加大茶文化品牌建设的力度的建议

1、第 PAGE2 页 共 NUMPAGES16 页加大茶文化品牌建设的力度的建议加大茶文化品牌建设的力度的建议古丈县虽然是个小县、穷县，但也是个有特色的县，有形象的县。有特色、有形象，并不是所有的县都可以这样说。古丈毛尖、红石林、坐龙峡，是古丈的形象。一叶、一石、一峡，是古丈的地理文化标志，是一种品牌。品牌对于一个地方的重要性不用多说。.freekan.地理文化品牌的形成，有其自然因素，也有赖于人为的强化。建议古丈县加大茶文化品牌建设的力度，安排部署县文化部门、文物部门及其他相关部门围绕古丈茶品牌的建设开展日常的文化、文物工作。文物部门应积极争取筹建“古丈茶博物馆”，收集、展示古丈茶生产、制作过

2、程中的文物和实物标本，介绍古丈茶生产、制作的流程，宣传古丈茶的品质特点，讲述古丈茶与古丈人的故事，演示古丈茶制作的过程与茶道表演艺术形式，使“古丈茶博物馆”成为宣传、介绍古丈茶的一个窗口，同时成为古丈山水旅游的一个文化景点。博物馆建设不必贪大，压滤机滤布先建一个小的，以后随其发展而自然扩展。建设资金可以向上级争取一点，自己安排一点，企业赞助一点。文化部门应积极联合企业和其他政府相关部门，在新茶采摘、上市季节组织丰富多彩的文化活动，如采茶比赛、炒茶比赛、茶歌比赛、茶艺表演比赛、竞选“最美茶姑”、竞选炒茶能手、评选名茶和“茶王”等等。本文来自.gongwen123.没有资金，先小搞，自娱自乐地搞，

3、慢慢地出了名，有了影响，则可大搞，并逐步使之节日化。文化、文物工作要围绕着县域主要产业经济的发展来开展，文化、文物工作的现实功用也就更强了，政府和社会对文化、文物工作的重视自然也就更高些，文化、文物工作也自然更有了自己的地域特色，事业也将得到更大的发展。古丈县目前虽穷、虽小，滤布但在湘西地区未来的旅游经济发展中却有着重要的区位优势，潜在价值不可小视。其往北一小时是张家界景区，往南一小时是凤凰古城景区，自身有红石林、坐龙峡、栖凤湖等景点，建设以罗依溪镇为湘西旅游中转站、集散地，很有现实的可能。衷心地祝愿古丈县的经济与社会得到更快、更好的发展，衷心地祝愿古丈人民生活得富裕幸福，衷心地祝愿古丈这座小

4、城成为全省最美、最祥和、最安宁、最幸福的小城！以上建议仅共古丈县委、县政府参考。附送：第 PAGE16 页 共 NUMPAGES16 页加州理工院长98任职演说加州理工院长98任职演说Inaugural AddressDr.David BaltimoreMarch 9,1998Representatives of academia,elected officials,Chairman Moore andother members of the Board of Trustees,former Presidents ofCaltech,alumni,Associates,members of t

5、he faculty,students,staff-including all of the Jet Propulsion Laboratory personnelattending electronically-former trainees from my over 30 years inresearch,friends and members of this great munity,I thank youall so much for being here today.Universities are enduring institutions.They go to great eff

6、orts tomark the transitions of their leadership免费公文网，压滤机滤布全国公务员共同天地 with the honored andhistoric ritual of an inauguration.But the truth is that theychange slowly,and new chief administrators do not alter thatmeasured pace.Thus,this overwhelming event,marking such a deepchange in my life,marks but a

7、 slight deflection in the establishedtrajectory of this great institution.My deepest goal as presidentis to maintain the essence of Caltech while helping it adapt to achanging world.I want to begin this address by thanking all of the members of theCaltech munity for the warm wele that Alice and I ha

8、vereceived.You have helped a pair of inveterate Easterners beemembers of two unique societies,the society of Caltech and thesociety of Pasadena.These are historic munities with deep andwonderful values,and we are so glad to have joined them.As an outsider here,Ive spent the last five months learning

9、 asmuch as I can about Caltech.I wanted to prehend the institutionwell enough to be able to help it solve the inevitable problemsthat I know will arise.But more importantly,I wanted to develop aperspective on Caltech that would allow me to choose the keyelements on which to work with the faculty-to

