who do nove a chance to study at University. Some countries already have this kind of policy. For exle, in America, students who study in accounting,

58、 hardly receive and funds from theernmenthe form of a scholarship because politins know they will earn large sums of money after their graduation.Finally, this will also lighten the finanl burden on theernment. Every country has a large number of universities, institutions and polytechnics. Imagine

59、how muoney will be saved if theernments remove the finanl allocations! By executing such a policy, theernment can make good use of the money to those aspects of their economyt are more important and urgent, such as public facilities for disabled people. This will bring the societyo line with other c

60、ountries and also bring greater harmony to the society.To sum up, the three reasons I be ve University graduates should pay full tuition for their education are:It is easier for them to find jobsThey end up in a higher socio-economic groupThe subsides used are better reallocated to other areas of th