10、establishpriorities.What I found is a most remarkable institution.The depth ofscholarship,the rigor of training,the mitment to the highestideals of personal behavior make Caltech a very special place.Itmanages to cover an extraordinary range of scientific and technicalareas with a minimal faculty.It

11、 has provided so many newexcitements for one trained in biology that it has been a continualfeast for me,and I know that there are many more fine mealsawaiting me.It is an institution that seemingly lacks a crisis,allowing me the luxury of a long period of contemplation.For thisrespite,I owe much to

12、 the sensitive stewardship of my predecessorTom Everhart.I stand in awe of Caltechs pantheon who built thisrare institution: Everhart,Goldberger,Brown,DuBridge,Millikan,Noyes,and Hale.What an act to have to follow.As I have gathered knowledge about Caltech,questions have occurredto me whose answers

13、can provide perspective for setting priorities.That is the position Im in now-many questions,few answers.Thus,I thought I would frame this address around the questions.It is anopen invitation to the many constituencies on the campus toparticipate in a dialogue -the Board of Trustees,faculty,administ

14、rators,students,staff,alumni,and the various friends ofCaltech who provide support.Thus,I will in this talk pose anumber of questions,explain why I raise them,and draw out some oftheir implications.The first of my questions is whether Caltech is truly immune fromthe winds blowing through American ac

15、ademic life.I raise thisbecause the last decade has been a stormy one for academia,withmany questioning the very basis of scholarship in both thehumanities and the sciences.The question might be whether byfocusing on science and technology,Caltech hews to eternal truths,or whether the self-criticism

16、 that the intellectual world hasembraced in the last decades has spilled over into our bastion ofrationality.The answer I suspect most would give here is thatwhile the culture wars and the science wars have been furiouslyengaged on the streets of Berkeley,New Haven,Cambridge,andParis,in Pasadena the

17、 progress of science continues quietly andunabated.Not that we dont reflect on our activities or even haveour participants in the wars;we have all of that.Its just thatwe have absolutes in which we believe.We have absolute zero on thetemperature scale,we know that nothing exceeds the speed of light.

18、It is interesting to contemplate what would happen if ourastronomers measured a red shift indicating that a galaxy wasreceding from us faster than the speed of light.Or if we somehowrecorded a temperature of absolute zero,or made a perpetual motionmachine.In these situations,the experiment would rec

19、eive thedeepest scrutiny and only in the unlikely case that it survivedwould theory e into question.Remember cold fusion.But we arewilling to question our absolutes.Our absolutes are not soabsolute-they await an experiment that contradicts them.They aretentative absolutes,and we are fortable with th

20、em,needing nodaily reminder of the threat that each experiment poses to ourfort.That is the culture of science,and it is a specialculture that we live with,we teach,and we believe in almost as areligion.It is a culture that is inprehensible to those whohave not manipulated the concepts of science.It

21、 insulates us frommany of the self-doubts of the larger intellectual world and allowsus to move forward.However,we should not be too placent.Major changes arecoursing through academia.They are not the intellectual challengesfrom which our culture immunizes us;they are technologicdevelopments and an

22、increasingly market-driven approach toeducation.We are already responding to these new pressures,incorporating technology and looking carefully at our costs andprice.We are in a favorable position economically because of ourrelatively low dependence on tuition.In fact,we are already ratedthe best bu

23、y in education.Furthermore,we have a special product,and right now the world wants to buy it-applications are up some20% again this year.The world realizes how well we prepare youngpeople to be scientists and engineers-the honor code and the smallnumber of students makes learning a shared experience

24、 of greatintensity,while our laboratories provide the hands-on experiencethat is the essence of science.However,we cannot be placent;we need to rethink our values and our value continually in thecontext of other opportunities available to students and othermodes of education.Let me turn from an abst

25、ract question to a concrete one.IsCaltech making a sufficient contribution to the economic life ofAmerica and especially of Pasadena? Years ago,Caltech was thescientific and technologic engine that drove the development of theaeronautics industry in Southern California.There is much newenergy in Cal

26、tech that could repeat this success.The opportunitylevel is particularly high at JPL,where necessity breeds inventionon a monumental scale.We have begun to release our energy ofinnovation to benefit the local munity and the country,butthere is much more we could do.What happened in aeronautics could

27、happen again in chemistry,biology,puter software,electronics,and other fields,if we provide the right catalysis.Why haveStanford and MIT and even UCSD bee engines of economic growthand Caltech,surely as fecund,lives in a city with minimalhigh-tech influence?The politics of Pasadena are certainly ani

28、ssue,but couldnt Caltech have more impact if it mitted itselfto this goal?Another of my questions is one I have raised publicly already,Arewe actively enough engaged in promoting diversity on the campus? Iphrase this as a question,but I have made it plain that Ipersonally believe that a campus that

29、better mirrors the demographyof America is desirable.Increased diversity has three benefits.First,it brings theparticular values of a Caltech education to a part of the Americanpublic that too rarely has such an advantage.Second,it assuresthat other students at Caltech develop an appreciation of the

30、variety of cultures that make up America,better preparing them foran active role in American life.Third,through educating a widermix of students,we contribute to the stability and effectivenessof our democratic society.I would remind you that AfricanAmericans,Latinos,and American Indians account for

31、 one third ofthe children born in America today.Meanwhile,there is an ongoingbacklash against affirmative action that is spreading through thenation.Minority graduates in engineering have increased from a fewhundred per year in the early 70s to 6,000 per year today.Thatsa great achievement,but it is

32、 still far from parity,andimprovement will require continued efforts.Another aspect of the question of diversity is the slow increase inthe fraction of women at Caltech.What do we need to do toaccelerate that trend?The mandate is there: in the student lifesurvey,both men and women at Caltech wanted

33、a higher fraction ofwomen students on campus.Caltech has for years recognized the need to focus on issues ofdiversity and has made great strides.However,it is an unfinishedagenda,and a difficult one-only thoughtful analysis and mittedeffort on the part of the entire campus will make it happen.Caltec

34、hs small student body means that tuition is a small part ofour total ine.Furthermore,we already give financial aid tosome 70 percent of our students.Therefore,we are in aparticularly good position to use our financial resources to shapeour student body.Also,we need to remember that financial matters

35、are only a part of the eduation: we also must ask ourselves whetherthe campus is weling,stimulating and supportive to a diversestudent body.In passing I referred to Caltech as a small school,and that iscertainly the self-image of this campus.However,interestingthings emerge when you ask,In what sens

36、e is Caltech a smallschool?There are many mantras specific to this campus but none is aspervasive as the statement,Caltech is a small school and wants tostay small. From that short theorem many corollaries are drawn.Itcan bee an argument for not taking new directions,for nothiring more faculty,for n

37、ot adding to the student body,for livingwith a less-than-critical mass of talent in many areas of scienceand engineering.All of this to maintain the wonderful and veryreal values of smallness-collegiality,encouragement ofinterdisciplinary efforts,focus of activities,esprit.However,inreality,Caltech

38、is actually small only in its numbers of studentsand faculty.If you pare Caltech to other research-intensiveschools,it has the highest ratio of space to faculty or federalsupport to faculty or probably any other measure of the amount ofscience done per faculty member.Because of the huge off-campusfa

39、cilities run by Caltech,the enormous plant on the campus,themany talented members of the staff who are wholly involved inresearch,and the postdoctoral fellows,Caltech is a lot biggerthan it might seem.And it is growing.Under Tom Everhart,therewere eight buildings put up that increased the square foo

40、tage oncampus by 20 percent,while the budget increased by a real 32percent.During the same time,the faculty increased by 6 percent,but actually it was still at a lower level than at an earlier peak.Another aspect of Caltechs size is JPL.It has a budget almostfour times that of Caltech and is growing

41、.Caltech is not really small,it is just balanced differently fromother schools.We keep our faculty and undergraduate student bodysmall and reap that harvest.But meanwhile we allow the ratio ofour activities to our faculty to grow continually.I think we needto question ourselves about the implication

42、s of this growth.Are wemaintaining sufficient control over our growth?Is it affecting thelife of the campus?How can we safeguard the values of smallness?Let me turn to the direction of the students.Here I have wondered,Does Caltech sufficiently develop those aspects of the lives ofits 20-year-old un

43、dergraduates that will allow them to beethoughtful,balanced,productive members of society? It is aquestion that I ask as I visit the Houses and meet with studentleaders.It is a question that I hear from alumni,many of whomseem to feel that they endured their undergraduate days rather thanenjoying th

44、em.It is a deep question about value systems.EachCaltech professor feels that his or her area of teaching iscritically important to the development of students and thatleaving out any of the glory of the field is a crime.For thestudents it bees a life of trying to keep up academically withlittle tim

45、e for personal development.We encourage sports,and havegreat facilities.But we do less than other schools,even smallones,to encourage the creative arts as extracurricular activities.The Caltech education concentrates on the products of rationalthought.We skimp on the other aspects of society,ones li

46、ke artand literature where the emotional and personal content is higher.We might seem to overlook those elements,but thats not really themessage we are sending,because thats not the faculty I have eto know.We are collectors of art,devotees of music,readers ofliterature.Many of us consult outside Cal

47、tech and understand themultiple strains that contribute to modern life.Maybe we could domore to bring that understanding to our students.It is not anissue of teaching more art or literature.My experience has beenthat you do not learn about the role of art or literature inclasses because the classroo

48、m is intrinsically an analyticframework-you learn how to look at art,how to listen to music,how to understand the structure and history of literature.But thereal reason for the arts,as a reflection of the plexity of lifewith its intricate mixture of rationality,passion,and history,isnot taught but r

49、ather learned by experience in the world-oftenthrough intense interactions with others.Might the Caltechundergraduate experience,as wonderful as it is,improve with moretime and opportunity for the students to grow as human beings?Ineed to hear more from the various constituencies on the campusabout

50、this issue.The alumni can be particularly helpful here.Turning to the research side of Caltech,I have asked,How can wejustify our activities in a world that is being increasinglymaterialistic? Caltech is a great undergraduate college and asuperb graduate school,but the largest part of its activities

51、 isfocused on research.And even though we have an engineering andapplied science division,most of the research is at the most basicend of the spectrum.Our big instruments,like Palomar,Keck andLIGO,are all attempts to answer very basic questions,like the ageof the universe or its very nature.JPL is m

52、ore practicallyoriented towards the mechanics of exploring space,but itsjustification is space science,answering questions like whetherlife ever evolved independently of that on earth.A few years ago,pure science seemed under very strong attack,and the cancellationof the Superconducting Supercollide

53、r seemed the proof that Americawas no longer willing to support basic science.Remarkably,thetone of Washington has changed recently,and congressmen are vyingfor who can promise more to the National Science Foundation,theNational Institutes of Health,and other agencies.Although theoverall NASA budget

54、 is being reduced,space science remains strong.America has certainly bee more materialistic: more students aregoing into business,admission to law schools is very petitive,and science and even engineering are not drawing interest amongyoung Americans the way they did in the decades following World W

55、arII.However,as we bee a richer and more powerful nation,theimportance of science as the driver of merce and the generatorof good health has bee increasingly evident,and thus science isreceiving unprecedented support.While taking advantage of the governments newlyfound interest inscience,we need to

56、remember and to reassert the values that havedriven most of us into science.It is the rush of discovery,theexcitement of being the first to uncover a new secret of nature,the satisfaction of seeing messy plexity resolve into elegantsimplicity that drives most of the research activity on thiscampus.L

57、uckily,basic science feeds the needs of industry,justifying its support.But it serves a higher function,that ofdemystifying the world,providing an orderly understanding ofnatural processes.When Time magazine features a scientific storyon its cover,its newsstand sales soar.Science serves the need ofp

58、eople to understand the world around them,and that understandingis one of our finest products.免费公文网，全国公务员共同天地Although science is doing well now and has great public support,there are major issues to be faced.Congressmen can support sciencetoday because of the extraordinary strength of the economy an

59、d thepossibility of a windfall from the tobacco industry.That could beephemeral.Also,to take advantage of the available federal funds,we need to make major investments in the campus in space,facilities,and people.Thus,our dependence on privatephilanthropy remains as great as ever.We are lucky that C

60、altechhas so many fine friends who are as mitted as the faculty toCaltechs greatness.I have said a lot about what I have learned about Caltech,butlittle about myself.Let me end on a more personal note.I deeplybelieve in the power,beauty,and fort that es from arational outlook on the world.In my youn